Physiology of lower gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: The lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, formed from the midgut and hindgut, encompasses the colon, rectum and anal canal. AIM: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the anatomy and physiology of the lower GI tract. METHODS: Literature review on anatomy and physiology of the lower GI tract, including normal motility and phases of defecation. It derives its blood supply from the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries while it is innervated by the extrinsic autonomic (the thoracolumbar and sacral nerves) and the intrinsic enteric nervous system. The colon has four layers: mucosa, submucosa, muscularis externa and serosa. The anal canal ends in the internal and external anal sphincters (EASs) involved in continence and defecation. The lower GI tract is predominantly involved in digestion, absorption, defecation and protection. Defecation is a complex process that requires inter-neural (enteric and autonomic nervous systems), neurohormonal and neuromuscular coordination. It has four phases which include basal, pre-expulsive, expulsive and end phase. High-propagating contractions in the colon propel stool to the rectum leading to rectal distention and the recruitment of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex. Once able, the EAS, under full conscious control, is then relaxed allowing stool to be evacuated. Other defecation reflexes include the gastrocolic, gastroileal and coloanal reflexes. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances provide novel techniques to investigate motility patterns including high-resolution manometry protocols with automated assessments, magnetic resonance imaging techniques for defecography, wireless motility capsules and fecobionics.

High prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders in a large cohort of patients with joint hypermobility.

The gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations in children with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/joint hypermobility syndrome (hEDS/JHS) are not well described. We investigated the prevalence of GI disorders in children and young adults with hEDS/JHS through a single-center retrospective review. Demographic data, clinical history, symptoms, and diagnostic studies were reviewed. Of 435 patients with hEDS/JHS, 66% were females (age 5-28 years). We noted a high prevalence of constipation (61%), dysphagia (32%), dyspepsia and/or gastroparesis (25%), eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) (21%), and celiac disease (4%) in our cohort. Upper endoscopy and gastric emptying scans had the highest yield to detect abnormalities. Motility studies were abnormal in 31% of the 80 patients who underwent them. Dysphagia symptoms are significantly associated with EoE. Thirty-three percent of dysphagia patients had EoE, versus 16% of non-dysphagia patients (p < 0.001). Screening hEDS/JHS patients for GI issues should be routine, with further investigations and referrals guided by identified symptoms.

"An urgent need for transition of care programs for adolescents and young adults with neurogastroenterology and motility disorders".

Transition of Care for Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NGM) Disorders.

Safety and Effectiveness of Prucalopride in Children with Functional Constipation with and without Upper Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric prucalopride studies for treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders have reported mixed results. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of prucalopride in functional constipation (FC) with and without upper GI symptoms. METHODS: Retrospective data on patients with FC receiving combined prucalopride and conventional therapy was compared with those receiving conventional therapy alone within 12 months. Thirty patients on combined therapy and those on conventional therapy were each matched on the basis of age, gender, race, and presence of fecal soiling. Response (complete, partial, or no resolution) was compared. Similarly, response to concurrent functional upper GI symptoms (postprandial pain, bloating, weight loss, vomiting, early satiety, or nausea) and dysphagia, as well as adverse effects, were evaluated in the combined group. RESULTS: Mean age of 57 cases was 14.7 ± 4.9 years and 68% were female. Comorbidities included functional upper GI (UGI) symptoms (84%), dysphagia (12%), mood disorders (49%), and hypermobility spectrum disorder (37%). Unmatched cases reported 63% improvement to FC; response did not differ between the matched cohorts (70% versus 76.6%, p = 0.84). Cases showed a 56% improvement in functional UGI symptoms and 100% in dysphagia. Adverse effects were reported in 30%, abdominal cramps being most common. Four (7%) patients with a known mood disorder reported worsened mood, of which two endorsed suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: Prucalopride efficaciously treated concurrent UGI symptoms and dysphagia in constipated pediatric patients and was overall well tolerated. Preexisting mood disorders seemed to worsen in a small subset of cases.

Psychological distress and coping efficacy in children with disorders of gut-brain interaction.

BACKGROUND: Multiple psychological factors influence disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs). We aimed to evaluate psychological distress in Colombian schoolchildren with and without DGBIs. METHODS: We included children ages 8-18 years without organic medical conditions from largest regional public schools in Colombia. Children completed Spanish versions of Rome III diagnostic questionnaire for DGBIs, State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC), Children's Somatization Inventory (CSI), and a measure of coping efficacy. These data, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, were compared between children with DGBIs and healthy peers. Exploratory analyses investigated differences between youth with symptoms of functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) compared with healthy peers. KEY RESULTS: Of 1496 children, 281 (mean age 12.9 ± 2.2 years, 49.8% females) self-reported criteria for DGBIs and 125 reported (44.5%) FAPDs. Children with DGBIs had higher trait anxiety, emotional sensitivity, somatization including GI, non-GI, pain-related, and non-pain-related subscales (p < 0.001 each) and lower coping efficacy (p = 0.02) compared to healthy peers. Females had higher trait anxiety and somatization (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005, respectively). State and trait anxiety and coping efficacy differed based on location in children with DGBIs (p = 0.02, p = 0.03, and p < 0.001, respectively). Children with FAPDs had higher trait anxiety (p = 0.02) and somatization (p < 0.001) compared to healthy youth. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Children with DGBIs had higher anxiety, emotional sensitivity, and somatization, and lower coping efficacy compared with healthy youth. This highlights the importance of appraising psychological distress characteristics as well as incorporating conflict resolution, assertiveness training, and resilience building during the treatment of DGBIs.

Liquid and solid gastric emptying and correlation with clinical characteristics in pediatric patients with dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on gastric emptying in dyspeptic children. We aimed to determine solid and liquid emptying rates in dyspeptic children and correlate with clinical characteristics. METHODS: Charts of dyspeptic children undergoing 4-hour dual-phase gastric scintigraphy were reviewed for demographics, symptoms, and comorbidities. KEY RESULTS: In 1078 dyspeptic patients (65% females, median age 13 years) vomiting (55%), nausea (53%), and abdominal pain (52%) were the most common symptoms. The most common comorbidities were mental health (32%), neurologic (27%), and hypermobility spectrum disorders (20%). Solid and liquid emptying rates were aligned in 61.23%. Delayed solid with normal liquid emptying were noted in 2.5%, compared to delayed liquid with normal solid emptying in 26.16%. Abdominal pain had a trend for association with delayed or normal solid emptying (p = 0.06). Nausea was mostly reported with normal solid emptying (p < 0.0001) and underreported in patients <12 years with vomiting (29%). Abnormal solid emptying (rapid and delayed) was noted more frequently in children with mental health disorders (p = 0.027). Rapid liquid emptying was more common in children with genetic disorders (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: Over half of children with dyspepsia had delayed liquid gastric emptying, and one quarter had delayed liquid with normal solid emptying. Dual-phase gastric emptying studies may help target therapy in dyspeptic children. Nausea is not a reliable symptom for dyspepsia in younger children. Given the significant association of abnormal gastric emptying in children with mental health disorders, we recommend screening and treating children with dyspepsia.

Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation in Children and Adolescents With Functional Dyspepsia-Integrating a Behavioral Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: Functional dyspepsia (FD) includes postprandial distress and epigastric pain syndrome. Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) in addition to behavioral interventions (BI) has shown benefits in children with functional abdominal pain but not specifically in FD. We aimed to assess the efficacy of PENFS for treating FD and compare the outcomes with those who received the combination of PENFS + BI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts of patients with FD who completed four weeks of PENFS were evaluated. A subset of patients received concurrent BI. Demographic data, medical history, and symptoms were documented. Outcomes at different time points included subjective symptom responses and validated questionnaires collected clinically (Abdominal Pain Index [API], Nausea Severity Scale [NSS], Functional Disability Inventory [FDI], Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory [CSSI], Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems [PROMIS] Pediatric Anxiety and Depression scales). RESULT: Of 84 patients, 61% received PENFS + BI, and 39% received PENFS alone. In the entire cohort, API (p < 0.0001), NSS (p = 0.001), FDI (p = 0.001), CSSI (p < 0.0001), PSQI (p = 0.01), PROMIS anxiety (p = 0.02), and depression (p = 0.01) scores improved from baseline to three weeks and at three months. Subjective responses showed nausea improvement (p = 0.01) and a trend for improvement in abdominal pain (p = 0.07) at week three. Abdominal pain subjectively improved at week three and three months (p = 0.003 and 0.02, respectively), nausea at week three and three months (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively), and a trend for improvement in sleep disturbances at week three and three months (p = 0.08 and p = 0.07, respectively) in the PENFS + BI group vs PENFS alone. CONCLUSION: Abdominal pain, nausea, functioning, somatization, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression improved at three weeks and three months after PENFS in pediatric FD. Subjective pain and nausea improvement were greater in the PENFS + BI group than in the group with PENFS alone, suggesting an additive effect of psychologic therapy.

Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation compared to standard medical therapy in adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders.

Introduction: Standard medical therapy (SMT) in children with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPD) includes cyproheptadine and amitriptyline. While percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) has shown benefit, no study has compared outcomes of PENFS to SMT. We aimed to examine changes in abdominal pain, nausea and disability before and after treatment and compare outcomes between treatments. Methods: The records of FAPD patients ages 11-21 years, treated with 4 weeks of PENFS, cyproheptadine or amitriptyline were reviewed. Outcomes were evaluated using validated questionnaires [Abdominal Pain Index (API), Nausea Severity Scale (NSS), and the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI)] at baseline and follow-up within 3 months (FU). Result: Of 101 patients, 48% received PENFS, 31% cyproheptadine and 21% received amitriptyline. Median ages were 17 (15-19), 16 (15-18) and 15 (11-16) years respectively and the majority were females (75%, 90% and 52% respectively). In the PENFS group, API (p = 0.001), NSS (p = 0.059) and FDI (p = 0.048) were significantly lower at FU. API (p = 0.034) but not NSS and FDI (p > 0.05) decreased significantly at FU in the amitriptyline group. API, NSS and FDI did not change significantly with cyproheptadine at FU (p > 0.05). FU API scores were lower in PENFS vs. cyproheptadine (p = 0.04) but not vs. amitriptyline (p = 0.64). The FDI scores were significantly lower in the amitriptyline vs. cyproheptadine group (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Therapy with PENFS showed improvements in abdominal pain, nausea and disability while amitriptyline showed improvements in abdominal pain within 3 months of treatment. PENFS was more effective than cyproheptadine in improving abdominal pain. Amitriptyline improved disability scores more than cyproheptadine and showed promise for treatment. PENFS may be a good non-pharmacologic alternative for FAPD.

The microbiome in adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome and changes with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a disorder of the gut-brain axis, is affected by the microbiome. Microbial studies in pediatric IBS, especially for centrally mediated treatments, are lacking. We compared the microbiome between pediatric IBS patients and healthy controls (HC), in relation to symptom severity, and with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS), a non-invasive treatment targeting central pain pathways. METHODS: We collected a stool sample, questionnaires and a 1-2 week stool and pain diary from 11 to 18 years patients with IBS. A patient subset completed 4 weeks of PENFS and repeated data collection immediately after and/or 3 months after treatment. Stool samples were collected from HC. Samples underwent metagenomic sequencing to evaluate diversity, composition, and abundance of species and MetaCyc pathways. KEY RESULTS: We included 27 cases (15.4 ± 2.5 year) and 34 HC (14.2 ± 2.9 year). Twelve species including Firmicutes spp., and carbohydrate degradation/long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) synthesis pathways, were increased in IBS but not statistically significantly associated with symptom severity. Seventeen participants (female) who completed PENFS showed improvements in pain (p = 0.012), disability (p = 0.007), and catastrophizing (p = 0.003). Carbohydrate degradation and LCFA synthesis pathways decreased post-treatment and at follow-up (FDR p-value <0.1). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Firmicutes, including Clostridiaceae spp., and LCFA synthesis pathways were increased in IBS patients suggesting pain-potentiating effects. PENFS led to marked improvements in abdominal pain, functioning, and catastrophizing, while Clostridial species and LCFA microbial pathways decreased with treatment, suggesting these as potential targets for IBS centrally mediated treatments.

High amplitude propagated contractions with Glycerin versus Bisacodyl: A within-subject comparison in children undergoing colonic manometry.

BACKGROUND: The presence of high amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs) measured by colonic manometry (CM) reflect an intact neuromuscular function of the colon. Bisacodyl and Glycerin are colonic stimulants that induce HAPCs and are used for the treatment of constipation. HAPCs characteristics with each drug have not been compared before. We aimed to compare the HAPC characteristics with Bisacodyl and Glycerin in children undergoing CM for constipation. METHODS: This is a prospective single-center cross-over study of children aged 2-18 years undergoing CM. All patients received both Glycerin and Bisacodyl during CM. They were randomized to group A with Bisacodyl first (n = 22) and group B with Glycerin first (n = 23), with 1.5 hours in between each dose. Differences in patient and HAPC characteristics between groups were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using Chi-square test or Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate. KEY RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were included. HAPCs post Bisacodyl had a longer duration of action (median of 40 vs 21.5 min, p < 0.0001), longer propagation (median of 70 vs 60 cm, p = 0.02), and more HAPCs (median of 10 vs 5, p < 0.0001) compared Glycerin. No differences were found in the HAPC amplitude and onset of action between both medications.

Clinical Hypnosis for Pediatric Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Practical Guide for Clinicians.

Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are common in the pediatric population and are associated with a significant reduction in quality of life. Bidirectional communication of the brain-gut axis plays an important role in pain generation and perception in FAPDs. There is a paucity of data on the best approach to treat this group of disorders, with no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and scarce research to substantiate the use of most medications. Use of hypnosis in pediatric FAPDs is supported by evidence and has long-term benefits of up to at least 5 years beyond completion of treatment, highlighting the importance of incorporating this therapy into the care of these patients. The mechanisms by which clinical hypnosis is beneficial in the treatment of FAPDs is not completely understood, but there is growing evidence that it impacts functioning of the brain-gut axis, potentially through influence on central pain processing, visceral sensitivity, and motility. The lack of side effects or potential for significant harm and low cost makes it an attractive option compared to pharmacologic therapies. This review addresses current barriers to clinical hypnosis including misconceptions among patients and families, lack of trained clinicians, and questions around insurance reimbursement. The recent use of telemedicine and delivery of hypnosis via audio-visual modalities allow more patients to benefit from this treatment. As the evidence base for hypnosis grows, acceptance and training will likely increase as well. Further research is needed to understand how hypnosis works and to develop tools that predict who is most likely to respond to hypnosis. Studies on cost-effectiveness in comparing hypnosis to other therapies for FAPDs will increase evidence for appropriate healthcare utilization. Because hypnosis has applications beyond pain and is child-friendly with minimal to no risk, hypnosis could be an important therapeutic tool in the wider pediatric gastrointestinal population.

Herbal Approaches to Pediatric Functional Abdominal Pain.

Chronic abdominal pain is one of the most common problems seen by both pediatricians and pediatric gastroenterologists. Abdominal-pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders (AP-FGIDs) are diagnosed in children with chronic and recurrent abdominal pain meeting clinical criteria set forth in the Rome IV criteria. AP-FGIDs affect approximately 20% of children worldwide and include functional dyspepsia (FD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional abdominal pain (FAP), and abdominal migraine. IBS accounts for 45% of pediatric AP-FGIDs. The pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain involves an interplay of factors including early life events, genetics, psychosocial influences, and physiologic factors of visceral sensitivity, motility disturbance, altered mucosal immune function, and altered central nervous system processing. Treatment approaches are varied and can include dietary, pharmacologic, and complementary medicine interventions, as well as psychosocial support, depending on the many aspects of the disorder and the needs of the individual patient. There is a strong interest in complementary and integrative medicine approaches to pediatric pain from both patients, providers, and families. In this article, we discuss popular herbal treatments typically used in the field of complementary medicine to treat pediatric AP-FGIDs: peppermint oil, Iberogast®, cannabis, fennel, and licorice. While high-quality data are rather limited, studies generally show that these remedies are at least as effective as placebo, and are well tolerated with minimal side effects. We will need more placebo-controlled, double-blind, and unbiased prospective studies to document and quantify efficacy.

Pediatric gastrointestinal neuromodulation: A review.

Neuromodulation, also known as bioelectric neuromodulation or neurostimulation, is the therapeutic use of electrical stimulation of nerves or brain centers. Neuromodulation has been trialed in an increasing range of human diseases as well as gastrointestinal disorders. The application of neuromodulation to treat pediatric motility and functional disorders is an exciting recent development. This review aims to briefly discuss the use of neuromodulation for the treatment of pediatric gastroparesis, constipation, and visceral hyperalgesia.

Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation on mechanosensitivity, sleep, and psychological comorbidities in adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) improves symptoms in adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs). However, little is known about its impact on sleep and psychological functioning. We evaluated the effects of PENFS on resting and evoked pain and nausea, sleep and psychological functioning, and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patient ages 11-19 years with FAPD requiring PENFS as standard care were recruited. Evoked pain was elicited by a Water Load Symptom Provocation Task (WL-SPT) before and after four weeks of treatment. Pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep, somatic symptoms, and physical and psychological functioning were assessed. Actigraphy was used to measure daily sleep-wake patterns. KEY RESULTS: Twenty patients (14.3 ± 2.2 years old) with FAPD were enrolled. Most patients were females (70%) and white (95%). During pain evoked by WL-SPT, visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity and nausea were lower following PENFS compared with baseline (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, respectively). After PENFS, resting VAS pain unpleasantness (p = 0.03), abdominal pain (p < 0.0001), pain catastrophizing (p = 0.0004), somatic complaints (0.01), functional disability (p = 0.04), and anxiety (p = 0.02) exhibited significant improvements, and some were sustained long-term. Self-reported sleep improved after PENFS (p's < 0.05) as well as actigraphy-derived sleep onset latency (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: We demonstrated improvements in resting and evoked pain and nausea, sleep, disability, pain catastrophizing, somatic complaints, and anxiety after four weeks of PENFS therapy. Some effects were sustained at 6-12 months post-treatment. This suggests that PENFS is a suitable alternative to pharmacologic therapy.

Effect of Mirtazapine on Nausea in Children with Functional Nausea and Functional Dyspepsia Postprandial Distress Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical response and safety of mirtazapine in the pediatric population with a diagnosis of functional nausea and nausea associated with functional dyspepsia postprandial distress syndrome. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mirtazapine for pediatric nausea and nausea associated with functional dyspepsia postprandial distress syndrome. Clinical response was classified as complete response, partial response, and no response. We also identified the prescribed doses, side effects, and weight changes during mirtazapine therapy. RESULTS: Among the 57 total patients, 67% were females and ages ranged from 7 to 19 years with a mean of 14 ± 3 years. Clinical (complete and partial) response was reported in 82% of patients. Nausea resolved in 82% and insomnia in 77% of the patients. Eighty-four percent gained weight with a mean of 4 ± 7 kg. Sixty-five percent did not report adverse effects. The most common adverse effects were undesired weight gain (16%) and dysphoria (9%). Two patients discontinued the medicine after the first dose because of adverse effects. There was a significant correlation between the initial dose and weight (rs = 0.478; p = 0.0002). The median initial and final doses were 15 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mirtazapine is an option for treating children and adolescents with functional nausea and nausea associated with functional dyspepsia post-prandial distress syndrome, especially for a select group of patients with concurrent weight loss, anxiety, and insomnia.

Outcomes of combined pyloric botulinum toxin injection and balloon dilation in dyspepsia with and without delayed gastric emptying.

Background: Pyloric botulinum toxin injection has improved symptoms in children with delayed gastric emptying. We aimed to determine the clinical response to combined endoscopic intra-pyloric botulinum toxin injection and pyloric balloon dilation (IPBT-BD) in patients with dyspepsia. Methods: Electronic medical records were reviewed to gather demographic data, symptoms, and follow-up on patients with dyspepsia. Cases were defined as those who underwent IPBT-BD in addition to their ongoing management. Controls received pharmacotherapy, behavioral intervention, or dietary management alone. Clinical response was defined as no change, partial, or complete improvement in symptoms within 12 months. Propensity score matching based on age, gender, and symptom duration was used to pair cases and controls. Results: In total, 79 cases and 83 controls were identified. After propensity matching, 63 patients were included in each group. The mean age for cases was 14.5 ± 3.9y; 62% were females and 98% were Caucasian. Further, 83% of 46 cases and 94% of 49 controls who had scintigraphy scans showed delayed gastric emptying. After matching, 76% of cases showed partial or complete improvement compared with 49% controls within 12 months (P = 0.004). Younger children tended to respond more favorably to the procedure (P = 0.08). Conclusions: In our propensity-matched analysis, combined IPBT-BD in addition to pharmacotherapy, behavioral, or dietary management clearly showed a benefit over these modalities alone. This favorable response lasted up to 12 months.

Anal Sphincter Defect and Fecal Incontinence.

Anal sphincter defects can lead to fecal incontinence. The relationship between the extent of defect and continence is controversial. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis can assess anal sphincter defects. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is used to assess sphincter integrity in adults. We present a 17-year-old male with history of sexual abuse, rectal prolapse, and fecal incontinence. MRI showed a small defect that did not explain his clinical presentation. TRUS identified more extensive defects which were not picked up by MRI. The patient had rectopexy, and his rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence resolved. TRUS was superior in identifying sphincter defects compared with MRI. Our case also highlights that continence is possible despite large sphincter defects in pediatric patients. This may reflect the compensatory mechanism of residual sphincter in the absence of the aggravating factors like rectal prolapse.

Non-pharmacologic approach to pediatric constipation.

Functional constipation (FC) is a pervasive problem in pediatrics. Although pharmaceuticals are commonly used for FC, parents and patients show reluctance or find dissatisfaction with available medications at times. Further, patients often have interest in utilizing nutraceutical supplements and botanicals that are available over the counter. This literature review aims to summarize research studies performed on non-pharmacologic approaches to constipation and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these modalities. Overall data on non-pharmacologic treatments for childhood constipation were sparse, and though some studies were available for adult populations, pediatrics studies were generally limited, lacking or flawed. Certain supplements, such as prebiotics, probiotics and fiber, are safe and are without significant side effects. Though fiber supplements such as glucomannan, green banana mass, cocao husk and various fiber blends have emerging evidence in children, evidence for psyllium, cellulose and flaxseed only have supportive studies in adults. Other than senna, studies of botanicals indicate significant safety concerns (in particular with Aloe vera with aloin and Cascara sagrada) and insufficient evidence. For patients with a significant behavioral or anxiety component to their FC and exhibit dyssynergia, mind-body interventions (e.g. diaphragmatic breathing, biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and behavioral modifications) are certainly safe and effective. Finally, movement and manipulative interventions such as abdominal massage, reflexology, acupuncture and transcutaneous nerve stimulation show promise in the field of pediatric constipation, and data is accumulating for efficacy. These modalities require further study to determine mechanisms of action and which populations may benefit the most from these therapies.

New advances in the treatment of paediatric functional abdominal pain disorders.

This Review summarises recent pharmacological and upcoming alternative interventions for children with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs). Pharmacological targets include prokinetics and drugs affecting gastric accommodation to treat postprandial distress and nausea. Similarly, anti-inflammatory agents, junctional protein regulators, analgesics, secretagogues, and serotonin antagonists have a therapeutic role for irritable bowel syndrome. Non-pharmacological treatments include peripheral electrical nerve field stimulation to the external ear, gastric electrical stimulation, dietary interventions such as low fructose and fibre based diets, and nutraceuticals, which include probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Newer psychological advances such as exposure-based cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness meditation are being investigated for paediatric functional pain. Lastly, alternative therapies such as acupuncture, moxibustion, yoga, and spinal manipulation are also gaining popularity in the treatment of FAPDs.