Long-term outcomes to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab based on pathological response for patients with resectable stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma.

BACKGROUND: While neoadjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma has shown promising results, the data have been limited by a relatively short follow-up time, with most studies reporting 2-year outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine long-term outcomes for stage III/IV melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a follow-up study of a previously published phase Ib clinical trial of 30 patients with resectable stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma who received one dose of 200 mg IV neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 3 weeks before surgical resection, followed by 1 year of adjuvant pembrolizumab. The primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence patterns. RESULTS: We report updated results at 5 years of follow-up with a median follow-up of 61.9 months. No deaths occurred in patients with a major pathological response (MPR, <10% viable tumor) or complete pathological response (pCR, no viable tumor) (n = 8), compared to a 5-year OS of 72.8% for the remainder of the cohort (P = 0.12). Two of eight patients with a pCR or MPR had a recurrence. Of the patients with >10% viable tumor remaining, 8 of 22 patients (36%) had a recurrence. Additionally, the median time to recurrence was 3.9 years for patients with ≤10% viable tumor and 0.6 years for patients with >10% viable tumor (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year results from this trial represent the longest follow-up of a single-agent neoadjuvant PD-1 trial to date. Response to neoadjuvant therapy continues to be an important prognosticator with regard to OS and RFS. Additionally, recurrences in patients with pCR occur later and are salvageable, with a 5-year OS of 100%. These results demonstrate the long-term efficacy of single-agent neoadjuvant/adjuvant PD-1 blockade in patients with a pCR and the importance of long-term follow-up for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02434354.

Sorafenib in advanced melanoma: a Phase II randomised discontinuation trial analysis.

The effects of sorafenib--an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting the tumour and tumour vasculature--were evaluated in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a large multidisease Phase II randomised discontinuation trial (RDT). Enrolled patients received a 12-week run-in of sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Patients with changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements <25% from baseline were then randomised to sorafenib or placebo for a further 12 weeks (ie to week 24). Patients with > or =25% tumour shrinkage after the run-in continued on open-label sorafenib, whereas those with > or =25% tumour growth discontinued treatment. This analysis focussed on secondary RDT end points: changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements from baseline after 12 weeks and overall tumour responses (WHO criteria) at week 24, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and biomarkers (BRAF, KRAS and NRAS mutational status). Of 37 melanoma patients treated during the run-in phase, 34 were evaluable for response: one had > or =25% tumour shrinkage and remained on open-label sorafenib; six (16%) had <25% tumour growth and were randomised (placebo, n=3; sorafenib, n=3); and 27 had > or =25% tumour growth and discontinued. All three randomised sorafenib patients progressed by week 24; one remained on sorafenib for symptomatic relief. All three placebo patients progressed by week-24 and were re-started on sorafenib; one experienced disease re-stabilisation. Overall, the confirmed best responses for each of the 37 melanoma patients who received sorafenib were 19% stable disease (SD) (ie n=1 open-label; n=6 randomised), 62% (n=23) progressive disease (PD) and 19% (n=7) unevaluable. The overall median PFS was 11 weeks. The six randomised patients with SD had overall PFS values ranging from 16 to 34 weeks. The most common drug-related adverse events were dermatological (eg rash/desquamation, 51%; hand-foot skin reaction, 35%). There was no relationship between V600E BRAF status and disease stability. DNA was extracted from the biopsies of 17/22 patients. Six had V600E-positive tumours (n=4 had PD; n=1 had SD; n=1 unevaluable for response), and 11 had tumours containing wild-type BRAF (n=9 PD; n=1 SD; n=1 unevaluable for response). In conclusion, sorafenib is well tolerated but has little or no antitumour activity in advanced melanoma patients as a single agent at the dose evaluated (400 mg b.i.d.). Ongoing trials in advanced melanoma are evaluating sorafenib combination therapies.

Review of the 2001 AJCC staging system for cutaneous malignant melanoma.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for melanoma has recently been revised and published. The previous staging system had not been substantially modified since the late 1980s. In a series of papers, the staging system for melanoma was critically analyzed, and many shortcomings were identified. Many well-established prognostic factors were not used in the staging system. This assessment has led to a substantially modified staging system for cutaneous melanoma in 2001 that is a considerable improvement over past staging systems, albeit more complex. The following modifications are the most important: 1) The primary determinant of tumor (T) staging is tumor thickness as measured in millimeters. The Clark level of invasion is now used only for defining T1 (< or = 1mm) melanomas; 2) The cutpoints for tumor thickness are less than or equal to 1 mm, 1 to 2 mm, 2 to 4 mm, and greater than 4 mm; 3) Ulceration has been added in describing the primary tumor; 4) Local recurrence, satellite disease, and in-transit metastases have similar prognosis and are now all classified together as regional stage III disease; 5) Size of lymph node as prognostic factor has been eliminated and replaced with the number of positive nodes; 6) The presence of an elevated serum lactic dehyrogenase level is used in the metastasis (M) category. This revised staging system more precisely defines prognosis and will improve the stratification of patients in future clinical trials.

