Chondrolaryngoplasty with Endoscopic Direct Visualization of the Vocal Cords: Demonstration of Technique.

SUMMARY: Chondrolaryngoplasty is a surgical procedure that reduces a prominent thyroid cartilage. Demand for chondrolaryngoplasty has significantly increased over recent years in transgender women and nonbinary individuals and has been shown to alleviate gender dysphoria and improve quality of life. When performing chondrolaryngoplasty, surgeons must carefully balance the desire for maximal cartilage reduction with the potential for damage to surrounding structures (ie, the vocal cords) that may result because of overaggressive or imprecise resection. Our institution has adopted the technique of direct vocal cord endoscopic visualization using a flexible laryngoscope for increased safety. Briefly, surgical steps include dissection and preparation for translaryngeal needle placement, endoscopic visualization of the needle placed above the level of the vocal cords, marking of the corresponding level, and resection of the thyroid cartilage. The following article and supplemental video provide further detailed descriptions of these surgical steps as a resource for training and technique refinement.

Laryngochondroplasty: A Systematic Review of Safety, Satisfaction, and Surgical Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Since first performed in 1975, two main surgical techniques for laryngochondroplasty have evolved: anatomical localization and direct endoscopic visualization. The aim of this study was to evaluate which method is safest and had the highest patient-reported satisfaction rates, and to determine whether these outcomes have changed over time. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed to find and analyze all medical publications related to laryngochondroplasty. Of these studies, patients who underwent laryngochondroplasty for gender-affirmation surgery were evaluated. Surgical and patient-reported outcomes were compared between different surgical techniques and between studies before and after the year 2010. RESULTS: A total of 226 patients have been reported to have undergone laryngochondroplasty for gender-affirmation surgery. Overall transient and long-term complication rates were 14% and 0%, respectively. A 97% satisfaction rate was reported overall. Endoscopic visualization techniques were associated with lower short-term complications (OR, 21.11; 95% CI, 7.56 to 58.93); there was no difference in long-term complications (OR, 7.81; 95% CI, 0.31 to 194.37) or patient satisfaction (OR, 5.73; 95% CI, 0.32 to 101.97). Studies performed before the year 2010 had a significantly greater number of short-term complications compared to studies performed after the year 2010 (OR, 10.16; 95% CI, 3.71 to 27.82), with no difference in long-term complications (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 0.18 to 113.25) or patient satisfaction (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 0.59 to 42.20). CONCLUSIONS: All laryngochondroplasty techniques result in high patient satisfaction. Endoscopic visualization may help facilitate safe surgery and should be used in conjunction with anatomical familiarity. Technique choice should be dictated by the surgeon's experience and patient desires.

Association Between Mental Health Conditions and Postoperative Complications After Gender-Affirming Surgery.

This cohort study assesses whether postoperative complications are associated with having been diagnosed with a mental health condition in patients who have undergone gender-affirming surgery.

Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 1: Breast/Chest, Face, and Voice).

OBJECTIVE: To perform the first systematic review of all available gender-affirming surgery (GAS) publications across all procedures to assess both outcomes reported in the literature and the methods used for outcome assessment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rapidly increasing clinical volumes of gender-affirming surgeries have stimulated a growing need for high-quality clinical research. Although some procedures have been performed for decades, each individual procedure has limited data, necessitating synthesis of the entire literature to understand current knowledge and guide future research. METHODS: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify all outcomes measures in GAS cohorts, including PCOs, complications, and functional outcomes. Outcome data were pooled to assess currently reported complication, satisfaction, and other outcome rates. RESULTS: Overall, 15,186 references were identified, 4162 papers advanced to abstract review, and 1826 underwent full-text review. After review, there were 406 GAS cohort publications. Of non-genitoplasty titles, 35 were mastectomy, 6 mammoplasty, 21 facial feminization, and 31 voice/cartilage. Although 59.1% of non-genitoplasty papers addressed PCOs in some form, only 4.3% used instruments partially-validated in transgender patients. Overall, data were reported heterogeneously and were biased towards high-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the most comprehensive review of GAS literature. By aggregating all previously utilized measurement instruments, this study offers a foundation for discussions about current methodologic limitations and what dimensions must be included in assessing surgical success. We have assembled a comprehensive list of outcome instruments; this offers an ideal starting basis for emerging discussions between patients and providers about deficiencies which new, better instruments and metrics must address. The lack of consistent use of the same outcome measures and validated GAS-specific instruments represent the 2 primary barriers to high-quality research where improvement efforts should be focused.

Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction).

OBJECTIVE: To perform the first systematic review of all available GAS publications across all procedures to assess outcomes reported in the literature and the methods used for outcome assessment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Assessment of GAS results is complex and multidimensional, involving not only complication rates but also anatomic (eg, vaginal depth), functional (eg, urinary), and psychosocial outcomes. A fully comprehensive aggregation of all prior research would offer an essential cornerstone for continued progress. METHODS: A systematic review was performed after PRISMA guidelines to identify all outcomes measures in GAS cohorts, including patient-centered outcomes, complications, and functional outcomes. Data were aggregated to assess pooled rates of complications, satisfaction, and other outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 15,186 references were identified, 4162 papers advanced to abstract review, and 1826 underwent full-text review. After review, there were 406 GAS cohort publications, including 171 vaginoplasty, 82 phalloplasty, 16 metoidioplasty, 23 oophorectomy/vaginectomy, and 21 with multiple procedures.Although 68.7% of genitoplasty papers addressed patient-centered outcomes, only 1.0% used metrics validated in the transgender population. Forty-three different outcome instruments were used. No instrument was used in more than 15% of published series and 38 were used in only 1 or 2 publications. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found high patient satisfaction for genital procedures but little concordance between study methods, with almost 90% of patient-focused outcome metrics appearing only once or twice. Standardization of outcome instruments and measurement methods through patient-inclusive, multidisciplinary consensus efforts is the essential next step for quality improvement. As GAS continues to mature, building on current foundations with the goal of improving both surgical and patient-reported outcomes is essential.

Strategic Planning and Essential Steps for Establishing a Uterine Transplant and Rehabilitation Program: From Idea to Reality.

UTx is performed to address absolute uterine infertility in the presence of uterine agenesis, a nonfunctional uterus, or after a prior hysterectomy. After the initial success of UTx resulting in a livebirth (2014) in Sweden, there are over 70 reported UTx surgeries resulting in more than 40 livebirths worldwide. Currently, UTx has been performed in over 10 countries. As UTx is transitioning from an "experimental procedure" to a clinical option, an increasing number of centers may contemplate a UTx program. This article discusses essential steps for establishment of a successful UTx program. These principles may be implemented in cis- and transgender UTx candidates.

Telemedicine for Gender-Affirming Medical and Surgical Care: A Systematic Review and Call-to-Action.

Telemedicine has facilitated the delivery of affordable and accessible health care. However, little has been discussed about its use in gender-affirming care (GAC). Telemedicine has the potential to overcome many barriers encountered by transgender individuals such as limited geographic access to care and financial constraints, which have both been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine may also enhance opportunities for training in gender-affirming surgery. A systematic review of the literature on telehealth and GAC was performed. Identified uses of telehealth included: an electronic teleconsultation service, a virtual peer health consultation service, and an open online course on LGBT+ rights and health care for health care providers and laypeople. As the medical and health care communities adjust to the new reality of health care, efforts should be made to effectively incorporate telemedicine into GAC.

Trends of Medicare Reimbursement Rates for Common Plastic Surgery Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of Medicare reimbursement is essential for plastic surgeons providing care to Medicare beneficiaries. The authors sought to evaluate changes in Medicare reimbursement for common plastic surgery procedures from 2010 to 2020. METHODS: The authors assessed the Physician Fee Schedule of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. Rates of work-, facility-, or malpractice-related relative value units and total monetary units for 26 common plastic surgery procedures between 2010 and 2020 were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate relative differences and to compare observed changes over time with the rate of inflation. RESULTS: For the selected procedures, the authors found an average relative difference in terms of monetary units of an increase by 2.02 percent. However, after adjusting for inflation, the average relative difference was a decrease by 14.31 percent. The authors' analysis indicates that, on average, there was a 1.55 percent decrease in physician relative value units between 2010 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare reimbursement rates have changed significantly over the past decade. However, these changes did not keep pace with the rate of inflation. Plastic surgeons should be aware of these trends and advocate for more fair reimbursement rates.

