Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
4.
Am J Med ; 61(5): 641-9, 1976 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-984067

RESUMO

Sinus nod recovery time (SNRT) at paced atrial rates of 100 (SNRT100) and 120 (SNRT120) beats/min, atrial effective refractory periods at spontaneous heart rates (AERP) and at paced rates of 100 (AERP100) and 120 (AERP120) beats/min, and premature atrial stimulation were among the studies in evaluating 33 patients with symptomatic sinus node disease and 42 normal subjects. Although mean SNRT100 and SNRT120 were statistically significantly greater in patients than in control subjects, there was a significant overlap between patient and control groups, and SNRT100 or SNRT120 was associated with a 30.3 per cent false-negative and 5 per cent false-positive incidence. Correction for heart rate (SNRT-spontaneous cycle length) failed to improve the sensitivity or specificity of this test. There was no significant difference in mean AERP, AERP100 or AERP120, or in sinoatrial conduction time in patients compared with control subjects. Analyses of curves derived from plots of test and return cycles showed abnormal curves in only five of the 24 patients studied by progressively premature atrial stimulation. Two of these five patients showed normal zone I and II phenomena followed by a progressive linear increase in the return cycle that was thought to be due to abnormal refractoriness of the perinodal fibers.


Assuntos
Arritmia Sinusal/fisiopatologia , Marca-Passo Artificial , Adulto , Idoso , Eletrocardiografia , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Refratário Eletrofisiológico , Nó Sinoatrial/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA