What is the optimal management of an intra-operative air leak in a colorectal anastomosis?

AIM: An airtight anastomosis on intra-operative leak testing has been previously demonstrated to be associated with a lower risk of clinically significant postoperative anastomotic leak following left-sided colorectal anastomosis. However, to date, there is no consistently agreed upon method for management of an intra-operative anastomotic leak. Therefore, we powered a noninferiority study to determine whether suture repair alone was an appropriate strategy for the management of an intra-operative air leak. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data from a tertiary care referral centre. We included all consecutive patients with left-sided colorectal or ileorectal anastomoses and evidence of air leak during intra-operative leak testing. Patients were excluded if proximal diversion was planned preoperatively, a pre-existing proximal diversion was present at the time of surgery or an anastomosis was ultimately unable to be completed. The primary outcome measure was clinically significant anastomotic leak, as defined by the Surgical Infection Study Group at 30 days. RESULTS: From a sample of 2360 patients, 119 had an intra-operative air leak during leak testing. Sixty-eight patients underwent suture repair alone and 51 underwent proximal diversion or anastomotic reconstruction. The clinically significant leak rate was 9% (6/68; 95% CI: 2-15%) in the suture repair alone arm and 0% (0/51) in the diversion or reconstruction arm. CONCLUSION: Suture repair alone does not meet the criteria for noninferiority for the management of intra-operative air leak during left-sided colorectal anastomosis. Further repair of intra-operative air leak by suture repair alone should be reconsidered given these findings.

What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether mobilization of the splenic flexure during anterior resection is associated with an increased number of complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of all non-emergent anterior resections with anastomosis (open and laparoscopic) between January 2005 and December 2009 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Infectious, renal, and pulmonary adverse events as well as operative times were analyzed for cases with splenic flexure mobilization as compared to no mobilization. We then constructed multivariate models to identify risk factors for postsurgical adverse events. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 6,324 (57 %) open resections and 4,788 (43 %) laparoscopic resections were performed. Mobilization of the splenic flexure was associated with an increase in operating room time (204 vs 172 min, p < 0.0001). Although anastomotic leaks were not recorded, there was no difference in organ space infections (3.9 vs 3.7 %, p = 0.7) or return to operating room events between the two groups. However, patients who underwent splenic flexure mobilization had significantly more superficial surgical site infections (10.6 vs 8.4 %, p < 0.0002). Multivariate analysis accounting for laparoscopic or open surgery and standard preoperative and intraoperative variables demonstrated a persistent increase in superficial surgical site infections for patients with splenic flexure mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: Operating room times are longer and superficial surgical site infections are more common when the splenic flexure is mobilized. The absolute indications for splenic flexure mobilization should be addressed in further research.

How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal resections?

AIM: We sought to identify the rate of re-operation after an index colorectal surgical procedure and potential contributing risk factors. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We identified all patients who either returned or did not return to the operating room after any colorectal resection from January 2005 to December 2008. RESULTS: From a total cohort of 635, 265 patients included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program over the 4-year study period, we identified 54, 237 patients who underwent colorectal operations. A return to the operating room was coded in 5.4 ± 0.1% of non colorectal resection patients and 7.6 ± 0.2% of colorectal resection patients (P < 0.001). The multivariate model identified patients with postoperative diagnostic codes for abdominal cavity hernia or colostomy complication as having the highest odds of return to the operating room within 30 days. Patients returning to the operating room had longer length of stay and higher overall mortality compared with those patients who did not return to the operating room. CONCLUSION: Return to the operating room is a relatively common occurrence after colorectal resections, with an associated high rate of mortality. Given the association between return to the operating room and adverse patient outcomes, emphasis should be placed on determining strategies to reduce the need for return to the operating room.

Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A variety of devices are available for pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy including vascular staplers, clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices. This study assesses their speed, reliability, and cost to guide surgeons in their choice for intracorporeal pedicle ligation. METHODS: A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic vascular staplers and disposable clip appliers (S/C) with the LigaSure Atlas (LIG) was performed during elective right, left, and total colectomy. Cases were stratified by procedure. Failure was defined as any bleeding after proper pedicle ligation. RESULTS: The study included 48 S/C patients and 52 LIG patients with no differences in demographics, diagnosis, procedure, number of vessels ligated per procedure, or operative time. Failure occurred for 14 (9.2%) of the 152 vessels ligated in the S/C group, as compared with 5 (3%) of the 169 vessels ligated in the LIG group (p = 0.02). The median blood loss associated with device failure was 50 ml (range, 20-50 ml) in S/C group, as compared with 100 ml (range 25-800 ml) in the LIG group (p = 0.054). Major blood loss attributable to device failure and surgeon error occurred in only one LIG case. The mean cost per case of vessel ligation was significantly less in the LIG group (317 dollars +/- 0 dollars vs 400 dollars +/- 112 dollars; p < 0.001). The cost differences were greatest for total colectomy (LIG = 317 dollars +/- 0 dollars vs S/C = 565 dollars +/- 67 dollars; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Device failure, although more common in the S/C group, does not result in significant blood loss. The LigaSure Atlas is more cost effective during laparoscopic colectomy, especially total colectomy, and may allow the surgeon more versatility in its application.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance?

BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy has been introduced as an alternative to the standard laparoscopic technique, but it has not yet been established whether it offers the same benefits. Therefore, we compared the outcome of patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection (HALSR) to that of those undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR). METHODS: The study population comprised a sequential series of consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoid/left colectomy. Values are reported as mean (range). RESULTS: There were 85 LSR patients and 66 HALSR patients, with no differences in patient demographics or diagnoses. There were slight differences in operative time favoring HALSR (LSR 205 min (90-380) vs HALSR 189 min (120-290); p = 0.07), and the extraction incision was larger in the HALSR group (LSR 6.2 cm (3-25) vs HALSR 8.1 cm (7-12); p < 0.01). There was no difference in time for return of bowel function (LSR 2.8 days (1-15) vs HALSR 2.5 days (1-8); p = 0.31) or length of hospital stay (LSR 5.0 days (2-17) vs HALSR 5.2 days (3-22); p = 0.73). Complications were similar in the two groups (LSR 23% vs HALSR 21%), but there were fewer conversions in the hand-assisted group (HALSR 0% vs LSR 13%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection yields the same outcomes as standard laparoscopic techniques, but with fewer conversions. Hand-assistance is a helpful innovation that may expand the application of laparoscopic colectomy.

Using quality of life scores to help determine treatment: is restoring bowel continuity better than an ostomy?

OBJECTIVE: In colorectal surgery, evaluation of heath-related quality of life (HRQL) has been relatively minimal when compared to other medical specialties. Would the performance of such HRQL evaluations change our decision-making in patient care? In familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), procedures that restore bowel continuity (i.e. Ileorectal anastomosis or ileal pouch anal anastomosis) are routinely preferred to ileostomy because of the perceived, but unproven, better HRQL. This study evaluates FAP patients who underwent prophylactic colectomy with either permanent ileostomy or 'restored bowel continuity' reconstruction. The functional outcomes of both groups are reported, and the HRQL assessments are compared. METHODS: All FAP patients who underwent (procto) colectomy resection with reconstruction, either restored bowel continuity (BC) or permanent ileostomy (OST), between 1980 and 1998 were studied. Functional data were obtained by questionnaire and medical record review. HRQL was assessed by 2 validated instruments - the SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales and the SF-36 Health Survey - which measure physical summary (PSF) and mental summary functioning (MSF) as well as eight separate health quality dimensions including health perception (HP), physical (PF) and social functioning (SF), physical (PR) and emotional role limitations (ER), mental health (MH), bodily pain (BP), and energy level (E). RESULTS: Results were obtained in 54 patients; bowel continuity (44), ileostomy (10). Mean patient age was 39 years, mean follow up time was 10.5 years. Mean patient age at operation was 28 years. Functional results for BC included number of bowel movements/day (6.7), leakage (30%), having to wear a pad (11%), perianal skin problems (25%), food avoidance (68%), and inability to distinguish gas (27%). Functional results for OST were routinely excellent. Results of the HRQL surveys reveal no significant differences for BC vs OST (HP: 67 +/- 28 vs 79 +/- 39; PF: 91 +/- 14 vs 90 +/- 17; SF: 86 +/- 23 vs 97 +/- 5; PR: 79 +/- 34 vs 83 +/- 40; ER: 86 +/- 28 vs 88 +/- 27; MH: 77 +/- 19 vs 82 +/- 14; BP: 78 +/- 24 vs 71 +/- 32; E 60 +/- 21 vs 58 +/- 18, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although the perceived quality of life for ileostomy patients is generally worse than the 'restored bowel continuity' group, the measured HRQL is the same for both groups. These results suggest that a permanent ileostomy should be included as a viable and appropriate first line treatment option for FAP patients after resection. This study also suggests that HRQL should play a greater role in the evaluation of care and treatment in colorectal surgery.

Long-term outcomes of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis: the association of bowel function and quality of life 5 years after surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have reported that mean health related quality of life (HRQL) levels generally attain normalcy following construction of an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). It appears inconsistent, however, that these normal HRQL levels are achieved while bowel function (BF) scores generally remain statistically worse than "normal" (e.g., 4-8 stools/day, possible anal leakage, diaper usage). To investigate this inconsistency, the current study attempts to determine if any statistical associations are present between HRQL and BF, specifically in the long term. Multivariate regression analyses are performed using each of 8 individual HRQL domains against the full model of BF characteristics. METHODS: All patients more than 5 years status post an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedure for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) at a single institution were studied. FAP was chosen because patients are routinely asymptomatic preoperatively. BF (e.g., stool frequency, anal leakage) and HRQL (using the 8 health domains of the SF-36) were assessed by patient interview. Student's t tests and full model multivariate regression analyses were used to analyze associations between BF and HRQL. RESULTS: The sample included 25 patients (14 male). Mean age was 39 years, mean follow-up time was 11 years. Although mean scores for the 8 individual HRQL domains were not statistically different from the general United States population, regression analyses of the different domains did demonstrate significant associations with varying levels of BF. While controlling for age and gender, the analyses show that the physical function domain is improved with the ability to pass flatus independent of stool, and physical role and mental health domains are improved with decreased stool frequency. The social function domain is improved with increased stool retention time, while the perception of general health is improved with less diaper usage and less sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a statistically significant association between HRQL levels and BF is present. Of the numerous BF characteristics tested, five appear to be of greater importance with regard to certain HRQL domains. This finding may have clinical implications concerning pouch construction and surgical technique. Methodologically, this study demonstrates that merely using mean levels to describe HRQL may not elucidate meaningful relationships between important clinical outcomes, such as function and HRQL.

Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis.

PURPOSE: The main impetus for a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis to choose colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis over ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the better functional result. However, does better functional result necessarily translate into better overall quality of life? Previous studies of other diseases have demonstrated no such correlation. This study was performed to determine whether any relationship exists between functional result and quality of life in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after ileorectal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: All patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from 1980 to 1998 were studied. Functional data were obtained by questionnaire. Health-related quality of life was assessed by two validated instruments, the SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales and the SF-36 Health Survey, which measure physical and mental functioning and eight separate health-quality dimensions, including health perception, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, mental health, bodily pain, and energy or fatigue. RESULTS: Data were obtained in 44 of 68 patients, 14 with ileorectal anastomosis and 30 with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. No differences were demonstrated between the two groups for patient age, mean follow-up time, and mean patient age at operation. Functional results were worse for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group vs. the ileorectal anastomosis group in number of bowel movements per day (7.5 vs. 5.2; P < 0.05), leakage (43 vs. 0 percent; P < 0.01), pad usage (17 vs. 0 percent; P < 0.01), perianal skin problems (33 vs. 7 percent; P < 0.01), food avoidance (80 vs. 43 percent; P < 0.01), and inability to distinguish gas (37 vs. 7 percent; P < 0.01). Results of the health-related quality-of-life surveys, however, demonstrated no difference between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups. The Physical and Mental summary scales for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups were not significantly different (Physical Health Scale, 50.3 vs. 50.9; Mental Health Scale, 51.7 vs. 49.6), and none of the eight dimensions of the SF-36 health survey demonstrated statistical differences between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups. CONCLUSION: Better functional results were not equated with better quality of life in this pilot study. Although patients with the ileorectal anastomosis have better functional results than those with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, the measured health-related quality of life as determined by a validated generic health-related quality-of-life instrument is the same for both groups. These results suggest that all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis might be optimally treated with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. More importantly, this study suggests that health-related quality of life should play a greater role in the evaluation of care and treatment in colon rectal surgery.

Functional results after perineal complications of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the functional significance of perineal complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: Review of a prospective registry of 628 patients was undertaken. Bowel function was assessed by detailed functional questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-squared and Fisher's exact probability tests. RESULTS: Of 628 patients, 153 (24.4 percent) had 171 perineal complications. The 277 control patients had no complications. Complications included 66 (10.5 percent) anastomotic strictures, 28 (4.5 percent) anastomotic separations, 36 (5.7 percent) pouch fistulas, 41 (6.5 percent) episodes of pelvic sepsis, and 18 (2.9 percent) patients with multiple complications. After these complications were addressed, the pouch failure rate was low (10 percent); in 90 percent of patients, the pouch could be salvaged. Most pouch failures were the result of pouch fistulas, and most occurred in patients ultimately diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Functional results after cure of these perineal complications revealed no significant functional differences between control patients and those cured of anastomotic separations, anastomotic strictures, and pouch fistulas. Only a few minor differences were demonstrated in function after an episode of pelvic sepsis. The major deterioration in function occurred after treatment for multiple perineal complications. CONCLUSIONS: An appreciable number of perineal complications occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouch-perineal fistulas are associated with the highest pouch failure rate. The majority of these fistulas occur in patients ultimately diagnosed with Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis. Although there is no substitute for good technique and sound clinical judgment in the success of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, if perineal complications are successfully treated, functional outcome is equivalent to that in patients without perineal complications.

Colon and rectal surgery: a true subspecialty.

PURPOSE: The study contained herein used the database of the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery to demonstrate trends in colorectal practice from 1989 to 1996 and to compare the one-year technical experience of a colorectal resident with the five-year totals of a general surgery resident. METHODS: Complete case lists from applicants for the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery's qualifying examination have been entered into a database. Similar data have been compiled from the Residency Review Committee for Surgery. RESULTS: From 1989 through 1996, 446,082 procedures have been listed by 417 colorectal residents, an average of 1,060 cases per resident. When contrasted with the operative experience of a general surgery resident, the colorectal resident performs substantially more anorectal operations, more endoscopic procedures, and more index abdominal operations in one year than the average general surgery resident performs in five years. CONCLUSIONS: When added to the required general surgery experience, one year of training in colorectal surgery trains a true subspecialist with unique expertise in the treatment of disorders of the colon, rectum, and anus.

Fatigue rate index as a new measurement of external sphincter function.

