Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 43(6): 931-943, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428755

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vasoplegic syndrome (VS) is a common occurrence during heart transplantation (HT). It currently lacks a uniform definition between transplant centers, and its pathophysiology and treatment remain enigmatic. This systematic review summarizes the available published clinical data regarding VS during HT. METHODS: We searched databases for all published reports on VS during HT. Data collected included the incidence of VS in the HT population, patient and intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-two publications were included in this review. The prevalence of VS during HT was 28.72% (95% confidence interval: 27.37%, 30.10%). Factors associated with VS included male sex, higher body mass index, hypothyroidism, pre-HT left ventricular assist device or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), pre-HT calcium channel blocker or amiodarone usage, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and higher blood product transfusion requirement. Patients who developed VS were more likely to require postoperative VA-ECMO support, renal replacement therapy, reoperation for bleeding, longer mechanical ventilation, and a greater 30-day and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our systematic review are an initial step for providing clinicians with data that can help identify high-risk patients and avenues for potential risk mitigation. Establishing guidelines that officially define VS will aid in the precise diagnosis of these patients during HT and guide treatment. Future studies of treatment strategies for refractory VS are needed in this high-risk patient population.


Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Vasoplegia , Humanos , Vasoplegia/etiologia , Vasoplegia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia
2.
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 27(3): 171-180, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37347963

RESUMO

Background. The EZ-Blocker is the newest generation of bronchial blocker and offers a potential alternative to left-sided double lumen tubes for lung isolation and one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. Methods. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing left-sided double lumen tube to the EZ-Blocker for one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. The time for placement, incidence of intraoperative displacement, and surgeons' rating of lung collapse quality were designated as coprimary outcomes. The safety profiles of the two devices, including the incidence of airway trauma and post-extubation discomfort were also examined. Results. Six randomized controlled trials (495 patients) were analyzed. Compared to the EZ-Blocker, the left-sided double lumen tube was faster to place by a weighted mean difference of [95% CI] of -61.24 seconds [-102.48, -20.00] (P = .004) and was much less likely to become displaced during lung isolation with an odds ratio [95% CI] of .56 [.34, .91] (P = .02). The left-sided double lumen tube and the EZ-Blocker provided similar surgeon-rated quality of lung isolation. Although the left-sided double lumen tube caused a greater degree of post-extubation sore throat, there was a similar incidence of carinal trauma and post-extubation hoarseness compared to the EZ-Blocker. Conclusion. Our analysis suggests that the left-sided double lumen tube can be placed more quickly and is less prone to intraoperative displacement compared to the EZ-Blocker; the quality of lung collapse is similar. Thus, evidence appears to support the continued utilization of the left-sided double lumen tube for routine thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.


Assuntos
Ventilação Monopulmonar , Atelectasia Pulmonar , Cirurgia Torácica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos , Humanos , Ventilação Monopulmonar/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/métodos
3.
Am J Transplant ; 23(8): 1227-1240, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37156300

RESUMO

Intracardiac thrombosis and/or pulmonary thromboembolism (ICT/PE) is a rare but devastating complication during liver transplantation. Its pathophysiology remains poorly understood, and successful treatment remains a challenge. This systematic review summarizes the available published clinical data regarding ICT/PE during liver transplantation. Databases were searched for all publications reporting on ICT/PE during liver transplantation. Data collected included its incidence, patient characteristics, the timing of diagnosis, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes. This review included 59 full-text citations. The point prevalence of ICT/PE was 1.42%. Thrombi were most often diagnosed during the neohepatic phase, particularly at allograft reperfusion. Intravenous heparin was effective in preventing early-stage thrombus from progressing further and restoring hemodynamics in 76.32% of patients it was utilized for; however, the addition of tissue plasminogen activator or sole use of tissue plasminogen activator offered diminishing returns. Despite all resuscitation efforts, the in-hospital mortality rate of an intraoperative ICT/PE was 40.42%, with nearly half of these patients dying intraoperatively. The results of our systematic review are an initial step for providing clinicians with data that can help identify higher-risk patients. The clinical implications of our results warrant the development of identification and management strategies for the timely and effective treatment of these tragic occurrences during liver transplantation.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias , Transplante de Fígado , Embolia Pulmonar , Trombose , Humanos , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia
4.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 41(8): 1114-1123, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35644726

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is critical to identify patients at increased risk of right ventricular failure (RVF) before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is a hemodynamic parameter that is a specific measure of right ventricular function and may better identify LVAD recipients at risk for RVF. This systematic review analyzes the predictive value of preoperative PAPi to RVF in the setting of LVAD implantation. METHODS: Databases were searched for all studies reporting on PAPi and RVF after LVAD implantation. Data collected included: number of patients, patient characteristics, incidences of RVF, PAPi, central venous pressure (CVP), CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular stroke work index. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (4,756 patients) were included in this review. The incidence of RVF was found to be 27.48% (1,307 patients). The weighted mean (standard deviation) of preoperative PAPi associated with RVF vs No RVF was 2.17 (2.36) and 2.87 (3.21), respectively. When comparing LVAD recipients with RVF and No RVF, patients who developed RVF had a significantly lower preoperative PAPi by a WMD (95% CI) of -0.74 [-1.00, -0.49] (p < .001). The remaining variables (CVP; CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; and right ventricular stroke work index) were also confirmed as predictors of RVF after LVAD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates the utility of PAPi as a clinical predictor of RVF after LVAD implantation. Based on our findings, we recommend that PAPi be used in conjunction with traditional hemodynamic parameters when risk stratifying LVAD recipients for RVF.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Disfunção Ventricular Direita , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Artéria Pulmonar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/etiologia , Função Ventricular Direita
5.
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 25(3): 173-184, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356967

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New or worsened mitral regurgitation (MR) is an uncommon yet serious complication after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While there have been numerous reports of its occurrence, there is little consensus regarding its presentation and management. This systematic review summarizes the evidence in the current literature surrounding new or worsened MR after SAVR and analyzes its potential implications. METHODS: Databases were examined for all articles and abstracts reporting on new or worsened MR after SAVR. Data collected included number of patients studied; patient characteristics; incidences of new or worsened MR; timing of diagnosis; and treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-six full-text citations were included in this review. The prevalence of new or worsened MR after SAVR was 8.4%. Sixteen percent of new MR occurrences were from an organic etiology, and 83% of new MR occurrences were that of a functional etiology. Most diagnoses were made in the late or unspecified postoperative period using echocardiography (range: 0 minutes to 18 years postoperatively). While no patients died from this complication, 7.7% of patients (16 out of 207) required emergent procedural re-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying new or worsened MR following SAVR and accurate scoring of MR severity to guide treatment. It also outlines the associated clinical measures commonly documented following this complication, and the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of significant MR. These results reflect the current, limited state of the literature on this topic and warrant further investigation into MR detection and management strategies in SAVR patients.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 38(5): 530-544, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30718043

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary cuff dysfunction, either due to pulmonary vein obstruction, pulmonary vein stenosis, or pulmonary vein thrombosis, is an uncommon, yet serious complication after lung transplantation. Although there have been numerous reports of its occurrence, there is little consensus regarding the hemodynamic parameters associated with its presentation and diagnostic considerations. This systematic review summarizes the evidence surrounding pulmonary cuff dysfunction after lung transplantation surgery and empirically analyzes its implications. METHODS: Databases were examined for all articles and abstracts reporting on pulmonary cuff dysfunction. Data collected included: number of patients studied; patients' characteristics; incidences of pulmonary vein stenosis and pulmonary vein thrombosis; and timing and imaging modality utilized for diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-four full-text citations were included in this review. The point prevalence of pulmonary vein stenosis and thrombosis were 1.4% and 2.5%, respectively. The peak pulmonary cuff velocity associated with dysfunction was found to be 1.59 ± 0.66 m/sec. The diameter of the dysfunctional pulmonary vein was noted to be 0.48 ± 0.20 cm. The majority of diagnoses were made in the early post-operative period using transesophageal echocardiography. Overall, 41.3% of patients (26 of 63) required emergent procedural reintervention, and 32% of patients (20 of 63) diagnosed with pulmonary cuff dysfunction died during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying pulmonary cuff dysfunction after lung transplant surgery, and the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography for detection of this complication. The clinical implications of these results warrant the further development of identification and management strategies for lung transplant patients.


Assuntos
Função Retardada do Enxerto/diagnóstico , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Circulação Pulmonar/fisiologia , Estenose de Veia Pulmonar/complicações , Função Retardada do Enxerto/etiologia , Função Retardada do Enxerto/fisiopatologia , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Humanos , Estenose de Veia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Estenose de Veia Pulmonar/fisiopatologia
7.
Can J Anaesth ; 65(2): 194-206, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164528

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Dexamethasone is commonly used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blockade; however, uncertainty persists regarding its optimal route of administration and safety. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the incremental benefits of intravenous (IV) vs perineural (PN) dexamethasone when used as adjuvants for peripheral nerve blockade to improve analgesia. SOURCES: A search strategy was developed to identify eligible articles from the Cochrane and National Library of Medicine databases from inception until June 2017. The National Center for Biotechnology Information Medical Subject Headings browser thesaurus was used to identify search terms and combinations of keywords. Any clinical trial that randomly allocated adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) to receive either IV or PN dexamethasone for peripheral nerve blockade was considered for inclusion. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: After full-text screening of potentially eligible articles, 14 RCTs were included in this review. Overall, the use of PN dexamethasone did not provide a significant incremental benefit to the duration of analgesia [ratio of means (ROM), 1.23; Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85 to 1.85; P = 0.23] or to motor block duration (ROM, 1.14; HKSJ 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.31; P = 0.07). Also, at 24-hr follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding pain scores (standardized mean difference, 0.36; HKSJ 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.80; I2 = 75%; P = 0.09) and cumulative opioid consumption (mean difference, 5.23 mg; HKSJ 95% CI, -4.60 to 15.06; P = 0.15). Lastly, no long-term nerve-related complications were observed with the use of PN dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our meta-analysis suggest that PN and IV dexamethasone provide equivalent analgesic benefits and have similar safety profiles, when used as adjuvants, for peripheral nerve blockade.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Injeções , Medição da Dor , Nervos Periféricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA