A congestive heart failure project with measured improvements in care.

This project was designed to improve the in-hospital management of Medicare beneficiaries with congestive heart failure (CHF). Eleven hospitals were studied using two indicators: (a) assessment of left ventricular (LV) function, and (b) use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with systolic dysfunction. Baseline performance rates were obtained for 990 cases with the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) 127 for CHF discharged January 1994 to December 1994. Baseline data feedback presentations in 1995 spurred quality improvement plans with interventions such as physician education, critical care maps, and standing orders. Follow-up abstractions were performed on 612 discharges October 1995 through April 1997. The study demonstrated 12% improvement (53% to 65%, p < .01) in assessing LV function and 20% improvement (54% to 74%, p < .01) in appropriate ACE inhibitor use. Projects emphasizing Health Care Quality Improvement Program (HCQIP) principles can successfully affect health care management for the Medicare population.

Primary causes of medical instability of Medicare patients at discharge 1990-1991.

BACKGROUND: HCFA-sponsored Peer Review Organizations nationwide have been criticized by organized medicine, Medicare beneficiaries and interested Congressional parties for being punitive without exploiting educational opportunities garnered through their massive data collection capabilities. Until now this data has been poorly analyzed and has not been adequately utilized as a positive motivational tool. METHODS: HCFA has developed, with the cooperation of the medical community, six generic screens for Peer Review Organizations to utilize when evaluating quality care provided Medicare beneficiaries in an acute care setting. Through the sheer volume of cases seen, significant inpatient information can be obtained that cannot be duplicated in any other epidemiological endeavor. Line item discrepancies can be further studied through small-area-analysis to determine "who" as well as "what" may be the problem. RESULTS: By compiling and reviewing data in a systematic manner over two years (1990-1991), the Alabama Quality Assurance Foundation (AQAF) has singled out problems with patient medical stability at discharge as the predominant concern for care providers and reviewers alike. CONCLUSIONS: Having determined the primary problem in rendering quality care in a Prospective Payment System to Medicare beneficiaries lies in premature discharges, subsequent small-area-analysis further narrows the focus of concerned individuals. Hopefully, practitioners and providers alike will act on their own initiative in correcting this problem. Follow-up review will be utilized to assure this self-corrective action.