An open-label study examining the effect of pharmacological treatment on mannitol- and exercise-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

BACKGROUND: Mannitol- and exercise bronchial provocation tests are both used to diagnose exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The study aim was to compare the short-term treatment response to budesonide and montelukast on airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol challenge test and to exercise challenge test in children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. METHODS: Patients were recruited from a paediatric asthma rehabilitation clinic located in the Swiss Alps. Individuals with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a positive result in the exercise challenge test underwent mannitol challenge test on day 0. All subjects then received a treatment with 400 µg budesonide and bronchodilators as needed for 7 days, after which exercise- and mannitol-challenge tests were repeated (day 7). Montelukast was then added to the previous treatment and both tests were repeated again after 7 days (day 14). RESULTS: Of 26 children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, 14 had a positive exercise challenge test at baseline and were included in the intervention study. Seven of 14 (50%) also had a positive mannitol challenge test. There was a strong correlation between airway responsiveness to exercise and to mannitol at baseline (r = 0.560, p = 0.037). Treatment with budesonide and montelukast decreased airway hyperresponsiveness to exercise challenge test and to a lesser degree to mannitol challenge test. The fall in forced expiratory volume in one second during exercise challenge test was 21.7% on day 0 compared to 6.7% on day 14 (p = 0.001) and the mannitol challenge test dose response ratio was 0.036%/mg on day 0 compared to 0.013%/mg on day 14 (p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Short-term treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid and an additional leukotriene receptor antagonist in children and adolescents with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction decreases airway hyperresponsiveness to exercise and to mannitol.

The ADO index as a predictor of two-year mortality in general practice-based chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Existing prediction models for mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have not yet been validated in primary care, which is where the majority of patients receive care. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to validate the ADO (age, dyspnoea, airflow obstruction) index as a predictor of 2-year mortality in 2 general practice-based COPD cohorts. METHODS: Six hundred and forty-six patients with COPD with GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) stages I-IV were enrolled by their general practitioners and followed for 2 years. The ADO regression equation was used to predict a 2-year risk of all-cause mortality in each patient and this risk was compared with the observed 2-year mortality. Discrimination and calibration were assessed as well as the strength of association between the 15-point ADO score and the observed 2-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-two (8.1%) patients died during the 2-year follow-up period. Discrimination with the ADO index was excellent with an area under the curve of 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.84]. Overall, the predicted and observed risks matched well and visual inspection revealed no important differences between them across 10 risk classes (p = 0.68). The odds ratio for death per point increase according to the ADO index was 1.50 (95% CI 1.31-1.71). CONCLUSIONS: The ADO index showed excellent prediction properties in an out-of-population validation carried out in COPD patients from primary care settings.

[Chronic cough]. / Chronischer Husten.

In non-smokers without intake of an ACE-inhibitor, the three most common causes of chronic cough are eosinophilic airways disease (asthma or eosinophilic bronchitis), Upper-airway-cough-syndrome (UACS) and Gastro-esophageal-reflux desease (GERD). In smokers, chronic bronchitis and COPD are common causes as well. In patients with a normal chest X-ray and lack of information on a less frequent cause in history and physical examination, it is recommended therefore to routinely look for these diseases and/or to treat them empirically.

Chez les non-fumeurs qui ne prennent pas d'IEC, les trois causes de toux chronique les plus fréquentes sont les maladies éosinophiles des voies aériennes (asthme ou bronchite à éosinophiles), le Upper-airway-cough syndrome (UACS) et le reflux gastro-oesophagien. Chez les fumeurs il faut penser en plus à la bronchite chronique et la bronchopneumopathie chronique ob­structive (BPCO). Lors d'une radiographie de thorax normale sans anamnèse ni status pour une étiologie plus rare, il convient donc de rechercher systématiquement les pathologies sus-mentionées et de les traiter de façon empirique.

Response to add-on inhaled corticosteroids in COPD based on airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol.

