Clinical, radiological, and molecular diagnosis of congenital pituitary diseases causing short stature.

Short stature in children can be caused by congenital pituitary disorders involving at least one form of growth hormone deficiency. Clinical and radiological evaluations of the index case and family history assessments are essential to guide genetic diagnostic testing and interpret results. The first-line approach is panel testing of genes involved in pituitary development with variants known to be pathogenic in this context. It identifies a genetic cause in less than 10% of cases, however. Whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing techniques may provide original information but also raise new questions regarding the pathophysiological role of identified variants. These new tools can make genetic counselling more complex. The role of clinicians in these interpretations is therefore important. © 2022 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Cancerous leptomeningitis and familial congenital hypopituitarism.

People are at higher risk of cancer as they get older or have a strong family history of cancer. The potential influence of environmental and behavioral factors remains poorly understood. Earlier population and case control studies reported that upper quartile of circulating IGF-I is associated with a higher risk of developing cancer suggesting possible involvement of the growth hormone (GH)/IGF system in initiation or progression of cancer. Since GH therapy increases IGF-1 levels, there have been concerns that GH therapy in hypopituitarism might increase the risk of cancer. We report a 42-year-old female patient who presented with subacute onset of symptoms of meningitis and with the absence of fever which resulted in death 70 days after the onset of symptoms. The patient together with her younger brother was diagnosed at the age of 5 years with familial congenital hypopituitarism, due to homozygous mutation c.150delA in PROP1 gene. Due to evolving hypopituitarism, she was replaced with thyroxine (from age 5), hydrocortisone (from age 13), GH (from age 13 until 17), and sex steroids in adolescence and adulthood. Her consanguineous family has a prominent history of malignant diseases. Six close relatives had malignant disease including her late maternal aunt with breast cancer. BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutational analysis in the patient's mother was negative. Histology after autopsy disclosed advanced ovarian cancer with multiple metastases to the brain, leptomeninges, lungs, heart, and adrenals. Low circulating IGF-1 did not seem to protect this patient from cancer initiation and progression in the context of strong family history of malignancies.

GPR101 Mutations are not a Frequent Cause of Congenital Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency.

Patients with Xq26.3 microduplication present with X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG) syndrome, an early-childhood form of gigantism due to marked growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion from mixed GH-PRL adenomas and hyperplasia. The microduplication includes GPR101, which is upregulated in patients' tumor tissue. The GPR101 gene codes for an orphan G protein coupled receptor that is normally highly expressed in the hypothalamus. Our aim was to determine whether GPR101 loss of function mutations or deletions could be involved in patients with congenital isolated GH deficiency (GHD). Taking advantage of the cohort of patients from the GENHYPOPIT network, we studied 41 patients with unexplained isolated GHD. All patients had Sanger sequencing of the GPR101 gene and array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) to look for deletions. Functional studies (cell culture with GH secretion measurements, cAMP response) were performed. One novel GPR101 variant, c.589 G>T (p.V197L), was seen in the heterozygous state in a patient with isolated GHD. In silico analysis suggested that this variant could be deleterious. Functional studies did not show any significant difference in comparison with wild type for GH secretion and cAMP response. No truncating, frameshift, or small insertion-deletion (indel) GPR101 mutations were seen in the 41 patients. No deletion or other copy number variation at chromosome Xq26.3 was found on aCGH. We found a novel GPR101 variant of unknown significance, in a patient with isolated GH deficiency. Our study did not identify GPR101 abnormalities as a frequent cause of GH deficiency.

Combined pituitary hormone deficiency: current and future status.

Over the last two decades, the understanding of the mechanisms involved in pituitary ontogenesis has largely increased. Since the first description of POU1F1 human mutations responsible for a well-defined phenotype without extra-pituitary malformation, several other genetic defects of transcription factors have been reported with variable degrees of phenotype-genotype correlations. However, to date, despite the identification of an increased number of genetic causes of isolated or multiple pituitary deficiencies, the etiology of most (80-90 %) congenital cases of hypopituitarism remains unsolved. Identifying new etiologies is of importance as a post-natal diagnosis to better diagnose and treat the patients (delayed pituitary deficiencies, differential diagnosis of a pituitary mass on MRI, etc.), and as a prenatal diagnosis to decrease the risk of early death (undiagnosed corticotroph deficiency for instance). The aim of this review is to summarize the main etiologies and phenotypes of combined pituitary hormone deficiencies, associated or not with extra-pituitary anomalies, and to suggest how the identification of such etiologies could be improved in the near future.

