Does the COVID-19 pandemic condition the delusional content of patients with psychosis? An observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective is to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the triggers of psychopathology and on the delusional content of patients with psychotic symptoms treated during the first three months of the pandemic in a tertiary hospital in Madrid. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and retrospective study of all patients attending the psychiatric emergency room (ER) between 11th March and 11th June 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were included. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test were performed to compare categorical variables. The level of statistical significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS: In the first month of the pandemic, COVID-19 conditioned the delirious content of 38.5% of the admitted patients and acted as a direct trigger for 46.2% of consultations. In the second week it affected 100.0% of the patients in both cases. Subsequently, a progressive and significant decrease was observed, with COVID-19 being the triggering factor for 17.6% and 11.5% of consultations in the second and third months of the pandemic respectively. Similarly, it was the main determinant of the delusional content in 13.7% and 3.8% of cases respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current pandemic affects delirium's pathoplasty. The delusional content of patients admitted with psychotic symptoms is quickly conditioned, which may be related to the radical change in their life, without transition or prior preparation. The patient's environmental context and events have a huge impact on the dynamics and characteristics of mental disorders.

Hyperphosphatemia during nutrition recovery in patients with severe anorexia nervosa.

INTRODUCTION: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a disorder associated with many medical complications. Regarding phosphorus metabolism, the only recognized alteration is hypophosphatemia associated with refeeding syndrome. However, in our clinical practice, we have observed a high frequency of hyperphosphatemia in late phases of nutrition therapy in severely undernourished AN patients, which has barely been described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of patients with AN hospitalized for severe decompensation of the disease. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included, all women, with a median age of 23 years [20-46] and a body mass index at admission of 12.2 kg/m2 [11.7-13.1]. Hyperphosphatemia was noted in 9 of the 11 cases (81.8%) with a median time to onset of 53 days [30-75]. The median peak serum phosphorus (P) level was 5.1 mg/dl [4.9-5.4]. An inverse relationship was found between the increase in P levels and phosphorus supplementation at the onset of admission. The magnitude of the P increase was associated with the body weight gain achieved during nutrition therapy. CONCLUSION: Late hyperphosphatemia during nutrition therapy in severely undernourished AN patients affects more than 80% of cases. Body weight gain throughout nutrition therapy is a predictor of increased P levels.

[Does the COVID-19 pandemic condition the delusional content of patients with psychosis? An observational study]. / ¿La pandemia de COVID-19 condiciona el contenido delirante de los pacientes con psicosis? Un estudio observacional.

Introduction: The primary objective is to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the triggers of psychopathology and on the delusional content of patients with psychotic symptoms treated during the first three months of the pandemic in a tertiary hospital in Madrid.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and retrospective study of all patients attending the psychiatric emergency room (ER) between 11th March and 11th June 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were included. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test were performed to compare categorical variables. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05.Results: In the first month of the pandemic, COVID-19 conditioned the delirious content of 38.5% of the admitted patients and acted as a direct trigger for 46.2% of consultations. In the second week it affected 100.0% of the patients in both cases. Subsequently, a progressive and significant decrease was observed, with COVID-19 being the triggering factor for 17.6% and 11.5% of consultations in the second and third months of the pandemic respectively. Similarly, it was the main determinant of the delusional content in 13.7% and 3.8% of cases respectively.Conclusions: The current pandemic affects delirium's pathoplasty. The delusional content of patients admitted with psychotic symptoms is quickly conditioned, which may be related to the radical change in their life, without transition or prior preparation. The patient's environmental context and events have a huge impact on the dynamics and characteristics of mental disorders.

Análisis de la demanda asistencial en la urgencia y unidad de hospitalización psiquiátrica en el contexto de pandemia por COVID-19 / Analysis of the demand for care in a psychiatric emergency room and an acute inpatient unit in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo consiste en analizar el impacto del COVID-19 en la demanda asistencial de las urgencias y en los ingresos psiquiátricos durante el primer mes de la pandemia. MÉTODOS: Realizamos un estudio transversal observacional retrospectivo en pacientes que acuden a urgencias psiquiátricas entre el 11 de marzo y el 11 de abril de 2019 y 2020 respectivamente. Se incluyeron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas en el estudio. Se realizaron las pruebas de Chi Cuadrado o Test exacto de Fisher para el contraste de hipótesis de variables categóricas y la prueba U Mann-Whitney para el contraste de variables cuantitativas. El nivel de significación estadística se estableció en p<0.05. Los análisis se realizaron con IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTADOS: Se observa un descenso significativo de la media de pacientes atendidos al día en urgencias entre ambos periodos, siendo esta de 5,91 (±2,53) en 2019 y de 2,41 (±1,81) en 2020 (p<0.001). Se ha visto una disminución significativa de la ocupación media de camas en la UHB, ocupándose un 91,84% (±7,72) de camas en 2019 y un 58,85% (±13,81) en 2020 (p<0,001). En cuanto a la proporción de ingresos de los pacientes que acuden a urgencias, se ha visto un aumento significativo en el año 2020 respecto al año anterior. CONCLUSIONES: La demanda en la urgencia de pacientes psiquiátricos y la ocupación media de camas se ha reducido durante el primer mes tras la declaración de la pandemia. El miedo al contagio puede actuar como modulador de la demanda psiquiátrica.

INTRODUCTION: The aim is to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the demand for emergency care and psychiatric admissions during the first month of the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational and cross-sectional study. We reviewed the clinical records of all patients attending the psychiatric emergency room (ER) between March 11th and April 11th, of both 2019 and 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were included in the study. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were performed to compare categorical variables, while U Mann-Whitney U test was used for quantitative variables. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Analysis were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: The was a significant decrease in the number of patients attended in the ER. An average of 5.91 (±2.53) patients were treated per day in 2019 compared to 2.41 (±1.81) in 2020 (p<0.001). There was also a significant decrease in the occupancy rate at the inpatient psychiatric unit, with a 91.84% (±7.72) of beds occupied in 2019 and only 58.85% (±13.81) in 2020 (p<0.001). Regarding the percentage of patients admitted after assessment in the ER, there was a significant increase in 2020 compared to the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: The demand for care in the psychiatric emergency room and the average bed occupancy have decreased during the first month after the declaration of the pandemic. Fear of contagion may act as a modulator of psychiatric demand.

Arteterapia y salud mental / Art therapy and mental health

La investigación sobre la eficacia de la arteterapia en el ámbito de la salud mental es poco concluyente. Pacientes y terapeutas coinciden a menudo en señalar su utilidad para el desarrollo de la expresión, la comunicación, la socialización y la autoconciencia, pero al ceñirse en la investigación, no se encuentra evidencia de que lo consiga. Tomando el diagnóstico de esquizofrenia como referente se encuentra que frente a los estudios que sugieren una mejoría en la salud mental global, el funcionamiento social y la calidad de las relaciones interpersonales, hay otros que no encuentran mejoría significativa ni en variables principales, como funcionalidad global y sintomatología global, ni en otras asociadas como asistencia al grupo, funcionamiento social, satisfacción con el tratamiento o impacto sobre la sintomatología negativa. Las sucesivas revisiones consultadas sugieren que esta contradicción en los resultados podría deberse a limitaciones metodológicas y recomiendan clarificar aspectos relacionados con el cómo, por qué y para quién es útil la arteterapia, así como identificar los mecanismos que dan soporte o vehiculizan la intervención. A partir de aquí, en el presente artículo, décimo y último de la Serie Arteterapia, se expone una vía de trabajo que se ha ido desarrollando a lo largo de 20 años en un hospital de día de psiquiatría, como coadyuvante del tratamiento de personas con diagnóstico de enfermedad mental grave, mayoritariamente esquizofrenia

Research on the efficacy of Art Therapy in the mental health setting has been inconclusive. Patients and therapists often coincide in highlighting its usefulness for developing expression, communication, socialization and self-awareness; but in terms of strict research, there is no evidence showing that this is achieved. Taking the diagnosis of schizophrenia as reference, there are studies suggesting an improvement in overall mental health, social performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships; however, other studies have found no significant improvement either in primary variables, such as overall functionality and overall symptomatology, or in other associated variables, such as attendance to the group, social performance, satisfaction with treatment or impact on negative symptomatology. The subsequent reviews consulted suggest that this contradictory results could be due to methodological limitations, and recommend clarifying aspects regarding how, why and for whom is Art Therapy useful, as well as to identify those mechanisms supporting or conveying the intervention. From now on, this article, the tenth and last in the Art Therapy Series, presents a way of working that has been developing over 20 years in a Psychiatry Day Hospital, as coadjuvant treatment for persons diagnosed with severe mental disease, mostly schizophrenia