Efficacy and short-term safety of a new ACAT inhibitor, avasimibe, on lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins, in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

Although acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) inhibitors have been shown to reduce lipid levels in several animal models, the safety and lipid modifying activity of any single agent in this class has not been demonstrated in humans. The safety and efficacy of avasimibe (CI-1011), a new, unique, wholly synthetic ACAT inhibitor, was evaluated in the treatment of 130 men and women with combined hyperlipidemia and hypoalphalipoproteinemia (low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]). Following an 8-week placebo and dietary-controlled baseline period, patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo, 50, 125, 250, or 500 mg avasimibe administered as capsules once daily for 8 weeks. At all evaluated doses, avasimibe treatment resulted in prompt and significant reductions (P<0.05) in plasma levels of total triglycerides (TG) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) with mean reductions of up to 23% and 30% respectively, apparently independent of dose. No statistically significant changes in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C or apolipoprotein (apo) B were detected. ApoAI levels were also unchanged on all doses of avasimibe apart from the 500 mg dosage, which was associated with a significant decrease in plasma apoAI. The relevance of this latter finding in only one dosage group is not known. All doses of avasimibe were well tolerated with no resulting significant abnormalities of biochemical, hematological, or clinical parameters.

Efficacy and safety of combination simvastatin and colesevelam in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy and safety of colesevelam hydrochloride, a novel, nonsystemic, lipid-lowering agent, when coadministered with starting doses of simvastatin in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects with hypercholesterolemia (plasma low density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level > 160 mg/dL and triglyceride level < or = 300 mg/dL) were randomly assigned to receive daily doses of placebo (n = 33), colesevelam 3.8 g (recommended dose, n = 37), simvastatin 10 mg (n = 35), colesevelam 3.8 g with simvastatin 10 mg (n = 34), colesevelam 2.3 g (low dose, n = 36), simvastatin 20 mg (n = 39), or colesevelam 2.3 g with simvastatin 20 mg (n = 37), for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Mean LDL cholesterol levels decreased relative to baseline in the placebo group (P < 0.05) and in all active treatment groups (P < 0.0001). For groups treated with combination therapy, the mean reduction in LDL cholesterol level was 42% (-80 mg/dL; P < 0.0001 compared with baseline), which exceeded the reductions for simvastatin 10 mg (-26%, -48 mg/dL) or 20 mg (-34%, -61 mg/dL) alone, or for colesevelam 2.3 g (-8%, -17 mg/dL) or 3.8 g (-16%, -31 mg/dL) alone (P < 0.001). The effects of combination therapy on serum HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels were similar to those for simvastatin alone. Side effects were similar among treatment groups, and there were no clinically important changes in laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of colesevelam and simvastatin was effective and well tolerated, providing additive reductions in LDL cholesterol levels compared with either agent alone.

Effects of high-dose simvastatin on adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis in men with hypercholesterolemia.

In view of the role of both the de novo biosynthesis and receptor-mediated uptake of cholesterol for normal steroidogenesis, we evaluated whether extending the therapeutic dose of the hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, simvastatin, to 80 mg/d would affect adrenal and gonadal steroid synthesis in men with hypercholesterolemia. To evaluate this question, we enrolled men into a multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled study lasting 12 weeks. Men with serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) more than 145 mg/dL after 6 weeks of a lipid-lowering diet were randomized to 80 mg simvastatin or placebo. Half of the subjects were asked to undergo a 6-hour infusion of corticotropin (ACTH) to evaluate cortisol synthesis, and the entire cohort received a human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation test to assess gonadal hormone secretion using pooled serum samples taken 15 minutes apart. A total of 81 men (age, 45 +/- 11 years; 93% Caucasian) with baseline serum LDL-C of 197 mg/dL (placebo, n = 39) and 184 mg/dL (simvastatin 80 mg, n = 42) completed the study. After 12 weeks, serum LDL-C, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the simvastatin group changed by -43%, -25%, and 8%, respectively (all P < .001). The basal cortisol level and the peak serum cortisol and area under the curve response to the 6-hour ACTH infusion were comparable between the two treatment groups at baseline and after 12 weeks. The pooled total testosterone level at baseline was 541 and 513 ng/dL in the placebo and simvastatin-treated groups, respectively, which declined to 536 +/- 20.5 ng/dL (-1.5%) and 474 +/- 30.4 ng/dL (-13.6%, P = .09) after treatment (mean +/- SD). The pooled free testosterone declined by 6.3% in the simvastatin group, versus a 4.9% increase in the placebo group (P = .588), while pooled bioavailable testosterone declined 10.2% in the simvastatin group and increased 1.4% in the placebo group (P = .035). There were no changes in serum gonadotropin levels or sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). After administration of hCG, there were no differences in the peak total pooled testosterone level before or after 12 weeks of treatment. Simvastatin 80 mg was well tolerated compared with placebo. In conclusion, basal and stimulated cortisol production was unaffected by the use of simvastatin 80 mg versus placebo. As reported with other statins and cholestyramine, there were small declines in the simvastatin-treated group for pooled total, free, and bioavailable testosterone after 12 weeks, although there was no compensatory increase in serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or luteinizing hormone (LH) levels.

