RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The conventional myoelectric control scheme of hand prostheses provides a high level of robustness during continuous use. Typically, the electrical activity of an agonist/antagonist muscle pair in the forearm is detected and used to control either opening/closing or rotation of the prosthetic hand. The translation of more sophisticated control approaches (e.g. regression-based classifiers) to clinical practice is limited mainly because of their lack of robustness in real-world conditions (e.g. due to different arm positions). We therefore explore a new hybrid approach, in which a second degree of freedom (DOF) controlled by the myoelectric activity of the posterior auricular muscles is added to the conventional forearm control. With this, an independent, simultaneous and proportional control of rotation and opening/closing of the hand is possible. APPROACH: In this study, we compared the hybrid auricular control system (hACS) to the two most commonly used control techniques for two DOF. Ten able-bodied subjects and one person with transradial amputation performed two standardizes tests in three different arm positions. MAIN RESULTS: Subjects controlled a hand prosthesis significantly more rapidly and more accurately using the hACS. Moreover, the robustness of the system was not influenced by different arm positions. SIGNIFICANCE: The hACS therefore offers an alternative solution for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control of two degrees of freedom that avoids several robustness issues related to machine learning based approaches.
Assuntos
Eletromiografia/instrumentação , Mãos , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Próteses e Implantes , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica , Feminino , Antebraço , Força da Mão/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/inervação , Prática Psicológica , Desenho de Prótese , Rotação , Couro Cabeludo/inervação , Couro Cabeludo/fisiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Motor learning and memory consolidation require the contribution of different cortices. For motor sequence learning, the primary motor cortex is involved primarily in its acquisition. Premotor areas might be important for consolidation. In accordance, modulation of cortical excitability via transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) during learning affects performance when applied to the primary motor cortex, but not premotor cortex. We aimed to explore whether premotor tDCS influences task performance during motor memory consolidation. The impact of excitability-enhancing, -diminishing, or placebo premotor tDCS during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep on recall in the serial reaction time task (SRTT) was explored in healthy humans. The motor task was learned in the evening. Recall was performed immediately after tDCS or the following morning. In two separate control experiments, excitability-enhancing premotor tDCS was performed 4 h after task learning during daytime or immediately before conduction of a simple reaction time task. Excitability-enhancing tDCS performed during REM sleep increased recall of the learned movement sequences, when tested immediately after stimulation. REM density was enhanced by excitability-increasing tDCS and reduced by inhibitory tDCS, but did not correlate with task performance. In the control experiments, tDCS did not improve performance. We conclude that the premotor cortex is involved in motor memory consolidation during REM sleep.