Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
FEMS Microbiol Rev ; 46(4)2022 07 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175353

RESUMO

Many of the human infectious pathogens-especially the zoonotic or vector-borne bacteria-are fastidious organisms that are difficult to cultivate because of their strong adaption to the infected host culminating in their near-complete physiological dependence on this environment. These bacterial species exhibit reduced multiplication rates once they are removed from their optimal ecological niche. This fact complicates the laboratory diagnosis of the disease and hinders the detection and further characterization of the underlying organisms, e.g. at the level of their resistance to antibiotics due to their slow growth. Here, we describe the current state of microbiological diagnostics for five genera of human pathogens with a fastidious laboratory lifestyle. For Anaplasma spp., Bartonella spp., Coxiella burnetii, Orientia spp. and Rickettsia spp., we will summarize the existing diagnostic protocols, the specific limitations for implementation of novel diagnostic approaches and the need for further optimization or expansion of the diagnostic armamentarium. We will reflect upon the diagnostic opportunities provided by new technologies including mass spectrometry and next-generation nucleic acid sequencing. Finally, we will review the (im)possibilities of rapidly developing new in vitro diagnostic tools for diseases of which the causative agents are fastidiously growing and therefore hard to detect.


Assuntos
Bartonella , Coxiella burnetii , Rickettsia , Anaplasma/genética , Coxiella , Humanos , Rickettsia/genética
3.
Nat Microbiol ; 7(2): 195-199, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35013593

RESUMO

Here we compared SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody and T-cell responses between older adults (>80 years old, n = 51) and a younger control group (20-53 years old, n = 46) after receiving two doses of BNT162b2. We found that responses in older adults were generally lower, and we identified 10% low-/non-responders. After receiving a third vaccination with BNT162b2, 4 out of 5 low-/non-responders showed antibody and T-cell responses similar to those of responders after two vaccinations.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Imunidade Celular , Imunidade Humoral , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/imunologia , Humanos , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Imunização Secundária/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Neutralização , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA