Sector analysis of prostate implants.

The analysis of treatment plans generated following prostate implants (post plans) is an essential part of the patient's treatment regimen. The results are used to determine the adequacy of the individual implant and, just as importantly, to provide an evaluation of the institution's brachytherapy technique. Compiled post plan results can be used to compare data from different institutions and help determine guidelines that should be established as dosimetric goals. Sector analysis, or spatial dose mapping, is a novel method of analyzing brachytherapy results that has been developed for this purpose. The display of isodose curves provides spatial information pertaining to the dosimetric evaluation of post plans but is an unwieldy tool; ill suited to the creation of general conclusions for comparative efforts. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis is an excellent tool for examining dosimetric results, but the spatial information is lost. Sector analysis bridges the gap between isodose curves and DVH analysis in post plan analysis. To perform sector analysis we divide the gland into three regions in the cranial-caudal direction (base, midgland, and apex) and four regions on each transverse slice (anterior, posterior, left and right). This gives twelve sectors, each identified by its location in the cranial-caudal direction and position on the transverse slice, e.g., posterior midgland. DVH analysis is performed for each region separately and compiled for display. We present an example of the use of this technique wherein we have analyzed a sequential series of 118 implants performed by a single practitioner (BRP) at two institutions over a calendar year. The implants were performed using two different techniques at the two institutions. Sector analysis was used to compare the results of the implants at the two institutions.

Maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy for recurrent TA, T1 and carcinoma in situ transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a randomized Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy has been widely accepted as the optimal treatment for carcinoma in situ and high grade superficial transitional cell carcinoma. However, controversy remains regarding the role of maintenance therapy, and its long-term effect on recurrence and progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients in the study had transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder with carcinoma in situ or an increased risk of recurrence. The criteria for increased risk were 2 or more episodes of tumor within the most recent year, or 3 or more tumors within 6 months. At least 1 week following biopsy of carcinoma in situ and resection of any stage Ta or T1 transitional cell tumors 660 patients were started on a 6-week induction course of intravesical and percutaneous Connaught BCG. Three months following initiation of BCG induction therapy 550 consenting patients were stratified by purified protein derivative skin test and the presence of carcinoma in situ, and then randomized by central computer to receive BCG maintenance therapy (maintenance arm) or no BCG maintenance therapy (no maintenance arm). Maintenance therapy consisted of intravesical and percutaneous BCG each week for 3 weeks given 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months from initiation of induction therapy. The 384 eligible patients who were disease-free at randomization constitute the primary intent to treat analytic group because they could be followed for disease recurrence. All patients were followed for adverse effects of treatment, recurrence, disease worsening and survival. RESULTS: No toxicities above grade 3 were noted in the 243 maintenance arm patients. The policy of withholding maintenance BCG from patients with increased side effects may have diminished the opportunity to observe severe toxicity. Estimated median recurrence-free survival was 35.7 months (95% confidence interval 25.1 to 56.8) in the no maintenance and 76.8 months (64.3 to 93.2) in the maintenance arm (log rank p<0.0001). Estimated median time for worsening-free survival, defined as no evidence of progression including pathological stage T2 disease or greater, or the use of cystectomy, systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy, was 111.5 months in the no maintenance and not estimable in the maintenance arm (log rank p = 0.04). Overall 5-year survival was 78% in the no maintenance compared to 83% in the maintenance arm. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard induction therapy maintenance BCG immunotherapy was beneficial in patients with carcinoma in situ and select patients with Ta, T1 bladder cancer. Median recurrence-free survival time was twice as long in the 3-week maintenance arm compared to the no maintenance arm, and patients had significantly longer worsening-free survival.

Does prolonged combined androgen blockade have survival benefits over short-term combined androgen blockade therapy?

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether less than 120 days of an antiandrogen plus a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist resulted in a different survival outcome than 120 days or more of combined treatment in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer. METHODS: Survival data were available from a previously published controlled trial that had evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of two antiandrogens, bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with a monthly depot preparation of leuprolide or goserelin, in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer. Cox's proportional hazards regression model assessed the relative effects of the length of combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy on survival. This analysis was repeated in the subset of patients who lived at least 2 years beyond the date of randomization. Data were obtained at a median follow-up of 160 weeks. RESULTS: A survival benefit was demonstrated for patients receiving prolonged CAB therapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.275 (95% confidence interval 0.213 to 0.355, P = 0.0001) in favor of patients who received 120 days or more of CAB therapy (median survival 1035 days versus 302 days for less than 120 days of therapy). This result was confirmed in the patients who lived at least 2 years, in whom the median survival time was increased by 35%. The hazard ratio for 120 days or more of CAB therapy versus less than 120 days was 0.415 (95% confidence interval 0.246 to 0.702, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present exploratory analysis suggest that prolonged (120 days or more) antiandrogen treatment as part of CAB therapy may result in a better survival outcome.

