RESUMO
To evaluate the clinical perspective of Veno lymphatic malformation and definitive management in respect to outcome. (1) To discuss clinical presentation, symptomatology of Veno lymphatic malformation. (2) Demonstration of radiological features, diagnosis and management of Veno lymphatic malformation with its complication. This prospective study was conducted on four patients attending ENT-OPD of R.G.Kar Medical College, Kolkata, India who had presented with suspected vascular malformation. The study was conducted from March 2021 to March 2023 for a period of 2 years. The patients were subjected to detailed history and examination. The diagnosis of the Veno lymphatic malformation was based on the results of Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In our study there was male predominance. Most of the patients belonged to the 2nd and 3rd decade of life. The main sites of involvement were lateral neck followed by parotid region. The lesion size ranged in between 3.5 × 3.5 cm and 7 × 5 cm. The patient with parotid lesion was found to have phlebolith. Since most of the lesions were small with well-defined margins, we were able to excise the lesions completely without leaving any residue. Out of four cases one patient developed temporary paresis of spinal accessory nerve which resolved eventually. Veno lymphatic malformations are rare and there is no definitive protocol for management and to be individualized. Our study will be helpful for furthering the existing knowledge regarding the management of Veno lymphatic lesion emphasizing the need of multimodality approach in surgical decision making.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of benign mass lesions in the superficial lobe of parotid on the known anatomic landmarks for identifying the facial nerve trunk. METHOD: Patients with unilateral biopsy-proven benign mass lesions in the superficial parotid were selected for this observational study. During superficial/partial superficial parotidectomy, distance of the facial nerve trunk from each landmark was assessed using spring calliper and correlated with the lesion's volume (measured from the pre-operative imaging). At least two identifiers among tragal pointer (TP), posterior belly of digastric muscle (PBDM) and tympanomastoid suture (TMS) were considered. RESULTS: The study involved 32 patients. The lesions mostly involved the parotid tail (50%) and pretragal region (34.3%), and constituted of pleomorphic adenoma (~66%) and Warthin's tumor (~9%), the rest being various cysts and hamartomas. TP was universally uncovered, while PBDM and TMS were exposed in 26 and 25 patients, respectively. Average distances between the facial nerve trunk and TP, PBDM and TMS were 12.79 mm (SD=2.33), 9.78 mm (SD=1.21) and 7.58 mm (SD=1.33), respectively. Correlation coefficients between the lesion's volume and the distance of facial nerve from a given landmark were -0.11, 0.04 and -0.16 for TP, PBDM and TMS, respectively. CONCLUSION: TP was the most easily available landmark on surgical dissection, while PBDM was the most consistent and the least variable when volumetric data of the benign mass lesions in the superficial lobe of parotid were considered as a factor influencing the distance from the facial nerve trunk.
