Late-developing posttraumatic dural arteriovenous fistula of the vertebral artery: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: A dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) involving the vertebral artery (VA) is a rare vascular pathology that can result from damage to the VA, most frequently following cervical spine trauma. In most traumatic cases, the dAVF develops and manifests shortly after trauma. OBSERVATIONS: A patient was admitted after a fall from the stairs causing neck pain. Computed tomography of the cervical spine revealed a Hangman's fracture, and angiography showed a left VA dissection. The patient was treated with a cervical brace and clopidogrel. Three weeks after trauma, the patient was admitted because of bilateral leg ataxia, dizziness, and neck pain. Repeat imaging revealed increased displacement of the cervical fracture and a dAVF from the left VA with retrograde filling of the dAVF from the right VA. Embolization of the dAVF using coils proximally and distally to the dAVF was performed prior to placing a halo brace. At 6 months, all symptoms had disappeared and union of the cervical spine fracture had occurred. LESSONS: This case report emphasizes the need for follow-up angiography after traumatic VA injury resulting from cervical spine fracture and underlines important treatment considerations for successful obliteration of a dAVF of the VA.

Towards Improved Organizational Governance of Neurotrauma Surveillance Comment on "Neurotrauma Surveillance in National Registries of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Comparative Analysis of Data Dictionaries".

Neurotrauma surveillance data on burden and severity of disease serves as a tool to define legislations, guide high-yield risk-specific prevention, and evaluate and monitor management strategies for adequate resource allocation. In this scoping review, Barthélemy and colleagues demonstrate the gap in neurotrauma surveillance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and suggest strategies for governance in neurotrauma surveillance. We underline state accountability as well as the need for the close integration of academic and tertiary care clinical practitioners and policy-makers in addressing the public health crisis caused by neurotrauma. Additionally, multiple sources for surveillance must be included, especially in communities where victims may remain without access to formal healthcare. Finally, we offer insights into possible ways of increasing the visibility of neurotrauma on political agendas.

Affordability impacts therapeutic intensity of acute management of severe traumatic brain injury patients: An exploratory study in Tanzania.

Introduction: Quality health care in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is constrained by financing of care. Research question: What is the effect of ability to pay on critical care management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI)? Material and Methods: Data on sTBI patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, were collected between 2016 and 2018, and included payor mechanisms for hospitalization costs. Patients were grouped as those who could afford care and those who were unable to pay. Results: Sixty-seven patients with sTBI were included. Of those enrolled, 44 (65.7%) were able to pay and 15 (22.3%) were unable to pay costs of care upfront. Eight (11.9%) patients did not have a documented source of payment (unknown identity or excluded from further analysis). Overall mechanical ventilation rates were 81% (n=36) in the affordable group and 100% (n=15) in the unaffordable group (p=0.08). Computed tomography (CT) rates were 71.6% (n=48) overall, 100% (n=44) and 0% respectively (p<0.01); Surgical rates were 16.4% (n=11) overall, 18.2% (n=8) vs. 13.3% (n=2) (p=0.67) respectively. Two-week mortality was 59.7% overall (n=40), 47.7% (n=21) in the affordable group and 73.3% (n=11) in the unaffordable group (p=0.09) (adjusted OR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.07-2.41, p=0.32). Discussion and Conclusion: Ability to pay appears to have a strong association with the use of head CT and a weak association with mechanical ventilation in the management of sTBI. Inability to pay increases redundant or sub-optimal care, and imposes a financial burden on patients and their relatives.

Endovascular treatment and neurosurgical clipping in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

INTRODUCTION: There are two treatment modalities for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: endovascular treatment (EVT) and neurosurgical clipping. Results of economic evaluations are needed to gain insight into the relationship between clinical effectiveness and costs of these treatment modalities. This important information can inform both clinical decision-making processes and policymakers in facilitating Value-Based Healthcare. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, EBSCO, and Web of Science) were searched for studies published until October 2020 that had performed economic evaluations in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients by comparing EVT with neurosurgical clipping. The quality of reporting and methodology of these evaluations was assessed using the associated instruments (i.e. CHEERS statement and CHEC-list, respectively). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 6 studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies reported both effects and costs, however five did not relate effects to costs. Only one study related effects directly to costs, thus conducted a full economic evaluation. The reporting quality scored 81% and the methodological quality scored 30%. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of published cost-effectiveness studies on the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is poor. Six studies reported both outcomes and costs, however only one study performed a full economic evaluation comparing EVT to neurosurgical clipping. Although the reporting quality was sufficient, the methodological quality was poor. Further research that relates health-related quality of life measures to costs of EVT and neurosurgical clipping is required - specifically focusing on both reporting and methodological quality. Different subgroup analyses and modeling could also enhance the findings.