Which is the optimal antiandrogen for use in combined androgen blockade of advanced prostate cancer? The transition from a first- to second-generation antiandrogen.

Many physicians use combined androgen blockade in the form of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog or bilateral orchiectomy in combination with a non-steroidal antiandrogen to offer patients a potentially more effective treatment than castration alone. Three non-steroidal anti-androgens are available in the US, i.e. flutamide (Eulexin), bicalutamide (Casodex) and nilutamide (Nilandron). Nilutamide offers patients no benefit over flutamide or bicalutamide and has the least favorable safety profile. Because of its short half-life, flutamide must be administered 3 times a day. Furthermore, flutamide therapy is associated with a relatively high incidence of diarrhea, often intolerable for some patients. Bicalutamide is available in a convenient one tablet, once-a-day dosing regimen, is at least as effective as flutamide and is better tolerated in terms of diarrhea. Therefore, bicalutamide would seem to represent an appropriate first choice in patients who are suitable candidates for combined androgen blockade.

Exploratory analysis on the effect of race on clinical outcome in patients with advanced prostate cancer receiving bicalutamide or flutamide, each in combination with LHRH analogues. The Casodex Combination Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Black race has been associated with a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer mortality. This exploratory analysis investigated the effect of race on the clinical outcome of combined androgen blockade (CAB). METHODS: Data for analysis were obtained from a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing CAB in the form of bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily) plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs (LHRHa; goserelin acetate 3.6 mg, or leuprolide acetate 7.5 mg) in 813 patients with stage D(2) prostate cancer (median follow-up, 160 weeks). Patients were analyzed according to race (African American [AA], white, or other). The primary clinical events were disease progression and survival. RESULTS: Four hundred and four patients received bicalutamide/LHRHa and 409 received flutamide/LHRHa. Although treatment with bicalutamide/LHRHa resulted in slightly longer time to progression and survival time in white and AA males than treatment with flutamide/LHRHa, the differences between the treatment groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: No marked effect of race on clinical outcome was observed regardless of antiandrogen, suggesting that similar treatment benefits are to be expected in either race.

Endocrine effects, efficacy and tolerability of a 10.8-mg depot formulation of goserelin acetate administered every 13 weeks to patients with advanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the endocrine effects, efficacy and tolerability of a 10.8-mg depot formulation of Zoladextrade mark (goserelin acetate, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Delaware, USA), a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist analogue, when administration was extended from every 12 weeks to every 13 weeks in patients with advanced prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1995 and May 1996, 59 patients with either locally advanced (T3 or T4) or metastatic prostate cancer were enrolled in an open-label, multicentre trial. Primary efficacy endpoints were testosterone measurements, and assessments of prostate specific antigen (PSA) response, subjective and objective response. Quality of life (QoL) was a secondary efficacy endpoint. RESULTS: Mean testosterone concentrations decreased to < 0.3 microgram/L by week 4 and remained so for the duration of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in mean testosterone levels between weeks 12 and 13, or weeks 25 and 26. Serum testosterone suppression was adequate in all 58 evaluable patients at week 13, and 51 of 52 (98%) patients at week 26. Of the 58 evaluable patients, 52 (90%) had a PSA response. A subjective response was recorded for six of 11 evaluable patients. Of 58 patients evaluable for objective response, 46 (79%) had a partial response, three (5%) had stable disease and nine (16%) had objective progression. Except for a significant (P=0.014) decrease in overall sexual interest, QoL was unchanged during therapy. The most common side-effects, regardless of causality, were hot flushes (67%), pain (31%) and pelvic pain (22%). Mild injection-site complaints occurred with only three of 221 (1.4%) depot injections. CONCLUSIONS: Zoladextrade mark 10.8-mg depot, administered every 13 weeks to patients with advanced prostatic cancer, is well tolerated, provides adequate suppression of serum testosterone and produces PSA, subjective and objective responses.

Comparison of goserelin and leuprolide in combined androgen blockade therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To perform exploratory analyses of data from a controlled trial that assessed the efficacy and tolerability of two antiandrogens, bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with monthly depot preparations of leuprolide or goserelin, in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer. One analysis compared goserelin plus antiandrogen therapy with leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapy; a second analysis compared the four combined androgen blockade (CAB) regimens. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter trial, open-label for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, with a two-by-two factorial design. Eight-hundred thirteen patients were allocated in a ratio of 2:1 to goserelin therapy (3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide therapy (7.5 mg every 28 days) and 1:1 to bicalutamide therapy (50 mg once a day) or flutamide therapy (250 mg three times a day). The end points of time to progression and survival were assessed with a median of 160 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: The percentages of progression events (70.9% versus 73.3%) and deaths (54.3% versus 56.8%) were similar for goserelin plus antiandrogen and leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapies. The hazard ratios for goserelin plus antiandrogen therapy to leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapy were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 1.18; P = 0.92) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.11; P = 0.34) for time to progression and survival, respectively. Goserelin plus antiandrogen and leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapies were generally well tolerated, and the side effects associated with depot administration occurred with a low frequency in the two groups. There were no significant differences among the goserelin plus bicalutamide, goserelin plus flutamide, or leuprolide plus bicalutamide therapy groups, but leuprolide plus flutamide therapy had a significantly poorer outcome than the other three therapies. The side-effect profiles for the four CAB groups were generally similar; diarrhea was more common among patients treated with flutamide and hematuria was more common among patients treated with bicalutamide. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results of these exploratory analyses should be interpreted with caution, they indicate that goserelin plus antiandrogen and leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapies are similarly well tolerated and have equivalent time to progression and survival, and that leuprolide plus flutamide therapy appears to be the least effective of the four CAB regimens.

Oral bropirimine immunotherapy of bladder carcinoma in situ after prior intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin.

OBJECTIVES: Bropirimine is an oral immunomodulator that has demonstrated anticancer activity in transitional cell carcinoma in situ (CIS) in both the bladder and upper urinary tract. Activity also has been documented in patients after prior therapy with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). To more accurately estimate bropirimine's efficacy in BCG-resistant bladder CIS, a Phase II trial was performed. A separate analysis was performed in additional patients intolerant of BCG toxicity. METHODS: Patients received bropirimine 3.0 g/day by mouth for 3 consecutive days, weekly, for up to 1 year. Bladder biopsies and cytologic examination were performed quarterly. Complete response (CR) required negative biopsy and cytology results. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 86 patients entered were not evaluable. CR was seen in 21 (32%; 95th percentile confidence interval [CI], 21% to 44%) of 65 evaluable patients, including 14 (30%, CI 17% to 43%) of 47 BCG-resistant, and 7 (39%, CI 16% to 61%) of 18 BCG-intolerant patients. Overall, by intent-to-treat analysis, CR was thus seen in 21 (24%) of 86 subjects. Most BCG-resistant patients were failures to BCG without relapse, and had received 12 to 36 (median 12) BCG treatments; intolerant patients had received 4 to 11 treatments (median 6). Response duration ranged from 65 to 810 days, with median not yet reached (but greater than 12 months). Thirteen (15%) of 86 stopped bropirimine due to toxicity. Progression to invasive or metastatic disease during or immediately after therapy was documented in only 4 patients (6%), all nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Bropirimine may be an alternative to cystectomy for some patients with bladder CIS who have failed or have not tolerated BCG. Further evaluation to improve responses and durability is warranted.

Clinical benefits of bicalutamide compared with flutamide in combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma: final report of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. Casodex Combination Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy), multicenter study with a two-by-two factorial design. Eight hundred thirteen patients were allocated 1:1 to bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) and flutamide (250 mg three times daily) and 2:1 to goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) and leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days). RESULTS: The median times to progression and death were 97 and 180 weeks for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group compared with 77 and 148 weeks for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio for time to progression for bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.10, P = 0.41) and that for survival time was 0.87 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.05, P = 0.15). The therapies were generally well tolerated. The most common adverse event in the two groups was hot flashes. The incidence of hematuria was significantly higher for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group than for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group (12% versus 6%, P = 0.007), but no patient withdrew from therapy because of hematuria. There was a significantly (26% versus 12%, P < 0.001) higher incidence of diarrhea and more withdrawals for diarrhea (25 patients versus 2) for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group relative to the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group. CONCLUSIONS: With a median follow-up time of 160 weeks, the combination of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A was well tolerated and had equivalent time to progression and survival compared with flutamide plus LHRH-A. Treatment with bicalutamide plus LHRH-A resulted in longer median survival than treatment with flutamide plus LHRH-A.

Improved detection of recurrent bladder cancer using the Bard BTA stat Test.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the BTA stat Test in the detection of recurrent bladder cancer. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were determined using frozen voided urine samples from patients with recurrent bladder cancer, volunteers, patients with nonurologic conditions, and patients with a history of bladder cancer but free of disease. Results of cytology and the original BTA Test were compared with the sensitivity of the BTA stat Test in a large subgroup of the patients with cancer. RESULTS: The BTA stat Test detected 147 (67%) of 220 recurrent cancers. For those urine samples with previous cytologic and BTA Test results available, cytology had a sensitivity of 23%, the BTA Test 44%, and the BTA stat Test 58% for detection of recurrent cancer (P < 0.001, stat versus cytology). The specificity of the BTA stat Test was 72% for benign genitourinary disease and 95% in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The BTA stat Test has high sensitivity and is significantly superior to voided urine cytologic analysis in the detection of recurrent bladder cancer.

Organization and expression of human telomere repeat binding factor genes.

The ends of mammalian chromosomes terminate in structures called telomeres. Recently a human telomere repeat binding factor (TRF1) that binds the vertebrate TTAGGG telomeric repeat in situ was isolated by Chong et al. (1). TRF1 regulates telomere length (2), which is often altered in cancer cells. To understand their genetic organization, TRF1 genes were localized to human chromosomes 13cen, 21cen, and Xq13 by analysis of human monochromosomal hybrids, and by fluorescent in situ hybridization. We also confirmed the recent localization of a human TRF1 gene to chromosome 8, and provide evidence that this locus is alternatively spliced. In contrast to the TRF1 genes on chromosomes 8 and X, the chromosomes 13 and 21 TRF1 genes contained a 60 bp deletion in the coding region. The results suggest that two distinct forms of TRF1 are expressed and that the TRF1 gene family includes at least three pseudogenes whose dispersal in the human genome may have occurred via cDNA intermediates.

The significance of central pathology review in clinical studies of transitional cell carcinoma in situ.

PURPOSE: The causes of interobserver variation in the pathological diagnosis of urothelial neoplasia were studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A central review was performed on pathological specimens in a multi-institutional clinical study of patients with in situ transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. RESULTS: A significant discrepancy in pathological diagnosis was noted between the original report and the central review in 60 of 159 biopsies (38%) and in 73 of 217 cytology specimens (34%). Biopsy discrepancies were almost equally divided between upgrades and downgrades, whereas 89% of cytology discrepancies involved an upgrade in diagnosis by the central reviewer. The most significant factor causing variability in biopsy diagnoses was the multiplicity of classifications used by the originating pathologists. Other factors included fixation and biopsy artifacts. Cell degeneration secondary to treatment was the most important factor resulting in cytology under grading. At originating institutions the correlation of diagnoses between concurrent biopsy and cytology specimens was poor. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a well accepted standard for the histopathological diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma in situ poses a major problem for multi-institutional studies of this disease. Organizers must include a histopathological standard in the study plan and publicize it to all participants, particularly pathologists. Central review of pathological specimens is essential to maintain data integrity.

The use of the BTA Test in the detection of persistent or recurrent transitional-cell cancer of the bladder.

The BTA Test1 is an adjunctive test for the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer. For estimation of its potential in the management of patients with transitional-cell cancer (TCC) a review of published results was undertaken. Three prospective studies were analyzed, in which a total of 699 patients with a history of TCC were enrolled. The BTA Test was performed on voided urine and compared with either voided-urine or bladder-wash cytologic analysis in a blinded fashion. In all three studies the sensitivity of the BTA Test was more than double that of cytology, irrespective of whether the cytologic analysis was performed on voided or bladder-wash samples. The third study also included an additional 225 patients undergoing evaluation for hematuria, and TCC was found in 67 cases. The BTA Test detected 70% of these tumors, whereas cytology detected only 25%. The BTA Test is a simple, rapid test that can diagnose a substantial percentage of patients having new or recurrent bladder TCC. Its complete role in the management of such patients remains to be defined.

