Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Hospitalized Older Adult High-Cost Health Care Users: A Pilot Study.

Background: High-cost health care users use disproportionate amounts of health care resources relative to the typical patient. It is unclear to what extent poor-quality prescribing, including potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), may be contributing to their adverse outcomes and health utilization costs. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of PIP and to explore its impact in older adult high-cost health care users. Methods: The charts of older adult high-cost health care users admitted to 2 academic hospitals in Ontario, Canada, in fiscal year 2015/16 were reviewed. Eligible patients were at least 66 years old with at least 5 emergency department visits and 3 hospital admissions in the previous year. A total of 243 patients met these criteria, of whom 100 were randomly selected for review. Cases of PIP were identified using explicit prescribing quality indicators, including the STOPP/START criteria. Types of PIP included potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). Log-linear regression was used to characterize the relationship between PIP and future health care utilization. Medications were reconciled to determine the proportion of PIP addressed by the time of discharge. Results: Eighty-nine of the 100 patients had at least 1 instance of PIP. In total, 276 PIMs and 54 PPOs were identified. Of the 271 instances of PIP identified on admission, only 38 (14%) were resolved by the time of hospital discharge. Each additional PPO was associated with a 1.43-fold increase in the rate of future emergency department visits (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The rate of PIP among older adult high-cost health care users was high. Despite frequent interactions with the health care system, many opportunities to improve the quality of prescribing for this vulnerable population were missed. Greater attention to medication optimization is needed.

Contexte: Les grands utilisateurs de soins de santé consomment une proportion disproportionnée des ressources par rapport aux patients moyens. On ne sait pas vraiment dans quelle mesure la prescription de mauvaise qualité, notamment la prescription potentiellement inappropriée (PPI), contribue aux effets indésirables et aux coûts d'utilisation des soins de santé. Objectifs: Évaluer la prévalence des PPI et étudier ses effets chez les grands utilisateurs des soins de santé âgés. Méthodes: Les dossiers des grands utilisateurs de soins de santé âgés admis dans 2 hôpitaux universitaires en Ontario, au Canada, pendant l'exercice 2015­2016 ont été examinés. Les patients admissibles étaient âgés d'au moins 66 ans, avaient effectué au moins 5 visites à l'urgence et avaient été admis 3 fois à l'hôpital au cours de l'année précédente. Au total, 243 patients répondaient à ces critères, dont 100 ont été sélectionnés au hasard pour un examen. Les cas de PPI ont été identifiés à l'aide d'indicateurs explicites de la qualité de prescription, notamment les critères STOPP/START. Les types de PPI comprenaient des médicaments potentiellement inappropriés (MPI) et les omissions potentielles de prescription (OPP). La régression log-linéaire a été utilisée pour caractériser la relation entre la PPI et l'utilisation future des soins de santé. Un bilan comparatif des médicaments prescrits a été effectué pour déterminer la proportion de PPI traités au moment de la sortie de l'hôpital. Résultats: Quatre-vingt-neuf (89 %) des patients présentaient au moins 1 cas de PPI. Au total, 276 MPI et 54 OPP ont été identifiées. Sur les 271 cas de PPI identifiés au moment de l'admission, seuls 38 (14 %) étaient résolus au moment de la sortie de l'hôpital. Chaque OPP supplémentaire était associée à une augmentation de 1,43 fois du taux de futures visites à l'urgence (p < 0,001). Conclusions: Le taux de PPI chez les grands utilisateurs de soins de santé âgés était élevé. Malgré des interactions fréquentes avec le système de santé, de nombreuses occasions d'amélioration de la qualité des prescriptions pour cette population vulnérable ont été manquées. Une plus grande attention doit être portée à l'optimisation des médicaments.

The positive impact of a telemedicine education program on healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.

Context The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care service and delivery has been profound. In addition to shifting and expanding clinical responsibilities, rapidly evolving information and guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic has made it difficult for healthcare workers (HCWs) to synthesize and translate COVID-19 information into practice. Objective The objectives of this study are 1) to examine the impact of a telemedicine education program on HCW's self-efficacy and satisfaction and 2) to explore HCWs' experience in the program and context of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design We conducted a prospective mixed methods parallel-design study among ECHO COVID participants using pre-post questionnaires and focus group discussions (FGDs). We examined questionnaire results for changes in HCWs' self-efficacy and satisfaction. We analyzed FGD data to explore HCWs' experience in ECHO and the context of their practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Setting Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model is a virtual, telemedicine education model that provides longitudinal support and addresses the emerging needs of HCWs. "ECHO Ontario: Managing COVID-19 Patients in the Community" (ECHO) was launched in July 2020. The goal of the program was to disseminate best practices regarding COVID-19 as they emerged and to increase HCW confidence and knowledge of COVID-19. Population Studied The study population were practicing HCWs in the province of Ontario, Canada. 1) HCW self-efficacy 2) HCW satisfaction Results Of 299 HCWs registered in ECHO COVID, 114 (38.1%) participated in this analysis. Median self-efficacy scores increased from 5 (IQR 4 - 6) to 6 (IQR 6 - 6) (p < 0.0001), independent of profession, years in practice, age group, or type of practice environment. Participants were highly satisfied with the ECHO sessions with a median score of 4 (IQR 4 - 5). FGD data indicated that HCWs gained knowledge through ECHO, established the context of their practice, and revealed facilitators for ECHO program success, including the transition to virtual care, the practicability of knowledge provided, and a "perspective from the trenches." Conclusions This study demonstrated that a telemedicine education program aimed to support HCWs in managing patients with COVID-19 had a positive impact on self-efficacy and satisfaction, and that this impact was specifically mediated through the ECHO program.

Positive impact of a telemedicine education program on practicing health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A mixed methods study of an Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) program.

INTRODUCTION: In addition to shifting and expanding clinical responsibilities, rapidly evolving information and guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic has made it difficult for health care workers (HCW) to synthesise and translate COVID-19 information into practice. This study evaluated whether a COVID-19-specific telemedicine education program (ECHO COVID) would impact health care workers' self-efficacy and satisfaction in the management of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective mixed methods parallel-design study was conducted among ECHO COVID participants using pre-post questionnaires and a focus group discussion. Questionnaire results were examined for changes in health care workers' self-efficacy and satisfaction. Focus group discussion data were analysed to explore health care workers' experience in ECHO COVID and the context of their practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: 239 health care workers registered in ECHO COVID and 114 (47.7%) completed questionnaires and attended at least one ECHO COVID session. Median self-efficacy scores increased from 5 (IQR 4-6) to 6 (IQR 6-6) (p < 0.0001), independent of profession, years in practice, age group, or practice environment. Participants were highly satisfied with ECHO COVID sessions with a median score of 4 (IQR 4-5). Focus group discussion data indicated that health care workers gained knowledge through ECHO COVID and revealed facilitators for ECHO COVID program success, including the transition to virtual care, the practicability of knowledge provided, and a 'perspective from the trenches.' DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that a telemedicine education program aimed to support health care workers in managing patients with COVID-19 had a positive impact on health care workers' self-efficacy and satisfaction. This impact was specifically mediated by the ECHO COVID program.