PURPOSE: Assessment of sustained voluntary contraction of the external sphincter is helpful in evaluating the patient who has a defecation disorder on presentation. A new index of external sphincter function is described. METHOD: A prospective registry of patients referred for computerized anal manometry using standard protocols was reviewed. Patients were grouped by primary symptoms; those with overlapping complaints were excluded. The rate of fatigue, defined as the change in stationary squeeze over a 40-second period of voluntary contraction, was calculated by linear regression analysis. Fatigue rate index, a calculated measure of time necessary for the external sphincter to become completely fatigued, was determined to permit comparison of external sphincter fatigue in patients with different complaints. RESULTS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers (15 women; mean age, 45 years), 33 patients with a primary complaint of anal seepage (13 women; mean age, 53 years), 75 patients with gross incontinence (61 women; mean age, 53 years), and 49 patients with severe constipation (41 women; mean age, 45 years) were evaluated. Mean resting and squeeze pressures were 55 mmHg and 107 mmHg for volunteers, 37 mmHg and 97 mmHg for patients with seepage, 30 mmHg and 49 mmHg for incontinent patients, and 56 mmHg and 93 mmHg for constipated patients. Pudendal neuropathy, as evidenced by a prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (> 2.4 ms), was identified in 13 percent of volunteers, 32 percent of patients with seepage, 54 percent of incontinent patients, and 38 percent of constipated patients. Mean fatigue rate index was 3.3 minutes for volunteers, 2.3 minutes for seepage patients, 1.5 minutes for incontinent patients, and 2.8 minutes for constipated patients. Compared with volunteers and patients with seepage, the incontinent patients had a significantly shorter fatigue rate index (P < 0.05; Student's t-test), which was independent of the variations in resting pressure (P < 0.05; two-way analysis of variance). CONCLUSION: The external anal sphincter is normally subject to fatigue. Patients with worsening degrees of incontinence have a predictably lower fatigue rate index. Fatigue rate index is a simple measure of external sphincter integrity, which may be used in assessment of sphincter function and future treatment protocols.

Pudendal neuropathy is the only parameter differentiating leakage from solid stool incontinence.

PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence may occur in several forms. Although some patients are grossly incontinent, other patients experience only leakage. In patients with gross incontinence, severity can range from the mildest forms (limited to loss of control of flatus) to the most severe forms (involving loss of solid stool). This study was undertaken to determine which physiologic parameters differentiate female patients with incontinence of solid stool from patients with control of formed stool and incontinence limited to seepage. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive female patients with a primary complaint of seepage or solid stool incontinence were evaluated using water perfusion manometry, balloon inflation assessment of rectal sensitivity, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. A prospectively maintained database was used for collection of data. The findings in the two patient groups were compared with patients in a group of normal control individuals. Ages of the women in the three groups were similar. RESULTS: Both groups of patients demonstrated statistically significant (P < 0.05) decreases in rest and squeeze sphincter lengths, pressures, and pressure volumes compared with normal volunteers. The patients also had significantly more asymmetric high-pressure zones and hypersensitive rectums. No significant difference between the two groups of incontinent patients could be identified using any of these parameters. Significant differences between the groups were found in pudendal nerve function. The distal rectoanal excitatory reflex was abnormal in 58.1 percent of grossly incontinent women compared with 28.6 percent of patients with leakage (P < 0.05). The majority of patients with leakage alone (65 percent) had normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, whereas only 22.6 percent of women with gross fecal incontinence had normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency bilaterally (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Normal bilateral pudendal nerve function can partially compensate for abnormal sphincter symmetry and function, permitting women with grossly abnormal parameters to maintain control of bowel movements. It remains to be seen whether, with advancing age, patients with leakage will have development of slowed pudendal nerve conduction and, if so, whether their condition will progress to gross incontinence.

"Ideal" length of stay after colectomy: whose ideal?

