Is there an editorial glass ceiling? Editorial leadership in nephrology and transplantation journals: A gender-based cross-sectional analysis.

AIM: Editors-in-Chief (EiC) play a key role as gatekeepers in academic medicine, often shaping research agendas. Women have historically been underrepresented in editorial leadership roles in academic medicine. The purpose of this study was to examine gender representation among EiC of contemporary transplantation and nephrology journals. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated gender disparities among EiC of transplantation and nephrology medical journals. The study population was drawn from journals in two subject categories (1) 'Transplantation' and (2) 'Urology and Nephrology' in the 2023 Journal Citation Reports. Binary gender classification (woman/man) was determined by the names/pronouns used to describe the EiC on the journal or institutional webpage. The primary outcome was the proportion of women EiC. Secondary outcome was the proportion of women EiC based on journal topic, location and metrics. Descriptive statistics were used. Gender differences were compared using students t-test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 79 EiC were identified of which 16 (20%) were women and 63 (80%) were men (p < .001). Transplantation and nephrology journals had 21% and 20% women EiC, respectively. The proportion of women to men EiC was not impacted by journal category (p = .93), journal location (p = .61), journal impact factor (p = .71) or quartile (p = .59). CONCLUSION: There was a disparity in gender representation in EiC in nephrology and transplantation journals, with men holding 80% of all positions. These findings, among growing evidence of gender disparity, highlight a need for targeted efforts to promote gender equity in academic medicine.

Protracted COVID-19 pneumonitis early post-ABO incompatible kidney transplantation: Management considerations and the role of whole genome sequencing.

We present the case of a recent ABO incompatible kidney transplant recipient with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and pneumonitis. Serial whole genome sequencing confirmed intra-host viral evolution, which was used as a surrogate to confirm active viral replication and support re-treatment with antivirals, late in the course of infection. A prolonged course of remdesivir combined with immunosuppression modulation resulted in successful clearance of virus and clinical improvement. The diagnostic process undertaken in this case provides a useful guide for other clinicians when approaching similar patients.

Is an Abnormal ECG Just the Tip of the ICE-berg? Examining the Utility of Electrocardiography in Detecting Methamphetamine-Induced Cardiac Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine use is escalating in Australia and New Zealand, with increasing emergency department attendance and mortality. Cardiac complications play a large role in methamphetamine-related mortality, and it would be informative to assess the frequency of abnormal electrocardiograms (ECGs) amongst methamphetamine users. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and severity of ECG abnormalities amongst methamphetamine users compared to a control group. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on 212 patients admitted to a tertiary hospital (106 patients with methamphetamine use, 106 age and gender-matched control patients). Electrocardiograms were analysed according to American College of Cardiology guidelines. RESULTS: Mean age was 33.4 years, with 73.6% male gender, with no significant differences between groups in smoking status, ECG indication, or coronary angiography rates. Methamphetamine users were more likely to have psychiatric admissions (22.6% vs 1.9%, p<0.0001). Overall, ECG abnormalities were significantly more common (71.7% vs 32.1%, p<0.0001) in methamphetamine users, particularly tachyarrhythmias (38.7% vs 26.4%, p<0.0001), right axis deviation (7.5% vs 0.0%, p=0.004), left ventricular hypertrophy (26.4% vs 4.7%, p<0.0001), P pulmonale pattern (7.5% vs 0.9%, p=0.017), inferior Q waves (10.4% vs 0.0%, p=0.001), lateral T wave inversion (3.8% vs 0.0%, p=0.043), and longer QTc interval (436.41±31.61ms vs 407.28±24.38ms, p<0.0001). Transthoracic echocardiogram (n=24) demonstrated left ventricular dysfunction (38%), thrombus (8%), valvular lesions (17%), infective endocarditis (17%), and pulmonary hypertension (13%). Electrocardiograms were only moderately sensitive at predicting abnormal TTE. CONCLUSION: Electrocardiographic abnormalities are more common in methamphetamine users than age and gender-matched controls. Due to the high frequency of abnormalities, ECGs should be performed in all methamphetamine users who present to hospital. Methamphetamine users with abnormal ECGs should undergo further cardiac investigations.

What is the role of catheter antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing joint arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis at the time of urinary catheter insertion and removal is commonly administered in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty, despite the lack of evidence to support this practice. The rationale is the theoretical risk of prosthetic joint infection arising from bacterial seeding from the urinary tract at the time of catheterization. In an era of antimicrobial stewardship, further assessment is warranted. METHODS: This study aimed to investigate the incidence of catheter-associated (CA) bacteriuria and bacteraemia in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty and to assess the antimicrobial susceptibility of any isolated microorganisms. This prospective observational study undertaken over a 6-month period (May to October 2014) included 99 patients undergoing elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne. Urine specimens were collected at insertion and removal of urinary catheters along with blood cultures upon urinary catheter removal. RESULTS: Overall 98% of the cohort received catheter antimicrobial prophylaxis for urinary catheter insertion and removal; the majority of patients received gentamicin (94%). Bacteriuria on catheter insertion had an incidence of 4.4%. The incidence of CA bacteriuria was 1.3%. All cultured organisms were sensitive to commonly used antibiotics including cephazolin. There were no cases of bacteraemia with urinary catheter removal. Increasing age, American Society of Anesthesiologists status and female gender were associated with the development of bacteriuria. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CA bacteriuria and bacteraemia with antimicrobial prophylaxis is low. This study provokes discussion about the requirement of catheter prophylaxis in this surgical context and the utility of preoperative urine screening.