Developmental and Validation of Machine Learning Model for Prediction Complication after Cervical Spine Metastases Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing machine learning to predict postoperative complications in cervical spine metastases surgery. OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to develop a machine learning model that accurately predicts complications following cervical spine metastases surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical spine metastases surgery can enhance quality of life but carries a risk of complications influenced by various factors. Existing scoring systems may not include all predictive factors. Machine learning offers the potential for a more accurate predictive model by analyzing a broader range of variables. METHODS: Data from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected from medical databases. Predictive models were developed using Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, and Decision Tree Classifier algorithms. Variables included patient demographics, disease characteristics, and laboratory investigations. SMOTE was used to balance the dataset, and the models were assessed using AUC, F1-score, precision, recall, and SHAP values. RESULTS: The study included 72 patients, with a 29.17% postoperative complication rate. The Gradient Boosting model had the best performance with an AUC of 0.94, indicating excellent predictive capability. Albumin level, platelet count, and tumor histology were identified as top predictors of complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Gradient Boosting machine learning model showed superior performance in predicting postoperative complications in cervical spine metastases surgery. With continuous data updating and model training, machine learning can become a vital tool in clinical decision-making, potentially improving patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Psoas Muscle Area as the Prognostic Factor for Survival and Adverse Events in Spinal Metastasis Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the mortality and adverse events prediction following metastatic spinal surgery of MRI-based cross-sectional psoas muscle area (PMA). METHODS: A retrospective chart review, 120 patients who had undergone metastatic spinal surgery were included. The cross-sectional area identified the PMA under MR-imaging at the L3 or L4 pedicle level, which was classified into 3 tertiles. We used univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression to assess whether PMA was associated with 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, and overall mortality. RESULTS: The small psoas tertile group populations had a higher mortality rate than the large psoas tertile group. PMA in T1 and T2 had a probability of a higher 90-d mortality rate than PMA in T3 (T1 VS T3: P = .29 and T2 VS T3: P = .12). The median survival time was 7 months, 9 months, and 10 months in PMA T1, T2, and T3, respectively. PMA in tertile 2 had a significantly higher mortality rate of 38% compared to PMA in tertile 3 (HR 1.38, 95% CI .83-2.32, P = .02). Considering PMA as a continuous variable, every 1 mm2 increment of PMA resulted in the increase survivorship of 1% (HR .99 with 95% CI .99-1). CONCLUSION: The MRI-based cross-sectional PMA tends to predict the 90-d mortality rate and overall mortality rate in spinal metastasis patients who underwent spinal surgery. The PMA should be considered one of the prognostic factors in the treatment of metastatic spinal patients.

Development and internal validation of machine-learning models for predicting survival in patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop machine-learning algorithms for predicting survival in patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastasis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: This study develops machine-learning models to predict postoperative survival in spinal metastasis patients, filling the gaps of traditional prognostic systems. Utilizing data from 389 patients, the study highlights XGBoost and CatBoost algorithms̓ effectiveness for 90, 180, and 365-day survival predictions, with preoperative serum albumin as a key predictor. These models offer a promising approach for enhancing clinical decision-making and personalized patient care. METHODS: A registry of patients who underwent surgery (instrumentation, decompression, or fusion) for spinal metastases between 2004 and 2018 was used. The outcome measure was survival at postoperative days 90, 180, and 365. Preoperative variables were used to develop machine-learning algorithms to predict survival chance in each period. The performance of the algorithms was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were identified, with 90-, 180-, and 365-day mortality rates of 18%, 41%, and 45% postoperatively, respectively. The XGBoost algorithm showed the best performance for predicting 180-day and 365-day survival (AUCs of 0.744 and 0.693, respectively). The CatBoost algorithm demonstrated the best performance for predicting 90-day survival (AUC of 0.758). Serum albumin had the highest positive correlation with survival after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These machine-learning algorithms showed promising results in predicting survival in patients who underwent spinal palliative surgery for spinal metastasis, which may assist surgeons in choosing appropriate treatment and increasing awareness of mortality-related factors before surgery.

Development of Machine-Learning Models to Predict Ambulation Outcomes Following Spinal Metastasis Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop machine-learning algorithms to predict ambulation outcomes following surgery for spinal metastasis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Postoperative ambulation status following spinal metastasis surgery is currently difficult to predict. The improved ability to predict this important postoperative outcome would facilitate management decision-making and help in determining realistic treatment goals. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent spinal metastasis at a university-based medical center in Thailand between January 2009 and November 2021. Collected data included preoperative parameters and ambulatory status 90 and 180 days following surgery. Thirteen machine-learning algorithms, namely, artificial neural network, logistic regression, CatBoost classifier, linear discriminant analysis, extreme gradient boosting, extra trees classifier, random forest classifier, gradient boosting classifier, light gradient boosting machine, naïve Bayes, K-neighbor classifier, Ada boost classifier, and decision tree classifier were developed to predict ambulatory status 90 and 180 days following surgery. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and F1-score. RESULTS: In total, 167 patients were enrolled. The number of patients classified as ambulatory 90 and 180 days following surgery was 140 (81.9%) and 137 (82.0%), respectively. The extreme gradient boosting algorithm was found to most accurately predict 180-day ambulatory outcome (AUC, 0.85; F1-score, 0.90), and the decision tree algorithm most accurately predicted 90-day ambulatory outcome (AUC, 0.94; F1-score, 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning algorithms were effective in predicting ambulatory status following surgery for spinal metastasis. Based on our data, the extreme gradient boosting and decision tree best predicted postoperative ambulatory status 180 and 90 days after spinal metastasis surgery, respectively.

Safety and feasibility of ultra-long construct navigated minimally invasive spine surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy in extensive spinal metastasis : a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our study compares the outcomes of extensive spinal metastasis patients treated with Ultra-Long Construct Navigated Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (UNMISS) with Adjuvant Radiotherapy to those receiving only radiotherapy. Spinal metastasis often necessitates interventions like radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery, with an increasing trend towards surgical management. minimally invasive spine surgery has demonstrated advantages over traditional open surgery, with fewer complications and better postoperative outcomes. Radiotherapy continues as a standard for those unsuitable for surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included extensive spinal metastasis patients treated between January 2017 and December 2020. We compared patients undergoing UNMISS in conjunction with radiotherapy to patients receiving radiotherapy alone, evaluating demographic data, disease characteristics, and treatment outcomes (VAS, survival) to establish statistical significance. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in our study. Fourteen patients underwent UNMISS, and nine patients received radiotherapy alone. There was no difference in baseline characteristics of patients. The longest construct in our case series involved T1 to iliac. Both cohorts showed significant improvement in pain scores post-treatment (p = 0.01). However, the UNMISS group demonstrated significantly lower post-treatment VAS scores (p = 0.003), indicating enhanced pain relief. Survival outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The UNMISS should be considered as an alternative treatment in a patient with symptomatic extensive spinal metastasis. The primary goal of this technique is to stabilize the multiple levels of spinal metastasis and decompression of the neural element if needed. This technique is safe and has a better outcome in pain improvement than the patient who received radiotherapy alone.

Relationship between gait parameter and spinal sagittal profiles in asymptomatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: To study the gait parameters in asymptomatic volunteers and investigate the correlation between the gait and several radiographic sagittal profiles. METHODS: Asymptomatic volunteers (20-50 years of age) were included and allocated into three subgroups depending on pelvic incidence (low, normal, and high). Standing whole spine radiographs and gait analysis data were obtained. The Pearson Coefficient Correlation was used to determine the relationship between the gait and radiographic profiles. RESULTS: A total of 55 volunteers (28 male and 27 females) were included. The mean age was 27.35 ± 6.37 years old. The average sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL) were 37.78 ± 6.59, 14.51 ± 9.19 degrees, and 52.29 ± 10.87 degrees and - 0.36 ± 11.41, respectively. The mean velocity and stride of all the volunteers were 119.00 ± 30.12 cm/s and 130.25 ± 7.72 cm, correspondingly. The correlation between each of the radiographical and gait parameters was low (ranging from - 0.24 to 0.26). CONCLUSION: Gait parameters were not differenced significantly between each of the PI subgroups in asymptomatic volunteers. Spinal sagittal parameters also showed a low correlation with gait parameters.

Surgical outcome of scoliosis in patients with Marfan syndrome.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes after surgical scoliosis correction and posterior instrumented fusion in SMF patients. METHODS: A single-center medical database was reviewed to identify MF patients who presented with scoliosis from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery were included. Demographic, operative and clinical data were reviewed, and the preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up radiographic parameters were compared. RESULTS: Twelve patients were identified (2 males, 10 females) with an average age at surgery of 14.4 ± 2.6 years. Comorbidities were found in 84.6%. Most patients (90.9%) presented with a right thoracic curve. The average preoperative Cobb angle was 75.6 ± 15.5 degrees. Posterior instrumented spinal fusion was performed in all patients (1 hook/pedicular screw and 11 pedicle screws only). The average follow-up period was 6.8 ± 3.1 years. The mean postoperative Cobb angle after surgery and at the final follow-up was 33.4 ± 18.0 degrees and 35.5 ± 18.4 degrees, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference among the preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles (p < 0.001), but no significant difference among the sagittal angles. Two perioperative complications including superficial wound infection and broken rods were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior scoliosis correction and instrumented spinal fusion resulted in a satisfactory outcome in MF patients. Perioperative complications are not uncommon; however, no neurological complication or spinal decompensation was observed in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Postoperative outcomes of subaxial cervical spine metastasis: Comparison among the anterior, posterior, and combined approaches.

Background: The incidence of subaxial spinal metastases increases due to longer life expectancy resulting from successful modern cancer treatments. The three most utilized approaches for surgical treatment include the anterior, posterior, and combined approaches. However, despite increasing surgical volume, data on the postoperative complication profiles of different operative approaches for this patient population is scarce. Methods: The institutional databases of two large referral centers in Thailand were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with subaxial cervical spine metastasis who underwent cervical surgery during 2005 to 2015 were identified and enrolled. Clinical presentations, baseline characteristics, operative approach, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcomes, including pain, neurological recovery, and survival, were compared among the three surgical approaches. Results: The 70 patients (44 with anterior approach, 14 with posterior approach, 12 with combined approach) were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics, including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Tomita score, and Revised Tokuhashi score, among the three groups. There were no significant differences among groups for medical complications, surgical complications, neurological recovery, verbal pain score improvement, survival time, or ambulatory status improvement. However, the combined approach did show a significantly higher rate of overall perioperative complications (p = 0.01), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), and operative time (p < 0.001) compared to the other two approaches. Conclusions: Patients in the combined approach group had the highest rates of perioperative complications. However, although the differences were not statistically significant, patients in the combined group tended to have better clinical outcomes after follow-up and the longest survival time.

Pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma (PEM) of the spine with compression fracture: case report.

BACKGROUND: Pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma (PEM) is a sporadic type of pigmented melanocytic tumor with uncertain malignant potential. PEM arises as a solitary neoplasm that predominantly occurs spontaneously in otherwise healthy patients. Due to its rarity, a gold standard treatment regimen does not exist; however, symptomatic cases should be managed with radiotherapy and surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old Thai female presented with a sudden onset of back pain and weakness of the lower extremities during the postpartum period. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated abnormal soft tissue formation from T4 to T7; it extended to the vertebral bodies, left neural foramina, and posterior columns of T6 and T7. The patient underwent complete tumor debulking, decompressive laminectomy from T4 to T8, and posterior instrumentation from T3 to T10. The histopathology and immunohistochemistry suggested PEM. The patient fully resolved back pain after surgery. Nevertheless, as the patient re-presented with a neurological deficit a few months after the operative intervention, it was decided to perform a surgical resection via an en bloc vertebrectomy. At the one-year follow-up, although the patient reported continued improvement of her back pain, there was no motor power improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord compression due to PEM is uncommon, especially in adults. Early diagnosis and treatment provide a good prognosis and help to regain lost neurological functions. Complete tumor removal and decompression of the spinal cord must be considered as a treatment strategy. Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy have also been highlighted as treatment modalities for spinal tumors. With our reported case, early operative intervention coupled with radiotherapy produced satisfying outcomes.

Epidemiologic Study of Operative Treatment for Spinal Metastasis in Thailand : A Review of National Healthcare Data from 2005 to 2014.

