Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transplant ; 36(10): e14643, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35262975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant centers vary in approach to intraoperative vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and temperature management. Evidence is limited regarding impact of selected modalities on postoperative outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature and provide expert panel recommendations on optimal intraoperative arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), and vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and intraoperative temperature management regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). METHODS: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Recommendations made for: (1) Vascular accesses, arterial BP and CVP monitoring, (2) cardiac function monitoring, and (3) Intraoperative temperature management (CRD42021239908). RESULTS: Of 2619 articles screened 16 were included. Studies were small, retrospective, and observational. Vascular access studies demonstrated low rates of insertion complications. TEE studies demonstrated low rates of esophageal hemorrhage. One study found lower hospital-LOS and 30-day mortality in patients monitored with both PAC and TEE. Other monitoring studies were heterogenous in design and outcomes. Temperature studies showed increased blood transfusion and ventilation times in hypothermic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations were made for; routine arterial and CVP monitoring as a minimum standard of practice, consideration of discrepancy between peripheral and central arterial BP in patients with hemodynamic instability and high vasopressor requirements, and routine use of high flow cannulae while monitoring for extravasation and hematoma formation. Availability and expertise in PAC and/or TEE monitoring is strongly recommended particularly in hemodynamic instability, portopulmonary HT and/or cardiac dysfunction. TEE use is recommended as an acceptable risk in patients with treated esophageal varices and is an effective diagnostic tool for emergency cardiovascular collapse. Maintenance of intraoperative normothermia is strongly recommended.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Pressão Venosa Central , Vasoconstritores
2.
Int J Surg ; 99: 106265, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35181556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been shown to reduce the complications following a variety of major surgical procedures, possibly mediated by improved organ perfusion and function. We have shown that it is feasible to randomise patients to GDFT or standard fluid management following liver transplant in the cardiac-output optimisation following liver transplantation (COLT) trial. The current study compares end organ function in patients from the COLT trial who received GDFT in comparison to those receiving standard care (SC) following liver transplant. METHODS: Adult patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation were randomised to GDFT or SC for the first 12 h following surgery as detailed in a published trial protocol. GDFT protocol was based on stroke volume (SV) optimisation using 250 ml crystalloid boluses. Total fluid administration and time to extubation were recorded. Hourly SV and cardiac output (CO) readings were recorded from the non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) device in both groups. Pulmonary function was assessed by arterial blood gas (ABG) and ventilatory parameters. Lung injury was assessed using PaO2:FiO2 ratios and calculated pulmonary compliance. The KDIGO score was used for determining acute kidney injury. Renal and liver graft function were assessed during the post-operative period and at 3 months and 1-year. RESULTS: 60 patients were randomised to GDFT (n = 30) or SC (n = 30). All patients completed the 12 h intervention period. GDFT group received a significantly higher total volume of fluid during the 12 h trial intervention period (GDFT 5317 (2335) vs. SC 3807 (1345) ml, p = 0.003); in particular crystalloids (GDFT 3968 (2073) vs. SC 2510 (1027) ml, p = 0.002). There was no evidence of significant difference between the groups in SV or CO during the assessment periods. Time to extubation, PaO2: FIO2 ratios, pulmonary compliance, ventilatory or blood gas measurements were similar in both groups. There was a significant rise in serum creatinine from baseline (77 µmol/L) compared to first (87 µmol/L, p = 0.039) and second (107 µmol/L, p = 0.001) post-operative days. There was no difference between GDFT and SC in the highest KDIGO scores for the first 7 days post-LT. At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference in need for renal replacement therapy or graft function. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomised trial of fluid therapy post liver transplant, GDFT was associated with an increased volume of crystalloids administered but did not alter early post-operative pulmonary or renal function when compared with standard care.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Adulto , Débito Cardíaco , Hidratação/métodos , Objetivos , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Cureus ; 14(12): e32115, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36601179

RESUMO

Post-tonsillectomy complications can include bleeding, dehydration, edema, airway obstruction, and infection. Oral candidiasis or thrush is a rare complication that can occur post-operatively. We describe a case of a 10-year-old female with oral candidiasis as a postoperative complication of bilateral adenotonsillectomy, presenting on postoperative day (POD) 7 for poor oral intake secondary to worsening odynophagia. A physical exam revealed an easily scrapable, white plaque located mainly over her surgical sites, tongue, and hard palate. Microscopic examination of tissue scrapings revealed pseudohyphae confirming the diagnosis of oral candidiasis. She was treated with seven days of topical nystatin therapy, including topical and systemic pain control with significant improvement of symptoms by POD 13 and complete resolution on POD 21.