Effect of atorvastatin on blood lipid levels in the first 2 weeks of treatment: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The rate and degree of LDL cholesterol reduction, in the first 2 weeks of therapy, may relate to the early benefit of hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor therapy. In patients with similar baseline LDL cholesterol levels as in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, we report the results of a 2-week placebo-controlled, double-blind investigation of 10 mg/day atorvastatin. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 22 participants were non-Hispanic whites younger than age 72 (average age 47 years) who were modestly overweight and had normal blood pressure. There were no significant baseline lipid and lipoprotein differences. By day 5, there were significant (P <.01) reductions in total cholesterol and LDL levels. The total cholesterol level fell by 25% (226 mg/dL to 169 mg/dL) and LDL cholesterol fell 35% by day 14 (P <.001). Triglyceride levels declined by 24% (from 137 mg/dL to 104 mg/dL) by day 14, but this was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in HDL cholesterol. The total/HDL level dropped from 4.54 (day 0) to 3.32 (day 14), and the LDL/HDL level dropped from 2.92 to 1.88; both results were highly significant (P <. 001). CONCLUSION: The rapid lipid reduction observed with atorvastatin may benefit the vascular endothelium.

Improving prevention systems in primary care practices: the Health Education and Research Trial (HEART)

BACKGROUND: The Health Education and Research Trial (HEART) was a multicenter clinical trial designed to test methods to improve primary care practice systems for heart disease prevention services. We present the trial methodology, the practices' use of medical record tools, and changes in documentation of cardiovascular risk factor screening and management. METHODS: Primary care practices were recruited from 4 Midwestern states. The factorial design resulted in 4 study groups: conference only, conference and quality improvement consultations, conference and prevention coordinator, and all interventions combined. Medical record audits and physician, staff, and patient surveys assessed practice change in cardiovascular disease risk factor documentation. RESULTS: Practices participated fully in this project, set goals to improve preventive services, and implemented recommended medical record tools. The number of goals set and the increase in the use of medical record tools were greatest in the combined intervention group, with improvements noted in all groups. The use of patient history questionnaires, problem lists, and flow sheets was significantly higher in the combined intervention group when compared with the conference-only group. Documentation of risk factor screening in a recommended-medical record location improved in all intervention groups, with significant sustained improvements in the practices that received the combined intervention. Documented risk factor management significantly improved in all intervention groups compared with the conference-only control. CONCLUSION: Primary care practices are interested in improving prevention systems and can change these systems in response to supportive external interventions. Promoting organizational change to produce sustained improvement in preventive service clinical outcomes is a complex process that requires further research.

Lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day: long-term experience in a large group of patients with hypercholesterolemia. World Wide Expanded Dose Simvastatin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol promote the development of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. HYPOTHESIS: Simvastatin 80 mg/day will be more effective than simvastatin 40 mg/day at reducing LDL cholesterol and will be well tolerated. METHODS: Two similar, randomized, multicenter, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, 48-week studies were performed to evaluate the long-term lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day in patients with hypercholesterolemia. One study conducted in the US enrolled patients meeting the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL cholesterol criteria for pharmacologic treatment. In the other multinational study, patients with LDL cholesterol levels > or = 4.2 mmol/l were enrolled. At 20 centers in the US and 19 countries world-wide, 1,105 hypercholesterolemic patients, while on a lipid-lowering diet, were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:3 to receive simvastatin 40 mg (n = 436) or 80 mg (n = 669) once daily for 24 weeks. Those patients completing an initial 24-week base study were enrolled in a 24-week blinded extension. Patients who had started on the 80 mg dose in the base study continued on the same dose in the extension, while those who had started on the 40 mg dose were rerandomized at a 1:1 ratio to simvastatin 40 or 80 mg in the extension. RESULTS: There was a significant advantage in the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of the 80 mg dose compared with that of the 40 mg dose, which was maintained over the 48 weeks of treatment. The mean percentage reductions (95% confidence intervals) from baseline in LDL cholesterol for the 40 and 80 mg groups were 41% (42, 39) and 47% (48, 46), respectively, for the 24-week base study, and 41% (43, 39) and 46% (47, 45), respectively, after 48 weeks of treatment (p < 0.001 between groups). Larger reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides were also observed with the 80 mg dose compared with the 40 mg dose at Weeks 24 and 48. Both doses were well tolerated, with close to 95% of patients enrolled completing the entire 48 weeks of treatment. Myopathy (muscle symptoms plus creatine kinase increase > 10 fold upper limit of normal) and clinically significant hepatic transaminase increases (> 3 times the upper limit of normal) occurred infrequently with both doses. There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of patients with such increases, although there were more cases for both with the 80 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the 40 mg dose, simvastatin 80 mg produced greater reductions in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. Both doses were well tolerated.

Lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day: worldwide long-term experience in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clinical data suggesting that larger decreases in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) result in greater reductions in coronary heart disease events have led to the establishment of aggressive LDL-C targets for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. In view of this, the efficacy and safety of a new maximum dose of simvastatin, 80 mg, were evaluated in 9 studies involving 2819 hypercholesterolemic patients. This report focuses on the combined results from the 4 main or Pivotal studies in which a total of 1936 patients received simvastatin 40 or 80 mg for 36 to 48 weeks. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Pivotal studies had similar randomized, multicenter, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group designs. Their combined results demonstrated a significant advantage in the LDL-C-lowering effect for the 80 mg dose. At week 24, the mean percentage reductions (95% confidence intervals) from baseline in LDL-C for the 40 and 80 mg groups were -39.8% (-40.9, -38.7) and -45.7% (-46.5, -45.0) respectively (p < 0.001, between groups), and larger reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides were also observed in the 80 mg group. Both doses were well tolerated. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed and the overall clinical event profiles were similar in the two groups. Clinically significant hepatic transaminase increases (> 3 times the upper limit of normal/ULN) and myopathy (muscle symptoms plus creatine kinase increase > 10 times ULN) occurred infrequently with both doses. Simvastatin 80 mg had a comparable efficacy and safety profile in women and men as well as in non-elderly and elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin 80 mg provides additional LDL-C and triglyceride reductions compared to the 40 mg dose and has an excellent safety and tolerability profile.

Effect of hormone replacement therapy on the validity of the Friedewald equation in postmenopausal women: the postmenopausal estrogen/progestins interventions (PEPI) trial.

The Friedewald equation is often used to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Hormone therapy is known to raise triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and alter lipid contents of lipoproteins. We compared Friedewald estimated LDL-C to measured LDL-C in PEPI participants on placebo or four different hormone treatment groups. At baseline, the 0.2 coefficient for triglyceride (TG) was accurate for all five treatment groups. Among women who took >80% of their pills and whose TG was <4.5 mmol/l (400 mg/dl), LDL-C was underestimated for 69-82% of the participants in the active treatment groups, compared to 50% in the placebo group. After 3 years of therapy, the TG coefficient that offered a better fit of the Friedewald equation in the active treatment groups was 0.39 for the equation in mmol/l (0.17 for the equation in mg/dl). Using this coefficient is clearly warranted for greater accuracy in research studies.

Treating to meet NCEP-recommended LDL cholesterol concentrations with atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, or simvastatin in patients with risk factors for coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Our study compared use of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin for lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration in patients at risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). The goal was to reach the LDL cholesterol levels recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). METHODS: A combined total of 344 men and women took part in this 54-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, treat-to-target study. Patients were selected on the basis of their LDL cholesterol concentration and their risk for CHD. During treatment, doses were titrated at 12-week intervals to a maximum of 80 mg per day of atorvastatin and lovastatin, or 40 mg per day of fluvastatin and simvastatin, with colestipol added if necessary to attain the NCEP-recommended LDL cholesterol concentration. RESULTS: At the starting dose, atorvastatin decreased plasma LDL cholesterol significantly (P < .05) compared with the other reductase inhibitors, and the percentage of patients reaching target LDL cholesterol concentration at the starting dose was significantly greater in the atorvastatin group (P < .05). Overall, a significantly (P < .05) greater percentage (95%) of atorvastatin-treated patients achieved target LDL cholesterol concentration. The safety profile was similar among all reductase inhibitors tested. CONCLUSIONS: At the starting dose, a significantly (P < .05) greater percentage of atorvastatin-treated patients at risk for CHD reached the target LDL cholesterol concentration than patients with treated with other reductase inhibitors.

Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on glucose and insulin concentrations. PEPI Investigators. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the long-term impact of four hormone therapy regimens on insulin and glucose concentrations measured during a standard oral glucose tolerance test. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Intervention Study was a 3-year placebo-controlled randomized trial to assess effects of four hormone regimens on cardiovascular risk factors. This efficacy analysis describes glucose and insulin concentrations from 788 adherent women at baseline and at 1 and 3 years' postrandomization. RESULTS: When compared with women taking placebo, those taking conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) at 0.625 mg/day with or without a progestational agent had mean fasting insulin levels that were 16.1% lower, mean fasting glucose levels 2.2 mg/dl lower, and mean 2-h glucose levels 6.4 mg/dl higher (each nominal P < 0.05). No significant differences were apparent between women taking CEE only versus the three progestin regimens: medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) at 2.5 mg daily (continuous MPA), MPA at 10 mg on days 1-12 (cyclical MPA), and micronized progesterone (MP) (cyclical) at 200 mg on days 1-12. The impact of hormone therapy on insulin and glucose depended on baseline levels of fasting insulin and 1-h glucose (P < 0.05). However, the treatment effects on carbohydrate metabolism appeared to be consistent across participant subgroups formed by lifestyle, clinical, and demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Oral hormone therapy involving 0.625 mg/day of CEE may modestly decrease fasting levels of insulin and glucose. Postchallenge glucose concentrations are increased, however, which may indicate delayed glucose clearance.

Efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day in hypercholesterolemic patients. The Expanded Dose Simvastatin U.S. Study Group.

This randomized, multicenter, double-blind parallel-group study was performed to evaluate the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day, a dose twice the current maximum recommended dose. At 20 centers in the United States, 521 male and female hypercholesterolemic patients were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:3 to receive simvastatin 40 or 80 mg once daily, respectively, for 24 weeks in conjunction with a lipid-lowering diet. Patients met National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol criteria for pharmacologic treatment. The mean percentage reductions (95% confidence intervals) from baseline in LDL cholesterol averaged at weeks 18 and 24 were 38% (-40 to -36) and 46% (-47 to -45) for the 40- and 80-mg groups, respectively (p <0.001 between groups). One third of patients on the 40- and 80-mg doses achieved an LDL cholesterol reduction of 46% and > or = 53%, respectively. Decreases in apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, and triglycerides were also significantly greater among patients receiving 80 mg/day. Simvastatin was well tolerated in both groups. Two patients (0.6%) in the 80-mg group developed myopathy. Consecutive, clinically significant hepatic transaminase elevations occurred in 3 (1.0%) and 6 (1.9%) patients in the 40- and 80-mg groups, respectively (p= 0.486). In conclusion, simvastatin 80 mg/day provided substantial reductions in LDL cholesterol, allowing most patients to reach their NCEP target levels; it also had an excellent safety and tolerability profile.

Comparison of the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) cohort with women with coronary disease from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III)

BACKGROUND: The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) is the first large clinical trial designed to test the efficacy of postmenopausal estrogen/progestin therapy for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD). To examine the representativeness of the HERS cohort to the general population of postmenopausal women with CHD, we compared the baseline cardiovascular risk factor data from HERS with similar data from women presumed to have CHD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. METHODS: Age, race, and cardiovascular disease risk factors were compared in the 2763 postmenopausal women younger than 80 years old, with a uterus, and with documented CHD in HERS versus 145 similarly aged women with clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of CHD from phase I of NHANES III. RESULTS: There were fewer current smokers in HERS (13%) than in the NHANES cohort (21.7%, p = 0.05). Similarly, a history of hypertension was less prevalent in HERS (58.6%) than in the NHANES cohort (69.3%, p = 0.03). Women with fasting triglyceride levels >3.39 mmol/L or fasting glucose levels >16.6 mmol/L were excluded from HERS, resulting in fewer diabetics (22.9% vs 29.5%, p = 0.26) and lower serum triglyceride levels (1.88 mmol/L vs 2.25 mmol/L, p = 0.19) in HERS versus the NHANES cohort. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, physical activity, and total LDL and HDL cholesterol were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The HERS cohort had fewer CHD risk factors than women with myocardial infarction or angina in NHANES III, although comparison is hindered by differences in selection criteria. The many women with diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia in the NHANES cohort emphasizes the importance of testing strategies for secondary prevention of CHD in this high-risk subgroup.

The cost of reaching National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals in hypercholesterolaemic patients. A comparison of atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin.

OBJECTIVE: Recognising the importance of treating hyperlipidaemia, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) has established widely accepted treatment goals for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Medications used most commonly to achieve these LDL-C goals are HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The relative resource utilisation and cost associated with the use of reductase inhibitors of different LDL-C lowering efficacy are unknown, but are major health and economic concerns. The objective of this study was to determine the mean total cost of care to reach NCEP goals with various reductase inhibitors. DESIGN: In a randomised, 54-week, 30-centre controlled trial we compared resources used and costs associated with treating patients to achieve NCEP goals using 4 reductase inhibitors: atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The trial studied 662 patients; 318 had known atherosclerotic disease. INTERVENTIONS: Reductase inhibitor therapy was initiated at recommended starting doses and increased according to NCEP guidelines and package insert information. For patients who did not reach the goal at the highest recommended dose of each reductase inhibitor, the resin colestipol was added. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Patients treated with atorvastatin, compared-with other reductase inhibitors, were more likely to reach NCEP goals during treatment (p < 0.05), required fewer office visits (p < 0.001) and less adjuvant colestipol therapy (p = 0.001). Consequently, the mean total cost of care (1996 values) to reach NCEP goals was lower with atorvastatin [$US1064; 95% confidence interval (CI): $US953 to $US1176] compared with simvastatin ($US1471, 95% CI: $US1304 to $US1648), lovastatin ($US1972; 95% CI: $US1758 to $US2186) and fluvastatin ($US1542; 95% CI: $US1384 to $US1710). Results were similar for patients with or without known atherosclerotic disease. CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring drug therapy for hypercholesterolaemia, NCEP LDL-C goals are achieved significantly more often using fewer resources with atorvastatin compared with simvastatin, lovastatin or fluvastatin.

Primary care practice adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for patients with coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials demonstrate significant benefit from cholesterol management for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). National guidelines recommending goals for screening and treatment were published in 1993 and widely disseminated. This study examines cholesterol screening and management by primary care physicians after the guidelines were released. METHODS: Medical records and patient surveys provided data for 603 patients with CVD, aged 27 to 70 years, from 45 practices in 4 states during 1993 to 1995. Physician surveys measured estimated performance and other variables. Physician and patient factors associated with adherence, or lack of adherence, to national guidelines were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients (33%) with CVD were not screened with lipid panels, 271 patients (45%) were not receiving dietary counseling, and 404 (67%) were not receiving cholesterol medication. Only 84 patients (14%) with CVD had achieved the recommended low-density lipoprotein level of less than 2.58 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) and 302 (50%) had triglyceride levels lower than 2.26 mmol/L (200 mg/dL). Patients with a revascularization history and higher low-density lipoprotein and/or triglyceride levels were more likely to receive treatment, but other patient factors, including CVD risk factors, did not predict treatment. Physician specialty was not associated with differences in treatment, but physicians in practice for fewer years ordered more lipid panels. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with CVD in primary care were not receiving cholesterol screening and management as recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines in the 2 years after their release. Increasing cholesterol screening and treatment should be a priority for practice quality improvement and could result in significant reductions in CVD events for high-risk patients.

Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on lipoprotein(a) concentration. PEPI Investigators. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal hormone therapy has been reported to decrease levels of lipoprotein (Lp)(a) in cross-sectional studies and small or short-term longitudinal studies. We report findings from a large, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trial that allows a broad characterization of these effects for four regimens of hormone therapy. METHODS AND RESULT: The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions study was a 3-year, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of hormone regimens on cardiovascular disease risk factors in postmenopausal women 45 to 65 years of age. The active regimens were conjugated equine estrogens therapy at 0.625 mg daily, alone or in combination with each of three regimens of progestational agents: medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) at 2.5 mg daily (ie, continuous MPA), MPA at 10 mg days 1 to 12 (ie, cyclical MPA), and micronized progesterone at 200 mg days 1 to 12. Plasma levels of Lp(a) were measured at baseline (n = 366), 12 months (n = 354), and 36 months (n = 342). Assignment to hormone therapy resulted in a 17% to 23% average drop in Lp(a) concentrations relative to placebo (P<.0001), which was maintained across 3 years of follow-up. No significant differences were observed among the four active arms. Changes in Lp(a) associated with hormone therapy were positively correlated with changes in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and fibrinogen levels and were similar across subgroups defined by age, weight, ethnicity, and prior hormone use. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal estrogen therapy, with or without concomitant progestin regimens, produces consistent and sustained reductions in plasma Lp(a) concentrations.

A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of Atorvastatin.

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the number one cause of death in Western societies. Elevated levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) increase the risk for CHD. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl conenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors effectively reduce plasma cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. This study assesses the safety and dose-related effects of atorvastatin calcium on lipoprotein fractions in patients with LDL cholesterol levels between 160 mg/dL (4.1 mM) and 250 mg/dL (6.5 mM) or less and TG levels of 400 mg/dL (4.5 mM) or less. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled in a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients received placebo or atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, 60, or 80 mg once daily. Adjusted mean decreases in LDL cholesterol for patients receiving atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg were 37%, 42%, 50%, 52%, and 59%, respectively, compared with a mean increase of 0.3% for patients receiving placebo; the differences between each of the atorvastatin dose groups and placebo were statistically significant (P =.0001). Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced in atorvastatin groups (P =.0001). Adverse events were similar in the placebo and atorvastatin treatment groups. No patient had a serious adverse event or withdrew because of an adverse event during this study. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin effectively lowered plasma LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and apoB levels in a dose-related manner. Atorvastatin was well tolerated in hyperlipidemic patients over a 6-week period.

Comparison of one-year efficacy and safety of atorvastatin versus lovastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia. Atorvastatin Study Group I.

This double-blind study to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of atorvastatin was performed in 31 community- and university-based research centers in the USA to directly compare a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (reductase inhibitor) to an accepted drug of this class in patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Participants remained on a cholesterol-lowering diet throughout the study. One thousand forty-nine patients were randomized to receive atorvastatin 10 mg, lovastatin 20 mg, or placebo. At 16 weeks the placebo group was randomized to either atorvastatin or lovastatin treatment. At 22 weeks, patients who had not met low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol target levels doubled the dose of reductase inhibitor. Efficacy evaluation was mean percent change from baseline in LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B (apoB). Safety profiles as determined by change from baseline in laboratory evaluations, ophthalmologic parameters, and reporting of adverse events were similar for the 2 reductase inhibitors. After 52 weeks, the atorvastatin group maintained a significantly greater reduction in LDL cholesterol (-37% vs -29%), triglyceride (-16% vs -8%), total cholesterol (-27% vs -21%), and apoB (-30% vs -22%) (p <0.05). More patients receiving atorvastatin achieved LDL cholesterol target levels than did lovastatin patients (78% vs 63%, respectively), particularly those with coronary heart disease (37% vs 11%, respectively). Atorvastatin is highly effective and well tolerated in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia with no increased risk of adverse events.

Adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program Treatment goals in postmenopausal women with heart disease. The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS). The HERS Research Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of volunteer women with established heart disease who have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at or below the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel goals and to determine what factors are associated with levels above goal or not receiving lipid-lowering medication when indicated. DESIGN: Cross-sectional measurement of lipids and lipoproteins, blood pressure, height, weight, and other demographic and cardiovascular risk factors in 2763 postmenopausal women with heart disease. SETTING: At 18 centers throughout the United States, participants were recruited by means of lists of women with coronary heart disease from coronary units and catheterization laboratories, direct mail to age-eligible women, and advertisements. PATIENTS: Mean age of the cohort was 66.7 years (range, 44-79 years) and the distribution by race/ethnicity was 88.7% white, 7.9% African American, 2.0% Hispanic/Latina, 0.8% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 0.7% other. INTERVENTION: We report cross-sectional analysis of the cohort at baseline. OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured the frequency of achieving 1988 and 1993 Adult Treatment Panel treatment goals, and of being on a regimen of lipid-lowering medication. RESULTS: Although 47% of participants were taking a lipid-lowering medication, 63% did not meet the 1988 treatment goal of LDL-C level less than 3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) and 91% did not meet the 1993 goal of LDL-C level less than 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL). Factors independently associated with achieving the earlier goal were use of lipid-lowering medication, marital status, education, body mass index, exercise, hypertension, diabetes, gallbladder disease, and first diagnosis of coronary heart disease after 1990. Failure to use lipid-lowering medication was associated with age, being African American, marital status, body mass index, lack of exercise, alcohol consumption, current smoking, and first diagnosis of coronary heart disease before 1985. CONCLUSION: The majority of women enrolled in the trial had LDL-C levels that significantly exceeded the treatment goals set by the 1988 and 1993 Adult Treatment Panel guidelines. Better implementation of these guidelines among women with coronary disease would be highly desirable.

Atorvastatin, a New HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor as Monotherapy and Combined With Colestipol.

BACKGROUND: Atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in clinical development has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and marked cholesterol and triglyceride reduction at doses ranging from 10-80 mg/day. Since bile acid sequestering resins are often used in combination with HMGRIs to enhance cholesterol reduction, this trial was conducted to explore the use of atorvastatin alone and combined with colestipol in patients with primary hyperlipidemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred six patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >4.1 mM/L (160 mg/dL) and plasma triglycerides <3.9 mM/L (350 mg/dL) were randomized to treatment consisting of 20 g/day colestipol, 10 mg/day atorvastatin, or 10 mg/day atorvastatin plus 20 g/day colestipol for 12 weeks. Percent change from baseline in lipid variables were measured. The atorvastatin group showed a significant reduction in LDL cholesterol of 35% after 12 weeks. Combination therapy provided an additional 10% reduction in LDL cholesterol over that observed for atorvastatin alone. Twenty-one percent of all patients in the atorvastatin monotherapy group experienced associated adverse events compared with 60% in the combination therapy group. Ninety percent of atorvastatin monotherapy patients were compliant at every visit compared with 75% receiving combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination of atorvastatin plus colestipol was more effective in lowering LDL cholesterol than atorvastatin alone, atorvastatin 10 mg/day monotherapy provided a better safety profile and improved patient compliance, which may result in improved long-term cholesterol control.

Factors associated with glucose and insulin levels in healthy postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the covariates of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. We examined candidate factors in postmenopausal women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We determined the cross-sectional associations of sociodemographic, body-size, lifestyle, reproductive, and menopausal factors with pretrial fasting and postchallenge glucose and insulin levels in 869 postmenopausal women aged 45-65 years. Women were participants in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions study who were not taking estrogen or insulin. RESULTS: Plasma glucose levels increased significantly with age; serum insulin levels did not. BMI and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) each showed graded positive and independent associations with glucose and insulin levels. Alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, physical activity, parity, education, and income were also associated with insulin or glucose in age-adjusted models. In multivariable models, BMI and WHR explained 18% of the variability in fasting glucose, 16% in postchallenge glucose, 28% in fasting insulin, and 17% in postchallenge insulin. Age and all other factors combined accounted for < 6% of the variance in glucose or insulin. In multiply adjusted models, African-American and Hispanic women had higher fasting and 2-h insulin levels than non-Hispanic white women. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the variance in glycemia and insulin is unexplained. Measures of obesity and fat distribution account for nearly all the explained variance.