Analysis of Risk Factors for Allograft Outcome Comparing 2 Kidneys From the Same Donor in Separate Recipients.

BACKGROUND: An analysis of 2 kidney transplants from the same donor at the same center enables us to analyze the influence of risk factors on the outcome of the grafts in different recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 88 kidneys from 44 donors that were implanted in 88 recipients at our institution between 2007-2016. We defined unsatisfactory outcome as glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 allograft loss or recipient death within the first year after transplantation. Fifty-three kidneys were allocated and age-matched to donors above the age of 65 years (via Eurotransplant Senior Program or center offer). We compared kidney pairs with satisfactory outcome in both recipients (group A) to pairs with divergent outcome (group B) and unsatisfactory outcome in both recipients (group C). RESULTS: Thirty-four grafts (17 donors) had a satisfactory outcome for both recipients (group A), and 16 grafts (8 donors) had an unsatisfactory outcome for both recipients (group C). Donor age was significantly higher in group C vs group A (67.5 ± 6.7 vs 56.4 ± 16.0 years, P = .010). The 19 donors donating 1 kidney with satisfactory and the other with unsatisfactory outcome were 67.4 ± 10.7 years old (group B). A severe surgical complication occurred more often in recipients with an unsatisfactory outcome in comparison to patients with a satisfactory outcome. CONCLUSION: Donor age is an important risk factor for an unsatisfactory outcome, either in one or both kidneys of the same donor.

Outcome and natural course of renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients with severely impaired kidney function prior to transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Since introduction of the MELD score in the liver allograft allocation system, renal insufficiency has emerged as an increasing problem. Here we evaluated the course of kidney function in patients with advanced renal insufficiency prior to liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: A total of 254 patients undergoing LT at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (2011-2015) were screened for renal impairment (GFR < 30 ml/min) prior to LT in this observational study. RESULTS: Eighty (32%) patients (median 60 years; M/F: 48/32) had significant renal impairment prior to LT. Median follow-up post-LT was 619 days. Patient survival at 90 days, one year and two years was 76%, 66% and 64%, respectively. Need for dialysis postoperatively but not preoperatively was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.05). Renal function improved in 75% of survivors, but 78% of patients had chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 3 at end of follow-up. Of eight (16%) survivors remaining on long-term dialysis, so far only four patients have received a kidney transplant. CONCLUSION: Postoperative dialysis affected long-term mortality. In 75% of survivors renal function improved, but still the majority of patients had an impaired renal function (CKD stage 3-5) at end of follow-up. Future studies should elucidate the impact of kidney dysfunction and dialysis on recipients' long-term survival.

Fewer cytomegalovirus complications after kidney transplantation by de novo use of mTOR inhibitors in comparison to mycophenolic acid.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a risk factor for patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed risk factors for CMV infection in 348 patients who received a kidney transplant donated after brain death (n = 232) or by living donation (n = 116) between 2008 and 2013. Of the 348 patients analyzed, 91 received a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)-based immunosuppressive regimen. A total of 266 patients were treated with standard immunosuppression (Group 1) consisting of basiliximab induction, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), and either mycophenolic acid (MPA, n = 219) or everolimus (EVE) (n = 47). We also included 82 patients who received more intense immunosuppression (Group 2) with lymphocyte depletion, CNI, plus either MPA (n = 38) or EVE (n = 44). Only patients in the high-risk constellation received CMV prophylaxis in Group 1, while all patients in Group 2 received prophylaxis for 6 month. RESULTS: The overall rate of CMV infections was low with 10.1% in all patients. Despite the different prophylaxis strategies applied, no difference was seen in CMV infections between Group 1 (10.9%) and Group 2 (13.6%). A multivariate analysis revealed that patients on EVE had fewer CMV complications compared with patients on MPA (P = 0.013, odds ratio [OR] 4.8, confidence interval [CI] 1.4-16.5). Donor and recipient age >65 years was an independent risk factor (P = 0.002, OR 3.2, CI 1.5-6.7) for CMV infections. Patients with CMV infections had significantly worse graft function after 2 years (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CMV is a significant risk factor for long-term graft outcome. Patients treated with EVE developed fewer CMV complications compared to patients on MPA. The use of mTORi is useful in patients at high risk of developing CMV infections.

[Membranous glomerulonephritis]. / Membranöse Glomerulonephritis.

Membranous nephropathy remains the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The common variant is idiopathic membranous nephropathy with no evidence of any known precipitating factors. Membranous nephropathy also occurs as a secondary form in association with inflammatory or neoplastic diseases. Prognosis is mostly favorable as shown by the frequency of spontaneous remissions which averages 30%, although about one-third of patients progress to end-stage renal failure. Risk factors for a poor prognosis include severe proteinuria, hypertension, older age, male gender and impaired renal function. Therapy should include an ACE-Inhibitor and/or angiotensin-II receptor blocker to lower proteinuria (blood pressure < or =130/80 mmHg). The majority of patients should be observed for six months whilst receiving conservative treatment before deciding about an immunosuppressive approach. The debate over its management continues today. Steroids alone are ineffective. Evidence-based medicine supports the use of cyclosporine or the Ponticelli regimen (monthly cycling routine of chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide alternating with prednisone).