5.
HPB (Oxford) ; 22(8): 1112-1120, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31874736

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been shown to reduce postoperative complications following major surgery; this intervention has not been formally evaluated in the setting of liver transplantation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective trial of GDFT following liver transplantation randomising patients with liver cirrhosis to either 12 h of GDFT using non-invasive cardiac output monitoring or standard care (SC). The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included survival, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo), quality of life (by EQ-5D-5L) and resource use. Trial specific follow up occurred at 90 and 180 days after surgery. RESULTS: The study was feasible. Of 224 eligible patients, 122 were approached, 114 consented to participate and 60 were enrolled into the trial. The mean (SD) volume of IV crystalloid administered to the GDFT group during the 12-h study period was 3968 (2073) ml for the GDFT group and 2510 (1026) ml for the SC group. As regards secondary outcomes there was no difference in survival or overall complication rates. There was no significant difference in quality of life scores and resource use between the groups. CONCLUSION: A randomised study of GDFT following liver transplantation is feasible. A post-trial stakeholder meeting supported proceeding with a full multi-centre trial.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Débito Cardíaco , Estudos de Viabilidade , Hidratação , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida
6.
Vasc Med ; 25(1): 41-46, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31729285

RESUMO

Vascular surgery is the largest (non-cardiac) user of blood transfusion which is associated with increased risk to patients. Patient Blood Management (PBM) is a quality improvement programme in transfusion medicine involving educational change and recommendations through preoperative, operative, and postoperative surgery. We wished to assess the feasibility to implement a PBM programme in vascular surgery. A multidisciplinary programme was developed at a vascular unit by PBM experts. The PBM programme involved a series of educational lectures, consultations, and discussions with doctors, nurses, and theatre staff. A one-page PBM checklist of recommendations was developed for all patients undergoing vascular surgery. Prospective audits were conducted before (October 2014 to March 2015) and after (November 2015 to February 2016) PBM implementation. Outcomes were blood transfusion and haemoglobin concentration (Hb) trigger threshold. A total of 211 patients were admitted under vascular surgery: 127 for Audit 1 and 84 for Audit 2. Overall, 30% of patients were transfused, with 193 units transfused in Audit 1 and 85 in Audit 2. PBM implementation was associated with a reduction in patients receiving a blood transfusion (37% to 20%; p = 0.01). However, there was no difference in Hb trigger threshold (76 g/L vs 72 g/L, p = 0.051). A PBM programme is feasible and can be implemented in vascular surgery. PBM was associated with an improvement in transfusion use and length of patient stay that merits further investigation.


Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Transfusão de Sangue/normas , Lista de Checagem , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/sangue , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/normas
7.
Trials ; 19(1): 170, 2018 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29514697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation have a hyperdynamic circulation which persists into the early postoperative period making accurate assessment of fluid requirements challenging. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in a number of surgery settings. The impact of GDFT in patients undergoing liver transplantation is unknown. A feasibility trial was designed to determine patient and clinician support for recruitment into a randomised controlled trial of GDFT following liver transplantation, adherence to a GDFT protocol, participant withdrawal, and to determine appropriate endpoints for a subsequent larger trial to evaluate the efficacy of GDFT in patients undergoing liver transplantation. METHODS: The Cardiac output Optimisation following Liver Transplant (COLT) trial is designed as a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled study to assess the feasibility and safety of GDFT in liver transplantation for patients with cirrhosis. Consenting adults (aged between 18 and 80 years) with biopsy-proven liver cirrhosis who have been selected to undergo a first liver transplantation will be included in the trial and randomised into GDFT or standard care starting immediately after surgery and continuing for the first 12 h thereafter. Both groups will have cardiac output and stroke volume monitored using the FloTrac (EV1000) device. The intervention will consist of a protocolised GDFT approach to patient management, using stroke volume optimisation. The control group will receive standard care, without stroke volume and cardiac output measurement. After 12 h the patient's fluid management will revert to standard of care. The primary endpoint of this study is feasibility. Secondary endpoints will include a safety assessment of the intervention, graft and patient survival, liver function, postoperative complications graded by Clavien-Dindo criteria, length of intensive care and hospital stay and quality of life across the intervention and control groups. DISCUSSION: There is a growing body of evidence that the use of perioperative GDFT in surgical patients can improve outcomes; however, signals of harm have also been detected. Patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation have markedly different cardiovascular physiology than general surgical patients. If GDFT is proven to be feasible and safe in this patient group, then a multicentre trial to demonstrate efficacy and cost-effectiveness will be required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Registry, ID: ISRCTN10329248. Registered on 4 April 2016.


Assuntos
Débito Cardíaco , Hidratação/métodos , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Lactato de Ringer/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Perioperatória/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Lactato de Ringer/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
Anesth Analg ; 127(5): 1211-1220, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29064875

RESUMO

Anemia is common in elective surgery and is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Historical management of anemia has focused on the use of allogeneic blood transfusion but this in itself is not without risk. It too has been independently associated with morbidity and mortality, let alone the costs and relative shortage of this resource. In recognition of this, patient blood management (PBM) shifts the focus from the product to the patient and views the patient's own blood as a resource that should be conserved and managed appropriately as a standard of care. It consists of 3 pillars: the optimization of red blood cell mass; reduction of blood loss and bleeding; and optimization of the patient's physiological tolerance toward anemia. Integration of these 3 pillars in the form of multimodal care bundles and strategies into perioperative pathways should improve care processes and patient outcome. Preoperative anemia is most commonly caused by functional iron deficiency and should be treated with oral iron, intravenous iron, and/or recombinant erythropoietin. An individualized assessment of the thrombotic risk of discontinuing anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication should be balanced against the risk of perioperative bleeding. Neuraxial anesthetic techniques should be considered and minimally invasive surgery undertaken where appropriate. Cell salvage should be used if significant blood loss is anticipated and pharmacological treatments such as tranexamic acid and fibrin sealants have been shown to reduce blood loss. Point of care tests can guide the perioperative management of dynamic coagulopathy. Blood testing sampling should be performed only when indicated and when taken, sample volume and waste should be minimized. Restrictive blood transfusion thresholds and reassessment after single unit transfusion should be incorporated into clinical practice where appropriate. For PBM to become standard practice in routine surgical care, national health care quality change initiatives must set the agenda for change but the patient-centered approach to PBM should be delivered in a way that is also hospital centered. Characterization of the current practice of PBM at each hospital is crucial to facilitate the benchmarking of performance. Barriers to effective implementation such as lack of knowledge should be identified and acted on. Continuous audit of practice with a focus on transfusion rates and patient outcomes can identify areas in need of improvement and provide iterative feedback to motivate and inspire the main stakeholders.


Assuntos
Anemia/terapia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue , Eritrócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Anemia/sangue , Anemia/diagnóstico , Anemia/mortalidade , Biomarcadores/sangue , Transfusão de Sangue/mortalidade , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Eritrócitos/metabolismo , Hematínicos/efeitos adversos , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Assistência Perioperatória/efeitos adversos , Assistência Perioperatória/mortalidade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Reação Transfusional/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Liver Transpl ; 20(5): 584-90, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24481770

RESUMO

The aims of this study were to determine whether the withdrawal of aprotinin (APRO) led to an increased bleeding risk in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). A retrospective analysis compared consecutive patients undergoing OLT and treated with aprotinin (APRO group; n = 100) with a group in which aprotinin was not used (no-APRO group; n = 100). Propensity score matching was then performed for each group to identify 2 matched cohorts. Patients were matched by their primary diagnoses and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores. This resulted in 2 matched cohorts with 55 patients in each group. None of the patients in the APRO group had significant fibrinolysis. In the no-APRO group, 23.6% of the patients developed fibrinolysis (P < 0.003). Tranexamic acid was used in 61.5% of the patients (n = 8) in the no-APRO group in whom lysis was present, and this resolved the fibrinolysis in all but 1 of these patients. There were no differences in red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrate, or cryoprecipitate transfusions between the 2 groups. In conclusion, we have shown a significant increase in the prevalence of fibrinolysis during OLT since the withdrawal of APRO. However, there has been no increase in transfusion requirements.


Assuntos
Aprotinina/uso terapêutico , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemostáticos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Fígado , Idoso , Elasticidade , Feminino , Fibrinólise , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Falência Hepática/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Ácido Tranexâmico/química , Viscosidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA