Three years of maintenance with VRD in multiple myeloma: results of total therapy IIIB with a 15-year follow-up.

ABSTRACT: The total therapy (TT) IIIB phase 2 study incorporated bortezomib into tandem melphalan-based hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with dexamethasone, thalidomide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide for induction/consolidation and bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) for maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). This updated analysis presents a 15.4-year median follow-up. Of 177 patients, 21% patients had gene expression profile (GEP)-defined high-risk MM. 15-year progression free survival (PFS) was 27.9%. Median PFS was better in GEP-defined low-risk patients at 7.8 years and in International Staging System stage 1 patients at 8.7 years. Overall, median OS was 9.1 years, and 15-year overall survival (OS) was 35.9%. GEP-defined low-risk patients' median OS was 11.2 years, and that of GEP-defined high-risk patients was 2.8 years. There was no difference in OS between TT IIIB and TT IIIA. This study includes the longest follow-up of patients treated with maintenance VRD reported to date. In patients with GEP-defined low-risk, nearly half and one-third of patients without ongoing treatment showed no signs of progression at 10 and 15 years, respectively. One-third of patients survived more than 15 years, but 3 years of VRD maintenance did not improve outcomes for patients with GEP-defined high-risk MM. The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00572169.

Radiation exposure in multiple hereditary exostoses: A retrospective review.

Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation in patients with Multiple Hereditary Exostoses (MHE) is inevitable and necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of MHE. Radiation exposure has many potentially dangerous consequences, including the increased risk of developing cancer. This is especially concerning in the pediatric patient population since children are more likely to develop adverse effects from radiation than adults. This study aimed to quantify radiation exposure over a five-year period among patients diagnosed with MHE since such information is not currently available in the literature. Methods: Diagnostic radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, nuclear medicine studies, and intraoperative fluoroscopy exposures were analyzed for radiation exposure in 37 patients diagnosed with MHE between 2015 and 2020. Results: Thirty-seven patients with MHE underwent 1200 imaging studies, 976 of which were related to MHE and 224 unrelated to MHE. The mean estimated MHE cumulative radiation dose per patient was 5.23 mSv. Radiographs related to MHE contributed the most radiation. Patients from the ages of 10- to 24-years-old received the most imaging studies and exposure to ionizing radiation, especially compared to those under age 10 (P = 0.016). The 37 patients also received a total of 53 surgical-excision procedures, with a mean of 1.4 procedures per person. Conclusions: MHE patients are exposed to increased levels of ionizing radiation secondary to serial diagnostic imaging, with those ages 10-24 years old being exposed to significantly higher doses of radiation. Because pediatric patients are more sensitive to radiation exposure and are at an overall higher risk, the use of radiographs should always be justified in those patients.

Perioperative multimodal analgesic injection for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery.

