Mechanisms of elongation on the ribosome: dynamics of a macromolecular machine.

Protein synthesis in the cell is performed on ribosomes, large ribonucleoprotein particles, which in bacteria consist of three RNA molecules and over 50 proteins. This review summarizes recent progress in understanding the mechanisms of the elongation phase of protein synthesis. Results from rapid kinetic analysis of elongation reactions are discussed in the light of recent structural data.

[Mechanism of tRNA translocation on the ribosome]. / Mekhanizm translokatsii tRNK na ribosome.

During the translocation step of the elongation cycle of peptide synthesis two tRNAs together with the mRNA move synchronously and rapidly on the ribosome. Translocation is catalyzed by the elongation factor G (EF-G) and requires GTP hydrolysis. The fundamental biochemical features of the process were worked out in the 1970-80s, to a large part by A.S. Spirin and his colleagues. Recent results from pre-steady-state kinetic analysis and cryoelectron microscopy suggest that translocation is a multistep dynamic process that entails large-scale structural rearrangements of both ribosome and EF-G. Kinetic and thermodynamic data, together with the structural information on the conformational changes of the ribosome and of EF-G, provide a detailed mechanistic model of translocation and suggest a mechanism of translocation catalysis by EF-G.

Conformationally restricted elongation factor G retains GTPase activity but is inactive in translocation on the ribosome.

Elongation factor G (EF-G) from Escherichia coli is a large, five-domain GTPase that promotes tRNA translocation on the ribosome. Full activity requires GTP hydrolysis, suggesting that a conformational change of the factor is important for function. To restrict the intramolecular mobility, two cysteine residues were engineered into domains 1 and 5 of EF-G that spontaneously formed a disulfide cross-link. Cross-linked EF-G retained GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas it was inactive in translocation as well as in turnover. Both activities were restored when the cross-link was reversed by reduction. These results strongly argue against a GTPase switch-type model of EF-G function and demonstrate that conformational mobility is an absolute requirement for EF-G function on the ribosome.

GTPases mechanisms and functions of translation factors on the ribosome.

The elongation factors (EF) Tu and G and initiation factor 2 (IF2) from bacteria are multidomain GTPases with essential functions in the elongation and initiation phases of translation. They bind to the same site on the ribosome where their low intrinsic GTPase activities are strongly stimulated. The factors differ fundamentally from each other, and from the majority of GTPases, in the mechanisms of GTPase control, the timing of Pi release, and the functional role of GTP hydrolysis. EF-Tu x GTP forms a ternary complex with aminoacyl-tRNA, which binds to the ribosome. Only when a matching codon is recognized, the GTPase of EF-Tu is stimulated, rapid GTP hydrolysis and Pi release take place, EF-Tu rearranges to the GDP form, and aminoacyl-tRNA is released into the peptidyltransferase center. In contrast, EF-G hydrolyzes GTP immediately upon binding to the ribosome, stimulated by ribosomal protein L7/12. Subsequent translocation is driven by the slow dissociation of Pi, suggesting a mechano-chemical function of EF-G. Accordingly, different conformations of EF-G on the ribosome are revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is triggered upon formation of the 70S initiation complex, and the dissociation of Pi and/or IF2 follows a rearrangement of the ribosome into the elongation-competent state.

Role of domains 4 and 5 in elongation factor G functions on the ribosome.

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a large, five domain GTPase that catalyses the translocation of the tRNAs on the bacterial ribosome at the expense of GTP. In the crystal structure of GDP-bound EF-G, domain 1 (G domain) makes direct contacts with domains 2 and 5, whereas domain 4 protrudes from the body of the molecule. Here, we show that the presence of both domains 4 and 5 is essential for tRNA translocation and for the turnover of the factor on the ribosome, but not for rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis by EF-G. Replacement of a highly conserved histidine residue at the tip of domain 4, His583, with lysine or arginine decreases the rate of tRNA translocation at least 100-fold, whereas the binding of the factor to the ribosome, GTP hydrolysis and P(i) release are not affected by the mutations. Various small deletions in the tip region of domain 4 decrease the translocation activity of EF-G even further, but do not block the turnover of the factor. Unlike native EF-G, the mutants of EF-G lacking domains 4/5 do not interact with the alpha-sarcin stem-loop of 23 S rRNA. These mutants are not released from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis or translocation, indicating that the contact with, or a conformational change of, the alpha-sarcin stem-loop is required for EF-G release from the ribosome.

