Numerical assessment of induced electric fields in a worker's hand with commonly used metallic implants under exposure to low frequency magnetic fields.

The European Union's Workers' Directive 2013/35/EU on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields specifies action levels (ALs) for external electric and magnetic fields, which should protect against induced tissue-internal electric field strengthEiabove the exposure limit values, the latter being defined in order to prevent tissue stimulation at low frequencies. However, although 2013/35/EU explicitly calls for the protection of 'workers at particular risk' (including workers with metallic implants), the AL specified in the Directive have been derived under the assumption that there are no metallic parts present inside the body. Therefore, in the present work, we analysed the situation of a worker's hand and forearm bearing metallic implants (Herbert screw and volar radius plate) used for osteosynthesis after the most common bone fractures of the hand/forearm, exposed to low frequency magnetic fields. The uniform exposure of the whole hand and forearm as well as the exposure to a specific and widely used device, a deactivator for single-use labels of acousto-magnetic electronic article surveillance systems, were considered based on numerical computations using a high-resolution anatomical hand and forearm model. The results obtained indicated that the maximum induced electric field strength averaged in a volume of 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm cube was higher in the presence of the metallic implants by a factor of up to 4.2 for bone tissue and 2.3 for soft tissue compared with the case without an implant. Hence, it is obvious that the local induced electric field strengths may be substantially increased by the implants. The extent of this increase, however, is highly dependent on the implant's position inside the body, the implant's geometry, and the field distribution and orientation with respect to the anatomical structure and the implant.

Nonsinusoidalin situelectric field caused by magnetic deactivator device for EAS labels-assessment of field strength inside a detailed anatomical hand model.

In order to evaluate the localised magnetic field (MF) exposure of the cashier's hand due to a particular demagnetization device (deactivator) for single-use labels of an acoustomagnetic (AM) electronic article surveillance (EAS) system, comprehensive measurements of the MF near the surface of the deactivator, and numerical computations of the induced electric field strengthEi, were performed in high-resolution anatomical hand models of different postures and positions with respect to the deactivator. The measurement results for magnetic inductionBwere assessed with respect to the action levels (AL) for limb exposure, and the computational results forEiwere evaluated with respect to the exposure limit values (ELV) for health effects according to European Union (EU) directive 2013/35/EU. For the ELV-based assessment, a maximum of the 2 × 2 × 2 mm3averagedEi(maxEi,avg) and the respective 99.9th, 99.5th, and 99.0th percentiles were used. As the MF impulse emitted by the deactivator for demagnetization of the AM-EAS labels was highly nonsinusoidal, measurement results were assessed based on the weighted peak method in the time domain (WPM-TD). A newly developed scaling technique was proposed to also apply the WPM-TD to the assessment of the (nonsinusoidal)Eiregarding the ELV. It was used to calculate the resulting WPM-TD-based exposure index (EI) from frequency domain computations. The assessment regarding the AL for limbs yielded peak values of magnetic induction of up to 97 mT (measured with a 3 cm2MF probe on top of the deactivator surface) corresponding to an EI of 443%. However, this was considered an overestimation of the actual exposure in terms ofEias the AL were intentionally defined conservatively. A WPM-TD-based assessment ofEifinally led to the worst case EI of up to 135%, 93%, 78%, and 72% when using the maxEi,avg, 99.9th, 99.5th, and 99.0th percentiles, respectively.

Nanoimprinted multifunctional nanoprobes for a homogeneous immunoassay in a top-down fabrication approach.

Multifunctional nanoparticles are discussed as versatile probes for homogeneous immunoassays for in-vitro diagnostics. Top-down fabrication allows to combine and tailor magnetic and plasmonic anisotropic properties. The combination of nanoimprint lithography, thin film deposition, and lift-off processing provides a top-down fabrication platform, which is both flexible and reliable. Here, we discuss the material compositions and geometrical designs of monodisperse multicomponent nanoparticles and their consequences on optical and magnetic properties. The rotational hydrodynamics of nanoparticles is measured and considered under the influence of magnetic shape anisotropy in the framework of the Stoner-Wohlfarth theory. The plasmon-optical properties are explained by discrete-dipole finite-element simulations. Rotational dynamical measurements of imprinted nanoprobes for two test proteins demonstrate the applicability as highly sensitive biomolecular nanoprobes.

Computational models for contact current dosimetry at frequencies below 1 MHz.

Electric contact currents (CC) can cause muscle contractions, burns, or ventricular fibrillation which may result in life-threatening situations. In vivo studies with CC are rare due to potentially hazardous effects for participants. Cadaver studies are limited to the range of tissue's electrical properties and the utilized probes' size, relative position, and sensitivity. Thus, the general safety standards for protection against CC depend on a limited scientific basis. The aim of this study was therefore to develop an extendable and adaptable validated numerical body model for computational CC dosimetry for frequencies between DC and 1 MHz. Applying the developed model for calculations of the IEC heart current factors (HCF) revealed that in the case of transversal CCs, HCFs are frequency dependent, while for longitudinal CCs, the HCFs seem to be unaffected by frequency. HCFs for current paths from chest or back to hand appear to be underestimated by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC 60479-1). Unlike the HCFs provided in IEC 60479-1 for longitudinal current paths, our work predicts the HCFs equal 1.0, possibly due to a previously unappreciated current flow through the blood vessels. However, our results must be investigated by further research in order to make a definitive statement. Contact currents of frequencies from DC up to 100 kHz were conducted through the numerical body model Duke by seven contact electrodes on longitudinal and transversal paths. The resulting induced electric field and current enable the evaluation of the body impedance and the heart current factors for each frequency and current path.