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study compared postoperative as-needed (PRN) opioid consumption pre and postimplementation of a perioperative multimodal analgesic injection composed of ropivacaine, epinephrine, ketorolac, and morphine in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Secondary outcomes include pain score measurements, time to ambulation, length of stay, blood loss, 90-day complication rate, operating room time, nonopioid medication usage, and total inpatient medication cost before and after the initiation of this practice. METHODS: Consecutive patients weighing ≥ 20 kg who underwent PSF for a primary diagnosis of AIS between January 2017 and December 2020 were included. Data from 2018 were excluded to account for standardization of the practice. Patients treated in 2017 only received PCA. Patients treated in 2019 and 2020 only received the injection. Excluded were patients who had any diagnoses other than AIS, allergies to any of the experimental medications, or who were nonambulatory. Data were analyzed utilizing the two-sample t-test or Chi-squared test as appropriate. RESULTS: Results of this study show that compared with 47 patients treated postoperatively with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), 55 patients treated with a multimodal perioperative injection have significantly less consumption of PRN morphine equivalents (0.3 mEq/kg vs. 0.5 mEq/kg; p = 0.02). Furthermore, patients treated with a perioperative injection have significantly higher rates of ambulation on postoperative day 1 compared with those treated with PCA (70.9 vs. 40.4%; p = 0.0023). CONCLUSION: Administration of a perioperative injection is effective and should be considered in the perioperative protocol in patients undergoing PSF for AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Definition of Tweener: Consensus Among Experts in Treating Early-onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The term "Tweener" is colloquially used to refer to early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients whose age and development make them candidates for multiple surgical options. The purpose of this study was to establish expert consensus on a definition to formally characterize the Tweener population. METHODS: A 3-round survey of surgeons in an international EOS study group was conducted. Surgeons were provided with various patient characteristics and asked if each was part of their definition for Tweener patients. Responses were analyzed for consensus (≥70%), near-consensus (60% to 69%), and no consensus (<60%). RESULTS: Consensus was reached (89% of respondents) for including chronological age in the Tweener definition; 8 to 10 years for females and 9 to 11 years for males. Surgeons agreed for inclusion of Sanders score, particularly Sanders 2 (86.0%). Patients who have reached Sanders 4, postmenarche, or have closed triradiate cartilage should not be considered Tweeners. Bone age range of 8 years and 10 months to 10 years and 10 months for females (12 y for males) could be part of the Tweener definition. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the Tweener definition could be the following: patients with open triradiate cartilage who are not postmenarche and have not reached Sanders 4, and if they have one of the following: Sanders 2 or chronological age 8 to 10 years for females (9 to 11 y for males) or bone age 8 years and 10 months to 10 years and 10 months for females (12 y for males). This definition will allow for more focused and comparative research on this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-expert opinion.

Infections After Open Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Review of 288 Open Fractures.

We reviewed pediatric open fractures treated at a large Level 1 children's trauma center to determine the rate of infection after open fractures, potential risk factors for infection, and the rate of infection caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms. A retrospective review identified 288 open fractures in children 1 to 17 years of age. Post-traumatic infections developed in 24 (8.3%) open fractures. There was no significant association between the development of infection and mechanism of injury (p = 0.33), time to surgical debridement (p = 0.93), or type of empiric antibiotic given (p = 0.66). Infection occurred more frequently in overweight and obese patients (odds ratio = 2.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.93, 5.46, p = 0.07). There was one infection (4.2%) caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The most commonly identified organisms on culture were methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (n = 3) and pseudomonas (n = 3). Obesity is a significant risk factor for the development of infection after an open fracture in the pediatric population. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):073-075, 2022).

Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement are Unsatisfactory When Determining Abstract Study Design and Level of Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Understanding differences between types of study design (SD) and level of evidence (LOE) are important when selecting research for presentation or publication and determining its potential clinical impact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver reliability when assigning LOE and SD as well as quantify the impact of a commonly used reference aid on these assessments. METHODS: Thirty-six accepted abstracts from the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) 2021 annual meeting were selected for this study. Thirteen reviewers from the POSNA Evidence-Based Practice Committee were asked to determine LOE and SD for each abstract, first without any assistance or resources. Four weeks later, abstracts were reviewed again with the guidance of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) LOE chart, which is adapted from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were calculated using Fleiss' kappa statistic (k). χ2 analysis was used to compare the rate of SD-LOE mismatch between the first and second round of reviews. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for LOE improved slightly from fair (k=0.28) to moderate (k=0.43) with use of the JBJS chart. There was better agreement with increasing LOE, with the most frequent disagreement between levels 3 and 4. Interobserver reliability for SD was fair for both rounds 1 (k=0.29) and 2 (k=0.37). Similar to LOE, there was better agreement with stronger SD. Intraobserver reliability was widely variable for both LOE and SD (k=0.10 to 0.92 for both). When matching a selected SD to its associated LOE, the overall rate of correct concordance was 82% in round 1 and 92% in round 2 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Interobserver reliability for LOE and SD was fair to moderate at best, even among experienced reviewers. Use of the JBJS/Oxford chart mildly improved agreement on LOE and resulted in less SD-LOE mismatch, but did not affect agreement on SD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Factors that Influence Acquisition of Lower Extremity Braces in the Pediatric Orthopaedic Population.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity brace-wear compliance has been studied in pediatrics, but failure to acquire a prescribed brace has not been included. The purpose of this study was to evaluate brace acquisition as a component of brace-wear compliance. METHODS: Records of patients (0 to 21 y) prescribed lower extremity braces from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, spina bifida, short Achilles tendon, clubfoot, and other. Brace type was categorized as clubfoot foot abduction orthosis, ankle-foot orthosis, knee, hip, or custom/other braces. Brace prescription and acquisition dates were recorded. Insurance was classified as government, private, or uninsured. Patient demographics included age, sex, race, and calculated area deprivation index. RESULTS: Of the 1176 prescribed lower extremity braces, 1094 (93%) were acquired while 82 (7%) were not. The odds ratios (OR) of failure to acquire a prescribed brace in Black and Hispanic patients were 1.64 and 2.71 times that in White patients, respectively (95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.71, P=0.045; 1.23-5.6, P=0.015); in patients without insurance, the OR was 8.48 times that in privately insured patients (95% confidence interval: 1.93-31.1, P=0.007). The ORs of failure to acquire were 2.12 (P=0.003) in patients 4 years or more versus 0 to 3 years, 4.17 (P<0.0001) in cerebral palsy versus clubfoot, and 4.12 (P=0.01) in short Achilles tendon versus clubfoot. There was no significant association between sex or area deprivation index and failure of brace acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, 7% of prescribed braces were not acquired. Black or Hispanic race, lack of insurance, and older age were associated with failure to acquire prescribed braces. Braces prescribed for clubfoot were acquired more often than for cerebral palsy or short Achilles tendon. Brace-wear compliance is an established factor in treatment success and recurrence. This study identified risk factors for failed brace acquisition, a critical step for improving compliance. These results may help effect changes in the current system that may lead to more compliance with brace wear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Clinical implications of loss of bone marrow minimal residual disease negativity in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients frequently attain a bone marrow (BM) minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity status in response to treatment. We identified 568 patients who achieved BM MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and maintenance combination therapy with an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. BM MRD was evaluated by next-generation flow cytometry (sensitivity of 10-5 cells) at 3- to 6-month intervals. With a median follow-up of 9.9 years from diagnosis (range, 0.4-30.9), 61% of patients maintained MRD negativity, whereas 39% experienced MRD conversion at a median of 6.3 years (range, 1.4-25). The highest risk of MRD conversion occurred within the first 5 years after treatment and was observed more often in patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (95% vs 84%; P = .001). MRD conversion was associated with a high risk of relapse and preceded it by a median of 1.0 years (range, 0-4.9). However, 27% of MRD conversion-positive patients had not yet experienced a clinical relapse, with a median follow-up of 9.3 years (range, 2.2-21.2). Landmark analyses using time from ASCT revealed patients with MRD conversion during the first 3 years had an inferior overall and progression-free survival compared with patients with sustained MRD negativity. MRD conversion correctly predicted relapse in 70%, demonstrating the utility of serial BM MRD assessment to complement standard laboratory and imaging to make informed salvage therapy decisions.

Patient similarity network of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma identifies patient subgroups with distinct genetic features and clinical implications.

The remarkable genetic heterogeneity of multiple myeloma poses a substantial challenge for proper prognostication and clinical management of patients. Here, we introduce MM-PSN, the first multiomics patient similarity network of myeloma. MM-PSN enabled accurate dissection of the genetic and molecular landscape of the disease and determined 12 distinct subgroups defined by five data types generated from genomic and transcriptomic profiling of 655 patients. MM-PSN identified patient subgroups not previously described defined by specific patterns of alterations, enriched for specific gene vulnerabilities, and associated with potential therapeutic options. Our analysis revealed that co-occurrence of t(4;14) and 1q gain identified patients at significantly higher risk of relapse and shorter survival as compared to t(4;14) as a single lesion. Furthermore, our results show that 1q gain is the most important single lesion conferring high risk of relapse and that it can improve on the current International Staging Systems (ISS and R-ISS).

Radiation Reduction Strategies in Pediatric Orthopaedics.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric orthopaedic patients have the potential for significant radiation exposure from the use of imaging studies, such as computed tomography and bone scintigraphy. With the potential for long-term treatment, such as is required for scoliosis or osteogenesis imperfecta, patients are at even greater risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. DISCUSSION: Although an association between radiation and cancer risk is evident, causation is difficult to prove because comorbidities or genetic predispositions may play a role in the higher baseline rates of malignancy later in life. Efforts have been made over the years to reduce exposure using more modern imaging techniques and simple radiation reduction strategies. Educational efforts and clinical practice guidelines are decreasing the rate of computed tomography scan use in pediatrics. Although considerable work is being done on the development of radiation-free imaging modalities, imaging that uses ionizing radiation will, in the near term, be necessary in specific circumstances to provide optimal care to pediatric orthopaedic patients. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the ionizing radiation exposure associated with commonly used tests as well as radiation-reduction strategies is essential for the optimal and safe care of pediatric orthopaedic patients.

Can Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery be Done Safely in a Freestanding Ambulatory Surgery Center? Review of 3780 Cases.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complication rates in a large consecutive cohort of pediatric patients who had orthopaedic surgery at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center (ASC). The authors also wanted to identify the rates of same-day, urgent hospital transfers, and 30-day hospital admissions. The authors hypothesized that pediatric orthopaedic procedures at a freestanding ASC can be done safely with a low rate of complications. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients aged 17 years or younger who had surgery at a freestanding ASC over a 9-year period. Adverse outcomes were divided into intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, need for the secondary procedure, unexpected hospital admission on the same day of the procedure, and unexpected hospital admission within 30 days of the index procedure. Complications were graded as grade 1, the complication could be treated without additional surgery or hospitalization; grade 2, the complication resulted in an unplanned return to the operating room (OR) or hospital admission; or grade 3, the complication resulted in an unplanned return to the OR or hospitalization with a change in the overall treatment plan. RESULTS: Adequate follow-up was available for 3780 (86.1%) surgical procedures. Overall, there were 9 (0.24%) intraoperative complications, 2 (0.08%) urgent hospital transfers, 114 (3%) complications, and 16 (0.42%) readmissions. Seven of the 9 intraoperative complications resolved before leaving the OR, and 2 required return to the OR.Neither complications nor hospitalizations correlated with age, race, gender, or length or type of surgery. There was no correlation between the presence of medical comorbidities, body mass index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists score and complication or hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric orthopaedic surgical procedures can be performed safely in an ASC because of multiple factors that include dedicated surgical teams, single-purpose ORs, and strict preoperative screening criteria. The rates of an emergency hospital transfer, surgical complications, and 30-day readmission, even by stringent criteria, are lower than those reported for outpatient procedures performed in the hospital setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Peritubercle Lucency Sign in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

BACKGROUND: An area of enlargement of the metaphyseal socket around the epiphyseal tubercle, termed the peritubercle lucency sign, has recently been introduced as a possible predictor of contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis in patients with previous unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis. This study aimed to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability for detecting the presence or absence of the peritubercle lucency sign. METHODS: Thirty-five radiographs were presented to 6 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons on 2 separate occasions 30 days apart, ensuring that the images were shown in a different order on the second exposure. Both times the reviewers recorded whether the peritubercle lucency sign was present or absent in each of the radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: In the intraobserver analysis, percent agreement between the first and second time the radiographs were reviewed varied between 62.9% and 85.7%, for an average intraobserver agreement of 74.8%. κ values for the 6 reviewers varied between 0.34 and 0.716, with an average intraobserver κ value of 0.508. The interobserver percent agreement was 40.0% for the first time the radiographs were reviewed, 42.9% the second time, and the overall interobserver percent agreement was 29%. The interobserver κ value was 0.44 the first time the radiographs were reviewed, 0.45 the second time, and the overall interobserver κ value was 0.45. DISCUSSION: On the basis of our findings, the peritubercle lucency has modest intraobserver and interobserver reliability at best and should be used with other currently used factors, such as age, presence of endocrinopathy, status of triradiate cartilage, posterior sloping angle, and modified Oxford score, in determining the need for prophylactic pinning. Further refinement of the definition of the peritubercle lucency sign may be needed to improve agreement and reliability of the sign. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic study.

Hunger Games: Impact of Fasting Guidelines for Orthopedic Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Fasting guidelines for pediatric procedural sedation have historically been controversial. Recent literature suggests that there is no difference in adverse events regardless of fasting status. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine adverse outcomes and departmental efficiency when fasting guidelines are not considered during pediatric emergency department (PED) sedation for orthopedic interventions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 2674 patients who presented to a level I PED and required procedural sedation for orthopedic injuries between February 2011 and July 2018. This was a level III, retrospective cohort study. Patients were categorized into the following groups: already within American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) fasting guidelines on presentation to the PED (n = 671 [25%]), had procedural sedation not within the ASA guidelines (n = 555 [21%]), and had procedural sedation after fasting in the PED to meet ASA guidelines (n = 1448 [54%]). Primary outcomes were length of stay, time from admission to start of sedation, length of sedation, time from end of sedation to discharge, and adverse events. DISCUSSION: There was a significant difference in the length of stay and time from admission to sedation-both approximately 80 min longer in those with procedural sedation after fasting in the PED to meet ASA guidelines (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference among groups in length of sedation or time to discharge after sedation. Adverse events were uncommon, with only 55 total adverse events (0.02%). Vomiting during the recovery phase was the most common (n = 17 [0.006%]). Other notable adverse events included nine hypoxic events (0.003%) and five seizures (0.002%). There was no significant difference in adverse events among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Length of stay in the PED was significantly longer if ASA fasting guidelines were followed for children requiring sedation for orthopedic procedures. This is a substantial delay in a busy PED where beds and resources are at a premium. Although providing similar care with equivalent outcomes, the value of spending less time in the PED is evident. Overall, adverse events related to sedation are rare and not related to fasting guidelines.

Minimum 5-Year Follow-up on Graduates of Growing Spine Surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION: After discontinuation of growth friendly (GF) surgery for early onset scoliosis, patients undergo spinal fusion or continued observation. This last planned treatment is colloquially called "definitive" treatment, conferring these patients as "graduates" of a growing program. The 5-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of this cohort are unknown. METHODS: An international pediatric spine database was queried for patients from a GF program (spine or rib-based) with minimum 5-year follow-up from last planned surgery (GF or spinal fusion). Radiographs and charts were reviewed for main coronal curve angle and maximum kyphosis as well as occurrence of secondary surgery. RESULTS: Of 580 graduates, 170 (29%) had minimum 5-year follow-up (37% male). Scoliosis etiology was congenital in 41 (24%), idiopathic 36 (21%), neuromuscular 51 (30%), and syndromic 42 (25%). Index surgery consisted of spine-based growing rods in 122 (71%) and rib-based distraction in 48 (29%). Mean age at index surgery was 6.8 years, and patients underwent an average of 5.4 lengthenings over an average of 4.9 years (range, 6 mo to 11 y). Last planned treatment was at an average age of 11.8 years (range, 7 to 17 years). Last planned treatment consisted of spinal fusion in 114 patients, 47 had growing implants maintained, 9 had implants removed. Average follow-up was 7.3 years (range, 5 to 13 y).When compared from postdefinitive treatment to 2-year follow-up, there was noted progression of the coronal curve angle (46±19 to 51±21 degrees, P=0.046) and kyphosis (48±20 to 57±25 degrees, P=0.03). However, between 2 and 5 years, no further progression occurred in the coronal (51±21 to 53±21 degrees, P=0.26) or sagittal (57±25 to 54±28 degrees, P=0.93) planes. When stratified based on etiology, there was no significant coronal curve progression between 2- and 5-year follow-up. When comparing spinal fusion patients to those who had maintenance of their growing construct, there was also no significant curve progression.Thirty-seven (21%) underwent at least 1 (average, 1.7; range, 1 to 7) revision surgery following graduation, and 15 of 37 (41%) underwent 2 or more revision surgeries. Reason for revision was implant revision (either GF or spinal fusion) in 34 patients, and implant removal in 3. On an average, the first revision was 2.5 years after the definitive treatment plan (range, 0.02 to 7.4 y). In total, 15 of 37 (41%) revisions occurred over 2 years following the final decision for treatment plan, and 7 of 37 (19%) occurred 5 or more years after the definitive treatment.Patients who underwent spinal fusion as a definitive treatment strategy were more likely to undergo revision surgery (27%) than patients who had their GF implants maintained (11%) (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Five years following "graduation" from growing surgery for early onset scoliosis, there is progression of curve magnitude in both the coronal and sagittal planes up to 2 years, with no further progression at 5 years. A total of 21% of patients undergo at least 1 revision surgery, and average time to revision surgery is over 2 years from last planned surgery. Risk of revision surgery was higher in patients who underwent a spinal fusion as their definitive treatment strategy. LEVEL EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative. TYPE OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic.

The Frequency of Mediastinal Injury in Acute Posterior Sternoclavicular Dislocations: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Acute posterior sternoclavicular dislocations (APSCD) are rare injuries that historically have prompted concern for injury to the great vessels and other mediastinal structures from initial trauma or subsequent treatment, resulting in the recommendation that a thoracic or vascular surgeon be present or available during operative treatment. The objectives of the study were to characterize the demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics of a large series of APSCDs in skeletally immature patients and to describe the rate and nature of any vascular or mediastinal complications that occurred during treatment. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, records of consecutive patients under 25 years of age treated for APSCD were collected from each of 6 participating centers. Only acute injuries (sustained fewer than 10 days before presentation) were included. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, associated mediastinal injuries, and need for thoracic/vascular surgery were recorded. Mediastinal structures injured or compressed by mass effect were specifically characterized by review of preoperative computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: Review identified 125 patients with a mean age of 14.7 years; 88% were male. APSCD most commonly resulted from a sporting injury (74%) followed by falls from standing height (10%) and high-energy motor vehicle trauma (10%). The most common finding on cross-sectional imaging was compression without laceration of the ipsilateral brachiocephalic vein (50%). Eleven patients had successful closed reduction, and 114 (90%) had open reduction and internal fixation, with 25 failed or unstable closed reductions preceding open treatment. There were no vascular or mediastinal injuries during reduction or fixation that required intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter series of 125 APSCDs no injuries to the great vessels/mediastinal structures requiring intervention were identified. Although more than half of patients had evidence of extrinsic vascular compression at the time of injury, careful open reduction of acute injuries can be safely performed. Although vascular injuries following APSCD seem to be quite rare, vascular complications can be catastrophic. Treating providers should consider these data and their own institutional resources to maximize patient safety during the treatment of APSCD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic case control study.

Evaluation of Outcomes Before and After Implementation of a Standardized Postoperative Care Pathway in Pediatric Posterior Spinal Fusion Patients.

BACKGROUND: Standardized pathways decrease variability and improve outcomes and safety. PURPOSE: The article aims to evaluate outcomes of a standardized postoperative care pathway compared with individual surgeon preference. METHODS: A review of patients prestandardization and poststandardization was performed. Patients between the ages of 10-21 years with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (ICD-9 code 737.30) admitted to the hospital for posterior spinal fusion (CPT code 22630) were included in the study. The prestandardization group (25 patients) was enrolled from April 1, 2010, through March 30, 2011, and the poststandardization group (25 patients) from April 1, 2014, to March 30, 2015. Exclusion criteria were renal disease, epilepsy, neurological disorder, or postoperative complications that led to change in routine care including ileus or fever greater than 102 °F. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, with significance set at p < .001. RESULTS: The length of stay (p = .0166), time to ambulation (p < .0001), patient-controlled analgesia use (p < .0001), and postoperative time to resumption of regular diet (p < .0001) were all significantly decreased in the poststandardization group. There were no complications or readmissions in either group. CONCLUSION: The standardized pathway resulted in shorter length of stay, decreased narcotic use, decreased time to regular diet, and decreased time to ambulation with no increase in complication rates.

Initial Evaluation by a Non-Surgeon Provider Does Not Delay the Surgical Care of Pediatric Forearm and Elbow Trauma in a Walk-In Orthopaedic Clinic.

Introduction Walk-in and after-hours clinics are being increasingly utilized in orthopedics and are especially beneficial for patients with simple sprains, fractures, or overuse injuries that might otherwise require an emergency room visit. To meet the increased patient load, additional staffing often is required, which might include a family medicine physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. Few studies have evaluated the performance of these non-surgeon providers in an orthopedic clinical setting. This study compared the time to definitive care of pediatric patients with forearm and elbow injuries between non-surgeon providers in a walk-in clinic, orthopedic surgeons in a walk-in clinic, and a pediatric orthopedic surgeon in a regular clinic. Methods Children who had closed reduction and fixation of an elbow or forearm injury from January 2010 to December 2017 were identified. The patients were divided into groups: patients initially evaluated in a walk-in clinic by a non-surgeon provider; patients initially evaluated in a walk-in clinic by an orthopedic surgeon; and patients initially seen by a fellowship-trained, pediatric orthopedic surgeon in a regular clinic (control group). Neither type of provider (non-surgeon or surgeon) in the walk-in clinics definitively treated any injury but rather transferred care of the patient to a pediatric orthopedic surgeon. The number of clinic visits until surgery, the number of providers seen, the days before evaluation by a pediatric orthopedic surgeon, and the number of days before definitive surgical treatment were documented. Results Of the 162 patients identified, 36 (22%) were initially seen by an orthopedic surgeon and 62 (38%) by a non-surgeon provider in a walk-in clinic. The remaining 64 (40%) (control group) were initially seen in a regular office visit by a pediatric orthopedic surgeon. There were no significant differences noted for patients treated by orthopedic surgeon and non-surgeon providers in days before a referral visit to the pediatric orthopedic surgeon (3.7 vs. 3.9, respectively; p = 0.63) or days to surgery for definitive treatment (5.2 vs. 4.8, respectively; p = 0.62). The average number of providers seen (1.58 vs. 1.63, respectively; p = 0.69) and average number of clinic visits before surgery (2.08 vs. 2.06, respectively; p = 0.76) also were similar when comparing the two groups. The control group had significantly fewer days from evaluation to surgical treatment than the surgeon walk-in group (3.3 days vs. 5.2 days, p < 0.05) and the non-surgeon walk-in group (3.3 days vs. 4.8 days, p < 0.05). Conclusion There was no difference in the number of days to transfer patient care to a pediatric orthopedic surgeon between non-surgeon providers and orthopedic surgeons in the walk-in clinic. However, there was a one-day delay reaching definitive treatment when initial evaluation occurred in a walk-in clinic, regardless of whether the patient was initially seen by a surgeon or non-surgeon, when compared to an initial evaluation by a pediatric orthopedic surgeon.

Is rod diameter associated with the rate of rod fracture in patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods?

INTRODUCTION: Few risk factors for fracture in magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have been identified. We hypothesize an increased rate of rod fracture in small diameter rods compared to large diameter rods in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the diameter of MCGR constructs and the rate of rod fracture. METHODS: Patients with EOS who underwent MCGR implantation-primary or conversion-from 2013 to 2018 were identified from two registries including 40 centers. Rod diameter sizes greater than 5.0 mm or less than or equal to 5.0 mm were defined as "Large" and "Small" rods, respectively. Only dual-rod constructs were included. The primary outcome measure collected was rod fracture at any point in treatment up to the most recent follow-up. Cox regression was utilized for unequal follow-up to compare rate of breakage at the last follow-up between cohorts. RESULTS: 527 patients with 1,054 rods were included. 552 (52.4%) rods had a diameter of less than or equal to 5.0 mm and 461 (43.7%) rods had a diameter of greater than 5.0 mm. 41 (3.9%) rods were missing a recorded rod diameter and were not included in the analysis to determine the association between the rate of fracture and rod diameter. 20 (1.9%) total rod fractures occurred: 9 (1.6%) rods with diameters of ≤ 5.0 mm, 10 (2.2%) rods with diameters of > 5.0 mm, and 1 uncategorized rod (p = 0.529). No difference in the rate of rod fracture or survival distribution was found between rod diameters of > 5.0 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm even after stratification by ambulatory status, major coronal curve, weight, or location of anchors. DISCUSSION: Rod fracture appears to be a rare event in dual MCGR constructs and rod diameter does not seem to be associated with the incidence or rate of rod fracture. Surgeons may consider other criteria for selecting rod diameter in their patients such as patient size, amount of surgical correction, single vs. dual constructs, and risk of hardware prominence.