Late events of translation initiation in bacteria: a kinetic analysis.

Binding of the 50S ribosomal subunit to the 30S initiation complex and the subsequent transition from the initiation to the elongation phase up to the synthesis of the first peptide bond represent crucial steps in the translation pathway. The reactions that characterize these transitions were analyzed by quench-flow and fluorescence stopped-flow kinetic techniques. IF2-dependent GTP hydrolysis was fast (30/s) followed by slow P(i) release from the complex (1.5/s). The latter step was rate limiting for subsequent A-site binding of EF-Tu small middle dotGTP small middle dotPhe-tRNA(Phe) ternary complex. Most of the elemental rate constants of A-site binding were similar to those measured on poly(U), with the notable exception of the formation of the first peptide bond which occurred at a rate of 0.2/s. Omission of GTP or its replacement with GDP had no effect, indicating that neither the adjustment of fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the P site nor the release of IF2 from the ribosome required GTP hydrolysis.

Stimulation of the GTPase activity of translation elongation factor G by ribosomal protein L7/12.

Elongation factors (EFs) Tu and G are GTPases that have important functions in protein synthesis. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of both factors is strongly stimulated on the ribosome by unknown mechanisms. Here we report that isolated ribosomal protein L7/12 strongly stimulates GTP hydrolysis by EF-G, but not by EF-Tu, indicating a major contribution of L7/12 to GTPase activation of EF-G on the ribosome. The effect is due to the acceleration of the catalytic step because the rate of GDP-GTP exchange on EF-G, as measured by rapid kinetics, is much faster than the steady-state GTPase rate. The unique, highly conserved arginine residue in the C-terminal domain of L7/12 is not essential for the activation, excluding an "arginine finger"-type mechanism. L7/12 appears to function by stabilizing the GTPase transition state of EF-G.

Thiostrepton inhibits the turnover but not the GTPase of elongation factor G on the ribosome.

The region around position 1067 in domain II of 23S rRNA frequently is referred to as the GTPase center of the ribosome. The notion is based on the observation that the binding of the antibiotic thiostrepton to this region inhibited GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G (EF-G) on the ribosome at the conditions of multiple turnover. In the present work, we have reanalyzed the mechanism of action of thiostrepton. Results obtained by biochemical and fast kinetic techniques show that thiostrepton binding to the ribosome does not interfere with factor binding or with single-round GTP hydrolysis. Rather, the antibiotic inhibits the function of EF-G in subsequent steps, including release of inorganic phosphate from EF-G after GTP hydrolysis, tRNA translocation, and the dissociation of the factor from the ribosome, thereby inhibiting the turnover reaction. Structurally, thiostrepton interferes with EF-G footprints in the alpha-sarcin stem loop (A2660, A2662) located in domain VI of 23S rRNA. The results indicate that thiostrepton inhibits a structural transition of the 1067 region of 23S rRNA that is important for functions of EF-G after GTP hydrolysis.

Dynamics of translation on the ribosome: molecular mechanics of translocation.

The translocation step of protein elongation entails a large-scale rearrangement of the tRNA-mRNA-ribosome complex. Recent years have seen major advances in unraveling the mechanism of the process on the molecular level. A number of intermediate states have been defined and, in part, characterized structurally. The article reviews the recent evidence that suggests a dynamic role of the ribosome and its ligands during translocation. The focus is on dynamic aspects of tRNA movement and on the role of elongation factor G and GTP hydrolysis in translocation catalysis. The significance of structural changes of the ribosome induced by elongation factor G as well the role of ribosomal RNA are addressed. A functional model of elongation factor G as a motor protein driven by GTP hydrolysis is discussed.

Hydrolysis of GTP by elongation factor G drives tRNA movement on the ribosome.

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a GTPase that is involved in the translocation of bacterial ribosomes along messenger RNA during protein biosynthesis. In contrast to current models, EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis is shown to precede, and greatly accelerate, the rearrangement of the ribosome that leads to translocation. Domain IV of the EF-G structure is crucial for both rapid translocation and subsequent release of the factor from the ribosome. By coupling the free energy of GTP hydrolysis to translocation, EF-G serves as a motor protein to drive the directional movement of transfer and messenger RNAs on the ribosome.