Plating vs Closed Reduction for Fractures in the Distal Radius in Older Patients: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Distal radius fractures are common and are managed with or without surgery. Current evidence indicates surgical treatment is not superior to nonsurgical treatment at 12 months. Objective: Does surgical treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 60 years or older provide better patient-reported wrist pain and function outcomes than nonsurgical treatment at 24 months? Design, Setting, and Participants: In this secondary analysis of a combined multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) and a parallel observational study, 300 patients were screened from 19 centers in Australia and New Zealand. Of these, 166 participants were randomized to surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Participants who declined randomization (n = 134) were included in the parallel observational group with the same treatment options and follow-up. Participants were followed up at 3, 12, and 24 months by a blinded assessor. The 24-month outcomes are reported herein. Data were collected from December 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, and analyzed from February 4 to October 21, 2021. Interventions: Surgical treatment consisting of open reduction and internal fixation using a volar-locking plate (VLP group) and nonsurgical treatment consisting of closed reduction and cast immobilization (CR group). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was patient-reported function using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, wrist pain, patient-reported treatment success, patient-rated bother with appearance, and posttreatment complications. Results: Among the 166 randomized and 134 observational participants (300 participants; mean [SD] age, 71.2 [7.5] years; 269 women [89.7%]), 151 (91.0%) randomized and 118 (88.1%) observational participants were followed up at 24 months. In the RCT, no clinically important difference occurred in mean PRWE scores at 24 months (13.6 [95% CI, 9.1-18.1] points for VLP fixation vs 15.8 [95% CI, 11.3-20.2] points for CR; mean difference, 2.1 [95% CI, -4.2 to 8.5]; P = .50). There were no between-group differences in all other outcomes except for patient-reported treatment success, which favored VLP fixation (33 of 74 [44.6%] in the CR group vs 54 of 72 [75.0%] in the VLP fixation group reported very successful treatment; P = .002). Rates of posttreatment complications were generally low and similar between treatment groups, including deep infection (1 of 76 [1.3%] in the CR group vs 0 of 75 in the VLP fixation group) and complex regional pain syndrome (2 of 76 [2.6%] in the CR group vs 1 of 75 [1.3%] in the VLP fixation group). The 24-month trial outcomes were consistent with 12-month outcomes and with outcomes from the observational group. Conclusions and Relevance: Consistent with previous reports, these findings suggest that VLP fixation may not be superior to CR for displaced distal radius fractures for patient-rated wrist function in persons 60 years or older during a 2-year period. Significantly higher patient-reported treatment success at 2 years in the VLP group may be attributable to other treatment outcomes not captured in this study. Trial Registration: ANZCTR.org Identifier: ACTRN12616000969460.

Outcomes of Acute Operative Repair of Complete Digital Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Collateral Ligament Ruptures: A Systematic Review.

Background: No consensus exists regarding the management of complete collateral ligament injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) of fingers. Methods: We aimed to systematically review the outcomes of Acute (< 1 month) surgical repairs of these injuries. Outcomes assessed included Stability, Pain, Range-of-Motion and Return to Function. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS) was utilised in critical appraisal. Results: 70 patients with complete collateral ligament injuries of the PIPJ were identified in 5 studies. 49 were managed operatively and 21 non-operatively. All trials were methodologically flawed with a mean MCMS of 50.4, corresponding to a "Poor" Level of evidence. Conclusions: Whilst acute surgical repair of complete collateral ligament injuries of finger PIPJs are a described viable management option with promising results, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to inform current practice. Based on the current literature, no evidence-based conclusions can be made regarding superiority of acute surgical repair over conservative management or one method of surgical repair over another. Further high level studies are required.

Surgical Plating vs Closed Reduction for Fractures in the Distal Radius in Older Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The burden of injury and costs of wrist fractures are substantial. Surgical treatment became popular without strong supporting evidence. Objective: To assess whether current surgical treatment for displaced distal radius fractures provided better patient-reported wrist pain and function than nonsurgical treatment in patients 60 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial and parallel observational study, 300 eligible patients were screened from 19 centers in Australia and New Zealand from December 1, 2016, until December 31, 2018. A total of 166 participants were randomized to surgical or nonsurgical treatment and followed up at 3 and 12 months by blinded assessors. Those 134 individuals who declined randomization were included in a parallel observational cohort with the same treatment options and follow-up. The primary analysis was intention to treat; sensitivity analyses included as-treated and per-protocol analyses. Intervention: Surgical treatment was open reduction and internal fixation using a volar-locking plate (VLP). Nonsurgical treatment was closed reduction and cast immobilization (CR). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score, health-related quality of life, pain, major complications, patient-reported treatment success, bother with appearance, and therapy use. Results: In the 300 study participants (mean [SD] age, 71.2 [7.5] years; 269 [90%] female; 166 [81 VLP and 85 CR] in the randomized clinical trial sample and 134 [32 VLP and 102 CR] in the observational sample), no clinically important between-group difference in 12-month Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores (mean [SD] score of 19.8 [21.1] for VLP and 21.5 [24.3] for CR; mean difference, 1.7 points; 95% CI -5.4 to 8.8) was observed. No clinically important differences were found in quality of life, wrist pain, or bother at 3 and 12 months. No significant difference was found in total complications between groups (12 of 84 [14%] for the CR group vs 6 of 80 [8%] for the VLP group; risk ratio [RR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.21-1.33). Patient-reported treatment success favored the VLP group at 12 months (very successful or successful: 70 [89%] vs 57 [70%]; RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.48; P = .005). There was greater use of postoperative physical therapy in the VLP group (56 [72%] vs 44 [54%]; RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69; P = 0.02). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found no between-group differences in improvement in wrist pain or function at 12 months from VLP fixation over CR for displaced distal radius fractures in older people. Trial Registration: http://anzctr.org.au identifier: ACTRN12616000969460.

Effect of Bicortical Interfragmentary Screw Size on the Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A 3-Dimensional-Printed Biomechanical Study.

Purpose: Spiral metacarpal fractures fixed with 2 non-lagged, interfragmentary cortical screws were tested to failure. The effect of screw size (1.2 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.3 mm) on construct strength was tested in 3-point bending. Methods: Three-dimensional-printed metacarpal test models were reproduced from computed tomography scans to reduce the confounding variables of bone density and anatomy, often encountered when using cadavers. Results: No significant difference was found between the screw sizes, and the peak failure force was similar. Drill bit fracture and deformation during the insertion of the smallest screw (1.2 mm) as well as model failure during the insertion of the largest screw (2.3 mm) were found in some cases. Conclusions: Screws of 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm in diameter were of sufficient strength and did not have the issues encountered with smaller or larger screws. Concerns from previous authors regarding intraoperative fracture were consistent with the pre-testing failure of some 2.3-mm models. Clinical Relevance: Screws of 1.5 mm or 2 mm appear adequate for the fixation of spiral fracture patterns in metacarpal shafts using bicortical non-lagged technique with a low risk of fixation complications.

A Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderly (CROSSFIRE): a statistical analyses plan.

BACKGROUND: We are performing a combined randomised and observational study comparing internal fixation to non-surgical management for common wrist fractures in older patients. This paper describes the statistical analysis plan. METHODS/DESIGN: A Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderly (CROSSFIRE) is a randomised controlled trial comparing two types of usual care for treating wrist fractures in older patients, surgical fixation using volar locking plates and non-surgical treatment using closed reduction and plaster immobilisation. The primary aim of this comparative-effectiveness study is to determine whether surgery is superior to non-surgical treatment with respect to patient-reported wrist function at 12 months post treatment. The secondary outcomes include radiographic outcomes, complication rates and patient-reported outcomes including quality of life, pain, treatment success and cosmesis. Primary analysis will use a two-sample t test and an intention-to-treat analysis using the randomised arm of the study. Statistical analyses will be two-tailed and significance will be determined by p < 0.05. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess for differences in intention-to-treat, per-protocol and as-treated analyses. Sensitivity analyses will also be conducted to assess selection bias by evaluating differences in participants between the randomised and observational study arms, and for bias relating to any missing data. An economic analysis will be conducted separately if surgery is shown to provide superior outcomes to a level of clinical significance. DISCUSSION: This statistical analysis plan describes the analysis of the CROSSFIRE study which aims to provide evidence to aid clinical decision-making in the treatment of distal radius fractures in older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CROSSFIRE was approved by The Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (HNEHREC Reference No: 16/02/17/3.04). Registered on 22 July 2016 with The Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR Number; ACTRN12616000969460 ). This manuscript is based on v.11 of the statistical analysis plan. A copy of v.11, signed by the chief investigator and the senior statistician is kept at the administering institution.

Identification of 3q oncogene SEC62 as a marker for distant metastasis and poor clinical outcome in invasive ductal breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In previous studies, we have shown that SEC62 has an essential function in cell migration, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and endoplasmic reticulum stress tolerance of cancer cells. SEC62 expression correlated with distant and lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in different cancer entities. In this initial study, we investigated SEC62 expression and its possible role as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of 53 BC patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The immunoreactive score (IRS) according to Remmele and Stegner was evaluated and correlated with clinico-pathological findings and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We found increased SEC62 protein levels in tumor tissue compared to tumor-free tissue samples from the same patients. Tumors with high SEC62 expression (IRS > 8), or containing isolated cells with high SEC62 staining intensity, independent of the IRS, had more frequently distant metastases (48.4% vs. 18.2%; p = 0.024 and 47.4 vs. 6.7%; p = 0.005, respectively). Overall survival was significantly worse in BC patients with high SEC62 expression (SEC62 IRS > 8) (54.8% vs. 81.8%; p = 0.011) and in cases with isolated high-intensity SEC62 staining cells independently of SEC62 IRS (55.3% vs 93.3%; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: We are the first to describe the SEC62 expression and its correlation to clinicopathological parameters in mammary carcinoma. Our results suggest that SEC62 expression may serve as a prognostic marker for patients with invasive ductal breast cancer.

Sec62/Ki67 and p16/Ki67 dual-staining immunocytochemistry in vulvar cytology for the identification of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and vulvar cancer: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of a newly established immunocytochemical dual-staining protocol for the simultaneous expression of SEC62 and Ki67 in vulvar liquid-based cytology specimens for the identification of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and vulvar cancer. In addition, we investigated the p16/Ki67 dual stain, which has already been established in cervical cytology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this pilot study, residual material from liquid-based cytology was collected retrospectively from 45 women. The presence of one or more double-immunoreactive cells was considered as a positive test result for Sec62/Ki67 and p16/Ki67 dual staining. The test results were correlated with the course of histology. RESULTS: All cases of VIN and vulvar cancer were Sec62/Ki67 and p16/Ki67 dual-stain positive, and normal and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were all negative. The sensitivity of cytology for VIN + cases was 100% (22/22), whereas punch biopsy classified one case of vulvar carcinoma as inflammation. All cases with high-intensity (grades 3 and 4) Sec62 staining in Sec62/Ki67-positive cases were carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that Sec62/Ki67 and p16 Ki67 dual-staining cytology could be a promising adjunctive diagnostic tool for VIN and squamous cell carcinoma, in addition to standard histology.

Sec62/Ki67 dual staining in cervical cytology specimens: a new marker for high-grade dysplasia.

PURPOSE: In the previous studies, we demonstrated that Sec62 is essential for tumor cell migration, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and intracellular stress tolerance. An increase in Sec62 expression correlated with an increase in cervical dysplasia severity in liquid-based cytology specimens. Ki67 is an established proliferation marker. Thus, in this study, we examined a method of Sec62/Ki67 dual staining for the detection of high-grade dysplasia and cancer in cervical liquid-based cytology specimens. METHODS: Sec62/Ki67 dual staining was performed on 100 cervical liquid-based cytology specimens. The staining results were correlated with cytological, immunocytological (p16/Ki67), colposcopic, and histological findings. RESULTS: All 56 (n = 56, 100%) cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cervical cancer (CIN3+ lesions) were positive for Sec62/Ki67 staining, while low-grade lesions and normal cells were negative. Sec62/Ki67 staining was highly sensitive and specific for the detection of CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions (94.37%; 100% and 100%; 84.09%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sec62/Ki67 dual-staining immunocytochemistry is a promising cytological tool for interpreting high-grade squamous lesions in cytological specimens and for assessing the risk of progression to cancer.