Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 27(9): e401-e407, 2019 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30358637

RESUMO

Chronic pain causes a tremendous burden on the society in terms of economic factors and social costs. Rates of spinal surgery, especially spinal fusion, have increased exponentially over the past decade. The opioid epidemic in the United States has been one response to the management of pain, but it has been fraught with numerous catastrophic-related adverse effects. Clinically, spinal cord stimulation (SCS)/neuromodulation has been used in the management of chronic pain (especially spine-related pain) for more than two decades. More recent advances in this field have led to new theories and approaches in which SCS can be used in the management of chronic spine-related pain with precision and efficacy while minimizing adverse effects commonly seen with other forms of chronic pain treatment (eg, narcotics, injections, ablations). Narcotic medications have adverse effects of habituation, nausea, constipation, and the like. Injections sometimes lack efficacy and can have only limited duration of efficacy. Also, they can have adverse effects of cerebrospinal fluid leak, infection, and so on. Ablations can be associated with burning discomfort, lack of efficacy, recurrent symptoms, and infection. High-frequency stimulation, burst stimulation, tonic stimulation with broader paddles, and new stimulation targets such as the dorsal root ganglion hold promise for improved pain management via neuromodulation moving forward. Although a significant rate of complications with SCS technology are well described, this can be a useful tool in the management of chronic spine-related pain.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Entorpecentes/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor/tendências , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/tendências , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/efeitos adversos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/tendências
2.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 26(17): 610-616, 2018 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059395

RESUMO

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ)-based pain can be difficult to diagnose definitively through physical examination and conventional radiography. A fluoroscopically guided injection into the SIJ can be both diagnostic and therapeutic. The initial phase of treatment involves nonsurgical modalities such as activity modification, use of a sacroiliac (SI) belt, NSAIDs, and physical therapy. Prolotherapy and radiofrequency ablation may offer a potential benefit as therapeutic modalities, although limited data support their use as a primary treatment modality. Surgical treatment is indicated for patients with a positive response to an SI injection with >75% relief, failure of nonsurgical treatment, and continued or recurrent SIJ pain. Percutaneous SI arthrodesis may be recommended as a first-line surgical treatment because of its improved safety profile compared with open arthrodesis; however, in the case of revision surgery, nonunion, and aberrant anatomy, open arthrodesis should be performed.


Assuntos
Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Articulação Sacroilíaca , Artrodese/métodos , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Proloterapia/métodos , Ablação por Radiofrequência/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA