Selection influences naive CD8+ TCR-ß repertoire sharing.

Within each individual, the adaptive immune system generates a repertoire of cells expressing receptors capable of recognizing diverse potential pathogens. The theoretical diversity of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire exceeds the actual size of the T-cell population in an individual by several orders of magnitude - making the observation of identical TCRs in different individuals extremely improbable if all receptors were equally likely. Despite this disparity between the theoretical and the realized diversity of the repertoire, these 'public' receptor sequences have been identified in autoimmune, cancer and pathogen interaction contexts. Biased generation processes explain the presence of public TCRs in the naive repertoire, but do not adequately explain the different abundances of these public TCRs. We investigate and characterize the distribution of genomic TCR-ß sequences of naive CD8+ T cells from three genetically identical mice, comparing non-productive (non-functional sequences) and productive sequences. We find public TCR-ß sequences at higher abundances compared with unshared sequences in the productive, but not in the non-productive, repertoire. We show that neutral processes such as recombination biases, codon degeneracy and generation probability do not fully account for these differences, and conclude that thymic or peripheral selection plays an important role in increasing the abundances of public TCR-ß sequences.

Estimating the diversity, completeness, and cross-reactivity of the T cell repertoire.

In order to recognize and combat a diverse array of pathogens the immune system has a large repertoire of T cells having unique T cell receptors (TCRs) with only a few clones specific for any given antigen. We discuss how the number of different possible TCRs encoded in the genome (the potential repertoire) and the number of different TCRs present in an individual (the realized repertoire) can be measured. One puzzle is that the potential repertoire greatly exceeds the realized diversity of naïve T cells within any individual. We show that the existing hypotheses fail to explain why the immune system has the potential to generate far more diversity than is used in an individual, and propose an alternative hypothesis of "evolutionary sloppiness." Another immunological puzzle is why mice and humans have similar repertoires even though humans have over 1000-fold more T cells. We discuss how the idea of the "protecton," the smallest unit of protection, might explain this discrepancy and estimate the size of "protecton" based on available precursor frequencies data. We then consider T cell cross-reactivity - the ability of a T cell clone to respond to more than one epitope. We extend existing calculations to estimate the extent of expected cross-reactivity between the responses to different pathogens. Our results are consistent with two observations: a low probability of observing cross-reactivity between the immune responses to two randomly chosen pathogens; and the ensemble of memory cells being sufficiently diverse to generate cross-reactive responses to new pathogens.