Induction therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by consolidative chemoradiation as organ-sparing treatment in urothelial bladder cancer: study protocol of the INDIBLADE trial.

Introduction: Studies that assessed the efficacy of pre-operative immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder showed encouraging pathological complete response rates, suggesting that a bladder-sparing approach may be a viable option in a subset of patients. Chemoradiation is an alternative for radical cystectomy with similar oncological outcomes, but is still mainly used in selected patients with organ-confined tumors or patients ineligible to undergo radical cystectomy. We propose to sequentially administer ICB and chemoradiation to patients with (locally advanced) muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Methods: The INDIBLADE trial is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial. Fifty patients with cT2-4aN0-2M0 urothelial bladder cancer will be treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg on day 1, ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg on day 22, and nivolumab 3 mg/kg on day 43 followed by chemoradiation. The primary endpoint is the bladder-intact event-free survival (BI-EFS). Events include: local or distant recurrence, salvage cystectomy, death and switch to platinum-based chemotherapy. We will also evaluate the potential of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the bladder to identify non-responders, and we will assess the clearance of circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for ICB treatment response. Discussion: This is the first trial in which the efficacy of induction combination ICB followed by chemoradiation is being evaluated to provide bladder-preservation in patients with (locally advanced) urothelial bladder cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: The INDIBLADE trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on January 21, 2022 (NCT05200988).

The impact of image acquisition time on registration, delineation and image quality for magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance (MR) guided radiotherapy utilizes MR images for (online) plan adaptation and image guidance. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of variation in MR acquisition time and scan resolution on image quality, interobserver variation in contouring and interobserver variation in registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients with prostate cancer were included. Four T2-weighted 3D turbo spin echo (T2w 3D TSE) sequences were acquired with different acquisition times and resolutions. Two radiologists assessed image quality, conspicuity of the capsule, peripheral zone and central gland architecture and motion artefacts on a 5 point scale. Images were delineated by two radiation oncologists and interobserver variation was assessed by the 95% Hausdorff distance. Seven observers registered the MR images on the planning CT. Registrations were compared on systematic offset and interobserver variation. RESULTS: Acquisition times ranged between 1.3 and 6.3 min. Overall image quality and capsule definition were significantly worse for the MR sequence with an acquisition time of 1.3 min compared to the other sequences. Median 95% Hausdorff distance showed no significant differences in interobserver variation of contouring. Systematic offset and interobserver variation in registration were small (<1 mm) and of no clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results can be used to effectively shorten overall fraction time for online adaptive MR guided radiotherapy by optimising the imaging sequence used for registration. From the sequences studied, a sequence of 3.1 min with anisotropic voxels of 1.2 × 1.2 × 2.4 mm3 provided the shortest acquisition time without compromising image quality.

Nodal recurrence patterns on PET/CT after RTOG-based nodal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy (RT) for node-positive prostate cancer (PCN+) frequently involves nodal recurrences, in most cases out of field. This raises the question if current RTOG-based elective nodal fields can still be considered optimal. Modern diagnostic tools like PSMA PET/CT and choline PET/CT can visualize nodal recurrences with unprecedented accuracy. We evaluated recurrence patterns on PET/CT after RT for PCN+, with the aim to explore options for improved nodal target definition. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data of all patients treated with curative intent EBRT for PCN+ in NKI-AVL from 2008 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. EBRT comprised 70 Gy to the prostate or 66-70 Gy to the prostate bed, 60 Gy to involved nodes, and 52,5-56 Gy (46 Gy EQD2) to RTOG-based elective nodal fields, in 35 fractions. Locations of recurrences on PET/CT were noted, and nodal locations were correlated with the applied EBRT fields. RESULTS: 42 patients received PSMA (28) or choline (14) PET/CT at biochemical recurrence. 35 patients (83%) had a positive scan. At their first positive scan 17 patients had nodal metastasis, in some cases together with a local recurrence or distant disease. In-field nodal recurrences were uncommon (n = 3). Out-field nodal recurrences occurred more frequently (n = 14), with the majority (n = 12) just above the elective nodal field. These nodes were the single area of detectable failure in 6 patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Current RT with RTOG-based nodal fields for PCN+ provides good in-field tumour control, but frequent out-field nodal recurrences suggest missed microscopic locations. Expanding elective fields to include the aorta bifurcation may prolong recurrence-free survival. Future research must address whether the potential benefits of this strategy outbalance additional toxicity.

Quantitative determination of erlotinib and O-desmethyl erlotinib in human EDTA plasma and lung tumor tissue.

BACKGROUND: To increase knowledge about lung tumor tissue levels of erlotinib and its primary active metabolite, and about erlotinib plasma levels in intercalated dosing schedules, a sensitive and accurate method for determination of erlotinib and O-desmethyl erlotinib (OSI-420) in human plasma and lung tumor tissue has been developed. RESULTS: A method with HPLC-MS/MS was validated over a linear range from 5 to 2500 ng/ml in plasma and from 5.0 to 500 ng/ml for lung tumor tissue homogenate (50-5000 ng/g for lung tumor). Calibration curves in plasma were used to quantify analytes in lung tumor tissue homogenate. Lung tumor tissue of 15 patients has been collected and analyzed with the presented method. CONCLUSION: This method has been successfully validated and applied to determine plasma and lung tumor tissue concentrations of erlotinib and O-desmethyl erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Numerous markers have been evaluated to facilitate the non-invasive diagnostic work-up of mesothelioma. The purpose of this study was to conduct a structured review of the diagnostic performance of non-invasive marker tests for the detection of mesothelioma in patients with suspected mesothelioma. METHODS: Studies on the diagnostic accuracy of serum and cytological markers published till 31 December 2009, available in either PUBMED or Embase, to detect or exclude the presence of mesothelioma were extracted. Study quality was assessed with use of the Quadas criteria. RESULTS: In total, 82 articles were included in this systemic review. Overall, quality of the incorporated studies to address our objective was poor. The most frequently studied immunohistochemical markers for cytological analysis were EMA, Ber-Ep4, CEA, and calretinin. The most frequently investigated serum marker was soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP). The markers CEA, Ber-EP4, and calretinin were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from other malignant diseases. Markers EMA and SMRP were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from non-malignant diseases. No marker performed well in discriminating between mesothelioma and all other diseases. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is only limited evidence to properly assess the value of non-invasive marker tests in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Studies were of limited value to address our objective and results showed considerable unexplained study heterogeneity.