Sigma metrics analysis of serology screening assays to enhance quality and efficiency in New Zealand blood services.

Sigma metric analysis was conducted across two New Zealand Blood Services (NZBS) laboratories (Auckland and Christchurch) to optimize quality control (QC) procedures. We evaluated five assays (anti-HCV, HIV Ag/Ab combo, HTLV-I/II, HBsAg, and Syphilis) using internal quality control (IQC) and third-party daily QC data extracted from four Architect i2000SR instruments during Jan 2 -31st, 2023. Mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV%) were calculated, assuming zero bias. Sigma metrics were determined using the Total Allowable Error (TEa %) based on difference between positive control mean and signal-to-cutoff (s/co) cut-off. Most assays exhibited CV% values ≤10 % except for HBsAg IQC (18.5 %) and anti-HCV third-party QC (13.4 %) at Christchurch. TEa % ranged from 38 % to 90 %. Overall, the assays demonstrated Six Sigma performance (σ > 6), except for HBsAg IQC (3.97) and anti-HCV third-party QC (5.46) at Christchurch. These high-quality serology assays can benefit from simplified QC design without compromising blood safety.

Charting elimination in the pandemic: a SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey of blood donors in New Zealand.

New Zealand has a strategy of eliminating SARS-CoV-2 that has resulted in a low incidence of reported coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to describe the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in New Zealand via a nationwide serosurvey of blood donors. Samples (n = 9806) were collected over a month-long period (3 December 2020-6 January 2021) from donors aged 16-88 years. The sample population was geographically spread, covering 16 of 20 district health board regions. A series of Spike-based immunoassays were utilised, and the serological testing algorithm was optimised for specificity given New Zealand is a low prevalence setting. Eighteen samples were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, six of which were retrospectively matched to previously confirmed COVID-19 cases. A further four were from donors that travelled to settings with a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, suggesting likely infection outside New Zealand. The remaining eight seropositive samples were from seven different district health regions for a true seroprevalence estimate, adjusted for test sensitivity and specificity, of 0.103% (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.12%). The very low seroprevalence is consistent with limited undetected community transmission and provides robust, serological evidence to support New Zealand's successful elimination strategy for COVID-19.