Phenotypic homogeneity and genotypic variability in a large series of congenital isolated ACTH-deficiency patients with TPIT gene mutations.

CONTEXT: Congenital isolated ACTH deficiency (IAD) is a rare disease characterized by low plasma ACTH and cortisol levels and preservation of all other pituitary hormones. This condition was poorly defined before we identified TPIT, a T-box transcription factor with a specific role in differentiation of the corticotroph lineage in mice and humans, as its principal molecular cause. OBJECTIVE: We have enlarged our series of IAD patients to better characterize the phenotype and the genotype of this rare disease. DESIGN: Each exon of the TPIT gene was amplified and sequenced in IAD patients without any identified cause. A functional analysis of each new TPIT mutation was performed. RESULTS: We described the largest series of 91 IAD patients and identified three distinct groups: neonatal onset complete or partial IAD or late onset IAD. We did not identify any TPIT mutation in patients with partial or late-onset IAD. However, we found a TPIT mutation in 65% of patients with neonatal-onset complete IAD. These patients are homozygous or compound heterozygous for TPIT mutations, and their parents are healthy heterozygous carriers. We identified nine new mutations: four missense, one one-nucleotide deletion, three splice-site mutations, and one large deletion. TPIT mutations lead to loss of function by different mechanisms, such as non-sense-mediated mRNA decay, abnormal mRNA splicing, loss of TPIT DNA binding or protein-protein interaction defects. CONCLUSION: TPIT mutations are responsible for two thirds of neonatal-onset complete IAD but can not be detected in partial or late-onset IAD.

[Genetic aspects of growth hormone deficiency]. / Quelles causes génétiques rechercher en présence d'un déficit en hormone de croissance ?

Congenital growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a rare cause of growth delay. It should be suspected when other causes of hypopituitarism (sellar tumor, postsurgical or radioinduced hypopituitarism, etc.) have been ruled out. GHD can be isolated (IGHD) or associated with at least one other pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) including thyrotroph, lactotroph, corticotroph, or gonadotroph deficiencies. CPHD is caused by mutations of genes coding for pituitary transcription factors involved in pituitary ontogenesis or in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Clinical presentation varies, depending on the type and severity of GHD, the age at diagnosis, the association with other pituitary hormone deficiencies, or extrapituitary malformations. Clinical, biological, and radiological work-up is very important to determine for which transcription factor the patient should be screened. There is a wide variety of phenotypes depending on the transcription factor involved: PROP1 (somatolactotroph, thyrotroph, gonadotroph, and sometimes corticotroph deficiencies ; pituitary hyper- or hypoplasia), POU1F1 (somatolactotroph and thyrotroph deficiencies, pituitary hypoplasia), HESX1 (variable pituitary deficiencies, septo-optic dysplasia), and less frequently LHX3 (somatolactotroph, thyrotroph, and gonadotroph deficiencies, deafness, and limited head and neck rotation), LHX4 (variable pituitary deficiencies, ectopic neurohypophysis, cerebral abnormalities), and OTX2 (variable pituitary deficiencies, ectopic neurohypophysis, ocular abnormalities). Mutations of PROP1 remain the first identified cause of CPHD, and as a consequence the first to be sought. POU1F1 mutations should be looked for in the postpubertal population presenting with GH/TSH deficiencies and no extrapituitary malformations. Once genetic diagnosis has been concluded, a strict follow-up is necessary because patients can develop new deficiencies (for example, late-onset corticotroph deficiency in patients with PROP1 mutations). Identification of gene defects allows early treatment of pituitary deficiency and prevention of their potentially lethal consequences. If untreated, the main symptoms include short stature, cognitive alterations, or delayed puberty. An appropriate replacement of hormone deficiencies is therefore required. Depending on the type of transmission (recessive transmission for PROP1 and LHX3, dominant for LHX4, autosomal dominant or recessive for POU1F1 and HESX1), genetic counseling might be proposed. Genotyping appears highly beneficial at an individual and familial level.

Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome in 83 patients: novel HESX1 mutation and severe hormonal prognosis in malformative forms.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) is a particular entity in the population of patients with hypopituitarism. Only rare cases have a known genetic cause. OBJECTIVES: i) To compare subgroups with or without extra-pituitary malformations (EPM) in a cohort of PSIS patients to identify predictive factors of evolution, ii) to determine the incidence of mutations of the known pituitary transcription factor genes in PSIS. Study design We analyzed features of 83 PSIS patients from 80 pedigrees and screened HESX1, LHX4, OTX2, and SOX3 genes. RESULTS: PSIS had a male predominance and was rarely familial (5%). Pituitary hypoplasia was observed only in the group with EPM. Multiple hormone deficits were observed significantly more often with versus without EPM (87.5 vs 69.5% respectively). Posterior pituitary location along the stalk was a significant protective factor regarding severity of hormonal phenotype. A novel HESX1 causative mutation was found in a consanguineous family, and two LHX4 mutations were present in familial PSIS. CONCLUSION: PSIS patients with EPM had a more severe hormonal disorder and pituitary imaging status, suggesting an antenatal origin. HESX1 or LHX4 mutations accounted for <5% of cases and were found in consanguineous or familial cases.

Lanreotide for the treatment of acromegaly.

Lanreotide is an eight-amino acid peptide, which is an analog of the native somatostatin peptide, physiological inhibitor of growth hormone (GH). The drug shows high binding affinity for somatostatin receptors, SSTR2 and SSTR5, which is the primary mechanism considered to be responsible for decreasing GH secretion and GH cell proliferation in acromegaly. Two different formulations of lanreotide are currently available: lanreotide slow release, which requires intramuscular injection every 7-14 days, and lanreotide autogel, which requires deep subcutaneous injection every 4-8 weeks. Several studies have been published to date on the use of lanreotide in acromegaly. Antisecretory efficacy has been reported in 35%-70% of cases; this huge variability is probably explained by different indications (eg, primary or adjunctive postsurgical treatment), or the fact that some studies were based on patients known to be responders to somatostatin analogs. As a primary treatment, antisecretory efficacy was very similar, confirming the possibility of lanreotide as an option in cases of unsuccessful surgery, contraindication, or surgery refusal. Lanreotide also has antitumoral effects as it induces a decrease in tumor volume of [Symbol: see text]25% in 30%-70% of patients. This could be beneficial before transsphenoidal surgery, as a pretreatment, to decrease tumor volume and ease surgery; however, to date, advantages in terms of final remission or uncured status remain a matter of debate. Side effects are rare; the most frequent being gastrointestinal discomfort and increased risk of gallstone formation, and glucose metabolism modifications. Comparison with the other somatostatin analog, octreotide, tends to show identical levels of efficacy between both drugs. Lanreotide thus seems to be an effective treatment in acromegaly. To date, however, lanreotide is still considered as only suspending GH secretion, thus requiring prolonged and costly treatment.

A novel dysfunctional LHX4 mutation with high phenotypical variability in patients with hypopituitarism.

CONTEXT: LHX4 is a LIM homeodomain transcription factor involved in pituitary ontogenesis. Only a few heterozygous LHX4 mutations have been reported to be responsible for congenital pituitary hormone deficiency. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 136 patients with congenital hypopituitarism associated with malformations of brain structures, pituitary stalk, or posterior pituitary gland was screened for LHX4 mutations. RESULTS: Three novel allelic variants that cause predicted changes in the protein sequence of LHX4 (2.3%) were found (p.Thr99fs, p.Thr90Met, and p.Gly370Ser). On the basis of functional studies, p.Thr99fs mutation was responsible for the patients' phenotype, whereas p.Thr90Met and p.Gly370Ser were likely polymorphisms. Patients bearing the heterozygous p.Thr99fs mutation had variable phenotypes: two brothers presented somato-lactotroph and thyrotroph deficiencies, with pituitary hypoplasia and poorly developed sella turcica; the youngest brother (propositus) also had corpus callosum hypoplasia and ectopic neurohypophysis; their father only had somatotroph deficiency and delayed puberty with pituitary hyperplasia. Functional studies showed that the mutation induced a complete loss of transcriptional activity on POU1F1 promoter and a lack of DNA binding. Cotransfection of p.Thr99fs mutant and wild-type LHX4 failed to evidence any dominant negative effect, suggesting a mechanism of haploinsufficiency. We also identified prolactin and GH promoters as potential target genes of LHX4 and found that the p.Thr99fs mutant was also unable to transactivate these promoters. CONCLUSIONS: The present report describes three new exonic LHX4 allelic variants with at least one being responsible for congenital hypopituitarism. It also extends the phenotypical heterogeneity associated with LHX4 mutations, which includes variable anterior pituitary hormone deficits, as well as pituitary and extrapituitary abnormalities.

