The smoker's paradox in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: A national inpatient sample analysis from 2015 to 2020.

OBJECTIVES: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure used to alleviate patients with chronic liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Smoking can adversely impact liver function and has been shown to influence liver-related outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of smoking on the immediate outcomes of TIPS procedure. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study compared smokers and non-smokers who underwent TIPS procedures in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from the last quarter of 2015 to 2020. Multivariable analysis was used to compare the in-hospital outcomes post-TIPS. Adjusted pre-procedural variables included sex, age, race, socioeconomic status, indications for TIPS, liver disease etiologies, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Compared to non-smokers, smokers had lower risks of in-hospital mortality (7.36% vs 9.88 %, aOR 0.662, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (25.57% vs 33.66 %, aOR 0.68, p < 0.01), shock (0.45% vs 0.98 %, aOR 0.467, p = 0.02), and transfer out to other hospital facilities (11.35% vs 14.78 %, aOR 0.732, p < 0.01). There was no difference in hepatic encephalopathy or bleeding. Also, smokers had shorter wait from admission to operation (2.76±0.09 vs 3.17±0.09 days, p = 0.01), shorter length of stay (7.50±0.15 vs 9.89±0.21 days, p < 0.01), and lower total hospital cost (148,721± 2,740.7 vs 204,911±4,683.5 US dollars, p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent patterns among both current and past smokers. CONCLUSION: This study compared the immediate outcomes of smokers and non-smokers after undergoing the TIPS procedure. Interestingly, we observed a smokers' paradox, where smoker patients had better outcomes following TIPS. The underlying causes for this smoker's paradox warrant further in-depth exploration.

Disparity Among African Americans in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedure: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis from 2015 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure used to alleviate patients with chronic liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Racial disparities were present in TIPS where numerous studies suggested African American patients experience higher in-hospital mortality rates. However, the incidence of post-TIPS surgical complications, such as HE, has yet to be examined among African Americans. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive examination of the disparities in TIPS procedures among African American patients. METHODS: The study compared African American and Caucasian patients who underwent TIPS procedures in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from the last quarter of 2015-2020 after ICD-10 change. Preoperative variables, including demographics, comorbidities, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were examined and multivariable analysis was used to assess outcomes correcting preoperative variables with p < 0.1. RESULTS: Compared to Caucasians, African Americans had higher in-hospital mortality (16.18 vs 8.22%, aOR 1.781, p < 0.01), hepatic encephalopathy (33.09 vs 27.44%, aOR 1.300, p = 0.05), and acute kidney injury (45.59 vs 29.60%, aOR 2.019, p < 0.01). Using the generalized linear model, African Americans have longer length of stay (11.04 ± 0.77 days vs 8.54 ± 0.16 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite a higher prevalence of cirrhosis, African Americans continue to have marked underrepresentation in TIPS procedures in recent years. Their underrepresentation, in conjunction with higher mortality, morbidity, and increased comorbidity conditions, could imply disparity in accessing care. This finding underscores the necessity for improved access to diagnostic and therapeutic services for African Americans with liver cirrhosis.

Advanced chronic renal disease is an independent risk factor for inpatient mortality following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure used to alleviate portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. However, the risks and outcomes associated with TIPS in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative outcomes of TIPS procedures in patients with advanced CKD using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, a comprehensive all-payer inpatient database in the US. METHODS: The study identified patients who underwent TIPS procedures in the NIS database from Q4 2015 to 2020. Patients with advanced CKD were identified using specific ICD-10-CM codes, and they were compared to patients without CKD. Preoperative variables, including demographics, indications for TIPS, comorbidities, APR-DRG subclass, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were noted. Perioperative outcomes were examined by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 248 patients with advanced CKD and 5511 patients without CKD undergoing TIPS procedures were identified in the NIS database. Compared to non-CKD, patients with advanced CKD had higher mortality (13.70% vs. 8.60%, aOR = 1.56, P  = 0.03), acute kidney injury (51.21% vs. 29.34, aOR = 1.46, P  < 0.01), transfer out (25.00% vs. 12.84%, aOR = 1.88, P  < 0.01), and length of stay over 7 days (64.11% vs. 38.97%, aOR = 2.34, P  < 0.01). However, there was no difference in hepatic encephalopathy (31.85% vs. 27.19%, aOR = 1.12, P  = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Advanced CKD patients undergoing TIPS are at higher risk of mortality and AKI compared to patients without CKD; HE was mildly elevated but NS. Long-term prognosis of patients with advanced CKD who had TIPS is needed in future studies.

Tunneled Dialysis Catheters: Perspective from a Single Interventional Radiology Center.

Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) serve as vascular access for hemodialysis (HD) or plasmapheresis. This study examines the frequency and indications for TDC placement and removal by an interventional radiology service over a 5-year period. Indications for catheter placement (n = 289) included HD for patients with end stage kidney disease (65%) or acute kidney injury (AKI, 24%), and plasmapheresis (11%). Indications for catheter removal included infection (20%), dysfunction (33%), no longer needed (40%), and patient issues (7%). TDCs provide access for HD when a functioning arteriovenous access does not exist. Using a TDC in patients with AKI reduces catheter complications, such as mechanical dysfunction and infection, and provides better dialysis delivery. TDC placement in patients with AKI, despite its time and resource intensity, provides medical and financial benefits.

Reintervention Rate After Pigtail Catheter Insertion Compared to Surgical Chest Tubes.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest similar efficacy between large-bore chest tube (CT) placement and small-bore pigtail catheter (PC) placement for the treatment of pleural space processes. This study examined reintervention rates of CT and PC in patients with pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pleural effusion. METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients from September 2015 through December 2020. Patients were identified using ICD codes for pneumothorax, hemothorax, or pleural effusion. Use of a pigtail catheter (≤14Fr) or surgical chest tube (≥20Fr) was noted. The primary outcome was overall reintervention rate within 30 days of tube insertion. Patients who died with a pleural drainage catheter in place, unrelated to complications from chest tube placement, were excluded. RESULTS: There were 1032 total patients in the study: 706 CT patients and 326 PC patients. The PC group was older with more comorbidities and more likely to have effusion as the indication for pleural drainage. Patients with PC were 2.35 times more likely to have the tube replaced or repositioned (P < .0001), 1.77 times more likely to require any reintervention (P = .001) and 2.09 times more likely to remain in the hospital >14 days (P < .0001) compared to patients with CT. CONCLUSION: PCs have a significantly higher reintervention rate compared to CT for the treatment of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pleural effusion. Although PC are believed to cause less pain and tissue trauma, they do not necessarily drain the pleural space as well as CT. Decisions on which method of draining the chest should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Endovascular Repair of Zone 0 Ascending Aortic Pseudoaneurysm: A Case Report.

Although open surgery is standard of care for ascending aortic pathology, endovascular approaches can be viable options. We report the case of a 77-year-old man with a 5.7-cm ascending aorta penetrating ulcer. Given his age and clinical profile, the patient underwent Zone 0 thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Immediate and delayed migration of Onyx embolisation into the renal collecting system.

We present a case of Onyx embolisation of a renal pseudoaneurysm following partial nephrectomy with collecting system involvement with subsequent migration of Onyx into the renal collecting system resulting in renal obstruction. This occurred both immediately after embolisation and again 8 years after embolisation. Both cases required ureteroscopic surgical intervention. In the first instance, the pieces were removed using basket extraction. In the second, laser lithotripsy was used in addition to basket extraction. While there are a few cases of embolisation coils eroding into the renal collecting system, this is the second reported case of Onyx migration and the first where ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy was used. The patient is doing well and undergoing surveillance ultrasounds to ensure there is no further Onyx migration. This may be a consideration for patients with pseudoaneurysm embolisation especially in the setting of prior collecting system damage.

Outcomes of Stroke Thrombectomy Performed by Interventional Radiologists versus Neurointerventional Physicians.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that interventional radiologists (IRs) and neurointerventional (NI) physicians have similar outcomes of endovascular stroke thrombectomy (EVT), which could be used to improve the availability of thrombectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hospitals providing EVT performed by IRs and NI physicians at the same institution submitted sequential retrospective data limited to the era of modern devices. Good clinical outcomes (a 90-day modified Rankin score [mRS] of 0-2) and technically successful revascularization (a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of ≥2b) were compared between the specialties after adjusting for treating hospital, patient age, stroke severity, Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score, time from symptom onset to door, and clot location. Propensity score matching was used to compare the outcomes. A total of 1,009 patients were evaluated (622 treated by IRs and 387 treated by NI physicians). RESULTS: The median time from stroke onset to puncture was 245 versus 253 minutes (P = .49), the technically successful revascularization rate was 81.8% versus 82.4% (P = .81), and the good clinical outcome rate was 45.5% versus 50.1% (P = .16). After adjusting, the physician specialty was not a significant predictor of good clinical outcomes (odds ratio, 1.028; 95% confidence interval, 0.760-1.390; P = .86). After matching, an mRS of 0-2 was present in 47.7% of IR treated patients and 51.1% of NI treated patients (P = .366). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the successful revascularization rate and good clinical outcomes between IRs and NI physicians. The outcomes of EVT performed by IRs were similar to those of EVT performed by NI physicians, as determined using previously published trials and registries. This may be useful for addressing coverage and access to stroke interventions.

Comparison of Smartphone Augmented Reality, Smartglasses Augmented Reality, and 3D CBCT-guided Fluoroscopy Navigation for Percutaneous Needle Insertion: A Phantom Study.

PURPOSE: To compare needle placement performance using an augmented reality (AR) navigation platform implemented on smartphone or smartglasses devices to that of CBCT-guided fluoroscopy in a phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An AR application was developed to display a planned percutaneous needle trajectory on the smartphone (iPhone7) and smartglasses (HoloLens1) devices in real time. Two AR-guided needle placement systems and CBCT-guided fluoroscopy with navigation software (XperGuide, Philips) were compared using an anthropomorphic phantom (CIRS, Norfolk, VA). Six interventional radiologists each performed 18 independent needle placements using smartphone (n = 6), smartglasses (n = 6), and XperGuide (n = 6) guidance. Placement error was defined as the distance from the needle tip to the target center. Placement time was recorded. For XperGuide, dose-area product (DAP, mGy*cm2) and fluoroscopy time (sec) were recorded. Statistical comparisons were made using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The placement error using the smartphone, smartglasses, or XperGuide was similar (3.98 ± 1.68 mm, 5.18 ± 3.84 mm, 4.13 ± 2.38 mm, respectively, p = 0.11). Compared to CBCT-guided fluoroscopy, the smartphone and smartglasses reduced placement time by 38% (p = 0.02) and 55% (p = 0.001), respectively. The DAP for insertion using XperGuide was 3086 ± 2920 mGy*cm2, and no intra-procedural radiation was required for augmented reality. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone- and smartglasses-based augmented reality reduced needle placement time and radiation exposure while maintaining placement accuracy compared to a clinically validated needle navigation platform.

Complications and Management of the Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Endovascular treatment in thoracic aortic diseases has increased in use exponentially since Dake and colleagues first described the use of a home-made transluminal endovascular graft on 13 patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm at Stanford University in the early 1990s. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) was initially developed for therapy in patients deemed unfit for open surgery. Innovations in endograft engineering design and popularization of endovascular techniques have transformed TEVAR to the predominant treatment choice in elective thoracic aortic repair. The number of TEVARs performed in the United States increased by 600% from 1998 to 2007, while the total number of thoracic aortic repairs increased by 60%. As larger multicenter trials and meta-analysis studies in the 2000s demonstrate the significant decrease in perioperative morbidity and mortality of TEVAR over open repair, TEVAR became incorporated into standard guidelines. The 2010 American consensus guidelines recommend TEVAR to be "strongly considered" when feasible for patients with degenerative or traumatic aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta exceeding 5.5 cm, saccular aneurysms, or postoperative pseudoaneurysms. Nowadays, TEVAR is the predominant treatment for degenerative and traumatic descending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Although TEVAR has been shown to have decreased early morbidity and mortality compared with open surgical repair, endovascular manipulation of a diseased aorta with endovascular devices continues to have significant risks. Despite continued advancement in endovascular technique and devices since the first prospective trial examined the complications associated with TEVAR, common complications, two decades later, still include stroke, spinal cord ischemia, device failure, unintentional great vessel coverage, access site complications, and renal injury. In this article, we review common TEVAR complications with some corresponding radiographic imaging and their management.

Hybrid Repair of Chronic Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection with Expanding Arch Aneurysm.

PURPOSE: The management of patients with chronic Stanford type B aortic dissection who develop complications requires intervention without clear guidelines. Chronic aortic dissection is difficult to treat and often leads to significant morbidity and mortality. We report a complex case of chronic Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with an expanding false lumen aneurysm and distal fenestrations that required a multi-stage hybrid repair. TECHNIQUE: The patient first underwent a median sternotomy for the ascending aorta to the innominate artery and innominate artery to the left carotid artery bypass, followed by a left carotid to left axillary artery bypass. Due to continued aneurysmal growth, the patient ultimately underwent total cervical and abdominal aortic debranching as well as thoracic and abdominal endovascular grafting with iliac excluders. The patient recovered well after the surgery and had no further expansion of the aneurysm at 12-month follow up. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repairs have been the mainstay of chronic TBAD repair, but hybrid approaches may be necessary for difficult repairs. A multi-stage hybrid repair approach has been successful in a patient who had a chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration that failed medical management.

Single institutional experience of peripheral applications of a liquid embolic agent: Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Copolymer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymer for the treatment of a variety of peripheral vascular pathologies. RESULTS: Between October 2010 and October 2017, 43 patients who underwent total 54 EVOH embolization procedures for the treatment of peripheral vascular pathologies were included. The cases which involved the use of EVOH for the treatment of nonvascular, neurologic, ophthalmologic, otolaryngologic or head-neck pathologies were excluded. The demographic data, technical and clinical success rates, and procedure-related details and complications were obtained. The most common indications for EVOH embolization were type II endoleaks (n = 18) and peripheral arteriovenous malformations (n = 14). The majority of cases (62.5%) used EVOH without any adjunct embolic material. The results of this study showed 100% technical success rates and 89% clinical success rates. No events of nontarget embolization or other procedure-related complications were noted. The mortality & morbidity rates were 0%. The loss to follow up rate was 16% (9 /54). The mean follow-up period was 134 days (range, 30 to 522 days). CONCLUSION: The single institutional experience supports the safety and efficacy of EVOH embolization in the treatment of various peripheral vascular conditions.

Correction to: Thoracic endovascular repair of a rare case of leaking aortic arch intramural hematoma secondary to Giant cell arteritis.

'In the published article (Salaskar et al. 2019) the statement under the subheading 'Consent for publication' is incorrect.

Preservation of renal perfusion by hepatorenal and splenorenal bypasses before explantation of an infected abdominal aortic endograft.

We report the case of an 82-year-old patient with an infected abdominal aortic endograft who presented with a right psoas abscess and lumbar osteomyelitis. The psoas abscess was drained percutaneously. Fluid obtained grew Fusobacterium nucleatum. The patient, an active and highly functional individual, wished to pursue definitive management. The infected endograft was surgically removed, and the aorta was ligated above the renal arteries after staged axillary-bifemoral, hepatorenal, and splenorenal bypasses.

Pseudoaneurysm: a rare complication of distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox.

BACKGROUND: This report presents a case of distal radial artery pseudoaneurysm following cardiac catheterization and its successful endovascular management. Due to its novelty as a catheterization site, few to no reports exist regarding the complications associated with distal radial access. CASE PRESENTATION: A patient presented to the emergency department with severe wrist and hand swelling 48 h after successful cardiac catheterization via distal radial artery access. Angiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm which was embolized with Onyx™. Post intervention angiogram showed exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm and preservation of the left palmar arch vasculature. CONCLUSION: The case presented herein demonstrates a rare complication of distal radial access at the anatomical snuffbox.

Thoracic endovascular repair of a rare case of leaking aortic arch intramural hematoma secondary to Giant cell arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) secondary to Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) were treated with resection and open repair. However no prior studies have reported an aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) as a presentation of GCA or outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in TAA or IMH secondary to GCA. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59 year old female, nonsmoker, non-hypertensive, non-diabetic with a known history of GCA, temporal arteritis on prednisone presented with shortness of breath & chest pain. Chest CT revealed aortic arch IMH and large left hemothorax. CTA confirmed distal aortic arch focal dilation, a focal intimal irregularity in the distal aortic arch and extensive IMH without any active extravasation or signs of aortitis. Patient underwent an urgent TEVAR without oversizing the aortic landing zones. Post TEVAR aortogram showed exclusion of the site of IMH origin and dilated aortic arch segment by the stent and absence of active extravasation. One month post-TEVAR CTA showed patent stent graft with resolution of IMH and hemothorax. One year after TEVAR, patient remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: GCA can present as an IMH secondary to underlying chronic vasculitis. When endovascular repair is considered, great care should be taken not to grossly oversize aortic landing zones.

Correction to: Radiofrequency wire 'power wire' recanalization of calcified chronically occluded inferior vena cava.

'In the published article (Salaskar et al. 2018) the statement under the subheading 'Consent for publication' is incorrect.

Radiofrequency wire 'power wire' recanalization of calcified chronically occluded inferior vena cava.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) wire recanalization of short segments of central venous obstruction has been considered safe; however its use for recanalization of long segments of inferior vena cava (IVC) has not been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old female with recurrent massive hematemesis was found to have systemic venous upper esophageal varices on endoscopy and an extensive chronic IVC occlusion on CT. Using both a percutaneous transhepatic and transfemoral approach IVC recanalization was performed. A snare was advanced to the cavo-atrial junction via transhepatic venous access. From the groin utilizing RF wire steerable guide sheaths, endovascular reconstruction of the IVC was performed. Post recanalization venography demonstrated patent stented IVC and marked decrease in the intraabdominal-pelvic collaterals. No recurrence of hematemesis was noted. After 6 months, patient remained asymptomatic and had functioning right femoral arteriovenous hemodialysis graft. CONCLUSIONS: Using appropriate techniques, Power wire recanalization of long occlusive segments of IVC can be safe and effective.