Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 93
Filtrar
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 128(2): 169-79, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17611199

RESUMO

Radon is known to cause lung cancer in humans; however, there remain uncertainties about the effects associated with residential exposures. This case-control study of residential radon and lung cancer was conducted in five counties in New Jersey and involved 561 cases and 740 controls. A year long alpha-track detector measurement of radon was completed for approximately 93% of all residences lived in at the time of interview (a total of 2,063). While the odds ratios (ORs) for whole data were suggestive of an increased risk for exposures >75 Bq m(-3), these associations were not statistically significant. The adjusted excess OR (EOR) per 100 Bq m(-3) was -0.13 (95% CI: -0.30 to 0.44) for males, 0.29 (95% CI: -0.12 to 1.70) for females and 0.05 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.56) for all subjects combined. An analysis of radon effects by histological type of lung cancer showed that the OR was strongest for small/oat cell carcinomas in both males and females. There was no statistical heterogeneity of radon effects by demographic factors (age at disease occurrence, education level and type of respondent). Analysis by categories of smoking status, frequency or duration did not modify the risk estimates of radon on lung cancer. The findings of this study are consistent with an earlier population-based study of radon and lung cancer among New Jersey women, and with the North American pooling of case control radon seven studies, including the previous New Jersey study. Several uncertainties regarding radon measurements and assumptions of exposure history may have resulted in underestimation of a true exposure-response relationship.


Assuntos
Poluentes Radioativos do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Carcinógenos Ambientais/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Radônio/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Habitação , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco
2.
Br J Cancer ; 88(1): 50-7, 2003 Jan 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12556959

RESUMO

Recent use of oral contraceptive pills is associated with a modest risk of breast cancer among very young women. In this US population-based case-control study, we evaluated whether the excess risk associated with recent oral contraceptive use is ubiquitous for all pill types or attributable to specific oral contraceptive preparations. Hormonal content and potency of combination oral contraceptives used for the longest duration within 5 years of interview for breast cancer cases aged 20-44 years (N=1640) were compared with age-matched community controls (N=1492). Women who recently used oral contraceptives containing more than 35 microg of ethinyl oestradiol per pill were at higher risk of breast cancer than users of lower dose preparations when compared to never users (respective relative risks of 1.99 and 1.27, P(trend)<0.01). This relationship was more marked among women <35 years of age, where risks associated with high- and low-dose ethinyl oestradiol use were 3.62 and 1.91 (P(trend)<0.01), respectively. We also found significant trends of increasing breast cancer risk for pills with higher progestin and oestrogen potencies (P(trend)<0.05), which were most pronounced among women aged <35 years of age (P(trend)<0.01). Risk was similar across recently used progestin types. Our findings suggest that newer low-potency/low oestrogen dose oral contraceptives may impart a lower risk of breast cancer than that associated with earlier high-potency/high-dose preparations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Anticoncepcionais Orais/efeitos adversos , Hormônios/metabolismo , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Hormônios/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Estatística como Assunto
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 155(11): 1023-32, 2002 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12034581

RESUMO

Epidemiologic studies investigating the relation between individual carotenoids and risk of prostate cancer have produced inconsistent results. To further explore these associations and to search for reasons prostate cancer incidence is over 50% higher in US Blacks than Whites, the authors analyzed the serum levels of individual carotenoids in 209 cases and 228 controls in a US multicenter, population-based case-control study (1986-1989) that included comparable numbers of Black men and White men aged 40-79 years. Lycopene was inversely associated with prostate cancer risk (comparing highest with lowest quartiles, odds ratio (OR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 1.15; test for trend, p = 0.09), particularly for aggressive disease (comparing extreme quartiles, OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.94; test for trend, p = 0.04). Other carotenoids were positively associated with risk. For all carotenoids, patterns were similar for Blacks and Whites. However, in both the controls and the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, serum lycopene concentrations were significantly lower in Blacks than in Whites, raising the possibility that differences in lycopene exposure may contribute to the racial disparity in incidence. In conclusion, the results, though not statistically significant, suggest that serum lycopene is inversely related to prostate cancer risk in US Blacks and Whites.