Relevance of coexpression of somatostatin and dopamine D2 receptors in pituitary adenomas.

Dopamine and somatostatin are both involved in the negative control of normal pituitary cells. Dopamine subtype 2 receptor (D2DR) and somatostatin receptor (sst) agonists, mainly directed to sst2, are used in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. Nevertheless, a majority of corticotroph and gonadotroph adenomas and a third of somatotroph adenomas are still not sufficiently controlled by these treatments. D2DR and sst1, 2, 3 and 5 are present in most pituitary adenomas. These receptors may interact by heterodimerization as shown for sst1-sst5, sst5-D2DR, sst2-sst3 and sst2-D2DR suggesting possible additive effects. D2DR and sst2 agonist cotreatment showed limited additivity on GH secretion in acromegaly. Moreover, new chimeric compounds with sst2, D2DR and sst5 affinity have shown an increased control of secretion and/or proliferation of different types of pituitary adenomas in cell culture. Together with the multi-sst ligand drugs recently developed, these dopamine-somatostatin ligands represent a new opportunity in the combinatory treatment of pituitary adenomas.

[Clinical and genetic aspects of combined pituitary hormone deficiencies]. / Déficit hypophysaire combiné multiple : aspects cliniques et génétiques.

DEFINITION: Congenital hypopituitarism is characterized by multiple pituitary hormone deficiency, including somatotroph, thyrotroph, lactotroph, corticotroph or gonadotroph deficiencies, due to mutations of pituitary transcription factors involved in pituitary ontogenesis. INCIDENCE: Congenital hypopituitarism is rare compared with the high incidence of hypopituitarism induced by pituitary adenomas, transsphenoidal surgery or radiotherapy. The incidence of congenital hypopituitarism is estimated to be between 1:3000 and 1:4000 births. CLINICAL SIGNS: Clinical presentation is variable, depending on the type and severity of deficiencies and on the age at diagnosis. If untreated, main symptoms include short stature, cognitive alterations or delayed puberty. DIAGNOSIS: A diagnosis of combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) must be suspected when evident causes of hypopituitarism (sellar tumor, postsurgical or radioinduced hypopituitarism...) have been ruled out. Clinical, biological and radiological work-up is very important to better determine which transcription factor should be screened. Confirmation is provided by direct sequencing of the transcription factor genes. AETIOLOGY: Congenital hypopituitarism is due to mutations of several genes encoding pituitary transcription factors. Phenotype varies with the factor involved: PROP1 (somatolactotroph, thyrotroph, gonadotroph and sometimes corticotroph deficiencies; pituitary hyper and hypoplasia), POU1F1 (somatolactotroph and thyrotroph deficiencies, pituitary hypoplasia), HESX1 (variable pituitary deficiencies, septo-optic dysplasia), and less frequently LHX3 (somatolactotroph, thyrotroph and gonadotroph deficiencies, limited head and neck rotation) and LHX4 (variable pituitary deficiencies, ectopic neurohypophysis, cerebral abnormalities). MANAGEMENT: An appropriate replacement of hormone deficiencies is required. Strict follow-up is necessary because patients develop new deficiencies (for example late onset corticotroph deficiency in patients with PROP1 mutations). GENETIC COUNSELLING: Type of transmission varies with the factor and the mutation involved (recessive transmission for PROP1 and LHX3, dominant for LHX4, autosomal or recessive for POU1F1 and HESX1). PROGNOSIS: It is equivalent to patients without pituitary deficiencies if treatment is started immediately when diagnosis is confirmed, and if a specialized follow-up is performed.

