Risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients treated with thiazolidinediones in a managed-care population.

BACKGROUND: This study directly compares risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute heart failure (AHF), or all-cause death among pioglitazone- and rosiglitazone-treated patients in a managed-care population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients ≥18 years of age, newly initiated on rosiglitazone or pioglitazone between January 1, 2001, and December 12, 2005, were included. The date of the first pharmacy claim for rosiglitazone or pioglitazone was defined as index date. Patients were excluded if they had <1 year continuous eligibility preindex or a preindex insulin claim. Primary outcome measure was time to composite event of AMI, AHF or death among pioglitazone- and rosiglitazone-treated patients. The National Death Index database was accessed to obtain date of death for patients who died during the study period. Propensity score matching was used to control for potential confounders. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate effects of exposure to rosiglitazone and pioglitazone on time to event. A total of 36 628 patients (58% male; mean age, 54 years) were identified. Of the rosiglitazone-treated patients, 602 (4.16%) had an AMI, AHF, or death compared with 599 (4.14%) propensity score-matched pioglitazone-treated patients. No significant difference was observed between matched groups for risk of composite event (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.15; P=0.666) when patients were followed from index date until end of study period, termination of enrollment status, or diagnosis of AMI/AHF/death. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study directly comparing rosiglitazone and pioglitazone with a propensity score-matched population that includes mortality data, no significant differences were found in the risk of AMI, AHF or death.

Cardiovascular morbidity, heart rates and use of antimuscarinics in patients with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if cardiovascular (CV) comorbidity and treatment-associated antimuscarinic effects differ between patients with and without overactive bladder (OAB), and between treated and untreated patients with OAB, as OAB, CV disorders and exposure to medications with antimuscarinic effects are common in older patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database with a diagnosis of OAB (International Classification of Diseases-9 codes; from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2006) or a pharmacy claim for an antimuscarinic OAB medication, formed the OAB cohort, further stratified as treated and untreated. A random sample of patients with neither a diagnosis for OAB nor any urinary bladder dysfunction, nor a pharmacy claim for antimuscarinics, formed the non-OAB cohort. CV comorbidities and use of medications with antimuscarinic effects were assessed for the 12 months before OAB diagnosis/treatment. Information on heart rate (HR) on the day of the first OAB drug prescription was obtained from the GE Healthcare dataset. HR was assessed for patients aged > or =18 years with a diagnosis of OAB who were prescribed antimuscarinics (oxybutynin or tolterodine) at any dose or oral formulation between January 1995 and November 2006. RESULTS: The 6607 patients with OAB, with a substantial proportion with elevated HR at baseline, were more likely to have CV comorbidities (39% vs 21%; P < 0.001) and previous exposure to medications with antimuscarinic effects (33% vs 17%; P < 0.001) than the non-OAB patients. Rate of CV comorbidities (40% vs 38%; P = 0.326) did not differ between treated and untreated patients with OAB. However, there was a difference in previous exposure to medications with antimuscarinic effects (37% vs 29%; P < 0.001); 39.1% of patients with OAB had a HR of >80 beats/min before starting antimuscarinic treatment. CONCLUSION: In this study, the prevalence of CV comorbidities was significantly higher in patients with than without OAB; previous exposure to medications with antimuscarinic effects was also higher in patients with OAB. There was no difference in pre-existing CV comorbidities between the treated and untreated patients with OAB, but the high use of medications with antimuscarinic effects among these patients suggests that the presence of CV comorbidity might not be considered before using antimuscarinic agents for OAB.

Impact of asthma controller medications on clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes associated with various therapeutic classes of asthma controller medications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational study, which used administrative claims data from US commercial health plans, included patients with asthma aged 18 through 64 years who filled a prescription for at least 1 asthma controller medication from September 1, 2003, through August 31, 2005. Outcome metrics included the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), the use of oral corticosteroids, inpatient (INP)/emergency department (ED) visits, and asthma-related health care costs. A subset of 5000 patients was randomly selected for a survey using the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 56,168 eligible patients, 823 returned completed questionnaires. Compared with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), leukotriene modifiers (LMs) were associated with lower odds of INP/ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P<.001), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.81; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($193; P<.001). In the subgroup analysis of adherent patients, LMs were associated with higher odds of INP/ED visits (OR, 1.74; P=.04), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.46; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($235; P<.001). Inhaled corticosteroids and LMs had a comparable impact on all patient-reported outcomes. For combination therapy, ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist consistently showed at least equivalent or better outcomes in the use of SABAs and oral corticosteroids, the risk of INP/ED visits, cost, asthma control level, quality of life, and impairment in productivity and activity. CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower risk of INP/ED visits, and a lower cost if adherence was achieved. When adherence cannot be achieved, LMs may be a reasonable alternative. Combination therapy with ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist was associated with better or equivalent clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