Oral bropirimine immunotherapy of rodent prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Bropirimine is an oral immunostimulant found to have efficacy in human transitional cell carcinoma in situ following the initial discovery of its antitumor activity against the murine bladder cancer MBT-2. To determine if bropirimine might have activity in prostate cancer, it was tested against two rodent prostate cancer cell lines in vivo. METHODS: Tumors resulted from subcutaneous injection of PAIII and Dunning MAT-LyLu rodent prostate cancer cells. Bropirimine was given at 250 mg/kg orally on different schedules, and tumor volume and survival were recorded. RESULT: In the PAIII model, bropirimine prevented growth when given the day of tumor injection, and 95% of advanced tumors regressed completely when start of therapy was delayed. Bropirimine also caused growth inhibition and prolongation of survival in the MAT-LyLu model. CONCLUSIONS: Bropirimine immunotherapy is very effective in vivo against the PAIII cell line, and it has significant growth inhibition against the Dunning MAT-LyLu cell line.

A review of clinical studies of bropirimine immunotherapy of carcinoma in situ of the bladder and upper urinary tract.

OBJECTIVES: Bropirimine has been shown to have activity against carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder in a previous phase-I trial. A review of three completed clinical trials as well as ongoing studies is presented to provide a current update. METHODS: Details of the initial phase-I trial are reviewed, as are findings of a subsequent phase-II trial in bladder CIS and a multicenter study in upper tract CIS. All have used a dose of 3 g/day for 3 consecutive days each week, repeated weekly for up to 1 year. Cytology must be positive prior to treatment, and both biopsies and cytology must be negative after therapy for the patient to be considered a complete response. RESULTS: In the phase-II trial in bladder CIS, 20 (61%) of 33 patients had a complete response. Responders included patients with prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy, uni- and multifocal CIS, and primary and secondary CIS. Responses were seen in 10 (48%) of 21 evaluable patients with upper tract CIS. Toxicities in both studies were manageable in most patients. Trials underway include bropirimine in BCG-failed CIS, a randomized comparison to BCG in previously untreated patients, and a trial of the two together. CONCLUSION: Bropirimine does have activity against both bladder and upper tract CIS on the dose schedule used to date.

A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Analysis of time to progression. CASODEX Combination Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, multicenter trial, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, compared the antiandrogens bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy (LHRH-A) in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate carcinoma. An analysis of time to progression (median follow-up, 95 weeks) was performed to augment previous analyses of time to treatment failure and time to death. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to double-blind antiandrogen therapy, receiving either bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily), and were assigned 2:1 to LHRH-A with goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days). The primary endpoint of the trial was time to treatment failure, defined as an adverse event leading to withdrawal of randomized therapy, objective progression, death, or withdrawal from study therapy for any reason. Secondary endpoints were time to death, quality of life, and subjective response. The current analysis of time to progression included progression data collected prospectively for 561 patients (69%) and retrospectively for 252 patients (31%). RESULTS: Disease progression occurred for 223 of 404 patients (55%) in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group and for 235 of 409 patients (58%) in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio for time to progression of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to that of flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.9 (two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.08; P = 0.26). The upper one-sided 95% CI was 1.05, which met the definition of equivalence (< 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: At a median follow-up time of 95 weeks, bicalutamide plus LHRH-A and flutamide plus LHRH-A had equivalent time to progression.

Urinary nuclear matrix protein as a marker for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate an immunoassay for urinary nuclear matrix protein, NMP22, as an indicator for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of subjects participated in this trial of NMP22: 1-175 with transitional cell carcinoma, 2-117 with benign urinary tract conditions and 3-375 healthy volunteers. Each subject provided a single (3 voids) urine sample for analysis at the time of study entry. Each sample was assayed for the level of NMP22. RESULTS: In normal healthy volunteers and in subjects with benign conditions median NMP22 levels were 2.9 and 3.3 units per ml., respectively. Median urinary NMP22 levels in patients with transitional cell carcinoma were significantly greater than in comparison subjects. Patients with active transitional cell carcinoma had significantly greater median urinary NMP22 levels than those with no evidence of disease (6.04 versus 4.11 units per ml., p = 0.027, 1-tailed Mann-Whitney U test). We noted no effect of tumor grade, extent of disease or exposure to intravesical therapy on urinary NMP22 levels. CONCLUSIONS: NMP22 is a promising urinary tumor marker for monitoring transitional cell carcinoma. Nuclear matrix proteins are a new class of tumor markers that represent the basis for the development of assays with increased efficacy for the detection and treatment of cancer.