[Models for collaboration]. / Kooperationsmodelle.

In the future, a need-base health care system should be ensured by cooperation between the service providers. To promote this, the current legal framework is being adjusted to include the introduction of "day treatment at hospitals", distribution of "service groups" to individual clinics, and the establishment of integrated control centers and emergency centers. Healthcare providers are to be motivated to collaborate via financial support, and also the utilization of synergistic effects and the need of training of future professionals. However, the pursuit of collaboration is limited by professional law, regulations regarding anti-corruption, and the patients' interest in freedom of choice, up to competition law to antitrust law. Collaborations between hospitals and contracted physicians/practices are based on the specifications of the Hospital Remuneration Act (collaboration on a fee basis or in an employment relationship) and the German Social Code (contractual forms of collaboration for emergency services, medical care centers, before/after in-patient treatment, outpatient surgery, specialized medical care on outpatient basis, cooperating with attending physicians, and special healthcare services), as well as being employed at the hospital. Due to their precarious situation, hospitals increasingly cooperate with each other through strategic alliances, up to mergers. To make these collaborations successful, certain principles need to be considered. These concepts entail risks and require trust and a well-balanced relationship between costs and benefits for all partners. The bold path of fair collaborations, focusing on high-quality and efficient patient care, can represent a disruptive innovation for addressing our challenges in urology and healthcare in general.

[Cross-sectoral patient care in the district of Hamburg Harburg: an example of urological cooperation]. / Sektorenübergreifende Versorgung im Landkreis Hamburg-Harburg: Beispiel einer urologischen Kooperation.

BACKGROUND: Ensuring future urological care at the interface between out- and inpatient care is challenging due to demographic developments with an increasing proportion of urological diseases, the simultaneous threat of a shortage of physicians, and the increasing outpatient treatment of complex urological diseases. OBJECTIVES: The cross-sectoral cooperation model between a university maximum care provider and the urologic joint practice with a hospital affiliation (BAG) presented below can serve as an ideal model for outpatient-inpatient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since 2016, there has been close cooperation between the BAG in Winsen/Buchholz and the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE). In addition to direct patient transfer and the continuous pre- and posttreatment of patients, two residents from the UKE rotate to the BAG every year. RESULTS: The BAG benefits from this cooperation through planning security and support in everyday patient care, while the UKE benefits from patient transfer as well as surgical and "basic urological" training of residents. By avoiding duplicate examinations and earlier discharge of patients into outpatient follow-up care, resources are spared. Meaningful patient preselection enables minor interventions to be performed close to home via the BAG, whereas complex cases are carried out at a center of excellence. CONCLUSIONS: The cooperation is seen positively by all parties without exception and, above all, as a benefit for the patient's wellbeing. The optimal training and further education of young urologists in this expanding field can thus be supported and should be integrated into urological resident training.

[Acceptance and status of digitalization in clinics and practices : Current assessment in German urology]. / Akzeptanz und Stand der Digitalisierung in Klinik und Praxis : Aktuelles Stimmungsbild in der deutschen Urologie.

BACKGROUND: Digitalization of patient documentation and introduction of the electronic patient record (ePA) pose challenges to everyday clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the acceptance and status of the digitalization of patient data and the introduction of the ePA among German urologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire with 30 questions about the acceptance and status of digitalization of patient documentation and ePA was sent out via the newsletter of the German Society of Urology. RESULTS: A total of 80 urologists participated in the survey (response rate 2%). Digital platforms such as Urotube or Researchgate are used by 63% of participants. The complete implementation of digital patient documentation was reported by 72% of respondents working in medical practice and by 54% of those working in the hospital (p = 0.042). While 76% see the digitalization process as reasonable, 34% expressed partial or strong concerns about the complete digitalization of patient documentation. Only 14% of the participants offer video consultations. Advantages for ePA include better networking of the healthcare system (73%), improved diagnosis, indication (41%) and treatment quality (48%), and avoidance of medication errors (70%). CONCLUSION: German urologists are open to the digitalization process and ePA. Especially younger urologists are using digital media. The advantages of digitalization are, in particular, an improvement in treatment processes. For a smooth introduction, a cross-departmental establishment and, if necessary, an adaptation of the treatment processes are necessary.