OBJECTIVE: To study the factors relating to operative treatment for spinal metastasis in Thailand during 2005-2014 and to determine the hospital costs, mortality rate, and incidence of perioperative complication. METHODS: Inpatient reimbursement data from 2005 to 2014 was reviewed from three national healthcare organizations, including the National Health Security Office, the Social Security Office, and the Comptroller General's Department. The search criteria were secondary malignant neoplasm of bone and bone marrow patients (International Classification of Diseases 10th revision, Thai modification codes [ICD 10-TM], C79.5 and C79.8) who underwent spinal surgical treatment (ICD 9th revision, clinical modification procedure with extension codes [ICD 9-CM], 03.0, 03.4, 03.09, and 81.0) during 2005-2014. Epidemiology, comorbidity, and perioperative complication were analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, the number of spinal metastasis patients who underwent operative treatment was significantly increased from 0.30 to 0.59 per 100000 (p<0.001). More males (56.14%) underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastasis than females. The most common age group was 45-64 (55.1%). The most common primary tumor sites were the unknown origin, lung, breast, prostate, and hepatocellular/bile duct. Interestingly, the proportion of hepatocellular/bile duct, breast, and lung cancer was significantly increased (p<0.001). The number of patients who had comorbidity or in-hospital complication significantly increased over time (p<0.01); however, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased. CONCLUSION: During the last decade, operative treatment for spinal metastasis increased in Thailand. The overall in-hospital complication rate increased; however, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased.

Non-fusion palliative spine surgery without reconstruction is safe and effective in spinal metastasis patients: retrospective study.

Considering the shorter life expectancy and poorer prognosis of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression patients, anterior reconstruction and fusion may be unnecessary. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of palliative surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression with neurological deficit among patients who underwent posterior decompression and instrumentation without fusion or anterior reconstruction. This single-center retrospective review included all patients aged > 18 years with thoracic or lumbar spinal metastasis who were surgically treated for metastatic spinal cord compression without fusion or anterior reconstruction at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand during July 2015 to December 2017. Data from preoperation to the 1-year follow-up, including demographic and clinical data, Frankel classification, pain scores, complication, revision surgery, health-related quality-of-life scores, and survival data, were collected and analyzed. A total of 30 patients were included. The mean age was 59.83 ± 11.73 years, and 20 (66.7%) patients were female. The mean operative time was 208.17 ± 58.41 min. At least one Frankel grade improvement was reported in 53.33% of patients. The pain visual analog scale, the EuroQOL five-dimension five-level utility score, and the Oswestry Disability Index were all significantly improved at a minimum of 3 months after surgery. No intraoperative mortality or instrument-related complication was reported. The mean survival duration was 11.4 ± 8.97 months. Palliative non-fusion surgery without anterior reconstruction may be considered as a preferable choice for treating spinal metastasis patients with spinal cord compression with neurological deficits.

Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 to assess Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Metastasis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 (SOSGOQ2.0) is a spinal metastasis (SM)-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire that was previously reported to have good reliability and validity. There is currently no Thai version of the SOSGOQ 2.0. (TH-SOSGOQ2.0). PURPOSE: To assess the psychometric properties of the TH-SOSGOQ 2.0. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study. Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who were confirmed diagnosis of metastatic spinal disease, age 18 to 75 years, and having already undergone surgery and/or radiotherapy for the treatment of spinal metastasis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Validity and reliability of the TH-SOSGOQ 2.0 to assess QoL in Patients with SM. METHODS: Using the forward-backward translation technique, the SOSGOQ2.0 was translated into Thai language to create the TH-SOSGOQ2.0. SM patients were prospectively enrolled and evaluated for patient QoL using both the TH-SOSGOQ2.0 and the EQ-5D-5L (Thai version) at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Construct validity was assessed using multi-trait scaling analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation with EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subgroup of patients who took the TH-SOSGOQ2.0 two times one week apart. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (mean age: 57 years; 30 males, 38 females) were included. The Cronbach's alpha values for the total score, physical function, neurological function, pain, mental health, social function, and post-therapy domains were 0.87, 0.89, 0.91, 0.84, 0.82, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively. Good reliability was demonstrated (interclass correlation coefficient range: 0.70-0.84), except for the social function domain (0.60). Regarding concurrent validity, the TH-SOSGOQ2.0 domains demonstrated moderate to good correlation with the corresponding EQ-5D-5L 9 (Thai version) domains (range: -0.32 to -0.78). Physical function was the most well-correlated domain with the EQ-5D-5L (Thai version) (-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: TH-SOSGOQ2.0 demonstrated good reliability and validity for assessing QoL in Thai SM patients.

Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire.

Cross-sectional study. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) questionnaire. The SSS questionnaire was developed to assess symptom severity, physical functional status, and patient satisfaction in spinal stenosis patients that was previously reported to have good reliability and validity. There is currently no Thai version of the SSS questionnaire. The SSS questionnaire was translated into Thai language to create the Thai version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis (Thai-SSS) questionnaire. Translation was performed according to international standards using a forward-backward translation protocol. Translation was performed by two expert translators and one physician, and the final version was approved by an expert committee. Thai patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were enrolled and evaluated using the Thai-SSS questionnaire, the Thai version of the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after treatment. Reliability and validity of the Thai-SSS were assessed via comparison with the SF-36 and the VAS. One hundred seven patients were included. Eighty patients underwent decompression and fusion surgery, and the others underwent decompression alone. Cronbach's alpha of all domains of the Thai-SSS showed excellent internal consistency (0.869­0.921). The intraclass correlation coefficient for test­retest reliability was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65­0.85). Regarding concurrent validity, the physical function scale of the Thai-SSS was strongly correlated with the physical functioning domain of the SF-36 (r = 0.70). The symptom severity domain of the Thai-SSS was strongly correlated with the bodily pain domain of the SF-36 and the VAS (r = 0.76 and 0.78, respectively). The Thai-SSS was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating symptom severity, physical function, and patient satisfaction after treatment in Thai patients with spinal stenosis. Level of Evidence: 4.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Thai version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Self Report.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional reliability and validation study. OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Self Report (TH-SCIM-SR) in Thai spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. SETTING: Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. METHODS: A cross-cultural forward and backward translation of the original Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Self Report (SCIM-SR) was performed at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, to create the TH-SCIM-SR. The inclusion criteria were Thai patients with SCI duration of ≥3 months. Patients were evaluated by a team of healthcare professionals using the Thai version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Version III (TH-SCIM III). Study patients subsequently completed the TH-SCIM-SR two times with a 3-day interval between evaluations. Cronbach's Alpha, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to examine internal consistency, concurrent validity, and reliability, respectively. Bland-Altman plot was used to compare scoring results between the TH-SCIM III and the TH-SCIM-SR. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included. Cronbach's alpha of total score, self-care subscale, respiration/sphincter management, and mobility subscale were 0.91, 0.94, 0.75, and 0.90, respectively. The reliability analysis showed good reliability. The test-retest ICC of total score, self-care subscale, respiration/sphincter management, and mobility subscale were 0.95, 0.95, 0.78, and 0.96, respectively. Regarding construct validity, the subscales of TH-SCIM-SR demonstrated a strong correlation with those of the TH-SCIM III (0.85-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: TH-SCIM-SR showed good reliability and validity for assessing functional independence in Thai patients with SCI.

Nonfusion Muscle-Sparing Technique to Treat Long-Segment Thoracolumbar Extradural Arachnoid Cyst in a Child: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Spinal extradural arachnoid cyst is an uncommon cause of spinal cord compression. It results from a small dural defect that leads to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulation in the cyst and subarachnoid space, and the cyst can compress the spinal cord and nerve roots. Surgery is the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients, and most cases have an immediately satisfying outcome after surgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 10-year-old Thai boy presented with progressive weakness in both legs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a giant cystic lesion 23 cm in length from T1-L2 level. To our knowledge, this is the longest arachnoid cyst that has been reported in children. The operation included unilateral paraspinal muscle dissection with spinous process translation techniques, T1-L4 laminectomy, total cyst excision, and dural defect repair at the T4 level. The symptoms were fully resolved within 2 months after surgery. However, thoracic kyphosis was slightly increased, but the patient still has a normal sagittal profile. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal arachnoid cyst is rare, especially in children. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for improving the chance of full recovery, and for avoiding complication and irreparable defect. Total cyst removal with dural repair remains the best treatment alternative; however, potential complications, especially spinal malalignment after extensive laminectomy, must be considered. Postoperative MRI showed normal CSF flow and no spinal cord compression. The muscle-sparing technique with multiple-level laminectomy without spinal fusion that we used in this case provided a satisfying outcome.