Radiological findings based comparison of functional status in patients who have post-covid lung injury or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Following COVID-19 infection, some patients acquired lung injury and fibrosis. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is characterized by lung fibrosis. Both post-COVID lung injury and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis cause loss of respiratory function and involvement of the lung parenchyma. We aimed to compare respiratory related functional characteristics and radiological involvement between post-COVID lung injury and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: A single center, cross-sectional study was applied. Patients with post-COVID lung injury and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis included in the study. All patients underwent the 6-minute walk test, as well as the Borg and MRC scales. Radiological images were evaluated and scored for lung parenchymal involvement. The impact of post-COVID lung injury and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis on respiratory functions of were compared. The relationship of functional status and radiological involvement, as well as the effect of potential confounding factors were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included in the study. Forty-eight (67.6%) of the patients were male and the mean age was 65.4 ± 10.3 years. Patients with post-COVID lung injury had greater 6-minute walk test distance and duration, as well as higher oxygen saturations. The MRC and Borg dyspnea scores were comparable. At radiologic evaluation, ground glass opacity scores were higher in patients with post-COVID lung injury, whereas pulmonary fibrosis scores were higher in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. However, the total severity scores were similar. While pulmonary fibrosis score was found to have a negative correlation with 6-minute walk test distance, test duration, and pre- and post-test oxygen saturation levels, there was a positive correlation with oxygen saturation recovery time and MRC score. There was no relationship between ground glass opacity and the functional parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having equal degrees of radiological involvement and dyspnea symptom severity, PCLI patients exhibited higher levels of functional status. This might be due to different pathophysiological mechanisms and radiological involvement patterns of both diseases.

[Functional parameters and affecting factors in post-COVID period]. / Post-COVID dönemde fonksiyonel parametreler ve etkileyen faktörler.

Introduction: Post-COVID period is considered to be 12 weeks after the COVID-19 infection. Patients in the post-COVID period may have prolonged or newly developed symptoms. Depending on the prolonged effects of the disease, respiratory and functional parameters may be affected. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of COVID-19 infection on respiratory and functional parameters in the post-COVID period. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the functional parameters of patients with COVID-19 in the post-COVID period. Subjects with a history of microbiologically proven COVID-19 infection were evaluated with 6-minute walk test results, Borg, and MRC results at least 12 weeks after COVID-19 infection. The relationship between demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vaccination status, and severity of disease with 6-minute walk test results and dyspnea scales in the post-COVID period was investigated. Result: Two hundred seventeen patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 48.6 ± 14.9 years and 126 (58.1%) of them were female. 142 (65.4%) of the patients were completely vaccinated against COVID-19 and 75 (34.6%) patients were incompletely vaccinated or unvaccinated. 158 (72.8%) patients had mild disease, 51 (23.5%) patients had moderate disease, and eight (3.7%) patients had severe disease. Those with a history of moderate or severe disease had significantly worsened functional parameters in the postCOVID period compared to those with mild COVID-19. The Borg scale and MRC dyspnea scale values were significantly higher in women (p= 0.008, p= 0.002, respectively). Functional parameters of those who were completely vaccinated against COVID-19 and those who were incompletely or unvaccinated individuals in the post-COVID period were similar. Conclusions: The functional parameters of people with moderate or severe COVID-19 disease were found to be significantly impaired in the post-COVID period. While the effect of smoking and vaccination status on functional parameters in the post-COVID period could not be demonstrated, disease severity and accompanying comorbidity were found to be effective.

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in COPD patients

Background/aim: The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) have been evaluated before. This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the LCQ in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with cough. Materials and methods: COPD (GOLD B, C, D) patients over age 40 (n = 75) and healthy volunteers as a control group (n = 75) were included. A sociodemographic data form, the LCQ, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Form for Turkish people were completed. The internal reliability of the LCQ was determined using the Cronbach alpha coefficient (>0.6) and its repeatability by the intraclass consistency coefficient (P < 0.05) was accepted as significant. Results: For internal consistency, Cronbach alpha coefficients of all subscales of the LCQ, physical, psychological, and social, were found as 0.72, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively, with 0.92 for the total index. There was significant internal consistency for all subscales and the total index (Cronbach alpha coefficients of >0.6). In test­retest reliability, the correlation coefficient ranged between 0.71 and 0.80 for each question and was calculated as r = 0.89 for total LCQ score (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the LCQ has been found to have acceptable reliability and validity for use in Turkish COPD patients with chronic cough.

Knowledge Level of the Primary Healthcare Providers on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

INTRODUCTION: Awareness of the healthcare providers on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in our country and all over the world, and on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) which plays an important role in its nonpharmacological treatment will provide effectiveness in diagnosis and treatment of COPD. The present study aimed at determining knowledge level of the healthcare providers about COPD and PR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, family practitioners and staff of home-care in central county of Manisa City were applied a questionnaire in order to determine their knowledge level on COPD and pulmonary rehabilitation during the in-service training on "pulmonary rehabilitation, home-care services for the pulmonary diseases, and respiratory exercises." RESULTS: 65.5% of the healthcare providers responded to the survey. Rate of those correctly knowing at least one of four items was 97.2%. No responder knew all items correctly. Average value for correct answers was 5.30 ± 2.1 (range: 1-10). The physicians, men, and those working in family health centers had higher level of knowledge on COPD compared to nonphysician healthcare providers (p = 0.006), women (p = 0.002), and those working in other practices (p = 0.019), respectively. CONCLUSION: Knowledge level of the primary healthcare providers on COPD and PR remains inadequate. Dynamic postgraduate training on this topic will be useful in referring the patients to centers giving service for this condition.