Assuntos
Carotenoides/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Licopeno , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 10(10): 1055-62, 2001 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11588131

RESUMO

Incidence rates for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia have been rising rapidly. We examined nutrient intake as a risk factor for esophageal and gastric cancers in a population-based case-control study in Connecticut, New Jersey, and western Washington state. Interviews were completed for cases with histologically confirmed esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 282), adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia (n = 255), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 206), and noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 352), along with population controls (n = 687). Associations between nutrient intake and risk of cancer were estimated by adjusted odds ratios (ORs), comparing the 75th versus the 25th percentile of intake. The following nutrients were significantly inversely associated with risk of all four tumor types: fiber, beta-carotene, folate, and vitamins C and B6. In contrast, dietary cholesterol, animal protein, and vitamin B12 were significantly positively associated with risk of all four tumor types. Dietary fat [OR, 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27-3.76] was significantly associated with risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma only. Dietary nitrite (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.26-2.16) was associated with noncardia gastric cancer only. Vitamin C supplement use was associated with a significantly lower risk for noncardia gastric cancer (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88). Higher intake of nutrients found primarily in plant-based foods was associated with a reduced risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia, whereas higher intake of nutrients found primarily in foods of animal origin was associated with an increased risk.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Vigilância da População , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiologia , Washington/epidemiologia
5.
Cancer Causes Control ; 12(8): 755-61, 2001 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11562116

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between cumulative lifetime exposure to diagnostic radiation and the risk of multiple myeloma using data from a large, multi-center, population-based case-control study. METHODS: Study subjects included a total of 540 cases with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and 1998 frequency-matched population controls living in three areas of the United States (Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey). Information on exposure to diagnostic X-rays was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: No association was found between case-control status and the total number of reported diagnostic X-rays of any type (odds ratio (OR) for 20 or more compared to less than 5 X-rays = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.7-1.2). There was no evidence of an excess risk of multiple myeloma among individuals who reported exposure to 10 or more diagnostic X-rays that impart a relatively high radiation dose to the bone marrow, as compared to individuals reporting no such exposures (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that exposure to diagnostic X-rays has a negligible impact, if any, on risk of developing multiple myeloma.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Georgia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Michigan/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco
6.
Int J Cancer ; 93(1): 148-52, 2001 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11391635

RESUMO

The worldwide rates for histology- and subsite-specific types of esophageal and gastric cancer reveal strikingly divergent patterns. The contribution of environmental and genetic factors has been explored in several high-incidence areas, but data on genetic influences are scarce for Western countries. Using data from a multicenter, population-based, case-control study on 1,143 cases and 695 controls in the United States, we evaluated whether a family history of digestive or other cancers was associated with an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 293), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 221), gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (n = 261) or non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 368). After adjusting for other risk factors, individuals reporting a family history of digestive cancers experienced no increased risk of either type of esophageal cancer but they were prone to adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.97] and non-cardia segments (OR =1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.08). This familial tendency, particularly for non-cardia gastric tumors, was largely explained by an association with family history of stomach cancer (OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.50-4.23). In addition, family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risks of esophageal adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.07-2.83) and non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.09-2.82). Also seen were non-significant familial associations of esophageal squamous-cell cancer with prostate cancer as well as non-cardia gastric cancer with leukemia and brain tumors, though these relationships must be interpreted with caution. Our data point to the role of familial susceptibility to gastric cancer, but not to any form of esophageal cancer, in the United States.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Demografia , Família , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Grupos Raciais , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fumar , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Cancer Causes Control ; 12(2): 117-25, 2001 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11246840

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether dietary factors contribute to the risk of multiple myeloma and the two-fold higher incidence among blacks compared to whites in the United States. METHODS: Data from a food-frequency questionnaire were analyzed for 346 white and 193 black subjects with multiple myeloma, and 1086 white and 903 black controls who participated in a population-based case-control study of multiple myeloma in three areas of the United States. RESULTS: Elevated risks were associated with obese vs. normal weight (OR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.1 for whites and OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.9-2.4 for blacks), while the frequency of obesity was greater for black than white controls. Reduced risks were related to frequent intake of cruciferous vegetables (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.6-0.99) and fish (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9) in both races combined, and to vitamin C supplements in whites (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9) and blacks (OR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5-1.4), with the frequency of vitamin supplement use being greater for white than black controls. However, frequent intake of vitamin C from food and supplements combined was associated with a protective effect in whites (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.9), but not blacks (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.8-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: The greater use of vitamin C supplements by whites and the higher frequency of obesity among blacks may explain part of the higher incidence of multiple myeloma among blacks compared to whites in the United States. In addition, the increasing prevalence of obesity may have contributed to the upward trend in the incidence of multiple myeloma during recent decades.


Assuntos
População Negra , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Mieloma Múltiplo/etnologia , Estado Nutricional , Obesidade/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/etiologia , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 39(1): 92-9, 2001 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11148019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of exposure to pesticides for pancreatic cancer has been suggested in a number of epidemiologic studies. METHODS: Cases (N = 484), aged 30-79 years, were diagnosed in 1986-1989. Controls (N = 2,095) were a random sample of the general population. Information on usual occupation and potential confounding factors was obtained. A job-exposure matrix (JEM) approach was used to estimate the level of occupational exposure to pesticides. RESULTS: A significant trend in risk with increasing exposure level of pesticides was observed, with ORs of 1.3 and 1.4 for low and moderate/high exposure levels, respectively. Excess risks were found for occupational exposure to fungicides (OR = 1.5) and herbicides (OR = 1.6) in the moderate/high level after adjustment for potential confounding factors. An increased risk for insecticide exposure was disappeared after adjustment for fungicide and herbicide exposures. Results of our occupation-based analysis were consistent with those from the JEM-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pesticides may increase risk of pancreatic cancer, and indicate the need for investigations that can evaluate risk by specific chemical exposures. Published 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/induzido quimicamente , Praguicidas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , População Negra , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Fungicidas Industriais/efeitos adversos , Herbicidas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Inseticidas/efeitos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco , População Branca
9.
Am J Public Health ; 90(8): 1277-81, 2000 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10937009

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and risk of multiple myeloma among Blacks and Whites in the United States. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included 573 cases (206 Blacks and 367 Whites) with new diagnoses of multiple myeloma identified between August 1, 1986, and April 30, 1989, and 2131 controls (967 Blacks and 1164 Whites) from 3 US geographic areas. Information on occupation, income, and education was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: Inverse gradients in risk were associated with occupation-based SES, income, and education. Risks were significantly elevated for subjects in the lowest categories of occupation-based SES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16, 2.53), education (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.75), and income (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.93). Occupation-based low SES accounted for 37% of multiple myeloma in Blacks and 17% in Whites, as well as 49% of the excess incidence in Blacks. Low education and low income accounted for 17% and 28% of the excess incidence in Blacks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the measured SES-related factors account for a substantial amount of the Black-White differential in multiple myeloma incidence.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Classe Social , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Entrevistas como Assunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Cancer Lett ; 154(2): 143-9, 2000 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10806302

RESUMO

Environmental carcinogens may play a role in the etiology of breast cancer, but the extent of their contribution is not yet defined. The aims of this study were to determine whether polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-DNA adducts could be detected in stored paraffin blocks of breast tumor tissue (n=147) with an immunoperoxidase technique and whether they correlated with smoking history and/or mutant p53 protein expression. There was no significant difference in mean relative nuclear staining intensity in non-smokers (444+/-90, n=75), ever smokers (435+/-91, n=72), and current smokers (456+/-98, n=35). In either current or ever smokers, PAH-DNA adducts were non-significantly elevated in those with greater compared with lower exposure in relation to age at started smoking, years of smoking, cigarettes per day, and pack years. DNA damage levels were not elevated in tissues with compared with those without mutant p53 protein expression. These data demonstrate that immunohistochemical methods can be used to monitor DNA damage levels in archived breast tissues.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Adutos de DNA/metabolismo , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/metabolismo , Fumar , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Análise de Variância , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Carcinógenos/metabolismo , Adutos de DNA/biossíntese , Dano ao DNA , Feminino , Genes p53/genética , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Mutação , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismo
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(3): 231-8, 2000 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10782657

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has risen rapidly in the past two decades, for unknown reasons. The goal of this analysis was to determine whether gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or the medications used to treat it are associated with an increased risk of esophageal or gastric cancer, using data from a large population-based case-control study. METHODS: Cases were aged 30-79 years, newly diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 293), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 221), gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (n = 261), or non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 368) in three areas with population-based tumor registries. Controls (n = 695) were chosen by random digit dialing and from Health Care Financing Administration rosters. Data were collected using an in-person structured interview. RESULTS: History of gastric ulcer was associated with an increased risk of non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.2). Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma increased with frequency of GERD symptoms; the odds ratio in those reporting daily symptoms was 5.5 (95% CI 3.2-9.3). Ever having used H2 blockers was unassociated with esophageal adenocarcinoma risk (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.5). The odds ratio was 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-2.8) in long-term (4 or more years) users, but increased to 2.1 (95% CI 0.8-5.6) when use in the 5 years prior to the interview was disregarded. Risk was also modestly increased among users of antacids. Neither GERD symptoms nor use of H2 blockers or antacids was associated with risk of the other three tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with long-standing GERD are at increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, whether or not the symptoms are treated with H2 blockers or antacids.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antiácidos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiologia , Úlcera Gástrica/complicações , Washington/epidemiologia
12.
Br J Cancer ; 82(3): 718-25, 2000 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10682688

RESUMO

A population-based case-control study was carried out among 981 men (479 black, 502 white) with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1315 controls (594 black, 721 white). In-person interviews elicited information on sexual behaviour and other potential risk factors for prostate cancer. Blood was drawn for serologic studies in a subset of the cases (n = 276) and controls (n = 295). Prostate cancer risk was increased among men who reported a history of gonorrhoea or syphilis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6; 95% confidence internal (CI) 1.2-2.1) or showed serological evidence of syphilis (MHA-TP) (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.0-3.5). Patterns of risk for gonorrhoea and syphilis were similar for blacks (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and whites (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 0.8-3.2). Risks increased with increasing occurrences of gonorrhoea, rising to OR = 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-7.8) among subjects with three or more events (Ptrend = 0.0005). Frequent sexual encounters with prostitutes and failure to use condoms were also associated with increased risk. Syphilis, gonorrhoea, sex with prostitutes and unprotected sexual intercourse may be indicators of contact with a sexually transmissible factor that increases the risk of prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/complicações , População Branca
13.
Women Health ; 31(2-3): 81-96, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11289687