New SRIF analogs in the control of human pituitary adenomas: perspectives.

SRIF receptor (sst) subtypes expressed on the different neuroendocrine tumors are the basis for treatment of such tumors with SRIF analogues. Although the drugs of reference, octreotide and lanreotide, are widely used in the treatment of acromegaly, their long-term administration allows an effective control of both GH hypersecretion and IGF-I levels in about 60% of the patients. This variable sensitivity is related to a significant loss of the sst subtype 2 (sst2) in the octreotide partial responder acromegalic patients. Such a decrease is rescued, in these tumors, by an overexpression of the sst5. Further, all GH-secreting adenomas coexpress the D2 dopamine receptor, which also mediates the inhibitory effect of dopamine agonists on GH secretion in acromegalic tumors. Such specific profiles of receptor expression in this class of neuroendocrine tumors led to the development of new ligand molecules directed towards sst2 + sst5 receptors, sst1 + sst2 + sst3 + sst5 receptors, or sst2 + dopamine D2 receptors. These bi- or multivalents ligands proved, in cell culture studies, more effective than their single components for inhibiting GH and PRL secretion. This review covers the data recently issued using such hybrid or chimeric compounds. The mechanism(s) by which such ligands may act are yet unknown. One possible explanation of their increased potency could be through their ability to induce oligodimerization of the receptors at the cell membrane level, and modify, in a ligands-specific manner, the subsequent trafficking and recycling of the receptors. New details from the literature are reviewed, supporting the importance of such ligands into the agonist-dependant control of G-protein-coupled receptors oligomerization.

Efficacy of chimeric molecules directed towards multiple somatostatin and dopamine receptors on inhibition of GH and prolactin secretion from GH-secreting pituitary adenomas classified as partially responsive to somatostatin analog therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the potency of a somatostatin receptor (sstr)2-sstr5 analog, BIM-23244, of an sstr2-dopamine D2 receptor (sstr2-DAD2) molecule, BIM-23A387 and of new somatostatin-dopamine chimeric molecules with differing, enhanced affinities for sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2, BIM-23A758, BIM-23A760 and BIM-23A761, to suppress GH and prolactin (PRL) from 18 human GH adenomas that are partially responsive to octreotide or lanreotide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2 mRNA levels were determined by RT-PCR. The effect of drugs was tested in cell cultures at various concentrations. RESULTS: In all tumors, the sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2 mRNA levels were coexpressed (mean levels+/-s.e.m. 0.4+/-0.1, 5.3+/-1.9 and 2.0+/-0.4 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase). In 13 tumors, the maximal suppression of GH secretion produced by BIM-23A387 (30+/-3%) and BIM-23244 (28+/-3%) was greater than that produced by octreotide (23+/-3%). In six out of 13 tumors, BIM-23A758, BIM-23A760 and BIM- 23A761 produced greater maximal suppression of GH secretion than octreotide (33+/-5, 38+/-2 and 41+/-2 vs 24+/-2%). Their EC(50) values were 10, 2 and 4 pmol/l. BIM-23A761 was more effective than BIM-23A387 in GH suppression (41+/-2 vs 32+/-4%). The new chimeric molecules produced maximal PRL suppression greater than octreotide (62+/-8 to 74+/-5 vs 46+/-11%). CONCLUSIONS: Novel dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecules with differing, enhanced activity at sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2, consistently produced significatly greater suppression of GH and PRL than either octreotide or single-receptor-interacting ligands in tumors from patients classified as only partially responsive to octreotide therapy. The higher efficacy of the chimeric compounds was, at least partially, linked to their high affinity for sstr2 (IC50 1-10 pmol/l). The other mechanisms by which such molecules produce an enhanced inhibition of GH remain to be elucidated.

BIM-23A760, a chimeric molecule directed towards somatostatin and dopamine receptors, vs universal somatostatin receptors ligands in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas partial responders to octreotide.

We report the comparative efficacy of a somatostatin receptor 1 and 5 subtypes (SSTR2 and SSTR5), and dopamine D2 (DAD2) compound, BIM-23A760, in suppressing GH secretion, in cell culture from human GH-secreting tumors, from patients partially responsive to long-term treatments with octreotide or lanreotide. In 18 tumors tested, the SSTR2, SSTR5, and DAD2 mRNAs were coexpressed. The SSTR2-selective analog, BIM-23197, the SSTR5-selective analog, BIM-23268, and the dopamine (DA) analog, BIM-53097, produced a mean maximal suppression of GH secretion (24 +/- 3, 20 +/- 3, and 20 +/- 3%, respectively) that was similar to that obtained with octreotide (23 +/- 3%). Nevertheless, based on individual responses, 60% of the tumors were mostly sensitive to the SSTR2 analog while 19 and 21% of the tumors were mainly responsive to the SSTR5 analog and to the DA analog, respectively. Among a series of new chimeric compounds that bind the SSTR2, SSTR5, and DAD2 receptors with variable affinities, BIM-23A760 produced greater maximal suppression of GH secretion than octreotide (38 +/- 2 vs 24 +/- 2%; p<0.03). The EC50 for BIM-23A760 was 2 pmol/l. In the presence of sulpride, the dose response inhibition of GH secretion by the trihybrid molecule, BIM-23A760, was partially reversed. The trihybrid produced also a maximal suppression of PRL greater than octreotide (74 +/- 5 vs 46 +/- 11%). When SSTRs pan inhibitors such as BIM-23A779 (binding affinity for SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR5, respectively: 2.5, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6 nmol/l) or SOM230 were tested for their suppressive effects on GH secretion, they were less potent than the previous dopastatin hybrid molecule. After a brief exposure to a SSTR2-selective analog, BIM-23197, or to a DA analog, BIM-53097, the maximal GH suppression was achieved during 12 h. Under exposure to BIM-23A760, in the same conditions, maximal suppression of GH secretion lasted for 24 h. Such a longer biological effect, yet not explained, probably participates in the higher efficacy of BIM-23A760. The higher efficacy of BIM-23A760 is, at least partially, linked to its high affinity for the SSTR2 receptor subtype (IC50: 3 pmol/l). As compared to the dopastatin compound, the lower efficacy of the universal somatostatin ligands in the inhibition of GH secretion of GH-secreting tumors argues for the use of drugs targeted, according to specific receptors expression and functionality which may vary among the various classes of tumors.

Novel modalities of somatostatin actions.

The first part of this contribution reviews the current knowledge about endocrine and neuromodulatory actions of somatostatin. These biological actions are exerted according to endocrine, paracrine and autocrine modes of action and involve five distinct types of membrane receptors belonging to the 'super-family' of G-protein-coupled receptors. A new concept concerning a juxtacrine mode of action has recently been introduced to refer to the intervention of cytokines and growth factors in direct, cell-to-cell communication. The evidence in favor of juxtacrine actions of somatostatin will be presented in the second part of this review and illustrated by our own results on macrophage-lymphocyte T interactions in the immune system and spermatogonia-Sertoli cell interactions in mammalian testis. Another phenomenon such as ligand-induced somatostatin receptor homo- and hetero-dimerization resulting in 'poly'-receptors (with characteristics different from those of each of the two receptors forming the complex) is also at the origin of a novel mode of somatostatin action. The latter will be illustrated by the data obtained on human pituitary adenomas with somatostatin analogs specific for either 'poly'-receptor or relevant individual receptors. The arguments in favor of the analogous mode of actions among different families of chemical messengers such as peptides, cytokines and growth factors are discussed in the concluding section. The emerging unifying concepts on such functional analogies might provide a useful basis for the development of synthetic analogs not only for bioactive peptides but also for other types of chemical messengers.

Pituitary hormone deficiencies due to transcription factor gene alterations.

Mechanisms that control pituitary development are gradually better understood. They involve molecular signals from surrounding structures and the expression of a cascade of homeodomain transcription factors. Mutations of these transcription factors cause defects of embryologic development of the anterior pituitary responsible for isolated or multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (respectively, IPHD and MPHD) in both rodents and humans. In this review we emphasize the description of human phenotypes associated with genetic alterations found in IPHD (e.g. isolated corticotroph deficiency and Tpit mutations) and MPHD (mutations of POU1F1, PROP1, Hesx1, Lhx3, Lhx4, Ptx2).

[Therapeutic strategies in somatotroph adenomas with extrasellar extension: role of the medical approach, a consensus study of the French Acromegaly Registry]. / Stratégies thérapeutiques dans les adénomes somatotropes avec extension extrasellaire. Place du traitement médical. Etude consensus du Répetoire français de l'Acromégalie.

UNLABELLED: From the first 198 patient files included into the French Acromegaly Registry, we analyzed 68 patients harboring a somatotroph adenoma with extrasellar extension, after exclusion of those treated by stereotactic or conventional radiotherapy. In these patients (including 37 women), aged 21-77 yr. (45.7 +/- 13.3), GH concentrations ranged from 2-260 microg/L (38.6 +/- 44.3), and IGF I from 86-967% of age-matched upper limit of normal (303 +/- 164). Maximal diameter of the adenoma at MRI was 11-36.5 mm (20.4 +/- 6.5), with cavernous sinus involvement in 68% of cases. Three subgroups were defined: 20 patients treated by long-acting somatostatin analogs only (group M), for a mean duration of 3 yr. (extremes 1-7 yr.), 48 patients initially treated by transsphenoidal surgery (group C), of whom 21 were secondarily treated by long-acting somatostatin analogs (group CM) for a mean duration of 1.2 yr. (extremes 0.2-2 yr.). All 3 groups were not statistically different in terms of tumor mass and initial levels of GH and IGF-1. Patients from group M were significantly older than those of the other groups (p<0.05). RESULTS: 46% of patients from group C after surgery vs. 45% of patients from group M had a mean GH below 2.5 microg/L. Biochemical remission (GH<2.5 microg/L and normal IGF1 normal) was obtained in 31% of cases in group C, vs. 25% in group M. In this group, a decrease of the largest tumor diameter was observed in 10 patients (71.5%), ranging from 10-25% in 7 (50%) and exceeded 50% in 3 (21.5%). In group CM, the biochemical remission rate (42%) and final GH or IGF1 values were not significantly different from group M. In conclusion, these data suggest that surgery or long-acting somatostatin analogs have a comparable efficacy in terms of remission rates in somatotroph macroadenomas with extrasellar extensions.

Demonstration of enhanced potency of a chimeric somatostatin-dopamine molecule, BIM-23A387, in suppressing growth hormone and prolactin secretion from human pituitary somatotroph adenoma cells.

In acromegaly, the combination of somatostatin (SS) and dopamine (DA) agonists has been shown to enhance suppression of GH secretion. In the present study, a new chimeric molecule, BIM-23A387, which selectively binds to the SS subtype 2 receptor (sst(2); K(i) = 0.10 nM) and to the DA D2 receptor (D2DR; K(i) = 22.1 nM) was tested in cultures prepared from 11 human GH-secreting tumors for its ability to suppress GH and prolactin (PRL) secretion. The chimeric compound was compared with individual sst(2) and D2DR agonists of comparable activity at the individual receptors. All tumors expressed both sst(2) and D2DR mRNAs (0.8 +/- 0.2 and 4.7 +/- 0.7 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase mRNA, respectively). In cell cultures from seven octreotide-sensitive tumors, the maximal inhibition of GH release induced by the individual sst(2) and D2DR analogs and by BIM-23A387 was similar. However, the mean EC(50) for GH suppression by BIM-23A387 (0.2 pM) was 50 times lower than that of the individual sst(2) and D2DR analogs, either used individually or combined. Similar data were obtained in four tumors that were only partially responsive to octreotide. The inhibition of GH release by BIM-23A387 was only partially reversed by the D2R2 antagonist, sulpiride, or by the sst(2) antagonist, BIM-23454. Only when both antagonists were combined was the GH suppressive effect of BIM-23A387 totally reversed. Finally, BIM-23A387 produced a mean 73 +/- 6% inhibition of PRL in six mixed GH plus PRL tumors. These data demonstrate an enhanced potency of the chimeric molecule, BIM-23A387, in suppressing GH and PRL secretion from acromegalic tumors, which cannot be explained merely on the basis of binding affinity for SS and/or DA receptors.