Optimal Angiographic Goal and Number of Passes for Octogenarians Undergoing Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: The optimal recanalization goal and number of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) passes for elderly patients with large vessel occlusion strokes is unclear. METHODS: Consecutive patients 80 years or older undergoing EVT were identified from 2016 to 2022 at a single center. Clinical information, procedural details, and modified treatment in cerebral ischemia (mTICI) scores were collected. Primary outcome was modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess associations between mTICI scores, EVT passes, and 90-day outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients were identified. At 90 days, mTICI 2b recanalization resulted in high rates of poor outcomes (8.7% functional independence and 60.9% mortality) not significantly different from mTICI 0, 1 or 2a (median mRS 6 vs. 6, P = 0.61). Complete recanalization (mTICI 2c or 3) led to significantly better mRS outcomes at 90 days compared to mTICI 2b (median mRS 4 vs. 6, adjusted P = 0.038), with 26.8% functional independence and 37.8% mortality. In multivariable analysis, complete recanalization was significantly associated with better 90-day outcomes than mTICI 2b or lower recanalization (odds ratio 4.24 [95% Confidence interval 1.46-12.3]; P = 0.002), while the number of passes was not independently associated with worse outcomes (P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: For octogenarians, mTICI 2b recanalization yields limited clinical benefit and results in poor 90-day outcomes. In contrast, complete recanalization is independently associated with significantly better outcomes. Thus, once the decision is made to pursue EVT in the elderly, mTICI 2c or better recanalization should be the angiographic goal. Providers should not withhold thrombectomy passes based on age alone.

Predictors for large vessel recanalization before stroke thrombectomy: the HALT score.

BACKGROUND: Large vessel recanalization (LVR) before endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute large vessel ischemic strokes is a poorly understood phenomenon. Better understanding of predictors for LVR is important for optimizing stroke triage and patient selection for bridging thrombolysis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients presenting to a comprehensive stroke center for EVT treatment were identified from 2018 to 2022. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use, and LVR before EVT were recorded. Factors independently associated with different rates of LVR were identified, and a prediction model for LVR was constructed. RESULTS: 640 patients were identified. 57 (8.9%) patients had LVR before EVT. A minority (36.4%) of LVR patients had significant improvements in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Independent predictors for LVR were identified and used to construct the 8-point HALT score: hyperlipidemia (1 point), atrial fibrillation (1 point), location of vascular occlusion (internal carotid: 0 points, M1: 1 point, M2: 2 points, vertebral/basilar: 3 points), and thrombolysis at least 1.5 hours before angiography (3 points). The HALT score had an area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.90, P<0.001) for predicting LVR. LVR before EVT occurred in only 1 of 302 patients (0.3%) with low (0-2) HALT scores. CONCLUSIONS: IVT at least 1.5 hours before angiography, site of vascular occlusion, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia are independent predictors for LVR. The 8-point HALT score proposed in this study may be a valuable tool for predicting LVR before EVT.

Mildly elevated INR is associated with worse outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Elevated International Normalized Ratio (INR) is a marker of coagulopathy, but its impact on outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with stroke is unclear. This study investigates the impact of mild INR elevations on clinical outcomes following MT. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with stroke treated with MT were identified from 2015 to 2020 at a Comprehensive Stroke Center. Demographic information, past medical history, INR, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, use of tissue plasminogen activator, and last known normal to arteriotomy time were recorded. Outcome measures included modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Patients were divided into two groups: normal INR (0.8-1.1) and mildly elevated INR (1.2-1.7). RESULTS: A total of 489 patients were included for analysis, of which 349 had normal INR and 140 had mildly elevated INR. After multivariable adjustments, mildly elevated INR was associated with lower odds of excellent outcomes (mRS 0-1, OR 0.24, p=0.009), lower odds of functional independence (mRS 0-2, OR 0.38, p=0.038), and higher odds of 90-day mortality (OR 3.45, p=0.018). Elevated INR was not associated with a higher likelihood of ICH, and there were no differences in rates of HI1, HI2, PH1, or PH2 hemorrhagic transformations; however, elevated INR was associated with significantly higher odds of 90-day mortality in patients with ICH (OR 6.22, p=0.024). This effect size was larger than in patients without ICH (OR 3.38, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with stroke treated with MT, mildly elevated INR is associated with worse clinical outcomes after recanalization and may worsen the mortality risk of hemorrhagic transformations.

The Maryland Acute Stroke Emergency Medical Services Routing Pilot: Expediting Access to Thrombectomy for Stroke.

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion, but is not available at all stroke centers. Transfers between hospitals lead to treatment delays. Transport directly to a facility capable of MT based on a prehospital stroke severity scale score has been recommended, if transportation time is less than 30 min. Aims: We hypothesized that an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) routing algorithm for stroke, using the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) in the field, would improve time from last known well to MT, without causing patients to miss the IV Thrombolysis (IVT) window. Methods: An EMS algorithm in the Baltimore metro area using the LAMS was implemented. Patients suspected of having an acute stroke were assessed by EMS using the LAMS. Patients scoring 4 or higher and within 20 h from last known well, were transported directly to a Thrombectomy Center, if transport could be completed within 30 min. The algorithm was evaluated retrospectively with prospectively collected data at the Thrombectomy Centers. The primary outcome variables were proportion of patients with suspected stroke rerouted by EMS, proportion of rerouted ischemic stroke patients receiving MT, time to treatment, and whether the IVT window was missed. Results: A total of 303 patients were rerouted out of 2459 suspected stroke patients over a period of 6 months. Of diverted patients, 47% had acute ischemic stroke. Of these, 48% received an acute stroke treatment: 16.8% IVT, 17.5% MT, and 14% MT+IVT. Thrombectomy occurred 119 min earlier in diverted patients compared to patients transferred from other hospitals (P = 0.006). 55.3% of diverted patients undergoing MT and 38.2% of patients transferred from hospital to hospital were independent at 90 days (modified Rankin score 0-2) (P = 0.148). No patient missed the time window for IVT due to the extra travel time. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data, implementation of a pre-hospital clinical screening score to detect patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion was feasible. Rerouting patients directly to a Thrombectomy Center, based on the EMS algorithm, led to a shorter time to thrombectomy.

Exploring the Collateral Damage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stroke Care: A Statewide Analysis.

[Figure: see text].

Beyond the first pass: revascularization remains critical in stroke thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: The first pass effect has been recently reported as a predictor of good clinical outcome after stroke thrombectomy. We evaluate the first pass effect on outcome and the influence of revascularization in these and other patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database on anterior cerebral circulation stroke thrombectomy cases from April 2012 to April 2018. Data compiled included patient demographics, presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, vessel occlusion site, thrombectomy procedural details, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale scores. RESULTS: 205 patients were included. The numbers of patients who underwent one, two, three, four, five, and six passes were 69, 70, 55, 9, 1, and 1, respectively. Successful revascularization was achieved in 87%, 83%, and 64% of patients in the one, two, and 3 or more passes groups, respectively (p=0.002). Good functional outcome was inversely correlated with number of passes when comparing the one, two, and three or more passes groups (54%, 43%, 29%; P=0.014). In patients with full revascularization, there was no significant difference in good functional outcomes between the one, two, and three or more passes groups (64%, 65%, 50%; P=0.432). Number of passes was not an independent negative predictor of good clinical outcome (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.39; P=0.165). CONCLUSIONS: First pass thrombectomy patients have better functional outcomes compared with beyond-first pass patients. This effect is related at least in part to a higher rate of revascularization in one pass patients. Revascularization beyond the first pass should continue to be the goal of stroke thrombectomy.