Can we influence prescribing patterns?

A variety of programming techniques and methods of training have been employed to change physician behavior. Didactic continuing medical education lectures and clinical guidelines have had minimal impact, although endorsement of national professional guidelines by local opinion leaders appears to have a positive influence on the impact of professional guidelines. Interactive, hands-on workshops, performance reporting, and peer/patient feedback are also effective. Changing prescribing habits has been equally difficult. Drug utilization letters involving both pharmacist and physician have more impact than do letters sent only to the physician. Academic detailing, when properly executed, has been consistently effective. When combined with these strategies, closed formularies become a powerful tool in changing prescribing behavior.

Short-term incarceration for the management of noncompliance with tuberculosis treatment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To review the use of incarceration for noncompliance with tuberculosis treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: An urban tuberculosis control program. PATIENTS: Patients treated for active tuberculosis. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We reviewed the legal basis and practical application of quarantine for active tuberculosis, including the use of incarceration for noncompliance. The records of patients treated at the Denver Metro Tuberculosis Clinic during 1984 to 1994 were reviewed to identify patients who were incarcerated and to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention. Of 424 cases of tuberculosis, 20 patients (4.7%) were incarcerated for noncompliance; an additional 21 patients (5.0%) were lost to follow-up prior to completing therapy. Incarcerated patients were predominantly men who were born in the United States and had a history of homelessness and alcohol abuse. The median duration of the initial incarceration was 20 days (range, 7 to 51 days). Of the 17 patients released prior to completing therapy, 13 (76%) were compliant with outpatient, directly observed therapy after one or two short-term incarcerations (<60 days); only three patients were incarcerated for the duration of treatment. Overall, 18 of 20 incarcerated patients (90%) were successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 5% of the patients treated through our program were incarcerated for noncompliance; an additional 5% were unavailable for follow-up and would have been candidates for incarceration if found. Homelessness and alcoholism were closely associated with the use of incarceration. Short-term incarceration followed by outpatient, directly observed therapy was relatively successful in the management of this difficult patient population.

Noncompliance with directly observed therapy for tuberculosis. Epidemiology and effect on the outcome of treatment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology and clinical consequences of noncompliance with directly observed therapy (DOT) for treatment of tuberculosis. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: An urban tuberculosis control program that emphasizes DOT. PATIENTS: All patients treated with outpatient DOT from 1984 to 1994. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We defined noncompliance as follows: (1) missing > or = 2 consecutive weeks of DOT; (2) prolongation of treatment > 30 days due to sporadic missed doses; or (3) incarceration for presenting a threat to public health. Poor outcomes of therapy were defined as a microbiologic or clinical failure of initial therapy, relapse, or death due to tuberculosis. Fifty-two of 294 patients (18%) who received outpatient DOT fulfilled one or more criteria for noncompliance. Using multivariate logistic regression, risk factors for noncompliance were alcohol abuse (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 7.5; p = 0.02) and homelessness (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 7.2; p = 0.004). Noncompliant patients had poor outcomes from the initial course of therapy more often than compliant patients: 17 of 52 (32.7%) vs 8 of 242 (3.3%); relative risk was 9.9; 95% confidence interval was 4.5 to 21.7 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In an urban tuberculosis control program, noncompliance with DOT was common and was closely associated with alcoholism and homelessness. Noncompliance was associated with a 10-fold increase in the occurrence of poor outcomes from treatment and accounted for most treatment failures. Innovative programs are needed to deal with alcoholism and homelessness in patients with tuberculosis.

Directly observed therapy. Who is responsible?

Care of the tuberculosis patients is ultimately the responsibility of the community's public health officer-an agent of the executive branch of government with the legal obligation to protect each citizen from life-threatening communicable diseases. Any physician electing to care for a tuberculosis patient becomes accountable for either directly administering each dose of medication to the patient, or assuring that treatment is provided through a competent and responsive health department.

Combined effect of pyrazinamide and ofloxacin within the human macrophage.

SETTING: Recent reports of outbreaks of multidrug resistant tuberculosis have raised questions as to the most appropriate therapeutic response for those exposed to such organisms. A recent Centers for Disease Control National Action Plan suggests the combination of pyrazinamide (PZA) and a quinolone as a potential preventive therapy regimen. OBJECTIVE: Prior studies in the ex-vivo human macrophage model have shown PZA to have only a bacteriostatic effect and, in addition, to diminish the bactericidal effect of rifampin. This study was designed to quantify the intramacrophage antimycobacterial effect of PZA when combined with a quinolone (ofloxacin). DESIGN: Forty micrograms/ml of PZA was combined with varying concentrations of ofloxacin and administered to human macrophages infected with virulent tubercle bacilli; drug sequencing was also studied. RESULTS: A clinically achievable level of PZA enhances the antimycobacterial effect of low, non-bactericidal levels of ofloxacin and does not impede the bactericidal effect of a higher clinically effective level of ofloxacin. Unlike the combination of PZA and rifampin, these interactive effects are not affected by the sequence of drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the use of these agents as a potentially effective preventive therapy combination for individuals exposed to multidrug resistant tuberculous organisms.