Optimizing Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department.

Antibiotic stewardship is a core component of emergency department (ED) practice and impacts patient safety, clinical outcomes, and public health. The unique characteristics of ED practice, including crowding, time pressure, and diagnostic uncertainty, need to be considered when implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions in this setting. Rapid advances in pathogen detection and host response biomarkers promise to revolutionize the diagnosis of infectious diseases in the ED, but such tests are not yet considered standard of care. Presently, clinical decision support embedded in the electronic health record and pharmacist-led interventions are the most effective ways to improve antibiotic prescribing in the ED.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Techniques for Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia.

Pneumonia is common in the intensive care unit (ICU), infecting 27% of all critically ill patients. Given the high prevalence of this disease state in the ICU, optimizing antimicrobial therapy while minimizing toxicities is of utmost importance. Inappropriate antimicrobial use can increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance, Clostridiodes difficile infection, allergic reaction, and other complications from antimicrobial use (e.g., QTc prolongation, thrombocytopenia). This review article aims to discuss methods to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients with pneumonia, including the following: procalcitonin use, utilization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nares testing to determine need for vancomycin therapy, utilization of the Biofire® FilmArray® pneumonia polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and microbiology reporting techniques.

Early diagnosis with sequencing and successful treatment of Bipolaris prosthetic valve endocarditis.

We present a case of a 48-year-old man with congenital bicuspid aortic valve, history of Ross procedure, prosthetic pulmonary valve and homograft with rapid molecular diagnosis and prompt surgical and medical treatment for Bipolaris fungal endocarditis with excellent outcome with early valve replacement, debridement, combination antifungal therapy, ongoing suppressive therapy after treatment.

Intravenous to oral antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics: a step-up or a step-down for extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing urinary tract infections without concomitant bacteraemia?

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends numerous antibiotics for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of oral step-down antibiotics compared with continued intravenous therapy in UTIs without bacteraemia. This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study was conducted in hospitalised patients with ESBL-producing UTIs between July 2016 and March 2020. The primary outcome was a composite all-cause clinical failure, defined as 30-day re-admission, 30-day hospital mortality or a change in oral antibiotics during hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes included individual primary outcome components, re-admission due to a recurrent UTI, change in antibiotic during hospitalisation, hospital length of stay (LOS), antibiotic costs and adverse events. The study included 153 patients. The primary outcome occurred in 28% of both groups (27/95 vs. 16/58; P = 0.91). The primary outcome components were similar: re-admission (26% vs. 26%; P = 0.95); hospital mortality (2% vs. 2%; P = 1.0); and change in antibiotics (0% vs. 2%; P = 0.38). Mean hospital LOS and direct antibiotic costs were 8 ± 6 days vs. 5 ± 2 days (P < 0.01) and US$278 ± 244 vs. US$180 ± 104 (P < 0.01), respectively. Adverse events were similar, except diarrhoea (15% vs. 2%; P = 0.01). There was no difference in clinical failure, re-admission rate, re-admission due to a recurrent UTI, mortality rate or antibiotic change between groups. The switch group was associated with reduced hospital LOS and inpatient antibiotic costs.

Comparison of outcomes in urinary tract infections caused by AmpC-harboring organisms treated with AmpC stable versus AmpC susceptible agents.

There is minimal data on the optimal treatment of lower inoculum infections such as urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by SPICE organisms which encode the betalactamase enzyme, AmpC. This single-center, retrospective review of adult hospitalized patients with UTIs caused by a SPICE organism compared outcomes amongst patients treated with drugs susceptible to AmpC hydrolysis versus drugs stable against AmpC. Of 156 patients, similar rates of clinical response, 30-day infection related readmission, 30-day infection recurrence, 30-day mortality rates, and median length of hospital stay were found between the two groups. Notably, 44% of patients with ceftriaxone resistance reported had recent ß-lactam exposure versus only 11% of patients without ceftriaxone resistance (P = 0.002). Based on our data, there does not appear to be a difference in clinical response or any of the secondary outcomes in patients with UTIs treated with AmpC stable and AmpC susceptible agents.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Pharmacist During Microbiology Rounds.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate the impact of the participation of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) pharmacist in microbiology rounds at our institution. METHODS: This single-center retrospective descriptive study included inpatient and ambulatory adults (≥18 years) with a susceptibility request reviewed during microbiology rounds between October 2018 and March 2019. In October 2018, multidisciplinary telephone microbiology rounds were initiated with the medical directors of the clinical microbiology laboratory and ASP pharmacist to review susceptibility requests. Numbers and types of interventions made by an ASP pharmacist and potential benefits were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven susceptibility requests were reviewed by an ASP pharmacist, of which 83.6% were inpatient. An ASP pharmacist completed chart reviews for 92.5% of requests and contacted the requester or primary team 74.6% of the time. About half (47.8%) of susceptibility requests were approved, and only 65.2% of requests from an infectious diseases provider were approved (P = .039). The most frequent potential benefits of the intervention included preventing unnecessary susceptibility testing (47.8%), improving clinician understanding (40.3%), and preventing treatment of a culture result deemed as a contaminant (19.4%). CONCLUSIONS: ASP pharmacists are uniquely accessible and able to assist with preventing unnecessary susceptibility testing, optimizing antimicrobial therapy, and providing education to other health care professionals.