The effects of rheumatoid arthritis on labor force participation, work performance, and healthcare costs in two workplace samples.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the workplace costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the employer perspective. METHOD: Samples included 4485 manufacturing firm (MF) employees (109 with RA) and 915 commercially insured (CO) subscribers (333 with RA). Respondents completed the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The effects of RA were estimated using regression analysis. RESULTS: RA was associated with increased probability of no longer working (CO), increased effort to maintain work performance (CO), increased sickness absence (MF), and increased non-RA pharmacy costs (CO). RA was not associated with hours worked or hourly wage. Indirect costs of RA did not exceed direct medical costs. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect costs of RA to employers are significant and warrant further research to increase our understanding of the contribution of different RA treatment interventions to optimizing workforce productivity.

Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members.

The validity of the six-question World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Screener was assessed in a sample of subscribers to a large health plan in the US. A convenience subsample of 668 subscribers was administered the ASRS Screener twice to assess test-retest reliability and then a third time in conjunction with a clinical interviewer for DSM-IV adult ADHD. The data were weighted to adjust for discrepancies between the sample and the population on socio-demographics and past medical claims. Internal consistency reliability of the continuous ASRS Screener was in the range 0.63-0.72 and test-retest reliability (Pearson correlations) in the range 0.58-0.77. A four-category version The ASRS Screener had strong concordance with clinician diagnoses, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90. The brevity and ability to discriminate DSM-IV cases from non-cases make the six-question ASRS Screener attractive for use both in community epidemiological surveys and in clinical outreach and case-finding initiatives.

Risk of cardiovascular events in patients at optimal values for combined lipid parameters.

BACKGROUND: Current prevention guidelines support efforts to achieve optimal high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) values, in addition to low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) in order to reduce cardiovascular (CV) events. The study objective was to evaluate the risk of CV events in patients attaining versus not attaining combined (LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG) optimal lipid values. METHODS/RESULTS: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a 1.1 million member managed care database. Eligible patients had a full lipid panel between 10/1/99 and 9/30/00, were naive to lipid therapy, and had health plan eligibility 12 months pre- and post-index (baseline) lipid laboratory value. Optimal lipid values (LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG) were established using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP III) guidelines, and patients were placed into one of four groups: none, one, two, or three lipid components non-optimal at baseline. The presence of cardiovascular risk, disease, and events were determined by selected International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT codes). The definition of a CV event included: diagnosis of ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, stroke/TIA, or revascularization procedure. Odds ratios (OR) for a CV event associated with attainment of each optimal lipid fraction were determined by multivariate logistic regression. The study cohort included 30,348 patients, with a mean follow-up of 27 +/- 8 months. Mean age was 66 +/- 12 years; 16,549 (54%) were male; and 17,289 (57%) patients had coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalent. There were 5955 CV events that occurred in 4059 (13%) study patients. The presence of a single non-optimal lipid value slightly increased CV event risk [OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.95-1.18], whereas two or all three non-optimal lipid values significantly increased the risk of a CV event [OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.08-1.37; and 1.45; 95% CI: 1.24-1.68, respectively]. LIMITATIONS: As with all large observational databases there are potential limitations including: patient selection bias (e.g., more interventions in patients with greater illness, lack of mortality data, and frequency of lipid monitoring), unknown confounding variables, and potential coding errors. CONCLUSION: Not attaining optimal combined lipid values, independently and significantly, increased the risk of CV events in this large at-risk population with approximately 68,283 patient years of follow-up. The combination of non-attainment of optimal LDL-C with non-attainment of optimal HDL-C or TG values, or both, increased the adjusted risk of CV events by 22-45%. Thus, therapeutic strategies should focus on assessment and management of multiple lipid abnormalities, and not on single lipid risk factor modification.

Achievement of optimal combined lipid values in a managed care setting: is a new treatment paradigm needed?

