Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Adv Biomed Res ; 12: 99, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37288032

RESUMO

Background: Bariatric surgery is a surgical procedure for patients with extreme obesity. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is a method that provides special peri- and post-operation care. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of ERAS and standard recovery cares. Materials and Methods: This is a randomized clinical trial that was performed in 2020-2021 in Isfahan on 108 candidates for mini gastric bypass. Patients were then randomly divided into two equal groups receiving ERAS and standard recovery protocols. Patients were examined and visited after one month regarding the average number of hospitalization days, the average days required to return to normal activity or work, occurrence of pulmonary thromboemboli (PTE) and the rate of readmission. Results: Patients that received ERAS had significantly lower frequencies of nausea and vomiting (P = 0.032). Patients that received ERAS had significantly lower hospitalization duration (P < 0.001) compared to controls. No other significant differences were observed between two groups regarding surgery complication, re-admission rate and occurrence of PTE (P > 0.99 for all). Conclusion: Patients that received ERAS protocol after gastric bypass had significantly lower hospitalization duration and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. They also had similar post-operative outcomes compared to the standard protocol.

2.
Obes Surg ; 33(4): 1245-1252, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847922

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) is a combined bariatric metabolic technique, in which few studies have shown its outcomes efficacy. However, this technique has a high risk of malnutrition due to long biliopancreatic limb. Single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass (SASJ) has a shorter limb. Therefore, it seems to have a lower risk of nutrient deficiency. Furthermore, this technique is relatively new, and little is known about the efficacy and safety of SASJ. We aim to report our mid-term follow-up of SASJ from a high-volume center for bariatric metabolic surgery in the Middle East region. METHODS: For the current study, the 18-month follow-up data of 43 patients with severe obesity who underwent SASJ was collected. The primary outcome measures were demographic data, weight change variables according to ideal body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 at 6, 12, and 18 months, laboratory assessments, remission of obesity-associated medical problems, and other potential bariatric metabolic complications after the surgery. RESULTS: No patient was lost due to follow-up. After 18 months, patients lost 43.4 ± 11 kg of their weight and 68 ± 14% of their excess weight, and their BMI decreased from 44.9 ± 4.7 to 28.6 ± 3.8 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). The percentage of total weight loss till 18 months was 36.3%. The T2D remission rate at 18 months was 100%. Patients neither faced deficiency in significant markers for nutrition state nor represented major bariatric metabolic surgery complications. CONCLUSION: SASJ bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and remissions in obesity-associated medical problems within 18 months after surgery without major complications and malnutrition.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Desnutrição , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Redução de Peso , Desnutrição/cirurgia , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Adv Biomed Res ; 11: 49, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35982862

RESUMO

Background: The present study evaluated the effect of internal mesh fixation and external fixation (inguinal hernia truss) on postoperative complications in patients with inguinal hernia. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 64 patients that were candidates for inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic method following the totally extraperitoneal procedure. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the first group, the mesh was fixed with a maximum of three absorbable tacks. In the second group, the inguinal hernia truss was used as the external fixation for 6 weeks immediately after the surgery. Results: The results revealed that seroma, neuralgia, and recurrence were observed with the values of 6.4%, 19.4%, and 3.2% in Group A and 3.3%, 13.3%, and 3.3% in Group B (P > 0.05). Moreover, patients' pain scores 1 week and 1 month after the surgery in Group B were significantly lower than those of Group A (P < 0.05). However, the mean pain score of patients was not different between the two groups 3 and 6 months after the surgery (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the duration of return to work in Group B with an average of 8.07 ± 3.09 days was less than that of Group A with the average of 9.65 ± 5.34 days (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The mentioned findings can trigger the use of external fixation and an inguinal hernia truss as a support for the abdominal wall to make the dream of not using a foreign body in the human body come true.

4.
Adv Biomed Res ; 11: 41, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35814297

RESUMO

Background: Patient management after bariatric surgery is important in controlling patients' diabetes and recurrence prevention. This study aimed to meet the medical managements of patients with diabetes 6 months after the bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 77 type 2 diabetes patients' candidates for bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y [RYGP] and Omega). Postoperative implementation protocol was one-third of insulin for patients taking long-term insulin and the discontinuation of medications for patients of oral antidiabetic agents. Blood glucose (BG) level was checked regularly by the patients at home and the necessary medical management was applied. The weight, BG and HbA1C levels, and use of oral antidiabetic agents and insulin were assessed and recorded before 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery. Results: BG levels and HbA1C percentage in the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the intervention in Omega group were significantly lower than RYGB group (P value < 0.05). At 1 and 3 months after surgery, the mean insulin dose received by the Omega and RYGB groups was reduced to <30 units/day and 10 units/day, respectively, following the management protocol in this study. Moreover, 23.1% and 7.7% of patients in RYGB group and 12.1% and 3% of patients in Omega group took oral antidiabetic agents 1and 3 months after surgery, respectively. Insulin and oral antidiabetic agents were completely discontinued 6 months after the surgery. Conclusion: The long-term management and support of the patients by the implementation of a standard protocol after surgery are of great significance in obtaining the optimal outcome after bariatric surgery.

5.
J Obes ; 2020: 7572153, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32257428

RESUMO

Introduction. Obesity is among the newest health matters that human beings are struggling with. Length of bypassed intestine is important in achievement of most weight loss and least nutritional and absorptive disorders. This study has aimed to assess short-term metabolic and nutritional effects of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) with a loop bypass length of 180 centimeters (cm) and compare these factors among patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40-45 and 45-50 kilograms per square meter (kg/m2). Methods: 25 patients were put in group 1 (BMI = 40-45 kg/m2) and 25 patients in group 2 (BMI = 45-50 kg/m2). Patients' BMI, postoperative weight, excess weight loss, and laboratory tests including fasting blood sugar (FBS), lipid profile, serum iron (Fe), ferritin, total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), 25-OH vitamin D, vitamin B12, liver function tests, and albumin were recorded preoperatively and within 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results: Weight loss and BMI reduction was significantly more in patients with higher BMI level (P=0.007), and excess weight loss was higher in patients with lower preoperative BMI level (P=0.007), and excess weight loss was higher in patients with lower preoperative BMI level (P=0.007), and excess weight loss was higher in patients with lower preoperative BMI level (. Conclusion: Based on this study, 180-cm intestinal bypassed length works for patients with a BMI level of 40-45 and 45-50 kg/m2, according to their significant decrease in weight, BMI, and improving glycolipid profile.


Assuntos
Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Derivação Gástrica , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 13(4): 610-613, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31930718

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most common way of inserting a gastrostomy tube. If PEG is not appropriate for a patient, then the laparoscopic or open technique should be used. Here, we introduce a new laparoscopic technique for inserting a gastrostomy tube. MATERIAL AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We used this new laparoscopic approach in 21 patients for whom PEG was not suitable. After marking on the abdominal skin and inserting the trocars, two 2-0 silk sutures were passed. Two stitches were placed 2 cm apart in the stomach with one hand. Each suture was pulled out with the fascia closure, the stomach was pulled out with a Babcock, and a purse-string suture using a round 2-0 silk suture was placed outside the stomach, creating a mushroom-retained gastrostomy. CONCLUSION: This new laparoscopic technique is minimally invasive. It provides full control through only two trocars and required smaller incisions than common laparoscopic approaches. This method can be used to insert a gastrostomy tube in indicated patients when PEG placement is not suitable.


Assuntos
Gastrostomia , Laparoscopia , Nutrição Enteral , Humanos , Estômago/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura
7.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 15(9): 1604-1611, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31402293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity, which has various complications and co-morbidities, is an epidemic issue worldwide. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a well-known metabolic disorder among patients with severe obesity. While they are good candidates for bariatric surgery, this deficiency can affect the outcome of surgery negatively. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare 3 different VDD treatment strategies for use before bariatric surgery and compare serum vitamin D levels after 7 weeks. SETTINGS: University hospital, Isfahan, Iran. METHODS: This was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial on 100 patients who were referred for bariatric surgery from 2016 to 2018. Vitamin D (VitD) level was checked before surgery for the patients included in the study, if their VitD level was <30 ng/mL. We rechecked their serum VitD in the 8th week, after 7 weeks of treatment. The participants were randomly allocated into 3 groups: 33 patients were treated with 50,000 units VitD3 capsules every week for 7 weeks; 33 patients were treated with a single dose of 300,000 units VitD3 ampoule; and 34 patients were treated with a combination of a half of the injection dose, followed by the oral capsule for 4 weeks. RESULTS: No case was lost during the follow-up time. No significant differences were found among the 3 groups in terms of their age (P = .654), body mass index (P = .434), sex (P = .799), initial 25(OH) VitD level (P = .273), and history of supplement use (P = .45). Mean serum VitD levels were 15.21, 13.16, and 13.37 ng/mL, respectively, before the surgery and reached 32.91, 24.74, and 29.49 ng/mL after 7 weeks of treatment in oral, injection, and combined groups, respectively. Finally, the 7-week oral treatment option had significantly higher levels of VitD (P value = .034). CONCLUSION: VDD treatment with 50,000 units VitD3 capsule every week for 7 weeks before bariatric surgery yields a higher level of VitD. Based on our findings, injectable supplements are not recommended for VDD treatment.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicações , Deficiência de Vitamina D/terapia , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico) , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA