Legislating against hatred: meaning and motive in section six of the Race Relations Act of 1965.

The Race Relations Act of 1965 has been remembered by historians as one prong of a governmental strategy to deal with the impact of black and Asian post-war immigration to Britain, an attempt to improve inter-group relations at the same time as efforts were being made to restrict Commonwealth immigration. This iconic Act was the first to criminalize racial discrimination and outlaw the incitement of racial hatred. This article focuses on the creation and use of one part of this new law, Section Six, the incitement clause. It argues that early patterns of prosecution under this legislation reveal a government agenda which was not solely focused on the protection of black and Asian Britons but instead on longer-running issues relating to the tolerance of political violence. Far from simply outlawing racism, this article argues that the incitement clause ultimately enabled a re-articulation of racial discourse, tweaking the linguistic parameters of racist agitation while consciously allowing for its continuation. In doing so, it reflected a nation which was still unsure about the merits of multiculturalism, where it remained largely acceptable to argue that black and Asian Britons did not belong.

'Like a baby with a box of matches': British scientists and the concept of 'race' in the inter-war period.

Historians of science have often presented the inter-war period as a time when British scientific communities radically questioned existing scholarship on 'race'. The ascendancy of genetics, and the perceived need to challenge Nazi 'racial' theory have ben highlighted as pivotal issues in shaping this British revision of 'racial' ideas. This article offers a detailed analysis of British scientific thinking in the inter-war period. It questions whether historians have exaggerated or oversimplified the prevalence of anti-'racial' reform. It uses a wide range of scientific writings to consider issues of continuity and change in 'racial' thinking in mainstream British scientific communities. The article probes the relationship between science and politics, focusing on the extent to which ideological factors affected both the scientific agenda and conclusions as regards 'racial' issues. Far from dismissing the idea that events in the inter-war period triggered changes in the way in which British scientists dealt with 'race', the article argues that the seeds of the post-Second World War international scientific rejection of 'race' were sown in inter-war Britain amid considerable ambivalence and discord.