RESUMO

Data on 1,501 control women from a multi-center, population-based, case-control study of breast cancer were used to examine characteristics associated with recreational exercise during the year prior to the interview among women 20 to 44 years of age. In a univariate analysis, higher levels of recreational exercise were associated with: higher education; higher family income; white race; previous participation in recreational exercise above the median level at ages 12 to 13 and at age 20; being nulliparous; ever lactating; being a never or past smoker; having a low current Quetelet's index (QI: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); and living in Atlanta or Seattle (compared to New Jersey). In a multiple linear regression model, independent predictors of higher levels of recreational exercise were: participation in higher levels of exercise at 20 years of age; having a low current QI; and never having smoked. Though all women should be encouraged to participate in exercise, these findings identity subgroups of women that may need targeting when developing exercise intervention programs.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Recreação , Saúde da Mulher , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Feminino , Georgia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Recreação/fisiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Washington/epidemiologia
14.
Int J Epidemiol ; 28(5): 816-23, 1999 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10597976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several common medical conditions are associated with altered hormone levels, and may thus plausibly influence breast cancer risk. Few studies have examined such relationships, and we utilized a population-based case-control study of young women in the US to examine breast cancer risk following a history of various medical conditions. Relationships between breast cancer and each medical condition examined are biologically plausible, and relevant in terms of public health. METHODS: The study included 2173 breast cancer cases and 1990 population-based controls from three areas of the US, under 55 years, who were administered a questionnaire including details of physician-diagnosed medical conditions. RESULTS: No significantly increased or decreased breast cancer risk was associated with a history of thyroid disease, gallbladder disease, colorectal polyps, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol or surgery for endometriosis. There was some evidence of an increased breast cancer risk associated with ovarian cysts among women who did not receive an oophorectomy (relative risk [RR] = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.0-3.9). Non-significant increases in breast cancer risk were observed following diagnoses of several other cancers, including thyroid cancer, basal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease and malignant melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, our generally null results from this large, population-based study support results from previous studies in providing reassurance that women with a history of several common medical conditions do not appear to be at an increased risk of breast cancer at a young age.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Doenças da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Vigilância da População , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Br J Cancer ; 81(1): 167-74, 1999 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10487629

RESUMO

Findings have been inconsistent on effects of adolescent body size and adult weight gain on risk of breast cancer in young women. These relations were examined in a population-based case control study of 1590 women less than 45 years of age newly diagnosed with breast cancer during 1990-1992 in three areas of the US and an age-matched control group of 1390 women. Height and weight were measured at interview and participants asked to recall information about earlier body size. Logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk of breast cancer adjusted for other risk factors. Women who were either much heavier or lighter than average in adolescence or at age 20 were at reduced risk. Weight gain after age 20 resulted in reduced risk, but the effect was confined to early-stage and, more specifically, lower grade breast cancer. Neither the risk reduction nor the variation by breast cancer stage or grade was explained by the method of cancer detection or by prior mammography history. These findings suggest that relations between breast cancer risk in young women and body weight at different ages is complex and that the risk reduction with adult weight gain is confined to less aggressive cancers.


Assuntos
Constituição Corporal , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/fisiopatologia , Aumento de Peso , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fatores de Risco
16.
Br J Cancer ; 80(11): 1830-7, 1999 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10468306

RESUMO

In a population-based case-control study of pancreatic cancer conducted in three areas of the USA, 484 cases and 2099 controls were interviewed to evaluate the aetiologic role of several medical conditions/interventions, including diabetes mellitus, cholecystectomy, ulcer/gastrectomy and allergic states. We also evaluated risk associated with family history of cancer. Our findings support previous studies indicating that diabetes is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, as well as a possible complication of the tumour. A significant positive trend in risk with increasing years prior to diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was apparent (P-value for test of trend = 0.016), with diabetics diagnosed at least 10 years prior to diagnosis having a significant 50% increased risk. Those treated with insulin had risks similar to those not treated with insulin (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6 and 1.5 respectively), and no trend in risk was associated with increasing duration of insulin treatment. Cholecystectomy also appeared to be a risk factor, as well as a consequence of the malignancy. Subjects with a cholecystectomy at least 20 years prior to the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer experienced a 70% increased risk, which was marginally significant. In contrast, subjects with a history of duodenal or gastric ulcer had little or no elevated risk (OR = 1.2; confidence interval = 0.9-1.6). Those treated by gastrectomy had the same risk as those not receiving surgery, providing little support for the hypothesis that gastrectomy is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. A significant 40% reduced risk was associated with hay fever, a non-significant 50% decreased risk with allergies to animals, and a non-significant 40% reduced risk with allergies to dust/moulds. These associations, however, may be due to chance since no risk reductions were apparent for asthma or several other types of allergies. In addition, we observed significantly increased risks for subjects reporting a first-degree relative with cancers of the pancreas (OR = 3.2), colon (OR = 1.7) or ovary (OR = 5.3) and non-significantly increased risks for cancers of the endometrium (OR = 1.5) or breast (OR = 1.3). The pattern is consistent with the familial predisposition reported for pancreatic cancer and with the array of tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/etiologia , Núcleo Familiar , Razão de Chances , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Valores de Referência , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fumar , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(5): 413-9, 1999 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10350436

RESUMO

This study was undertaken to explore whether the incidence of breast tumors that overexpress HER-2/neu protein product (HER-2/neu+) is more strongly associated with oral contraceptives (OCs) and other factors than is the incidence of tumors that do not (HER-2/neu-). In a population-based sample of women <45 years, 42.9% (159 of 371) of in situ and invasive breast cancer cases were HER-2/neu+ as assessed by immunohistochemistry in archived tissue. Polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HER-2/neu+ and HER-2/neu-breast cancer, as compared with 462 population-based controls, in relation to OCs and other factors. The ratio of the ORs (HER-2/neu+ versus HER-2/neu-tumors) was used as an indicator of heterogeneity in risk. There was little heterogeneity in risk for OC use of 6 months or more by HER-2/neu status (age-adjusted ratio of ORs, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.83-2.00). Among early pill users (< or =18 years of age) heterogeneity was apparent (2.39; 95% CI, 1.08-5.30), which was attenuated in a multivariate model (1.99; 95% CI, 0.87-4.54); among cases with estrogen receptor-negative tumors, heterogeneity increased to 5-fold. For other risk factors, there was no marked heterogeneity between + and - tumors for HER-2/neu. In summary, the incidence of breast cancer among younger women in relation to OC use at an early age varied with HER-2/neu status, with the odds ratio for +tumors twice that for -tumors.


PIP: This population-based study was undertaken to address the hypothesis that the incidence of breast tumor with a high HER-2/neu+ protein product was associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use and other risk factors compared with HER-2/neu- tumors. The study was conducted through the collection of archived paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, laboratory evaluation and combined laboratory results with risk factor information. About 159 of 371 (42.9%) in-situ and invasive breast cancer cases showed overexpression of HER-2/neu+ during immunohistochemistry of archived tissue. During the statistical analysis using a polytomous logistic regression, odds ratio (OR) was calculated and 95% confidence interval (CI) for HER-2/neu+ breast cancer and HER-2/neu- breast cancer compared with 401 controls regarding OC use and other risk factors. The OR (HER-2/neu+ vs. HER-2/neu- tumors) was used as an indicator of heterogeneity in risk. There was little heterogeneity in risk for OC use of 6 months or more by HER-2/neu status (age-adjusted OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.83-2.00). In early pill users, heterogeneity by HER-2/neu status was apparent (2.39; 95% CI, 1.08-5.30). A 5-fold increase in heterogeneity risk was noted among women with estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors. In conclusion, the incidence of breast cancer among younger women in relation to OC use at an early age varied with HER-2/neu status, with the OR for positive tumors being twice that for negative tumors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Anticoncepcionais Orais/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/etiologia , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Fatores de Risco
18.
Cancer ; 85(11): 2385-90, 1999 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10357409

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the U.S., the incidence rate of multiple myeloma is more than twice as high for blacks as for whites, but the etiology of this malignancy is not well understood. METHODS: A population-based case-control interview study of 565 subjects (361 white, 204 black) with multiple myeloma and 2104 controls (1150 white, 954 black) living in 3 areas of the U.S. offered the opportunity to explore whether family history, of cancer contributes to the risk of multiple myeloma and explains the racial disparity in risk. RESULTS: For both races combined, the risk of multiple myeloma was significantly elevated for subjects who reported that a first-degree relative had multiple myeloma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-12.0). Increased risk was also associated with a family history of any hematolymphoproliferative (HLP) cancer (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0-2.8), especially in a sibling (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1-4.5). The risk associated with familial occurrence of HLP cancer was higher for blacks than for whites, but the difference between the ORs was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with previous studies that indicate a familial risk of multiple myeloma, but they explain little of the race-related difference in incidence rates.


Assuntos
População Negra , Saúde da Família , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/etiologia , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(3): 255-63, 1999 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10090304

RESUMO

p53 mutations may be a fingerprint for cigarette smoking and other environmental carcinogens, including breast carcinogens. This study was undertaken to explore whether p53 mutations are associated with environmental or other suspected or established risk factors for breast cancer. p53 protein detection by immunohistochemistry (which is more easily quantified in large epidemiological studies than are mutations, and are highly correlated with them) was determined for 378 patients from a case-control study of breast cancer. In this population-based sample of women under the age of 45 years, 44.4% (168/378) of the cases had p53 protein detected by immunohistochemistry (p53+). Polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) for p53+ and p53- breast cancer, as compared with the controls, in relation to cigarette smoking and other factors. The ratio of the ORs was used as an indicator of heterogeneity in risk for p53+ versus p53- cancer. The ratio of the ORs in a multivariate model was substantially elevated among women with a greater than high school education [2.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43-4.00], current cigarette smokers (1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.52), and users of electric blankets, water beds, or mattresses (1.78; 95% CI, 1.11-2.86). Nonsignificant heterogeneity was noted for family history of breast cancer and ethnicity but not for other known or suspected risk factors. Coupled with the strong biological plausibility of the association, our data support the hypothesis that in breast cancer, as with other tumors, p53 protein immunohistochemical detection may be associated with exposure to environmental carcinogens such as cigarette smoking.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Genes p53/genética , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/genética , Adulto , Roupas de Cama, Mesa e Banho , Leitos , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Carcinógenos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Escolaridade , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Mutação/genética , Razão de Chances , Vigilância da População , História Reprodutiva , Fatores de Risco
20.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(1): 25-34, 1999 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9950236

RESUMO

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men in the United States, with substantially higher rates among American blacks than whites. We carried out a population-based case-control study in three geographic areas of the United States to evaluate the reasons for the racial disparity in incidence rates. A total of 932 men (449 black men and 483 white men) who had been newly diagnosed with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1201 controls (543 black men and 658 white men) were interviewed in person to elicit information on potential risk factors. This report evaluates the impact of dietary factors, particularly the consumption of animal products and animal fat, on the risk of prostate cancer among blacks and whites in the United States. Increased consumption (grams/day) of foods high in animal fat was linked to prostate cancer (independent of intake of other calories) among American blacks [by quartile of intake, odds ratio (OR) = 1.0 (referent), 1.5, 2.1, and 2.0; Ptrend = 0.007], but not among American whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 1.6, 1.5, and 1.1; Ptrend = 0.90]. However, risks for advanced prostate cancer were higher with greater intake of foods high in animal fat among blacks [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 4.2, and 3.1; Ptrend = 0.006] and whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 2.6, and 2.4; Ptrend = 0.02]. Increased intake of animal fat as a proportion of total caloric intake also showed positive but weaker associations with advanced prostate cancer among blacks (Ptrend = 0.13) and whites (Ptrend = 0.08). No clear associations were found with vitamin A, calcium, or specific lycopene-rich foods. The study linked greater consumption of fat from animal sources to increased risk for prostate cancer among American blacks and to advanced prostate cancer among American blacks and whites. A reduction of fat from animal sources in the diet could lead to decreased incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer, particularly among American blacks.


Assuntos
População Negra , Comportamento Alimentar , Neoplasias da Próstata/etiologia , População Branca , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Animais , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Carotenoides/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Gorduras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Gorduras na Dieta/efeitos adversos , Ingestão de Energia , Humanos , Incidência , Licopeno , Masculino , Carne , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos , Vitamina A/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...