Intra-articular injection of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells with or without addition of platelet-rich plasma is effective in decreasing pain and symptoms in knee osteoarthritis: a controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and laboratory outcomes of intra-articular injections of culture-expanded bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to intra-articular corticosteroid injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Forty-seven patients with radiographic and symptomatic knee OA were randomized into three groups for intra-articular injections: autologous bone marrow-derived culture-expanded MSCs (n = 16); autologous bone marrow-derived culture-expanded MSCs + PRP (n = 14); and corticosteroid (n = 17). The outcomes were assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and range of motion (ROM) at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and intra-articular cytokines analysis at baseline, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The three groups showed significant improvement in most KOOS domains and global score at 1st month and all domains and global score at 12-month follow-up (p < 0.05). At the 1st month, only the MSCs group showed significant differences in KOOS symptoms domain (p = 0.003). The MSCs and MSCs + PRP groups showed the highest percentage of improvement in most KOOS domains and global score compared to the corticosteroid group. All three groups showed a significant reduction in intra-articular levels of human interleukin-10 cytokine, from baseline to 12 months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An intra-articular injection of bone marrow-derived culture-expanded MSCs with or without the addiction of PRP is effective in improving the function and decreasing symptoms caused by knee OA at 12-month follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Intra-articular injections of expanded mesenchymal stem cells with and without addition of platelet-rich plasma are safe and effective for knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular injections of autologous expanded mesenchymal stromal stem cells alone (MSCs), or in combination with platelet-rich plasma (MSCs + PRP), in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Eighteen patients (57.6 ± 9.6 years) with radiographic symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Dejour grades II-IV) were randomized to receive intra-articular injections of MSCs (n = 9) or MSCs + PRP (n = 9). Injections were performed 2-3 weeks after bone marrow aspiration (± 80-100 ml) which was obtained from both posterior iliac crests. RESULTS: The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) improved significantly throughout the 12 months for both groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences between groups were found in KOOS subscales and global score improvements at 12-month end-point (n.s.). The MSCs group showed significant improvements in the pain, function and daily living activities, and sports and recreational activities subscales (p < 0.05). Similarly, the MSCs + PRP group showed significant improvements in the pain, function and daily living activities and quality of life subscales (p < 0.05). The average number of fibroblast colony forming units (CFU-F) was 56.8 + 21.9 for MSCs group and 50.7 ± 21.7 for MSCs + PRP group. Minimal adverse effects were seen in both groups (10 adverse events, in 5 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular injections of expanded MSCs alone or in combination with PRP are safe and have a beneficial effect on symptoms in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Adding PRP to the MSCs injections did not provide additional benefit. These results are encouraging and support the recommendation of this minimally invasive procedure in patients with knee osteoarthritis, without requiring hospitalization. The CFU-F results may be used as reference for future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Proximal humeral fractures: an understanding of the ideal plate positioning.

PURPOSE: The present study aims to evaluate if the bicipital groove can be used as a parameter for ideal plate positioning in proximal humeral fixation applying locking compression plate. METHOD: The authors questioned whether the bicipital groove can be used as a parameter for ideal plate positioning applying locking compression plate for proximal humeral fractures. A method using the bicipital groove as the main parameter was developed using computed tomography scan (CT-scan). Seventy shoulders presenting fracture absence were used to calculate proper plate positioning, allowing the largest area for locked screw placement into the humeral head. Intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman graphics calculated intra-observer reliability for CT-scan evaluation. RESULTS: All observers presented satisfactory plate positioning using this method. The mean differences for observers were close to zero, suggesting high interobserver reproducibility. A significant (p <0.0001) intra-observer agreement existed for the three evaluators. Observer 2 agreement was the strongest (ICC = 0.98), showing almost perfect reproducibility measurement, followed by observer 3 (ICC = 0.84) with good reproducibility, and lastly observer 1 demonstrated moderate degree agreement (ICC = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Considering the CT-scan analysis, the bicipital groove can be used as a parameter for ideal plate positioning in proximal humeral fractures. This method demonstrated satisfactory intra-observer reproducibility. Adopting this method, longer and better distributed screw placement provides more stable fixation for proximal humeral fractures.