Estimated GFR Accuracy When Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimates Are Discrepant in Older Adults.

Rationale & Objective: Serum creatinine and cystatin C are used to estimate glomerular filtration rate, but creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr), cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcys), and combined creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr-cys) are often divergent, particularly in older adults. We investigated which estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was more accurate and less biased compared with measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Study Design: A diagnostic test study from the Berlin Initiative Study. Setting & Participants: The study population included 657 individuals aged 70 years or older with iohexol plasma clearance (mGFR) and serum creatinine and cystatin C measurements: 567 community-dwelling participants and 90 with a serum creatinine of ≥1.5 mg/dL. Tests Compared: We defined 3 groups on the basis of the difference eGFRcys - eGFRcr: whether < -5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (lower eGFRcys), within 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (reference), or ≥ 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (lower eGFRcr). eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and eGFRcr-cys were compared to mGFR to assess bias and accuracy. Outcome: Median bias (eGFR minus mGFR) with 95% CIs and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within ±30% of mGFR). Results: The mean ± standard deviation age was 78 ± 6 years; the mean eGFRcys, eGFRcr, and eGFRcr-cys were 59 ± 23, 64 ± 20, and 61 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, and the mean mGFR was 56 ± 19 mL/min. Half of the participants were in the lower eGFRcys group (n=337, 51%). Among them, the median bias for eGFRcys was the lowest (median bias, -2.7; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.9) compared with the other eGFR equations. Conversely, in the lower eGFRcr group (n=121, 18%), the median bias for eGFRcr was the lowest compared with those for eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys (2.9; [95% CI, 0.9-4.8] vs 13.8 [95% CI, 11.4-15.6] and 9.5 [95% CI, 7.7-11.0], respectively). Accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within ±30% of mGFR) was 93% for eGFRcr in the lower eGFRcr group and 92% for eGFRcys and 94% for eGFRcr-cys in the lower eGFRcys group. Limitations: Untested generalizability in younger populations. Conclusions: Among older adults, the lower eGFR between eGFRcys and eGFRcr was a more accurate and less biased estimate of mGFR when comparing the groups.

Workplace Mental Health: Application of a Population Health Approach of Proactive Screening to Identify Risk and Engage in Care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a proactive, voluntary screening program designed to identify employees with emerging mental health risk and engage them in care. METHODS: Risk was proactively identified through online screening of 344 participants. At-risk participants were offered a mental health care concierge to provide support, develop a care plan, and connect to care. RESULTS: Risk for common mental health conditions was identified in 244 (71%) participants, of whom 66 (27%) connected with a care concierge. Compared with participants who did not connect to a care concierge, those who did were more likely to report a financial crisis (68.2% vs 50.8%) and less likely to report verbal abuse (9.1% vs 19.6%) and difficulty meeting daily needs (12.1% vs 25.1%). CONCLUSION: Implementation of this screening program identified employees at risk for mental health conditions and facilitated connection to care.

Impact of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program on Risk Factors for Chronic Disease in a Workforce Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of a digital Diabetes Prevention Program (dDPP) on chronic disease risk factors in a workplace population. METHODS: dDPP participants were employees and spouses with BMI ≥ 24 kg/m and prediabetes or diabetes (n = 84). Annual change in risk factors before and after dDPP were assessed in the dDPP group and in a retrospectively identified matched control group drawn from those who participated in a dDPP after the conclusion of this study (n = 252). RESULTS: In the dDPP group, body weight, BMI, fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol decreased in the post-dDPP period compared with the pre-dDPP period (P < 0.05). In the control group, no difference between the annual change before and after dDPP was observed (P > 0.37). CONCLUSION: The dDPP was effective in reducing risk factors for chronic disease in a workplace setting.