BACKGROUND: The use of inhaled corticosteroids in mild to moderate COPD is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol might identify patients who are likely to respond to add-on inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Ninety subjects with mild to moderate COPD were recruited and 68 subsequently randomized in a double-blind manner to receive inhaled budesonide (1,600 µg/d, n = 31) or placebo (n = 37) for 3 months. Thirty-eight subjects had airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol (17 received budesonide, 21 placebo). All subjects received tiotropium throughout the study, including 4 weeks before randomization. Spirometry, quality of life (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire), degree of dyspnea, airway responsiveness to mannitol, and exhaled nitric oxide were assessed at week 0 (recruitment), week 4 (baseline prior to randomization), and week 16 (posttreatment). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, budesonide was associated with improved quality of life in subjects showing airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol (difference of changes in quality of life score between randomization and study completion, −9.1; 95% CI, −15.8 to −2.3; P < .01). Treatment with inhaled budesonide also led to a reduction in airway responsiveness to mannitol compared with placebo (difference in log10 response-dose ratio, −0.3; 95% CI, −0.6 to −0.04; P < .01). However, postrandomization changes in FEV1 % predicted, quality of life, and exhaled nitric oxide showed no difference between budesonide and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with mild to moderate COPD and airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol, quality of life and airway responsiveness improved after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids added to long-acting bronchodilator therapy.

Patient-reported respiratory symptoms and pre-bronchodilator airflow limitation among smokers in Switzerland.

AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of airflow limitation among smokers aged > or =40 years visiting primary care practices in Switzerland, and the correlation between airflow limitation and patient-reported symptoms. METHODS: General practitioners (GPs) were invited to participate in the study via letter. Airflow limitation was measured using an EasyOne spirometer without administration of a bronchodilator, and patient-reported symptoms were evaluated using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: 15,084 subjects recruited by 440 GPs had acceptable quality spirometry traces; 8,031 of these (53%) had symptom data available and were included in this analysis. Only 18.5% of the GP consultations were for respiratory reasons. In total, 29% of individuals had pre-bronchodilator airflow limitation suggesting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)/Hardie interpretation. The interviewer-administered questionnaire indicated that 58% of individuals had at least one current symptom - cough, sputum production, or dyspnoea. There were no differences in lung function for patients answering yes or no to symptom questions. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-bronchodilator airflow limitation and patient-reported respiratory symptoms are frequent among smokers, but short dichotomous questions about symptoms are not useful for identifying patients with airflow limitation. Spirometry can identify patients with early airflow limitation in general practice. However, poor quality of spirometry, even with an automated feedback and quality control spirometer, remains an issue.

Bronchial hyper-responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Several lung diseases including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) involve chronic inflammation of the airways. Therefore, there is great interest in non-invasive methods assessing airway inflammation. Measurement of bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and exhaled nitric oxide (NO) are such indirect markers of airway inflammation. Additional information about severity of disease, prognosis and possible response to anti-inflammatory treatment with inhaled corticosteroids can be gained by these methods. However, they are not yet established in assessing patients with COPD in clinical routine. BHR has long been recognised as a hallmark of asthma. Less is known about prevalence and clinical relevance of BHR in the general population and in COPD patients. Longitudinal studies have shown that BHR in healthy persons is a risk factor for development of respiratory symptoms, asthma and COPD. BHR has also been shown to increase the detrimental effect of cigarette smoke and is associated with a decline in lung function. Furthermore, studies indicate that the presence of BHR is a prognostic factor in COPD. Increased BHR to histamine has been shown to be a predictor for mortality in COPD patients. Based on current guidelines, treatment of patients with severe COPD (GOLD stage III and IV) and regular exacerbations includes therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids have been shown to reduce frequency of exacerbations but they have not been shown to modify long-term decline in FEV1. However, one small study found that BHR to inhaled mannitol could possibly predict responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with moderately severe COPD and identify a subgroup of patients that is likely to benefit from this treatment. Exhaled NO has been shown to correlate with other inflammatory markers and to be elevated in asthma. In COPD patients, data is inconsistent. However, measuring exhaled NO may have a role in the identification of patients with severe, unstable COPD who were shown to have higher NO levels compared to patients with stable COPD. This suggests that exhaled NO might be a method to assess and monitor disease activity in COPD. Possible explanations for the contradictory results are different measurement techniques of exhaled NO and different smoking histories of patients in various studies. Smoking has been found to be a confounding factor by reducing NO levels significantly, an effect which might counteract the potentially increased exhaled NO due to airway inflammation. In conclusion, measuring BHR and exhaled NO in patients with COPD might provide additional information about disease severity, prognosis and possible response to anti-inflammatory medical treatment. However, to establish these methods in clinical routine in COPD patients, more data is clearly needed.