Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 820: 152892, 2022 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35051468

RESUMO

Oil and gas extraction activities occur across the globe, yet species-specific toxicological information on the biological and ecological impacts of exposure to petrochemicals is lacking for the vast majority of marine species. To help prioritize species for recovery, mitigation, and conservation in light of significant toxicological data gaps, a trait-based petrochemical vulnerability index was developed and applied to the more than 1700 marine fishes present across the entire Gulf of Mexico, including all known bony fishes, sharks, rays and chimaeras. Using life history and other traits related to likelihood of exposure, physiological sensitivity to exposure, and population resiliency, final calculated petrochemical vulnerability scores can be used to provide information on the relative sensitivity, or resilience, of marine fish populations across the Gulf of Mexico to oil and gas activities. Based on current knowledge of traits, marine fishes with the highest vulnerability scores primarily occur in areas of high petrochemical activity, are found at or near the surface, and have low reproductive turnover rates and/or highly specialized diet and habitat requirements. Relative population vulnerability scores for marine fishes can be improved with additional toxicokinetic studies, including those that account for the synergistic or additive effect of multiple stressors, as well as increased research on ecological and life history traits, especially for deep living species.


Assuntos
Ecossistema , Peixes , Poluição por Petróleo , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Animais , Peixes/fisiologia , Golfo do México , México , Indústria de Petróleo e Gás , Reprodução , Especificidade da Espécie
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25343615

RESUMO

Aflatoxin M1 contamination in dairy products is a risk when feedstuff contaminated with aflatoxin B1 produced by moulds is consumed by milk-producing animals. Milk can be screened for aflatoxin M1 at the European Union maximum limit of 50 ng l⁻¹ by a lateral flow test, the MRLAFMQ (Aflatoxin M1) Test. The method takes 15 min with no milk dilution or a sample preparation step. The lateral flow assay was validated at the Technology and Food Science Unit of the Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO-T&V) according to European Union guidelines using fortified raw milk samples. A detection capability of 50 ng l⁻¹ was demonstrated with a false negative rate lower than 2% at 50 ng l⁻¹ and a false positive rate of less than 0.3%. Quantitative readings had a mean bias of +2 to 6 ng l⁻¹ at 50 ng l⁻¹ with a standard deviation of 5-8 ng l⁻¹. Based on the validation results, the test could be considered appropriate for milk screening prior to milk unload at dairies.


Assuntos
Aflatoxina M1/análise , Carcinógenos Ambientais/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos , Manipulação de Alimentos , Inspeção de Alimentos/métodos , Leite/química , Animais , Bélgica , Cromatografia de Afinidade , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , União Europeia , Guias como Assunto , Limite de Detecção , Leite/normas , Pasteurização , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Espectrometria de Fluorescência
3.
J AOAC Int ; 94(1): 348-57, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21391513

RESUMO

The Charm 3 SL3 beta-Lactam Test is a 3 min receptor-based lateral-flow Rapid One-Step Assay (ROSA) that detects the six beta-lactam drugs of concern approved for dairy cattle in the United States. The method is a biochemical formulation change of the SL3 beta-Lactam Test evaluated and approved in 2007. The Charm 3 SL3 was evaluated under the AOAC Research Institute Performance Tested Method (PTM) program following the protocol of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine. The method was approved as PTM 071002 on May 8, 2009. The following drugs were detected in three combined lots: penicillin G at 3.8 ppb, ampicillin at 8.0 ppb, amoxicillin at 8.4 ppb, cephapirin at 20.0 ppb, ceftiofur (total metabolites) at 79 ppb, and cloxacillin at 8.6 ppb > or = 90% of the time with 95% confidence. These detection levels are lower than, but within 75% of, the U.S. Safe Level/Tolerances. Lot-to-lot repeatability was typically within 20% of these determined levels. The test kit was found to be suitable for testing thawed frozen samples. It was also found to respond with equal or better sensitivity to samples that contained incurred analytes, i.e., both the microbiologically active parent drug and its active metabolites. There were no interferences from somatic cells at 1.1 million/mL, bacterial cells at 300 000 CFU/mL, or 32 other non-beta-lactam drugs at 100 ppb. Ruggedness experiments indicated that the test procedure is robust. These results meet the fit-for-purpose approval criteria for inclusion in the National Conference for Interstate Milk Shipments milk testing program.


Assuntos
Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Leite/química , beta-Lactamas/análise , Animais , Antibacterianos/análise , Bovinos , Análise de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Análise de Alimentos/normas , Controle de Qualidade , Estados Unidos
4.
J AOAC Int ; 89(5): 1327-34, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17042183

RESUMO

An interlaboratory study of 21 public health, state agriculture, and industry laboratories in the United States tested raw commingled bovine milk containing aflatoxin M1 using the Charm Rapid One Step Assay (ROSA) Safe Level Aflatoxin M1 Quantitative lateral flow method. Blind coded sample pairs were fortified with 0, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, and 550 parts per trillion (ppt) aflatoxin M1. A ROSA reader quantitatively interpreted test strips with ppt readings. Readings < or = 400 ppt were interpreted as negative, and readings >400 ppt were interpreted as positive. Initial positive samples were subsequently assayed 2 additional times. If both retest results were >400 ppt, the sample was called positive/ actionable relative to U.S. and Codex levels, 500 ppt. The concentration of 400 ppt was chosen for the positive/negative interpretation to provide 90% sensitivity with 95% confidence at the 500 ppt legislative level. The combined false negative rate was <5% (4 of 83) for samples at 500 and 550 ppt. The false violatives at 0, 300, 350, 400, and 450 ppt (n = 42 at each level) were 0, 0, 21, 14, and 93%, respectively. The 90% positive concentration with 95% confidence was 503 ppt by probit analysis. The average intralaboratory repeatability was 11% and average interlaboratory reproducibility was 13% for the fortified sample pairs. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of the study samples by 5 laboratories showed 38% false negatives with the 500 and 550 ppt samples, and a 0% false-violative rate with samples less than the 500 ppt action level.


Assuntos
Aflatoxina M1/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Imunoensaio/métodos , Leite/química , Animais , Bovinos , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Reações Falso-Positivas , Coloide de Ouro , Imunoensaio/estatística & dados numéricos , Laboratórios , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...