The association of resilience, social connections, and internal locus of control with pain outcomes among older adults.

Our objective was to investigate the hypothesis that psychological resources, including resilience, social connections, and internal locus of control, separately and in additive combinations, would be associated with selected pain outcomes: 1) days of opioid use and 2) medical/drug expenditures over 2 years. A mailed survey was sent to a stratified sample of older adults age≥65 with diagnosed back pain, osteoarthritis, and/or rheumatoid arthritis. Each of the resources was dichotomized as high/low and/or counted with equal weighting. Among respondents (N=3,131), the prevalence of mild/no and moderate/severe pain severity was 59% and 41%, respectively. As hypothesized, each resource was associated with lower levels of pain; additively, reported pain severity decreased as the number of resources increased. For moderate/severe pain, there was reduced opioid use among those with more resources; and, for mild/no pain, decreased medical/drug expenditures among those with ≥2 resources. Interventions that integrate psychological resources may enhance their effectiveness.

The association of physical activity with loneliness, social isolation, and selected psychological protective factors among older adults.

The primary objectives were to investigate the association of physical activity levels with 1) loneliness and social isolation; 2) protective factors: resilience, purpose-in-life, and perception of aging; and 3) the impact of these factors on healthcare expenditure patterns across physical activity levels. The study sample was identified from adults age ≥65 who completed a health survey in 2018 or 2019 (N=6,652). Among survey respondents, the prevalence of low, moderate, and high physical activity levels was 29%, 31%, and 41%, respectively. Moderate and high physical activity were associated with 15%-30% lower likelihoods of loneliness and social isolation; and with 27% to 150% higher protective factors. In addition, physical activity was associated with the mitigation of increased healthcare expenditures associated with loneliness, social isolation, and low levels of protective factors. Thus, physical activity could serve as an intervention to reduce loneliness and social isolation, augment protective factors, and mitigate excess healthcare expenditures.

Loneliness, Social Isolation, and All-Cause Mortality in a Large Sample of Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Using data from a large random sample of U.S. older adults (N = 7982), the effect of loneliness and social isolation on all-cause mortality was examined considering their separate and combined effects. METHODS: The UCLA-3 Loneliness Scale and the Social Network Index (SNI) were used to define loneliness and social isolation. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed. RESULTS: Among study participants, there were 548 deaths. In separate, adjusted models, loneliness (severe and moderate) and social isolation (limited and moderate social network) were both associated with all-cause mortality. When modeled together, social isolation (limited and moderate social network) along with severe loneliness remained significantly associated with mortality. DISCUSSION: Results demonstrate that both loneliness and social isolation contribute to greater risk of mortality within our population of older adults. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, loneliness and social isolation should be targeted safely in efforts to reduce mortality risk among older adults.

The association of increasing resilience with positive health outcomes among older adults.

Our objective was to investigate three levels of resilience (low, medium, and high), identify associated characteristics, and measure the impact of increasing resilience on quality of life (QOL), healthcare utilization and expenditures, and preventive services compliance. The study sample was identified from adults age ≥65 who completed surveys during May-June 2019 (N=3,573). Other protective factors, including purpose-in-life, optimism, locus of control, and social connections, were dichotomized as high/low and counted with equal weighting (0 to 4). Among survey respondents, the prevalence of low, medium, and high resilience levels was 27%, 29%, and 44%, respectively. The strongest predictors of medium and high resilience included increasing number of other protective factors, lower stress, and no depression. Individuals with medium and high resilience had significantly higher QOL and lower healthcare utilization and expenditures. Resilience strategies integrated into healthy aging programming could be associated with improvements in QOL and/or healthcare utilization and expenditure outcomes.

Cumulative effect of loneliness and social isolation on health outcomes among older adults.

OBJECTIVES: Loneliness and social isolation are described similarly yet are distinct constructs. Numerous studies have examined each construct separately; however, less effort has been dedicated to exploring the impacts in combination. This study sought to describe the cumulative effects on late-life health outcomes. METHOD: Survey data collected in 2018-2019 of a randomly sampled population of US older adults, age 65+, were utilized (N = 6,994). Survey measures included loneliness and social isolation using the UCLA-3 Loneliness Scale and Social Network Index. Participants were grouped into four categories based on overlap. Groups were lonely only, socially isolated only, both lonely and socially isolated, or neither. Bivariate and adjusted associations were examined. RESULTS: Among participants (mean age = 76.5 years), 9.8% (n = 684) were considered lonely only, 20.6% (n = 1,439) socially isolated only, 9.1% (n = 639) both lonely and socially isolated, and 60.5% (n = 4,232) neither. Those considered both lonely and socially isolated were more likely to be older, female, less healthy, depressed, with lower quality of life and greater medical costs in bivariate analyses. In adjusted results, participants who were both lonely and socially isolated had significantly higher rates of ER visits and marginally higher medical costs. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate cumulative effects of these constructs among older adults. Findings not only fill a gap in research exploring the impacts of loneliness and social isolation later in life, but also confirm the need for approaches targeting older adults who are both lonely and socially isolated. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, this priority will continue to be urgent for older adults.

The additive impact of multiple psychosocial protective factors on selected health outcomes among older adults.

Our objective was to investigate the additive properties of five psychosocial protective factors: purpose-in-life, resilience, optimism, internal locus of control and social connections. Self-reported psychological (depression, stress) and physical (health status, functionality) health outcomes and measured healthcare utilization and expenditures were included. The study sample was identified from adults age ≥65 who completed a health survey during May-June 2019 (N = 3,577). Each of the five protective factors was dichotomized as high/low (1/0) and counted with equal weighting. The protective factors were additive such that significant improvements in psychological and physical health outcomes were evident across factor subgroups: as the number of factors increased, health outcomes improved. The magnitude of the improvements was greatest between 0 and 1 factor. In addition, a significant linear trend for reduced healthcare expenditures ($1,356 reduction per factor added) was evident. Interventions promoting at least one protective factor would be beneficial for older adult populations.

Safety Events Associated with Tramadol Use Among Older Adults with Osteoarthritis.

Tramadol is a low-level opioid increasingly recommended to treat moderate-to-severe acute and chronic pain. Although characterized as having fewer opioid-related adverse events, the longer term safety of tramadol use among older adults has not been thoroughly documented. Thus, the primary objective was to examine the risk of safety events associated with chronic tramadol use compared to other chronic opioid use or no opioids among older adults with osteoarthritis. Safety events considered included: ≥3 emergency room (ER) visits, falls/hip fractures, cardiovascular (CVD) hospitalization, composite safety event hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. The study population included older adults ages ≥65 years diagnosed with osteoarthritis and classified into new or continuing tramadol use, new or continuing other opioid use, or nonuse. Inclusion criteria included: 6-month pre period and up to 33 months post period. Tramadol, other opioid, and no opioid users were 1:1 propensity-matched providing study populations of 25,899 within each category; 72% were new chronic opioid users. Multiple logistic regression or Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to document risk. Generally, tramadol users had fewer adverse event risks compared to other opioid users but higher risks than nonusers. New users of tramadol or other opioids had higher risks than continuing users. Tramadol use was associated with increased risk of multiple ER utilizations, falls/fractures, CVD hospitalizations, safety event hospitalizations, and mortality (new users only) compared to nonuse. Thus, although tramadol use may be appropriately recommended within a pain management strategy for older adults with osteoarthritis, careful monitoring for adverse safety events is warranted.