PURPOSE: In response to external pressure to achieve an idealized length of stay after colon resection, a study was designed to define perioperative factors that significantly impact average length of stay (ALOS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 226 patients undergoing open colon resection from 1988 to 1995 to determine the effects of age, type of procedure, nature of the procedure (elective vs. emergency), and postoperative course on ALOS. Statistics were calculated by Student's t-test, chi-squared analysis, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Average length of stay was 10 (range, 4-34) days, with a significant trend toward lower ALOS in recent years; ALOS in 1988 averaged 11 days, whereas in 1994, ALOS averaged 9 days (r2 = 0.118; P < 0.001). Patients younger than 65 years of age had an ALOS of 9 days vs. 11 days in patients older than 65 years (P = 0.0024). Patients with anastomoses on the right and left side had similar ALOS (8.5 vs. 9.1 days), whereas creation of a stoma was associated with a significantly higher ALOS (12.1 days; P < 0.00001). The need for postoperative nasogastric intubation (14.9 vs. 9.3 days) and the performance of emergency operations (12.2 vs. 6.5 days) were also associated with a significantly higher ALOS (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Caution must be exercised in accepting rigid criteria for length of stay for patients undergoing colorectal resections, as uncontrollable clinical variables are involved in defining the "ideal" patient.

Intraoperative colonic lavage in nonelective surgery for diverticular disease.

BACKGROUND: Staged resection of the sigmoid colon has been the traditional strategy for treating patients who require nonelective surgery to manage complications of diverticular disease. Resection and primary anastomosis has not generally been recommended when the clinical setting is compromised by contiguous inflammation or inadequate mechanical cleansing of the colon because of concerns regarding the potential risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Although many reports have confirmed that intraoperative colonic lavage (ICL) is a safe method for relieving fecal loading of the colon to facilitate primary intestinal anastomosis in patients with mechanical obstruction of the distal colon, there is very limited experience with the use of this technique in treating acute inflammatory disorders of the colon. In this report, we present our results with ICL in the nonelective treatment of patients with complications of diverticulitis. METHODS: Records of all patients undergoing urgent operations at the Lahey Clinic to treat complications of diverticular disease from July 1987 to January 1996 were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 62 patients who required nonelective operations, 33 underwent ICL in an attempt to perform primary anastomosis. In five patients, the operation included creation of a colostomy. The indication for surgery was obstruction in 13 patients (39 percent), persistent abscess or phlegmon in 13 (39 percent), perforation in 6 patients (18 percent), and hemorrhage in 1 patient (3 percent). According to Hinchey's classification system, 18 patients had Stage I disease, 10 had Stage II, and 5 patients had Stage III disease. There were no patients with Stage IV disease. The single anastomotic complication in the series was responsible for the sole operative mortality. The morbidity rate of 42 percent, included three intraoperative complications (2 splenic injuries and 1 ureteral laceration), two intra-abdominal abscesses (6 percent), and six wound infections (18 percent). CONCLUSION: In our experience, ICL has proven to be a safe method for accomplishing single-stage resection of the colon in selected patients with diverticulitis who require an urgent operation. When there is no evidence of diffuse purulent or feculent peritonitis, we believe this is the preferred method for treating patients who are hemodynamically stable.

Afferent limb obstruction complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

PURPOSE: Small-bowel obstruction is a common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Acute angulation of the afferent limb at the pouch inlet is the cause of obstruction in a subset of patients requiring laparotomy. METHODS: Patients were identified from the Lahey Clinic ileoanal pouch registry, a prospective computerized database of all patients who have undergone IPAA since 1980. Records of patients who were identified as having afferent limb obstruction as a cause of bowel obstruction after IPAA were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 567 patients had undergone total proctocolectomy and ileoanal J-pouch at time of the study. Of 122 patients with one or more episodes of obstruction after IPAA, 48 required operative intervention. Afferent limb obstruction was identified as the cause of obstruction in six patients (12 percent). The most common presentation was recurrent partial obstruction (4 of 6 patients). Contrast small-bowel series and enemas were suggestive of obstruction in four of six patients, the most consistent radiographic finding being small-bowel dilation to the level of the pouch inlet. All patients underwent laparotomy for unresolved obstruction. Intraoperatively, the afferent limb was found to be adherent posterior to the pouch, causing acute angulation at the pouch inlet. Rather than risk injury to the pouch or its mesentery, the obstruction was bypassed by side-to-side anastomosis of the afferent limb to the pouch (enteroenterostomy) in five of six patients. One patient underwent ileostomy only because of technical considerations. Two patients required re-exploration and pexy of the afferent limb to the pelvic sidewall (pouchopexy) to relieve recurrent afferent limb obstruction. CONCLUSION: Afferent limb obstruction should be suspected in patients with recurrent obstruction after IPAA. Bypass of the obstructed segment from distal ileum to the pouch is safe and effective treatment. Because of the risk of recurrent afferent limb angulation, concurrent pouchopexy should be considered.

Evolutionary changes in the pathologic diagnosis after the ileoanal pouch procedure.

PURPOSE: Inadequate initial differentiation between ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease may lead to a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis. Construction of an ileoanal pouch in these patients may result in significant morbidity and pouch failure when the ultimate diagnosis is Crohn's disease. METHOD: We prospectively studied 543 patients with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease to determine whether a patient's pathologic diagnosis changed with time and how it affected outcome. RESULTS: Preoperative diagnosis was ulcerative colitis in 499 patients, indeterminate colitis in 42 patients, and Crohn's disease in 2 patients. Prior colectomy was performed in 58 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis and in all patients with indeterminate colitis and Crohn's disease. Postoperatively, the diagnosis changed in 20 patients with ulcerative colitis (13 to indeterminate colitis, 7 to Crohn's disease). Another two patients with indeterminate colitis showed evidence of Crohn's disease in the resected rectal specimen. As patients were followed up, an additional 13 patients were found to have Crohn's disease (5 indeterminate colitis, 8 ulcerative colitis). With the current diagnosis, perineal complications and pouch failure occurred, respectively, in 23 and in 2 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis, in 44 and in 12 percent of patients with indeterminate colitis, and in 63 and in 37 percent of patients with Crohn's disease. Pathologic diagnosis was altered in 35 patients (6 percent) overall, with a 12-fold increase in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Only 3 percent of patients with ulcerative colitis compared with 13 percent of patients with indeterminate colitis had a change in diagnosis to Crohn's disease (P = 0.006; Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: Pouch-related complications, eventual pouch failure, and discovery of underlying Crohn's disease occurred in a significant number of patients with a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis. Until more accurate diagnostic differentiation is available, caution is advised in recommending the ileoanal pouch procedure to patients with indeterminate colitis.

Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease.

PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic surgery in treatment of patients with diverticulitis is unclear. A retrospective comparison of laparoscopic with conventional surgery for patients with chronic diverticulitis was performed to assess morbidity, recovery from surgery, and cost. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing elective resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis from 1992 to 1994 at a single institution were reviewed. Laparoscopic resection involved complete intracorporeal dissection, bowel division, and anastomosis with extracorporeal placement of an anvil. RESULTS: Sigmoid and left colon resections were performed laparoscopically in 25 patients and by open technique in 17 patients by two independent operating teams. No significant differences existed in age, gender, weight, comorbidities, or operations performed. In the laparoscopic group, three operations were converted to open laparotomy (12 percent) because of unclear anatomy. Major complications occurred in two patients who underwent laparoscopic resection, both requiring laparotomy, and in one patient in the conventional surgery group who underwent computed tomographic-guided drainage of an abscess. Patients who underwent laparoscopic resection tolerated a regular diet sooner than patients who underwent conventional surgery (3.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 5.7 +/- 1.1 days; P < 0.001) and were discharged from the hospital earlier (4.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.8 +/- 1.1 days; P < 0.001). Overall costs were higher in the laparoscopic group than the open surgery group ($10,230 +/- 49.1 vs. $7,068 +/- 37.1; P < 0.001) because of a significantly longer total operating room time (397 +/- 9.1 vs. 115 +/- 5.1 min; P < 0.001). Follow-up studies with a mean of one year revealed two port site infections in the laparoscopic group and one wound infection in the open group. Of patients undergoing conventional resection, one patient experienced a postoperative bowel obstruction that was managed nonoperatively, and, in one patient, an incarcerated incisional hernia developed that required urgent laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection in patients with chronic diverticulitis is safe, with faster recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with conventional open surgery. Higher cost of operating room usage time makes the laparoscopic technique difficult to justify economically. Simplification of operating room use and better case selection may improve cost-effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach.

Ileocolic resection for acute presentation of Crohn's disease of the ileum.

PURPOSE: Traditional therapy for patients with terminal ileitis found at laparotomy for appendicitis has been to perform appendectomy when the cecum is normal and to leave the diseased ileum in place. METHODS: To determine the role of ileocolic resection in the setting of acute ileitis, records of 1,421 patients with Crohn's disease seen from 1986 to 1994 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Crohn's disease was found at laparotomy for presumed appendicitis in 36 patients (2.5 percent). Ten patients underwent ileocolic resection, 23 had appendectomy, and 3 had exploratory laparotomy alone. One patient whose appendix was removed also had ileocecal bypass. Of the 36 patients, 20 were women and 16 were men. Mean age at operation was 24 (range, 11-61) years, and mean follow-up time was 14 (range, 0.1-49) years. After initial ileocolic resection, five patients (50 percent) required no further resection, with a mean follow-up time of 12.4 (range, 4-19) years. None required more than three ileocolic resections, with a mean follow-up time of 18.1 (range, 4-49) years. Of 26 patients treated traditionally, 24 (92 percent) required ileocolic resection for intractability or complications of Crohn's disease. Thirty-eight percent required resection within one year and 65 percent within three years (intractability, 8; obstruction, 3; fistula, 4; and perforation, 2). Of 24 patients who subsequently underwent resection, only 6 (25 percent) required further small-bowel resection for Crohn's disease, with a mean follow-up time of 13 (range, 0.1-34) years. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients found to have Crohn's disease at laparotomy for appendicitis required early ileocolic resection. Therefore, the traditional dictum of nonoperative therapy for these patients may not be in their best long-term interest and merits re-evaluation.

Prospective comparative study of abnormal distal rectoanal excitatory reflex, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and single fiber density as markers of pudendal neuropathy.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the role of abnormal distal rectoanal excitatory reflex (RAER) as a marker of pudendal neuropathy and to compare results with pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) and single fiber density (SFD) estimation. METHODS: Fifteen female patients (mean age, 47.1 (range, 20-70) years) referred to the pelvic floor laboratory with pelvic floor disorders (fecal incontinence, 13 patients; constipation, 2 patients) were evaluated prospectively with neurophysiologic tests and balloon reflex manometry for evidence of pudendal neuropathy. RESULTS: Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency provided evidence of pudendal neuropathy in ten patients (67 percent) and was normal in five patients (33 percent). Increased SFD confirmed denervation of the external anal sphincter in 12 patients (80 percent), being normal in 3 patients (20 percent). Distal RAER was abnormal in 13 patients (87 percent) and was normal in 2 patients (13 percent). In ten patients (67 percent), the three diagnostic modalities were in complete agreement, correctly identifying neuropathy in nine patients (60 percent) and excluding nerve damage in one patient (7 percent). Distal RAER was normal despite prolonged PNTML and increased SFD in one patient (7 percent). In two patients (13 percent), distal RAER was abnormal or absent despite normal PNTML and SFD. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was normal in the presence of abnormal distal RAER and increased SFD on electromyography in two patients (13 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal distal RAER compares favorably with current neurophysiologic tests used to diagnose pudendal neuropathy.