High content screening analysis of phospholipidosis: validation of a 96-well assay with CHO-K1 and HepG2 cells for the prediction of in vivo based phospholipidosis.

Drug-induced phospholipidosis is marked by an excessive accumulation of phospholipids in lysosomes which can occur after exposure to cationic amphiphilic drugs. Phospholipidosis is considered as an adverse side effect and may delay or negatively affect registration of drug candidates. Currently, the gold standard method of phospholipidosis detection is electron microscopy on tissue samples. This technique is time consuming and only performed relatively late in drug development. Therefore, in vitro screening methods for phospholipidosis are essential in early drug development. In this study, an in vitro phospholipidosis detection assay is developed with CHO-K1 and HepG2 cells by using the fluorescent marker NBD-PE and high content screening analysis. Lysosomal localization of NBD-PE was demonstrated by colocalization with Lysotracker and lamellar body formation by electron microscopy. Upon drug exposure, lysosomal NBD-PE accumulation can be visualized and quantified. Validation with 56 reference compounds, divided in 25 phospholipidosis inducers and 31 negative compounds, showed that this new in vitro assay has a high sensitivity (CHO-K1=92.0% and HepG2=88.0%) and specificity (CHO-K1=87.1% and HepG2=80.6%) for predicting phospholipidosis in vivo. Thus a selective screening tool has been developed for early selection of drug candidates with low probability for phospholipidosis.

Gene expression analysis of precision-cut human liver slices indicates stable expression of ADME-Tox related genes.

In the process of drug development it is of high importance to test the safety of new drugs with predictive value for human toxicity. A promising approach of toxicity testing is based on shifts in gene expression profiling of the liver. Toxicity screening based on animal liver cells cannot be directly extrapolated to humans due to species differences. The aim of this study was to evaluate precision-cut human liver slices as in vitro method for the prediction of human specific toxicity by toxicogenomics. The liver slices contain all cell types of the liver in their natural architecture. This is important since drug-induced toxicity often is a multi-cellular process. Previously we showed that toxicogenomic analysis of rat liver slices is highly predictive for rat in vivo toxicity. In this study we investigated the levels of gene expression during incubation up to 24 h with Affymetrix microarray technology. The analysis was focused on a broad spectrum of genes related to stress and toxicity, and on genes encoding for phase-I, -II and -III metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Observed changes in gene expression were associated with cytoskeleton remodeling, extracellular matrix and cell adhesion, but for the ADME-Tox related genes only minor changes were observed. PCA analysis showed that changes in gene expression were not associated with age, sex or source of the human livers. Slices treated with acetaminophen showed patterns of gene expression related to its toxicity. These results indicate that precision-cut human liver slices are relatively stable during 24h of incubation and represent a valuable model for human in vitro hepatotoxicity testing despite the human inter-individual variability.

Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity are endpoints of major environmental and regulatory concern. These endpoints are also important targets for development of alternative methods for screening and prediction due to the large number of chemicals of potential concern and the tremendous cost (in time, money, animals) of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays. Both mutagenicity and carcinogenicity involve complex, cellular processes that are only partially understood. Advances in technologies and generation of new data will permit a much deeper understanding. In silico methods for predicting mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity based on chemical structural features, along with current mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data sets, have performed well for local prediction (i.e., within specific chemical classes), but are less successful for global prediction (i.e., for a broad range of chemicals). The predictivity of in silico methods can be improved by improving the quality of the data base and endpoints used for modelling. In particular, in vitro assays for clastogenicity need to be improved to reduce false positives (relative to rodent carcinogenicity) and to detect compounds that do not interact directly with DNA or have epigenetic activities. New assays emerging to complement or replace some of the standard assays include Vitotox, GreenScreenGC, and RadarScreen. The needs of industry and regulators to assess thousands of compounds necessitate the development of high-throughput assays combined with innovative data-mining and in silico methods. Various initiatives in this regard have begun, including CAESAR, OSIRIS, CHEMOMENTUM, CHEMPREDICT, OpenTox, EPAA, and ToxCast. In silico methods can be used for priority setting, mechanistic studies, and to estimate potency. Ultimately, such efforts should lead to improvements in application of in silico methods for predicting carcinogenicity to assist industry and regulators and to enhance protection of public health.

Microarray analysis in rat liver slices correctly predicts in vivo hepatotoxicity.

The microarray technology, developed for the simultaneous analysis of a large number of genes, may be useful for the detection of toxicity in an early stage of the development of new drugs. The effect of different hepatotoxins was analyzed at the gene expression level in the rat liver both in vivo and in vitro. As in vitro model system the precision-cut liver slice model was used, in which all liver cell types are present in their natural architecture. This is important since drug-induced toxicity often is a multi-cellular process involving not only hepatocytes but also other cell types such as Kupffer and stellate cells. As model toxic compounds lipopolysaccharide (LPS, inducing inflammation), paracetamol (necrosis), carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4), fibrosis and necrosis) and gliotoxin (apoptosis) were used. The aim of this study was to validate the rat liver slice system as in vitro model system for drug-induced toxicity studies. The results of the microarray studies show that the in vitro profiles of gene expression cluster per compound and incubation time, and when analyzed in a commercial gene expression database, can predict the toxicity and pathology observed in vivo. Each toxic compound induces a specific pattern of gene expression changes. In addition, some common genes were up- or down-regulated with all toxic compounds. These data show that the rat liver slice system can be an appropriate tool for the prediction of multi-cellular liver toxicity. The same experiments and analyses are currently performed for the prediction of human specific toxicity using human liver slices.

Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists: new tools to investigate disorders characterized by cortisol hypersecretion.

Increased cortisol levels have been observed in patients suffering from a number of metabolic and psychiatric disorders. In some of these disorders a causal relationship has been suggested between the increased cortisol secretion and the observed clinical phenomena. Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists which block cortisol effects might have a benefit in both the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders. Selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonists with in vivo potency have not been described thus far, partly due to the similarity between the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors. In the present studies, we report on three different chemical classes derived from the glucocorticoid/progestagen antagonist RU486. Selected compounds from the classes 11-monoaryl steroids, 11,21-bisaryl steroids and 11-aryl, 16-hydroxy steroids proved to be selective glucocorticoid receptor binders with in vivo antagonistic activity. Most compounds were able to pass the blood-brain barrier. These compounds offer the opportunity to investigate and possibly treat patients with a disturbed hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis without side effects caused by an antiprogestagenic action.

Preclinical experience with two selective progesterone receptor modulators on breast and endometrium.

Org 31710 and Org 33628 are two highly selective progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) with respect to their anti-progestational and anti-glucocorticoid activity. The compounds have been studied both in vitro and in vivo. Org 33628 has approximately four times stronger anti-progestational activity in vitro than does Org 31710, and in rats it is about 15 times more potent in the pregnancy interruption test. Two main indications for the use of PRMs are breast cancer and fertility regulation. The effects of both Org 31710 and Org 33628 were tested in relevant models for these indications. The effects of the two compounds on breast tumor development were assessed and in rats using the DMBA model. Their potency in menses induction was tested in monkeys on a 4-day regimen in the luteal phase, and after a single dose at day 21 of the normal cycle, and under a continuous progestin treatment using desogestrel. The compounds were also tested alone in a continuous low-dose regimen. The effects on follicular development and ovulation were determined by measuring estradiol and progesterone levels. Cycle control was monitored by daily vaginal swabs. In the DMBA model, Org 31710 at oral doses of 0.8, 2.0, and 5.0 mg/kg showed a clear dose-related reduction in tumor load. With the two highest doses, an even lower tumor load was seen after a 3-week treatment period compared to the tumor load at the start of treatment. Org 33628 showed a similar efficacy as Org 31710 at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg. RU 486 after oral treatment was two times less potent in this model than Org 31710 and Org 33628. The efficacy of menses induction using the 4-day regimen is dependent on the time of administration relative to the progesterone peak in the luteal phase. The highest efficacy is achieved in the descending part of the peak, at which a 100% success rate is found with a dose of 1 mg/kg of either Org 31710 or Org 33628. In Cynomolgus monkeys, at a single dose of 15 mg/kg of Org 31710 or Org 33628 in the luteal phase, menses induction was achieved only in 60% of the treatment cycles. Surprisingly menses induction can be achieved with a single dose that is about a ten-times lower when the monkeys are treated continuously with desogestrel. Cycle control is better at low than at high doses of antiprogestin in combination with daily dosing of 4 microg/kg desogestrel. Despite the difference in receptor affinity, no difference between Org 31710 and Org 33628 was found in menses induction. In the continuous low-dose (1 mg/kg) regimen with the PRMs, follicular development occurs normally while ovulation is inhibited. Ovulation is resumed shortly after stopping treatment, and a normal menses occurs after the first progesterone peak. Both compounds may be interesting options for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer and for fertility control.

Influence of the substitution of 11-methylene, delta(15), and/or 18-methyl groups in norethisterone on receptor binding, transactivation assays and biological activities in animals.

The profile of norethisterone and newly developed derivatives thereof were assessed by in vitro binding and transactivation assays on progesterone (PR) as well as on androgen (AR) receptors and by subcutaneous treatment in in vivo models. The following in vivo models were performed: A McPhail test for progestational activity in immature rabbits, an ovulation inhibition test in cycling rats and a Hershberger test for androgenic activity in immature orchidectomised rats. The compounds tested were: norethisterone (NET), 11-methylene-NET (11-NET), Delta(15)-NET (15-NET), 18-methyl-NET (18-NET, Levonorgestrel, LNG), 11-methylene-Delta(15)-NET (11, 15-NET), 11-methylene-18-methyl-NET (11,18-NET, 3-keto-desogestrel, Etonogestrel, ETG), (Delta(15)-18-methyl-NET (15,18-NET, Gestodene, GSD) and 11-methylene-Delta(15)-18-methyl-NET (11,15,18-NET). Compared to the non-substituted compound NET, the binding to and agonistic activity via PR was increased for all the three mono-substituted compounds, although the stimulatory effect of 15-NET was only twofold. Compounds with 18-methyl in combination with Delta(15) (GSD), with 11-methylene (ETG) or with both combined showed clear synergistic effects, leading to equipotent compounds. If the 18-methyl group was lacking as in 11,15-NET, potency was lower than for ETG or GSD, but higher than for 18-NET (LNG). A correlation coefficient of 0.9 was found between binding affinity and agonistic potency. With respect to the AR binding and transactivation activities, the 18-methyl group potentiated androgenic in vitro activity (LNG). The 11-methylene group increased relative binding affinity in NET, but reduced androgenic activity clearly when also other substituents were present (11,15-NET, ETG and 11,15,18-NET). The Delta(15) bond alone did not change the binding in NET, but decreased androgen binding, induced by the 18-methyl substituent, in GSD and 11,15,18-NET. Transactivation activity was also diminished in the compounds having a Delta(15) bond. In the McPhail test mono-substitution of NET increased the progestagenic in vivo activity three to five times. Bi- and tri-substitution enhanced the activity further. With respect to ovulation inhibition mono-substitution of NET resulted in three to nine times more potent compounds, whereas bi- and tri-substitution increased potency further, except for 11,15-NET, which was as active as 11-NET. The relative progestagenic potencies in the McPhail and ovulation inhibition tests, correlated significantly with those of the relative binding affinity values (correlation coefficient of 0. 91 and 0.93, respectively) and relative transactivation activity values (0.88 and 0.81) for the PR. In the Hershberger test, all the compounds increased androgenic activity with respect to growth of ventral prostate weight compared to NET, with the exception of 11, 15-NET and 11,15,18-NET. The androgenic activity was negligible for these latter compounds. The androgenicity of both 18-NET (LNG) and 15,18-NET (GSD), on the other hand, was significantly higher than that of 11,18-NET (ETG). The results of this in vivo test are in line with the AR binding and transactivation activity values (correlation coefficients of 0.86 and 0.88). In addition, selectivity indices were calculated by dividing the progestational potencies by androgenic potencies for both in vitro and in vivo assays. ETG and GSD had clearly higher in vitro and in vivo indices than the other compounds with NET and LNG having the lowest indices. Because the androgenicity of 11,15-NET and 11,15,18-NET was very low, no exact selectivity ratios could be calculated for these compounds. From these experiments we may conclude that small structural modifications exert enhancement of progestational activity and a clear reduction in androgenicity leading to very selective progestagenic compounds. The influence of bi-substitution is additive over mono-substitution, whereas tri-substition is not additive. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Contraceptive progestins. Various 11-substituents combined with four 17-substituents: 17alpha-ethynyl, five- and six-membered spiromethylene ethers or six-membered spiromethylene lactones.

Norethisterone (NET) is a 19-nortestosterone derivative with progestagenic and some androgenic activity, which was used in the first generation of contraceptives. NET was succeeded by levonorgestrel (LNG) and later on by desogestrel (DSG) and gestodene (GSD). Although these latter two progestins had increased potency, there was still androgenicity with gestodene and to a lesser extent with desogestrel. New progestins were synthesized in order to further enhance progestagenic and to reduce androgenic activity. Four different chemical moieties were introduced in position 17 of 19-nortestosterone, viz. 17alpha-ethynyl, five- and six-membered spiromethylene ethers, and a six-membered-spiromethylene lactone. In combination with these structures seven different substituents were added at position 11, i.e. methylene, methyl, ethyl, ethenyl, ethynyl, 2-propenyl and 1-propynyl. All substituents except for methylene occupied the 11beta-position. All these 32 compounds were synthesized and analysed in vitro and in vivo against etonogestrel (ETG, 3-keto-desogestrel), the biologically active metabolite of desogestrel. Their relative binding potency to progesterone (PR), androgen (AR) and estrogen (ER) receptors were determined in cell lysates of human breast tumor MCF-7 cells and to glucocorticoid (GR) receptors in that of human leukemic IM-9 cells. Moreover, their relative agonistic activities were assessed in Chinese hamster ovary cell-based transactivation assays. All in vivo activities were determined in McPhail (progestagenic), ovulation inhibition (progestagenic and estrogenic), Hershberger (androgenic), hormone screening (glucocorticoid and estrogen) and Allen-Doisy (estrogenic) tests after oral and for the McPhail test also after subcutaneous administration. The progestagenic binding and transactivation potencies of all compounds in the three 17-spiro series were higher than those of the corresponding analogues in the 17alpha-ethynyl series. None of the compounds showed estrogenic or clear androgenic binding and transactivation potential except for a six-membered-spiromethylene lactone with a propynyl group. This compound showed strong androgenic binding. The glucocorticoid binding and transactivation were very low for the compounds with the 17alpha-ethynyl and the five-membered-spiromethylene ether groups, whereas both six-membered-spiro series showed, clearly with methyl and ethynyl substituents, and less pronounced with methylene and ethenyl, higher binding and transactivation values. For the 17alpha-ethynyl series, the McPhail test showed high potencies with methylene, methyl and ethenyl substituents after oral treatment or with propenyl after subcutaneous administration. The introduction of the spiro substituents in position 17 led to high potencies for other 11-substituents as well. Besides methyl, also ethyl, ethynyl and propynyl were potent substituents. With ovulation inhibition tests, the ethyl, ethenyl and ethynyl substituents were the more potent compounds in all four series. However, compounds with methyl or ethynyl additions appeared to be glucocorticoidal in the hormone screening test irrespective of the 17-substituent, while with the three spiro series even methylene and ethenyl groups became active. Androgenicity was only observed at dose levels at or above 5 mg/kg, which is 2.5-fold weaker than ETG. Moreover, estrogenicity appeared negligible with the three spiro series, while with the 17alpha-ethynyl series methyl, ethyl, ethenyl and ethynyl substituents, a very high estrogenic potential was assessed. Based on the high efficacy and low side-effects, the following compounds show a high selectivity: 17alpha-ethynyl with ethyl, ethenyl and 2-propenyl substituents, six-membered spiromethylene ether with ethyl and six-membered-spiromethylene lactone with ethyl, 2-propenyl or 1-propynyl substituents. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Development of time-resolved immunofluorometric assays for rat follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone and application on sera of cycling rats.

The aim of this study was to develop time-resolved immunofluorometric assays (TR-IFMA) for measuring rat (r)FSH and rLH. The advantages of these IFMAs are higher sensitivity due to lower background values, higher specificity as only intact molecules of FSH and LH can be measured, and a very long shelf life of the nonradioactive biotin antigens compared with radiolabeled iodine antigens. For rFSH, IFMAs are lacking, while for rLH, if present, the resources for antibodies are scarce or the mouse monoclonal antibodies (mMAbs) against LHalpha are inactive with FSH. Thus specific antibodies need to be obtained. With the final TR-IFMAs, rFSH and rLH levels were assessed during the estrous cycle and compared with those obtained with the more classical RIAs and fluoroimmunoassays (FIAs). Two IFMAs for rFSH were developed with mMAbs against the recombinant human (rec h)FSHbeta subunit (FSH56A) attached to the wall and two different rabbit polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) against the alpha subunit of rec hFSH (R93-2705) or recombinant rat (rec r)LH (R95-2715) conjugated with biotin as signal antibody. With both IFMAs, rFSH holo-molecules can be measured. Rat FSH standards could be assessed between 0.02 and 10 ng/ml with a detection limit of 0.05 and 0.24 ng/ml in buffer and serum, respectively. These detection limits in four IFMAs were 8- to 16-fold lower than those in RIAs and FIAs. This detection level allowed the measurement of FSH levels in serum of hypophysectomized (HYPEX) rats at 0.18 ng/ml. In serum of cycling rats, the FSH levels of the IFMA were 2-fold lower than those of the FIA, while in ovariectomized (OVX) rats the IFMA levels were comparable. A peak level of FSH was found during proestrus of Day 2 and gestation with both RIA and FIA, but with IFMAs at gestation only. An IFMA for rLH was set up with mMAb (hCG77A) reacting with rLHbeta as capture and rabbit PAb to rec rLHalpha (R95-2712) as signal antibody. Rat LH standard could be assessed between 0.001 and 10 ng/ml with a detection limit of 0.012 and 0.1 ng/ml in buffer and serum, respectively, which was 8-fold lower than that in RIA/FIA. In serum of HYPEX rats, LH was undetectable (< 0.04 ng/ml), whereas a high background level of 2.5 ng/ml was measured in the FIA. In serum of cycling rats, only a very low LH level of 0.14 ng/ml was measured, which strongly deviated from the level of 3.46 ng/ml with an FIA. The load of LH in serum of OVX rats was 2.91 ng/ml, which was 12-fold lower than that for the FIA. The peak level of LH was detected on proestrus Day 2 with RIA, FIA, and IFMA. In conclusion, two IFMAs for rFSH and one for rLH have been developed with high sensitivity and specificity for intact gonadotropins. The LH pattern during the estrous cycle was comparable between IFMA, RIA, and FIA, although the overall level in the IFMA was much lower, as were HYPEX levels. The FSH pattern differed only on proestrus Day 2 in the IFMA from that of RIA/FIA, showing a peak level with RIA/FIA and a basal level with the IFMA. This implies that in RIA/FIA measurements, proteins other than intact FSH and LH interfere with the analysis at proestrus Day 2 for FSH and in HYPEX, cycling, and OVX rats for LH.

Hormonal properties of norethisterone, 7alpha-methyl-norethisterone and their derivatives.

Norethisterone (NET) is a progestagenic compound with very weak androgenicity and estrogenicity. These low androgenic and estrogenic activities may be attributed to NET itself or induced by metabolites of NET. In order to improve the bioactivity of NET, the effects of a 7alpha-methyl substitution were studied. Thus this study has two objectives: first the comparison between biological activities of NET and 7alpha-methyl-NET (MeNET), and second the biological activity of tentative metabolites of NET and those of MeNET. The metabolites consist of a 3-keto-, 3alpha- or 3beta-hydroxy-group located next to a carbon 4 to 5 double bond (Delta(4)) or a 5alpha-hydrogen atom. The 7alpha-methyl substitution was of special interest as it prevents 5alpha-reduction. The biological activities of NET, MeNET and their potential metabolites were assessed by in vitro binding, transactivation and proliferation assays on progesterone (PR), androgen (AR), estrogen (ER) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors and by in vivo progestagenic McPhail, androgenic Hershberger, estrogenic Allen-Doisy tests and combined estrogenic and progestagenic ovulation inhibition tests. NET is a compound with five- to eight-fold weaker PR binding and transactivation activities than the reference compound Org 2058 (100%) and two-fold stronger than progesterone. Binding and transactivation activities of NET for AR (DHT=100%) are 3.2 and 1.1%, respectively, for ER none (E2=100%) and for GR below 1% (DEX=100%). MeNET is 1.5- to two-fold less progestagenic and ten- to 20-fold more androgenic than NET, while it does not show activity for ER and GR. The relative binding affinity of 5alpha-NET was seven-fold lower for PR and 1.5-fold higher for AR than for NET, while in transactivation assays 5alpha-NET was only active at levels below 1% for all tested receptors. 3beta-Hydroxy-(5alpha-reduced)-metabolites showed clear ER binding and transactivation activities, while 3alpha-hydroxy-(5alpha-reduced)-metabolites did hardly possess these characteristics. These hydroxy metabolites did not bind or activate other receptors. Substitution of 7alpha-methyl to NET metabolites led to similar characteristics, but with higher activities for AR and ER and weaker activity for PR. The outcome of in vivo tests showed a remarkable effect for MeNET. Progestagenic activity in rabbits appeared for NET equipotent to or eight-fold higher than for MeNET, after subcutaneous or oral treatment, respectively. On the other hand, MeNET showed in rats a ten-fold higher androgenicity and eight-fold higher estrogenicity than NET. Ovulation inhibition was induced at very low oral or subcutaneous dose levels, being 120- or ten-fold lower than for NET, respectively. The estrogenicity can also be induced by 3alpha- or 3beta-hydroxy metabolites of MeNET, which are 15 or even more than 40-fold stronger than those of NET, respectively. In conclusion, after the introduction of a 7alpha-methyl substituent to NET an increased estrogenicity and androgenicity and a reduced progestagenic activity was found. The in vivo estrogenicity is mainly due to 3beta-hydroxy-MeNET and to a lesser extent to 3alpha-hydroxy-MeNET, while the androgenicity and progestagenicity are most likely caused by MeNET itself. Since the 7alpha-methyl substituent inhibits 5alpha-reductase, 5alpha-reduced MeNET metabolites can be excluded from biological activities. As MeNET is a very effective ovulation inhibitor, due to its mixed progestagenic and estrogenic profile, a further reduction of androgenicity of MeNET may yield new contraceptives with an attractive profile for contraception.

Human progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in CHO cells. I. Stable transfection of receptor and receptor-responsive reporter genes: transcription modulation by (anti)progestagens.

A hormone-dependent transcription modulation system was established on the basis of a two-step transfection procedure of the human progesterone receptor isoforms (hPR-A and hPR-B, respectively) and a progesterone receptor-responsive reporter (MMTV-Luc). In the first step, stable transfection of the hPR-A and hPR-B isoform-encoding cDNAs was performed in the steroid receptor-negative CHO K1 cell line. Individual clones were characterized for hPR-isoform expression with respect to Western immuno-blotting, transcriptional activation and hormone binding. With respect to the latter characteristic, individual hPR-isoforms demonstrated similar dissociation constants (Kd for hPR-A: 0.5 +/- 0.3 and hPR-B: 0.8 +/- 0.3 nM, respectively) irrespective of the amount of receptor isoform expressed (Bmax varying from 4.1 to 33.2 nM). The Kd values observed for individual hPR-isoforms were comparable to those found for human breast tumor MCF-7 cells (Kd for hPR-A + hPR-B: 0.6 +/- 0.3 nM). In the second step, hPR-isoform expressing CHO clones were supertransfected with a MMTV-Luc reporter construct resulting in permanent cell lines useful for testing the activity of natural and synthetic steroids in their ability to modulate gene transcription. Both isoform-specific reporter cell lines responded in a similar ranking order towards different progesterone reference compounds such as Org 2058, progesterone (Prog), R5020, norethisterone (NE), and medroxy progesterone acetate (MPA). Moreover, a good correlation was observed between the relative binding affinity (RBA) and the transcriptional activation potency of these compounds towards the individual hPR-isoforms. The latter correlation could not only be demonstrated for the progestagenic agonist reference compounds but was also observed for the progestagenic antagonist reference compounds like Org 33628, Org 31710, RU 38486 and ZK 98299. The major difference observed between the individual PR-isoforms was related to the degree of stimulation of the reporter gene (MMTV-based) within the cellular CHO context. Therefore, these cell lines can be used for the determination and quantitation of the activity of (anti)progestagenic compounds in vitro but may also be useful to predict the activity of compounds in vivo (see also II Comparison of binding, transactivation and ED50 values of several synthetic (anti) progestagens in vitro in CHO and MCF-7 cells and in vivo in rabbits and rats).

Human progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in CHO cells. II. Comparison of binding, transactivation and ED50 values of several synthetic (anti)progestagens in vitro in CHO and MCF-7 cells and in vivo in rabbits and rats.

The human progesterone receptor A and B isoforms (hPR-A and hPR-B) were stably transfected in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells in the presence or absence of the mouse mamma tumor virus (MMTV) promoter and luciferase (LUC) reporter gene. In this way four stably transfected CHO cell lines, i.e. hPR-A, hPR-B, hPR-A-MMTV-LUC and hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells, were prepared. hPR-A and -B isoforms were compared by binding and transactivation analysis for 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens. Thereby Org 2058 was used as standard in both agonistic and binding assays and Org 31710 in antagonistic assays. The obtained data were compared with relative binding affinities (RBA) for both hPR-A and -B, which are present in human breast tumor MCF-7 cells, and with biopotency estimations with McPhail tests in rabbits and ovulation inhibition and pregnancy interruption tests in rats. The relative binding affinities of 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens towards hPR-A, hPR-B or hPR-A/B of either CHO or MCF-7 cells were highly correlated with respect to ranking. This was also shown by the high correlation coefficients between the RBA's of hPR-B and hPR-A in CHO cells (r = 0.983) and between those of hPR-B of CHO and hPR A/B of MCF-7 cells (r = 0.957). The transactivation data of the 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens for the hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells were compared with those for hPR-A-MMTV-LUC cells and showed no differences between both cell lines with exception of the progestagens Org 32704 and 33766 and the antiprogestagen Org 33245. Therefore only the relative agonistic activities (RAA) and relative antagonistic activities (RANTA) of hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells were compared with RBA values of hPR-B, showing a high similarity in ranking for the tested compounds, and high correlation coefficients of r = 0.91 and r = 0.97, respectively. Remarkably, RBA's were 1.6 fold higher than RAA's and RANTA's. These in vitro RBA, RAA and RANTA values for hPR-B were checked for their pharmacological relevance by in vivo biopotency measurements with the 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens in rabbits and rats. The in vitro binding and transactivation potencies of progestagens appeared to be very predictive for in vivo analysis on endometrium proliferation in rabbits in the McPhail test with correlation coefficients of r = 0.81 and r = 0.87, while ovulation inhibition in rats correlated less well with r = 0.516 and r = 0.65. On the other hand, the antiprogestagenic potencies found with binding and transactivation assays had a good correlation with the potencies in the pregnancy interruption test in rats for all antiprogestagens tested, being r = 0.849 and r = 0.744, respectively. In conclusion, the binding and transactivation potencies for the tested compounds in hPR-A and -B containing cell lines showed in general a good resemblance. The transactivation studies with hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells indicated that ranking of compounds was fairly identical to binding analysis and could be used for pre-screening of the (anti)-progestagenic bioactivity in the McPhail test in rabbits, the ovulation inhibition test and the pregnancy interruption test in rats. Therefore this transactivation assay can replace binding assays. Moreover, direct pre-screening of agonists, antagonists and partial antagonists is even possible in this in vitro bioassay, making transactivation assays for a particular class of chemical compounds to a valuable pre-screening tool for in vivo studies.

The stereoisomers of 17alpha-[123I]iodovinyloestradiol and its 11beta-methoxy derivative evaluated for their oestrogen receptor binding in human MCF-7 cells and rat uterus, and their distribution in immature rats.

We studied the potential of both stereoisomers of 17alpha-[123I]iodovinyloestradiol (E- and Z-[123I]IVE) and of 11beta-methoxy-17alpha-[123I]iodovinyloestradiol (E- and Z-[123I]MIVE) as suitable radioligands for the imaging of oestrogen receptor(ER)-positive human breast tumours. The 17alpha-[123I]iodovinyloestradiols were prepared stereospecifically by oxidative radio-iododestannylation of the corresponding 17alpha-tri-n-butylstannylvinyloestradiol precursors. Competitive binding studies were performed in order to determine the relative binding affinity (RBA) of the unlabelled 17alpha-iodovinyloestradiols for the ER in both human MCF-7 breast tumour cells and rat uterine tissue, compared with that of diethylstilboestrol (DES). Target tissue uptake, retention and uptake selectivity of their 123I-labelled analogues were studied in immature female rats. All four 17alpha-iodovinyloestradiols showed high affinity for the ER in human MCF-7 cells, as well as rat uterus. Their RBA for the ER showed the following order of decreasing potency: RBA of DES >Z-IVE >Z-MIVE >E-MIVE > or =E-IVE. Neither of these 17alpha-iodovinyloestradiols showed any significant binding to the sex hormone binding globulin in human plasma. The biodistribution studies showed ER-mediated uptake in the uterus, ovaries and pituitary, that of E- and Z-[123I]MIVE being higher than that of E- and Z-[123I]IVE. High target-to-non-target tissue uptake ratios, especially at longer periods after injection (up to 24h), were exhibited by both isomers of [123I]MIVE. The uterus-to-blood uptake ratio was higher for E-[123I]MIVE. However, the uterus-to-fat uptake ratio appeared to be higher for the Z-isomer of [123I]MIVE, especially at 24h after injection. Metabolic properties and temperature effects, which play a more important role in vivo, probably cause the discrepancies seen between in vitro and in vivo binding results. On the basis of their in vitro binding properties and in vivo distribution characteristics we conclude that E- and Z-[123I]MIVE could be suitable radioligands for the diagnostic imaging of ER in human breast cancer. Therefore, further studies with these radioligands in mature normal and tumour-bearing rats are warranted.

Effects of two classes of progestagens, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives, on cell growth of human breast tumor cells: I. MCF-7 cell lines.

The effects of two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), R5020, progesterone (PROG)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), levonorgestrel (LNG), gestodene (GES), norethisterone (NE), Org 30659] on proliferation of three estradiol (E2)-dependent human breast tumor MCF-7 cell lines of different origin [Van der Burg (B), Litton bionetics (L) and McGrath (M)] were studied. The pregnane derivatives hardly stimulated cell growth at 10(-6) M in MCF-7 B and L cells except for Org 2058 in B cells, whereas in M cells a statistically significant growth induction was observed except for PROG. The 19-nortestosterone derivatives induced cell growth at doses at 10(-7) M or higher in all three cell lines. NE, GES and Org 30659 were more potent stimulators than KDG and LNG at 10(-7) M. E2 already showed maximal stimulation at 10(-10) M. For all three cell lines, the effects and ranking of the individual progestagens were similar. Antiprogestagens, like RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block these stimulatory effects while antiestrogens like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384 could. This suggests that cell growth by the above-mentioned progestagens occurs via an interaction with the estrogen receptor. Indeed, displacement studies with cytosol from MCF-7 M cells revealed that at very high concentrations NE, GES and Org 30659 were able to displace 50% of the radiolabelled E2, while KDG and LNG could not. Relative binding affinities (RBAs) were 0.010, 0.025 and 0.015% for NE, GES and Org 30659, respectively. The effect of the two classes of progestagens on cell proliferation was also investigated at several dose levels in combination with E2 (10(-10) M) in the MCF-7 B cell line. This resulted in a statistically significant inhibition of cell growth with R5020, MPA and most of the 19-nortestosterone derivatives at concentrations of 10(-8) M. Org 2058 and NE did not have any influence on E2-induced growth. The inhibitory effects could not be blocked by antiprogestagens. In summary these studies with 3 subclones of MCF-7 cells show that the pregnane derived progestagens stimulate growth only in one subclone, whereas the 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens do so in all three subclones. The progestagens possess estrogenic activity only at high pharmacological doses, being 10,000 times weaker than estradiol. In combination with estrogens most progestagens gave a reduction of E2-stimulated growth in the B subclone.

Effects of two classes of progestagens, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives, on cell growth of human breast tumor cells: II. T47D cell lines.

Two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, progesterone (PROG), R5020, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [norethisterone (NE), levonorgestrel (LNG), 3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), gestodene (GES), Org 30659] were studied for their effect on cell growth of two human breast tumor T47D cell lines of different origin, i.e. from ATCC (A) and Sutherland (S) et al. [Sutherland et al., Cancer Res. 48 (1988) 5084-5091]. The effect of estradiol (E2) and progestagens alone as well as the combined effect of E2 (10(-10) M) and progestagens were investigated at several dose levels. Compared with E2-induced growth at 10(-10) M, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens at 10(-6) M alone did enhance cell growth in T47D-A cells up to 25 and 100% respectively, whereas in T47D-S cells they did not influence growth. All these progestagens at 10(-6) M did not affect E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells, whereas in T47D-S cells they completely reduced cell proliferation at doses between 10(-10) and 10(-8) M. The involvement of progestagen (PR) and estrogen (ER) receptors with respect to growth stimulation was studied by using specific antihormones. In T47D-A cells, the antiprogestagens RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block progestagen-induced growth. Antiestrogens, like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384, inhibited the 19-nortestosterone derivative-induced cell growth by approx. 50%. Remarkably, both antiprogestagens alone could also inhibit E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells by about 50%. In T47D-S cells, E2-induced cell growth was completely blocked by both antiprogestagens and antiestrogens. Both antiprogestagens in T47D-S cells were equipotent to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and 10-fold more potent than ICI 164,384. In conclusion pregnane and 19-nortestosterone-derived progestagens stimulated cell growth in T47D-A cells at high unphysiological concentrations, whereas they did not affect cell growth in T47D-S cells. The 19-nortestosterone derivative induced growth in T47D-A cells could partially be inhibited by antiestrogens. In T47D-A cells, E2-induced cell growth was not influenced by both classes of progestagens, whereas in T47D-S cells all tested progestagens, antiprogestagens, and antiestrogens inhibited E2-induced cell growth completely. These results with T47D cells as well as those obtained previously with MCF-7 cells show that subclones of cell lines may respond differently to various types of progestagens in the presence and absence of estrogens.

Pharmacological properties of a new selective antiprogestagen: Org 33628.

UNLABELLED: For antiprogestagens both selectivity (ratio of antiprogestational to antiglucocorticoid activity) and potency are important conditions for their applications in fertility regulation and correction of hormone-dependent irregularities. Org 33628 appears to fulfill both conditions most convincingly. The activities of this new antiprogestagen in various assays are compared with those of RU 38486 and a few other antiprogestagens. The binding of Org 33628 to the progesterone receptor is twice as high as that of RU 38486 whereas the binding to the glucocorticoid receptor is 25 times lower than that of RU 38486. The activity of Org 33628 in the pregnancy interruption test in rats is 16 times higher than that of RU 38486. The antiglucocorticoid activity of Org 33628 in rats is about eight times lower than that of RU 38486. In the ovulation inhibition test in rats Org 33628 is approximately 80 times more potent than RU 38486. For menses induction in the stumptail monkey activity observed for Org 33628 is only twice as high. IN CONCLUSION: Org 33628 is a very potent and selective antiprogestagen with a remarkably high ovulation-inhibitory activity. The magnitude of the potency difference with RU 38486 is species and/or target organ dependent.

Effects of progestagens and Org OD14 in in vitro and in vivo tumor models.

Sex steroids, in particular estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4), play, together with other hormones and growth factors, a role in the development of normal breast tissue. The effect of four progestagens (norethisterone, 3-ketodesogestrel, gestodene and P4) and Org OD14, a steroid with weak estrogenic, progestagenic and androgenic properties were studied on growth of breast tumor cells in vitro using two subclones of MCF-7 (H and A) and T47D (S and A) cells. In addition, we investigated the effects of 3-ketodesogestrel, gestodene and Org OD14 on the growth of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene(DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in rats. In the in vitro assays with MCF-7 cells norethisterone, 3-ketodesogestrel and gestodene stimulated growth only at high doses (> or = 10(-7) M), whereas P4 had no effect. Gestodene was more potent than 3-ketodesogestrel and norethisterone. Org OD14, stimulated cell growth at a dose of 10(-8) M, while E2 is active at 10(-10) M. In T47D-A cells similar effects were found, but the subclone S did not respond to the progestagens and Org OD14. The two T47D subclones also reacted differently to progestagens during growth stimulation with E2. In T47D-S the progestagens and Org OD14 inhibited, while in T47D-A these compounds did not modulate the effect of E2. In the DMBA model we found that gestodene and 3-ketodesogestrel were able to inhibit tumor growth to the same extent. Surprisingly, Org OD14 was even more effective in the DMBA model using the therapeutic approach. Using the prophylaxic approach tumor development was delayed and tumor growth was strongly suppressed. The inhibitory effects of Org OD14 on tumor growth in the DMBA model may be attributed to its mixed hormonal profile. From these studies we conclude that different cell lines and even subclones thereof respond quite differently to steroids. Both in vitro and in vivo studies are required to judge whether synthetic steroids might be involved in an increased risk for the development of breast tumors.

Pharmacology of two new very selective antiprogestagens: Org 31710 and Org 31806.

Org 31710 and Org 31806 are new antiprogestagens. These compounds were tested for their binding affinity to various steroid receptors and for their bio-activity in various animal models and the results were compared with those of RU38486 and ZK 98299. Both Org compounds are strong antiprogestagens with little antiglucocortocoid activity and are devoid of other hormonal activities except for some weak androgenic and anti-androgenic activity. The two compounds are more potent than RU38486 and ZK 98299 with respect to their anti-progestational activity and are more selective. The Org compounds are effective in inhibiting the development of tumours in the 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) rat model. Org 31710 and Org 31806 may be applied for both the treatment of breast tumours and the improvement of fertility control.