Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 7(4): 88, 2006 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17233540

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the in vitro and in vivo transdermal potential of w/o microemulsion (M) and gel (G) bases for diclofenac sodium (DS). The effect of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a penetration enhancer was also examined when it was added to the M formulation. To study the in vitro potential of these formulations, permeation studies were performed with Franz diffusion cells using excised dorsal rat skin. To investigate their in vivo performance, a carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model was used. The commercial formulation of DS (C) was used as a reference formulation. The results of the in vitro permeation studies and the paw edema tests were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. The in vitro permeation studies found that M was superior to G and C and that adding DMSO to M increased the permeation rate. The permeability coefficients (Kp) of DS from M and M+DMSO were higher (Kp = 4.9 x 10(-3) +/- 3.6 x 10(-4) cm/h and 5.3 x 10(-3) +/- 1.2 x 10(-3) cm/h, respectively) than the Kp of DS from C (Kp = 2.7 x 10(-3) +/- 7.3 x 10(-4) cm/h) and G (Kp = 4.5 x 10(-3) +/- 4.5 x 10(-5) cm/h). In the paw edema test, M showed the best permeation and effectiveness, and M+DMSO had nearly the same effect as M. The in vitro and in vivo studies showed that M could be a new, alternative dosage form for effective therapy.


Assuntos
Diclofenaco/administração & dosagem , Diclofenaco/química , Portadores de Fármacos/administração & dosagem , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Composição de Medicamentos/métodos , Excipientes/química , Pele/química , Absorção , Administração Cutânea , Animais , Difusão , Técnicas In Vitro , Masculino , Teste de Materiais , Ratos , Absorção Cutânea
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA