The assessment of quality of care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort in the District of Landeck in Austria.

INTRODUCTION: Structured diabetes care based on evidence-based guidelines is one of the main strategies to improve glycemic control and to reduce long-term complications in diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This study is based on the "Diabetes-Landeck Cohort", a population-based cohort of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM). We assessed the quality of diabetes care and compared it between three groups of care units, that is, general practitioners (GP), diabetes specialists in private practice (DSPP), and hospitals (HOSP). RESULTS: The total study population comprised 1616 patients with T2DM, including 378 patients of GP, 281 of DSPP, and 957 from HOSP. We identified statistically significant differences: DSPP showed the highest percentage of structured training, sufficient training, eye examinations and foot examinations. The group HOSP showed the highest proportion for increased HbA1c≥ 7.5 and almost all long-term complications surveyed, that is, nephropathy (23.2%), neuropathy (14.4%), diabetic foot (5.1%), and cerebrovascular diseases (10.9%). CONCLUSION: This population-based cohort study on patients with T2DM in Austria showed significant differences in important quality-of-care process and outcome parameters across different groups of care units. Future research should also include prediction modeling for early warning and monitoring systems as well as adjustment for patient characteristics and duration and severity of disease.

A population-based cohort of adult patients with diabetes mellitus in a Western District of Austria: The Diabetes Landeck cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has become an important and exacerbating health epidemic, with severe consequences for both patients and health systems. The National Diabetes Strategy of Austria addresses the lack of high-quality data on DM in Austria and the need for developing a national data network. The aims of our study are to establish a cohort including all adult diabetes patients in a district in western Austria, describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of this cohort, and provide an estimation of diabetes prevalence. METHODS: We recruited a population-based cohort of adult patients with a diagnosis of DM in cooperation with a network of all caregivers. Data collection was based on a case report form, including patient characteristics, clinical parameters and long-term complications. RESULTS: In total, 1845 patients with DM were recruited and analysed. We observed an overall prevalence of 5.3% [95% CI: 5.0%-5.5%]. For the subsequent main analysis, we included 1755 patients with DM after excluding 90 patients with gestational DM. There were significant differences between genders in the distribution of specific clinical parameters, patient characteristics, and the long-term complications diabetic foot, amputation and cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, we established the first diabetes cohort study in Austria. Prevalence and the proportion of specific long-term complications were lower when compared to the international context. We assume that the Diabetes Landeck Cohort has reached a high degree of completeness; however, we were not able to identify independent data sources for a valid check of completeness.

Prescription of oral antidiabetic drugs in Tyrol - Data from the Tyrol diabetes registry 2012-2015.

Diabetes mellitus affects 9% of the adult population worldwide and the economic burden of the disease is growing exponentially. In type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), when life style interventions fail to achieve treatment targets, oral antidiabetic drugs are prescribed to improve glycemic control. Several new oral antidiabetics have been launched in the last few years, which enlarged the spectrum of available treatment options in T2DM. The present study aimed to examine T2DM treatment patterns in a cohort of 7769 patients recruited from the Diabetes Registry Tyrol (DRT) with at least one visit from 2012-2015. Secondly, the study aimed to evaluate the use of new oral antidiabetics compared to older oral antidiabetics (OAD). It was found that 43.4% of all patients were treated with OAD alone while 21.2% had oral antidiabetics combined with insulin. 19.9% of the study population were treated with insulin or insulin analogs only. 15.3% had no pharmacological treatment. Metformin was used most frequently (47.9% of the study population), followed by gliptines (27.2%). The most common treatment regimen in this population was the dual therapy of metformin and another OAD (17.2%), followed by metformin monotherapy (16.6%) and triple therapy of metformin and two additional OAD (11.0%).

Increased cancer incidence risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a cohort study in Tyrol/Austria.

BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses revealed an association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cancer. The strongest relationship was demonstrated for liver and pancreatic cancer, followed by endometrial cancer. We aimed at assessing the association between T2DM and cancer specifically for Tyrolean patients. METHODS: We investigated cancer incidence in Tyrolean subjects with T2DM by linking the data from the Diabetes and the Cancer Registries. 5709 T2DM patients were included and the sex- and age-adjusted standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated, cancer incidence in the Tyrolean population serving as the standard. Endpoints were the time at which cancer was diagnosed, death or end of the observation period (31 December 2010). RESULTS: Site-specific analyses revealed statistically significantly elevated SIRs for cancer of the pancreas (1.78, 95% CI 1.02, 2.89) and corpus (1.79, 95% CI 1.15, 2.66) for women, and cancer of the liver (2.71, 95% CI 1.65, 4.18) and pancreas (1.87, 95% 1.11, 2.96) for men. Sub-analyses performed according to the time of diabetes diagnosis revealed that SIR was highest in the first year after diabetes diagnosis, but SIR was demonstrated to be elevated in women for cancer of the liver (SIR 3.37, 95% CI 1.24, 7.34) and corpus (SIR 1.94, 95% CI 1.09, 3.20) and in men for liver (SIR 2.71, 95% CI 1.40, 4.74) in the period more than five years after diabetes diagnosis. In addition, increased risk at borderline statistical significance was observed in females for liver cancer (SIR 2.40, 95% CI 0.96, 4.94) and cervical cancer (SIR 1.81, 95% CI 0.87, 3.32) and in males for kidney cancer (SIR 1.65, 95% CI 0.99, 2.57). CONCLUSION: This study revealed a higher risk for cancer at certain sites in Tyrolean patients with T2DM. However, it is important to interpret the results with great caution due to inherent methodological problems. Optimized care programs for patients with T2DM should be integrated into the recommended procedures for cancer screening.

Multicentre evaluation of a second generation point-of-care assay with an extended range for the determination of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.

BACKGROUND: In the second generation of the point-of-care (POC) assay Roche CARDIAC proBNP, the upper limit of the measuring range was extended from 3000 to 9000 ng/L. METHODS: A thirteen-site multicentre evaluation was carried out to assess the analytical performance of the POC NT-proBNP assay and to compare it with a laboratory N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assay. RESULTS: In method comparisons of six lots of POC NT-proBNP with the lab reference method (Elecsys proBNP) mean bias ranged from -10 to +17%. In lot-to-lot comparisons all six investigated lots of POC NT-proBNP showed excellent agreement, with mean bias between -7% and +2%. The majority of all coefficients of variation obtained from ten-fold measurements using 56 native blood samples were below 8%. No interference was observed with hemolytic blood (hemoglobin concentrations up to 0.12 mmol/L), lipemic blood (triglyceride concentrations up to 14.0 mmol/L) nor icteric blood (bilirubin concentrations up to 63 micromol/L). Hematocrit values between 24% and 51% had no influence on the assay result. High NT-proBNP concentrations above the measuring range of POC NT-proBNP did not lead to false low results due to potential high-dose hook effect. Results with POC NT-proBNP were not influenced by different ambient temperatures (18 degrees C to 32 degrees C), the sample material used, nor by over- or underdosing by 15 microL compared to the regular sample volume of 150 microL. CONCLUSIONS: The POC NT-proBNP assay showed an excellent analytical performance including a good agreement with the laboratory method. The assay is therefore suitable for its intended use in point-of-care settings.