Convalescent Plasma for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

In Winter 2020, Italy, and in particular the Lombardy region, was the first country in the Western hemisphere to be hit by the COVID-19 pandemic. Plasma from individuals recovered from COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma, CCP) was the first therapeutic tool adopted to counteract the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this retrospective cohort study, we report the experience of the city hospital of Mantua, Lombardy region, on the compassionate use of CCP in patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19. Between April 2020 and April 2021, 405 consecutive COVID-19 patients received 657 CCP units with a median anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (nAb) titer of 160 (interquartile range (IQR), 80−320). Their median age was 68 years (IQR, 56−78 years), and 62% were males. At enrollment, 55% of patients had an increased body mass index (BMI), and 25.6% had at least three comorbidities. The 28-day crude mortality rate was 12.6% (51/405). Young age (<68 years), mild disease (admission to low-intensity departments) and early treatment (<7 days from symptoms onset) with high nAb titer (≥320) CCP were found as independently associated with a favorable response to CCP treatment. No safety concerns were recorded, with a rate of CCP-related adverse reactions (all of mild intensity) of 1.3%. In our real-life experience, the first in the western world, early administration of high-titer CCP was a safe and effective treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Pulmonary embolism in patients with severe COVID-19 treated with intermediate- to full-dose enoxaparin: A retrospective study.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may predispose patients to pulmonary embolism (PE), despite standard thromboprophylaxis. Our retrospective study aimed to report the prevalence of PE in patients with COVID-19 and severe respiratory failure (SRF) treated with intermediate- to full-dose enoxaparin. We analyzed data from patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and SRF admitted to our Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU) from February 27 to April 20, 2020. All patients received at least intermediate-dose enoxaparin (40 mg twice daily). Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was used to detect PE. Ninety-two patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and SRF were admitted to our RICU. Twenty-two patients underwent CTPA (24 %), 11 of whom had PEs (12%). We hypothesize that the enoxaparin treatment may be responsible for the lower prevalence of PE as compared to previous reports of similar patients, even if our report had several limitations, mainly the small sample size.

Bosentan for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a progressive disease leading to worsening functional status and reduced survival for those patients who cannot undergo pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Pharmacotherapy with novel drugs for pulmonary hypertension may be useful in treating patients who are poor candidates for surgery, but there are still few clinical data on medical therapy for CTEPH. The aim of this prospective open-label, multicenter, study is to compare the efficacy of 1-year bosentan treatment to standard drugs in nonoperated patients with CTEPH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four nonoperated patients with CTEPH were enrolled. Functional assessment included 6 minute walk test (6MWT), Borg index, WHO classification, arterial blood gases and echocardiography systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). Seventeen patients received bosentan (62.5 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks and then 125 mg b.i.d.); 17 patients were treated with standard therapy alone. RESULTS: At admission sPAP was 76.18+/-5.96 mmHg in bosentan group and 71.48+/-3.71 mmHg in controls, p(a)O(2) 64.68+/-2.25 mmHg in bosentan group, and 59.52+/-2.05 mmHg in controls, 6MWT 297.53+/-34.25 mt in bosentan group, and 268.47+/-36.54 mt in controls. After 12 months there were significant differences between the groups in the 6MWT (+57.24+/-22.21 m vs -73.13+/-21.23 m, p<0.001), dyspnoea index (Borg score 4.29+/-0.49 vs 7.06+/-0.32, p<0.001) and oxygenation (p(a)O(2) 65.93+/-3.76 mmHg vs 48.48+/-1.31 mmHg, p<0.001). The sPAP was stable after 12 months of bosentan (76.18+/-5.96 mmHg vs 71.00+/-5.41 mmHg, p=0.221) in contrast to controls (71.48+/-3.71 mmHg vs 80.44+/-4.70 mmHg, p=0.029). CONCLUSION: The data of this open-label study in nonoperated CTEPH patients suggest an improvement in functional outcomes adding Bosentan to diuretics and oral anticoagulants. No improvement was observed using only standard drugs after 1-year.

Deep venous thrombosis of the neck and pulmonary embolism in patients with a central venous catheter admitted to cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac surgery: a prospective study of 815 patients.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used for therapeutic purposes and to measure hemodynamic variables that cannot be recorded from a peripheral vein. However, the method can involve complications. In cardiac surgery, CVCs are electively placed in the right internal jugular vein but there is little information on deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in catheterized veins (CVC-related DVT) or on secondary pulmonary embolism (PE). The impact of CVC-related DVT and PE in cardiac surgery and measures to prevent PE were assessed. We used ultrasonography (US) to check the point of insertion of CVC in 815 patients in the intensive cardiac rehabilitation unit after heart surgery. In this series, 386 patients (48%) had CVC-related DVT; those already receiving anticoagulant, and considered at low risk, continued that therapy, while those taking an antiplatelet agent (aspirin 100 mg daily) but deemed at high risk of PE from the US findings were given an anticoagulant instead. Only patients with CVC-related DVT at low risk of PE continued taking aspirin. At 3 months, there were no cases of PE among patients receiving an anticoagulant, but six on antiplatelet had non-fatal PE. The prevalence of PE in the whole series of 815 patients was 0.7%. CVC-related DVT is a frequent complication of heart surgery. Anticoagulant therapy started early does not prevent thrombus formation but probably prevents PE, whereas antiplatelet gives no such protection. Sonographic screening of the CVC removal in intensive care unit may be useful for avoiding PE after CVC-related DVT.

Prevalence and prognostic role of cardiovascular complications in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to Italian respiratory intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular complications are frequently observed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) admitted to respiratory intensive care units and may affect the prognosis. The aims of this study were to evaluate a) the prevalence of cardiovascular complications in patients with COPD exacerbation admitted to respiratory intensive care units, b) which parameters detected at admission were predictive of cardiovascular complications, and c) the prognostic role of cardiovascular complications. METHODS: A series of 278 consecutive patients with COPD admitted to 11 Italian respiratory intensive care units between November 1997 and January 1998 has been retrospectively analyzed. All cardiovascular complications were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients (39.6%) developed cardiovascular complications: congestive heart failure 49 (17.6%), arrhythmias 40 (14.4%), shock 13 (4.7%), and hypotension 11 (4%). Multivariate analysis showed that the APACHE II score, ECG abnormalities (supraventricular ectopic beats, right and/or left ventricular hypertrophy) and digoxin therapy were independent predictors of cardiovascular complications. The overall mortality was 9% being 4.7% in patients without and 15.5% in patients with cardiovascular complications (p = 0.0044). Multivariate analysis showed that the APACHE II score, respiratory rate, pneumonia and end-stage respiratory diseases were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular complications occurred in many patients with COPD exacerbation admitted to respiratory intensive care units, and identify a subset of patients with higher mortality.

[New challenges in the management of patients with venous thromboembolism]. / Le nuove sfide nella gestione del paziente con tromboembolia venosa.

Venous thromboembolism encompasses deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), which represent different manifestations of the same disease process. Recent epidemiological studies confirm that DVT is a major health problem and that survival after pulmonary embolism is much worse than previously thought. Our understanding of the risk factors and natural history of DVT has undergone considerable evolution in recent years, influencing the clinical management of this epidemic disease. Known risk factors for DVT have been focused on hospitalised patients so that they have about 100-fold higher risk of developing DVT compared with non hospitalised people. So it is crucial for every hospital to develop its own strategy for prevention, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with DVT. It is now recognised that DVT is a chronic disease, given the high percentage of recurrences after the initial event. The possible modality to decrease the morbidity and mortality following DVT are: a) To develop prevention modalities that have been demonstrated efficacious by clinical evidence; b) To improve the diagnosis of DVT, emphasizing the crucial role of clinical suspicion in patients at high risk; c) To optimize the therapeutic management and follow-up of this chronic disease, with clinical and instrumental tools for monitoring patients during the follow-up and early recognizing the those at risk of recurrences and/or complications.