BACKGROUND: Published guidelines suggest the management of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) values after the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal is achieved. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the attainment of optimal combined lipid values (LDL-C, HDL-C, and TGs) and associated therapy over time. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted among managed-care patients who had a baseline lipid panel taken between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2000; were naive to lipid therapy; and had plan eligibility for at least 12 months before and 12 to 36 months after the baseline lipid values. Patients were categorized as elevated-risk primary prevention (ERP) or as coronary heart disease (CHD) and CHD risk equivalents (CHD-RE). The attainment of optimal combined lipid values was assessed at baseline and quarterly thereafter. Associations between lipid values and the use of lipid-altering therapy were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 30,348 patients were monitored for a mean (SD) duration of 27 (8) months. Mean (SD) age was 66 (12) years and 55% (16,549/30,348) were men; 43% (13,059/30,348) were categorized as ERP and 57% (17,289/30,348) as CHD-RE. Combined lipid values were optimal in 14% (4167/30,348),18% (5508/30,348), and 22% (2936/13,100) of patients at baseline, 12 months, and 36 months, respectively. After 36 months, 78% (10,164/13,100) of patients did not attain optimal combined lipid values. Lipid therapy, primarily statin monotherapy (87% [7992/ 92251), was prescribed in 30% (9225/30,348) of patients. After 36 months, 34% (4492/13,100) of patients had isolated elevated LDL-C and 20% (2588/13,100) had non-optimal HDL-C and/or TGs. Lipid therapy was associated with the attainment of optimal combined values for LDL-C and TGs (both, P < 0.05), but not for HDL-C. Because the study was retrospective, causality cannot be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, use of combination lipid therapy and targeted therapy aimed at the specific lipid abnormalities may increase the attainment of optimal lipid parameters.

Gout medication treatment patterns and adherence to standards of care from a managed care perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To determine allopurinol treatment patterns and adherence to published standards of care for patients with gout. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective claims analysis in a managed care database included patients 18 years or older, with continuous eligibility for 1 year before and after the start date and 2 or more visits during which the gout disease code (274.xx) was assigned or 1 or more pharmacy prescriptions for a gout-specific medication between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2002 (intake period). Factors associated with compliance with allopurinol therapy were measured based on the medication possession ratio, and adherence to 2 quality-of-care indicators for gout management was assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 64.9% of allopurinol users had a modal daily dose or the most commonly observed daily dose of 300 mg/d, median length of therapy was 3 months, and a high proportion of patients had a medication possession ratio of 10% or less. Suggested quality-of-care Indicators for gout had low performance: 53% of patients with renal impairment received a modal daily dose of 300 mg or greater, and 83% of patients who started taking allopurinol did not have their serum urate levels measured within 180 days. Patients with gout flares were less likely to be compliant with allopurinol (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.63). Patients with renal impairment at baseline were 3.2 times more likely to undergo serum urate testing than patients without renal impairment (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence Interval, 1.25-8.23). CONCLUSION: There was low compliance with allopurinol therapy for treatment of gout. Patients potentially received suboptimal quality of care as measured by serum urate testing and appropriateness of allopurinol dosing in patients with renal impairment.

Serum urate levels and gout flares: analysis from managed care data.

BACKGROUND: The desired serum urate level (SUA) for prevention of gout attacks is widely recommended to be in the subsaturating range, <6.0 mg/dL. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate attainment of this target SUA among gout patients on allopurinol in a naturalistic setting and to assess its impact on gout flare risk. METHODS: : This was a retrospective, observational study in a southeastern U.S. managed care organization of approximately 2.2 million members. The first gout claim/prescription within the intake period (January 1, 2000-December 31, 2002) was the index date. Included patients had > or =2 visits with gout International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code (274.xx) or > or =1 pharmacy script(s) for allopurinol, colchicine, probenecid, or sulfinpyrazone. Excluded patients were <18 years and/or did not have a 1-year continuous eligibility pre-/postindex date. Gout flares were defined by office/emergency room visit with gout or joint pain code(s) and > or =1 of the following within 7 days of the visit: intraarticular aspiration/injection, joint fluid microscopy, or pharmacy claim for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, colchicine, corticosteroid, or ACTH. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to evaluate gout flare risk/rate and association with target SUA. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of 5942 gout patients identified used allopurinol postindex. Among allopurinol users with pre-/postindex SUA data (n = 162), mean SUA was lowered from 8.7 mg/dL to 7.1 mg/dL; reduction was significant (P < 0.001). Among allopurinol users who did not have SUA <6.0 mg/dL preindex (n = 147), only 25% reached target levels during postindex. Despite pharmacotherapy, patients with nontarget levels were 59% more likely to flare than those at target. Allopurinol users who were not at target were 75% more likely to flare. CONCLUSION: The failure of allopurinol users to achieve target SUA levels of <6.0 mg/dL may be attributed to lack of awareness of optimal SUA, allopurinol dosing, compliance, and efficacy. Patients who did not achieve target SUA were at increased flare risk.

Monitoring anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Randomized control trials and observational studies show high-quality warfarin therapy leads to safe and effective stroke prophylaxis. In usual community practice, patient, physician and health care system factors are barriers to optimal anticoagulation. We examined the predictive relationship between inpatient and outpatient INR values in chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke (S), bleed (B) and control events (C) in usual community practice. METHODS: This nested case-control analysis identified AF patients hospitalized for S, B and C using medical and pharmacy claims spanning 4.5 years ('98-'03) and validating diagnosis with chart abstraction. AF was defined as 2 medical claims for AF >or= 42 days apart with a related prescription claim for warfarin. INRs from both outpatient and inpatient settings were used to yield a continuous history of coagulation status. Time-in-therapeutic-range (TTR) was calculated by Rosendaal's linear interpolation method. Correlation of inpatient and prognostic utility of last outpatient INRs was tested with S or B hospitalizations using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 614 hospitalizations (means: age 73.9, CHADS(2) = 3.24; 52% male) included S (n = 98), B (n = 101) and C (n = 415) events. Average TTR was 28.6% (49.4% at INR <2.0, 21.9% at INR >3.0). First INR on admission (INR <2.0 or >3.0) was associated with S and B hospitalizations (OR-adjusted [95%CI], 1.68 [1.04-2.73] and 1.72 [1.02-2.90]), respectively. Last outpatient INR <2.0 was not associated with S (OR-adjusted [95%CI], 1.12 [0.77-1.81]), and INR >3.0 was not associated with B (OR-adjusted [95%CI], 1.25 [0.67-2.32]). Last outpatient INR measurement occurred at 28, 22 and 24 days (median; S, B & C, respectively) before hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Patients were observed within therapeutic range less than 30% of their time on warfarin. While inpatient INRs were clearly associated with both ischemic stroke and bleed events, last outpatient INR before event was not predictive.

Opportunity for intervention to achieve American Heart Association guidelines for optimal lipid levels in high-risk women in a managed care setting.

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association (AHA) recently established evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in women, including lipid management. This study evaluated optimal lipid-level attainment and treatment patterns on the basis of these guidelines in high-risk women in a managed care setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a historical prospective cohort analysis of a 1.1-million-member, integrated, managed-care database. Eligible high-risk women were those with evidence of previous CVD or risk equivalent who had a full lipid panel available between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2000; were naive to lipid therapy; and had a minimum of 12 months health plan eligibility preindex and postindex lipid panel. Optimal lipid levels were defined as LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) >50 mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL, and triglycerides <150 mg/dL. Laboratory values and lipid pharmacotherapy were assessed longitudinally over the postindex follow-up (up to 36 months). A total of 8353 high-risk women (mean age, 66+/-14 years) with a mean follow-up of 27+/-8 months were included. Only 7% attained optimal combined lipid levels initially, and this increased to 12% after 36 months. Lipid-modifying therapy was initiated in 32% of patients, including 35% of women with LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL and 15% with LDL-C <100 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk women, few attained the AHA's standards for all lipid fractions, and only one third received recommended drug therapy, highlighting significant opportunities to apply evidence-based recommendations to manage lipid abnormalities in high-risk women.

Pharmaceutical services in rural hospitals in Illinois--2001.

The results of a survey characterizing pharmaceutical services in rural hospitals in Illinois are reported and compared with results of a similar survey conducted in 1991. A questionnaire was developed and mailed to pharmacy directors at rural hospitals in Illinois to obtain information about product-related services, the use of technology, clinical pharmacy services, and human resources data (including vacancies) for 2001. Of the 71 surveys that were mailed, 47 pharmacy directors (66%) responded. Respondent hospitals were smaller compared with those responding in 1991 (mean average daily census, 41.0 versus 51.2, respectively). As in 1991, nearly all respondents reported the provision of unit dose services and complete and comprehensive i.v. admixture programs (100% and 83%, respectively, for 2001). Three respondents (6%) reported having a cleanroom facility. The most commonly used technology reported was nursing-unit-based automated drug dispensing cabinets (35%). Nearly all hospitals reported providing drug therapy monitoring, patient education and counseling, pharmacokinetic consultations, and nutritional support. Consistent with national reports, staffing levels and vacancies increased between 1991 and 2001. In 2001, the mean number of full-time equivalents was 7.1, with a pharmacist to technician ratio of 1.0:1.08 and a ratio of pharmacists to occupied beds of 1.0:22.6. The overall vacancy rate was 8%, with a vacancy rate of 14% and 5% for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, respectively. A 2001 survey of pharmacy departments in rural hospitals in Illinois showed progression in the provision of distributive and clinical pharmacy services since 1991. Employee vacancy rates in pharmacy departments were high in 2001, especially among pharmacist positions, but were lower than those reported for the general population of hospitals.