Vaginal Canal Reconstruction in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty with Flaps, Peritoneum, or Skin Grafts: Where Is the Evidence?

BACKGROUND: To optimize neovaginal dimensions, several modifications of the traditional penile inversion vaginoplasty are described. Options for neovaginal lining include skin grafts, scrotal flaps, urethral flaps, and peritoneum. Implications of these techniques on outcomes remain limited. METHODS: A systematic review of recent literature was performed to assess evidence on various vaginal lining options as adjunct techniques in penile inversion vaginoplasty. Study characteristics, neovaginal depth, donor-site morbidity, lubrication, and complications were analyzed in conjunction with expert opinion. RESULTS: Eight case series and one cohort study representing 1622 patients used additional skin grafts when performing penile inversion vaginoplasty. Neovaginal stenosis ranged from 1.2 to 12 percent, and neovaginal necrosis ranged from 0 to 22.8 percent. Patient satisfaction with lubrication was low in select studies. Three studies used scrotal flaps to line the posterior vaginal canal. Average neovaginal depth was 12 cm in one study, and neovaginal stenosis ranged from 0 to 6.3 percent. In one study of 24 patients, urethral flaps were used to line the neovagina. Neovaginal depth was 11 cm and complication rates were comparable to other series. Two studies used robotically assisted peritoneal flaps with or without skin grafts in 49 patients. Average neovaginal depth was approximately 14 cm, and complication rates were low. CONCLUSIONS: Skin grafts, scrotal flaps, urethral flaps, and peritoneal flaps may be used to augment neovaginal canal dimensions with minimal donor-site morbidity. Further direct comparative data on complications, neovaginal depth, and lubrication are needed to assess indications in addition to advantages and disadvantages of the various lining options.

The Affordable Care Act and Its Impact on Plastic and Gender-Affirmation Surgery.

SUMMARY: The Affordable Care Act's provisions have affected and will continue to affect plastic surgeons and their patients, and an understanding of its influence on the current American health care system is essential. The law's impact on pediatric plastic surgery, craniofacial surgery, and breast reconstruction is well documented. In addition, gender-affirmation surgery has seen exponential growth, largely because of expanded insurance coverage through the protections afforded to transgender individuals by the Affordable Care Act. As gender-affirming surgery continues to grow, plastic surgeons have the opportunity to adapt and diversify their practices.

Gender Confirmation Surgery: Moving Forward.

Facial surgery can help facilitate an individual's social transition and alleviate gender dysphoria. As such, surgical requests for feminizing and masculinizing procedures continue to increase. Surgical management requires knowledge of anatomy and anatomic differences as well as an understanding of social challenges faced by transgender and gender diverse individuals. Here, the authors provide a brief overview of gender confirmation surgery specific to the head and neck and craniofacial skeleton. In addition, the authors explore barriers to accessing healthcare for transgender and gender diverse individuals throughout the world.

Training Surgeons in Gender Confirmation Surgery.

Gender confirmation surgery can be an important component in helping individuals alleviate gender dysphoria. Increased advocacy, awareness, and acceptance of these medically necessary procedures have resulted in a greater demand for such procedures, exceeding the number of qualified surgeons able to perform them. It is recognized that formal training guidelines and fellowship programs are needed so as to assure that surgeons performing these procedures are adequately experienced. Here, the authors discuss a potential framework by which a multidisciplinary training program in gender confirmation surgery can be developed and implemented.

Anatomical Basis and Surgical Techniques Employed in Facial Feminization and Masculinization.

Increasingly, facial feminization and masculinization techniques are being employed in the treatment of gender dysphoria. For the facial surgeon, knowledge of the anatomical differences between masculine and feminine facial skeletal structures is of utmost importance. Combining this knowledge with the various surgical and non-techniques that may be employed in order to achieve each patient's goals will allow the facial surgeon to greatly impact the lives of persons of transgender and gender diverse experience. Below, this article discusses these anatomical differences as well as current surgical practices employed in order to masculinize or feminize the face.