Management of Oral Sub Mucous Fibrosis Using Three Different Flaps: Superficial Temporal, Nasolabial Flap, Buccal Fat Pad Flap Along with Active Physiotherapy- A Comparative Study.

To assess the efficacy of different flaps along with active physiotherapy for comprehensive management of OSMF. A total of 33 patients of oral submucous fibrosis were admitted and surgically treated. All patients were diagnosed with bilateral oral submucous fibrosis of buccal mucosa. All the patients had advanced oral sub mucous fibrosis with interincisal distance less than 20 mm. Eleven patients were treated with buccal pad of fat, eleven with nasolabial flap and eleven patients were treated with temporo-parietal fascia flap. Physiotherapy was started from the 5th postoperative day and the patients were followed regularly for one year to measure maximum interincisal distance. There was a significant corelation between post-operative mouth opening and regular physiotherapy, exercise and quitting of the habit irrespective of type of reconstruction flap used. On the basis of the result obtained from this study, significant improvement in mouth opening was seen in patients who performed aggressive physiotherapy irrespective of the flap used. Thus we conclude along with the surgical treatment, post-operative physiotherapy and cessation of habit are of equal importance for good prognosis in OSMF patients.

Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma after Third Molar Surgery.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the third molar impactions, with respect to: pain, swelling, healing, and periodontal status distal to the second molar in patients who need surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients of both sexes aged between 16 and 60 years who required bilateral surgical removal of their impacted third molars and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. After surgical extraction of the third molar, primary closure was performed in the control group, whereas PRP was placed in the socket followed by primary closure in the case group. The outcome variables were pain, swelling, wound healing, and periodontal probe depth that were follow-up period of 2 months. Quantitative data are presented as mean. Statistical significance was checked by t-test. RESULTS: There was a difference in the pain (0.071) and facial swelling (0.184), reduction between test and control on day 3, but it was not found to be significant. Periodontal pocket depth (0.001) and wound healing (0.001) less in case group compared with the control group was found to be significant. CONCLUSION: The use of PRP lessens the severity of immediate postoperative sequelae and decreases preoperative pocket depth.

Glandular odontogenic cyst: A diagnostic dilemma.

Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) is a rare and uncommon jaw bone cyst of odontogenic origin described in 1987 by Gardener et al. as a distinct entity. It is a cyst having an unpredictable, potentially aggressive behavior, and has the propensity to grow in large size with relatively high recurrence rate. It poses a diagnostic challenge as it can be clinically and histopathologically confused with lateral periodontal cyst, botryoid odontogenic cyst, radicular and residual cysts with mucous metaplasia, and low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The present case report describes GOC in both male and female patients with intra-oral swelling following extraction of 36 and 46, respectively. Careful histopathological examination is needed to diagnose GOC, and a careful long-term follow-up is advocated.

Excision of Oral Leukoplakia by CO2 Lasers Versus Traditional Scalpel: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: Laser surgery has shown to exhibit several advantages over scalpel for many procedures. Some of these advantages include hemostasis, decreased scarring, and ability to perform certain procedures without anaesthesia. It has been postulated that laser surgery results in less post-operative pain. However this can be a difficult parameter to measure. This study sought to determine if there was a difference in the intensity and frequency of pain following excision with scalpel when compared to excision done with a CO2 laser. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: (1) Hemostasis intra operatively and (2) pain, swelling and scarring post-operatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with bilateral (60 lesions) were selected for the entire proposed research. Group A: carbon dioxide laser excision (experimental group). Group B: scalpel excision (control group). RESULT: (1) Intra operative bleeding is significantly higher in scalpel side compared to laser side treatment. (2) Percentage change (gained) in facial edema is significantly higher in scalpel side compared to laser side treatment. (3) Distribution of level of pain is approximately similar in both the treatments. (4) Distribution of scarring after 1 month post-operative pain is significantly higher in scalpel side compared to laser side treatment. CONCLUSION: Through this study we can infer that CO2 laser supersedes conventional scalpel in terms of better intra-operative and reduced scarring. Post-operative pain and swelling after laser excision did not show any significant difference from that of scalpel.