Early stage (I, II, III) melanoma.

Metastatic melanoma beyond the regional nodes (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV) is a highly lethal disease. Few affected individuals survive beyond 5 years despite aggressive treatment. Clearly, effective adjuvant therapies to prevent the development of stage IV disease in at-risk patients are worthwhile and acceptable to patients, even if they are associated with significant toxicities. Improvements in our understanding of the prognosis and staging of melanoma have allowed us to better categorize patients based on their risk of developing metastatic disease, permitting the development of logical strategies using adjuvant therapies with toxicity profiles that are appropriate based on the level of risk for recurrence. Adherence to the standards of care for the surgical management of melanoma patients with high-risk primary disease or regional disease will help optimize the benefit that can be derived from adjuvant therapy. Clinical trials remain critically important as we seek to improve the outcome for melanoma patients, but for high-risk melanoma patients outside the context of clinical trials, adjuvant therapy with high-dose interferon-alfa2b should be considered a standard treatment option.

Metastatic melanoma.

The overall survival for patients with metastatic melanoma ranges from 4.7 to 11 months, with a median survival of 8.5 months. Standard treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma has not been defined. The range of treatment options includes close observation, surgical resection of isolated metastases, therapy with dacarbazine, combination chemotherapy, and participation in clinical trials. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have shown activity in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Dacarbazine (DTIC-Dome; Bayer Corporation, West Haven, CT) has a response rate of 15% to 20% and remains the reference agent for the treatment of metastatic disease. Additional agents with single-agent activity include cisplatin, (Platinol-AQ; Bristol-Myers Oncology, Princeton, NJ); carmustine (BiCNU; Bristol-Myers Oncology, Princeton, NJ); paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ); and docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Collegeville, PA). Temozolomide (Temodar; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ), which is essentially an oral form of dacarbazine but with greater central nervous system penetrance, is associated with a response rate of 20%. Combination chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen has been extensively evaluated in patients with metastatic melanoma. Although the initial results with the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine, and tamoxifen) were associated with overall response rates of 50% to 55% in single-institution studies, results from larger multicenter studies reveal responses rates ranging from 10% to 20%. Based on the results of several clinical trials, there is no evidence that the addition of tamoxifen improves the response rate. Another combination regimen is cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD), which is associated with a 20% to 25% response rate. There has been widespread interest in developing immunotherapies against metastatic melanoma. Interferon (IFN)-alfa and interleukin (IL)-2 as single agents have produced response rates in the 15% to 20% range. Biochemotherapy, which is a combination of immunotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, has been studied in patients with metastatic melanoma. Multiple phase II studies have demonstrated high response rates but unclear impact on overall survival. Therapy is associated with significant toxicity. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will clarify the role of biochemotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Ongoing new approaches to treatment include the therapeutic use of vaccines alone or in combination with cytokines.

Primary and metastatic diseases in malignant melanoma of the gastrointestinal tract.

In this review, the gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations of malignant melanoma including primary mucosal melanoma of the GI tract and metastatic melanoma to the GI tract are discussed. Although malignant melanoma most commonly arises in the skin, primary melanomas can also arise from the mucosal epithelial lining of the gastrointestinal tract. The vast majority of gastrointestinal melanoma is metastatic from a cutaneous primary; however, there is evidence that melanoma can arise de novo from within certain areas of the gastrointestinal system. The sporadic nature and small numbers of patients reported in the literature with mucosal melanomas have prevented a good understanding of the pathogenesis, natural history, and optimal treatment of this uncommon presentation of melanoma.

Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Several single-institution phase II trials have reported that the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine, and tamoxifen) can induce major tumor responses in 40% to 50% of stage IV melanoma patients. This study was designed to compare the overall survival time, rate of objective tumor response, and toxicity of the Dartmouth regimen with standard dacarbazine treatment in stage IV melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter phase III trial, 240 patients with measurable stage IV melanoma were randomized to receive the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine 220 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, carmustine 150 mg/m(2) day 1 every other cycle, and tamoxifen 10 mg orally bid) or dacarbazine 1, 000 mg/m(2). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were observed for tumor response, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS: Median survival time from randomization was 7 months; 25% of the patients survived > or = 1 year. There was no difference in survival time between the two treatment arms when analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis or when only the 231 patients who were both eligible and had received treatment were considered. Tumor response was assessable in 226 patients. The response rate to dacarbazine was 10.2% compared with 18.5% for the Dartmouth regimen (P =.09). Bone marrow suppression, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue were significantly more common in the Dartmouth arm. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in survival time and only a small, statistically nonsignificant increase in tumor response for stage IV melanoma patients treated with the Dartmouth regimen compared with dacarbazine. Dacarbazine remains the reference standard treatment for stage IV melanoma.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants.

PURPOSE: Because toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can adversely affect short- and long-term patient quality of life, can limit the dose and duration of treatment, and may be life-threatening, specific agents designed to ameliorate or eliminate certain chemotherapy and radiotherapy toxicities have been developed. Variability in interpretation of the available data pertaining to the efficacy of the three United States Food and Drug Administration-approved agents that have potential chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-protectant activity-dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine-and questions about the role of these protectant agents in cancer care led to concern about the appropriate use of these agents. The American Society of Clinical Oncology sought to establish evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines for the use of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine in patients who are not enrolled on clinical treatment trials. METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed the clinical data regarding the activity of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine. A computerized literature search was performed using MEDLINE. In addition to reports collected by individual Panel members, all articles published in the English-speaking literature from June 1997 through December 1998 were collected for review by the Panel chairpersons, and appropriate articles were distributed to the entire Panel for review. Guidelines for use, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were reviewed and approved by the Panel. Outcomes considered in evaluating the benefit of a chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-protectant agent included amelioration of short- and long-term chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related toxicities, risk of tumor protection by the agent, toxicity of the protectant agent itself, quality of life, and economic impact. To the extent that these data were available, the Panel placed the greatest value on lesser toxicity that did not carry a concomitant risk of tumor protection. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Mesna: (1) Mesna, dosed as detailed in these guidelines, is recommended to decrease the incidence of standard-dose ifosfamide-associated urothelial toxicity. (2) There is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of mesna to prevent urothelial toxicity with ifosfamide doses that exceed 2.5 g/m(2)/d. (3) Either mesna or forced saline diuresis is recommended to decrease the incidence of urothelial toxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide use in the stem-cell transplantation setting. Dexrazoxane: (1) The use of dexrazoxane is not routinely recommended for patients with metastatic breast cancer who receive initial doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. (2) The use of dexrazoxane may be considered for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received a cumulative dosage of 300 mg/m(2) or greater of doxorubicin in the metastatic setting and who may benefit from continued doxorubicin-containing therapy. (3) The use of dexrazoxane in the adjuvant setting is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. (4) The use of dexrazoxane can be considered in adult patients who have received more than 300 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin-based therapy for tumors other than breast cancer, although caution should be used in settings in which doxorubicin-based therapy has been shown to improve survival because of concerns of tumor protection by dexrazoxane. (5) There is insufficient evidence to make a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in the treatment of pediatric malignancies, with epirubicin-based regimens, or with high-dose anthracycline-containing regimens. Similarly, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in patients with cardiac risk factors or underlying cardiac disease. (6) Patients receiving dexrazoxane should continue to be monitored for cardiac toxicity. Amifostine: (1) Amifostine may be considered for the reduction of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoth

Autologous stem-cell transplant after conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer: impact on the delivery of local-regional radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation is used increasingly in the treatment of poor-prognosis primary breast cancer. Because these patients may be cured with standard multimodality therapy, it is important to address both the efficacy of transplantation, and its effect on the delivery of standard treatments including local radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with high risk primary breast cancer were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa and stem-cell transplant following surgery and conventional-dose adjuvant chemotherapy. Outcome, including sites of failure and delivery of local radiation therapy, was assessed for 103 patients. RESULTS: Overall and disease-free survival rates at 18 months were 83% (+/- 4%) and 77% (+/- 4%) respectively. Twenty patients (19.4%) received radiation therapy prior to transplant. Of the remaining 83, 77 received radiation therapy after transplant. Overall, 5 (19.2%) of 26 first sites of recurrence were local alone. For patients receiving radiation prior to transplant, 3 of 7 (43%, 95% CI: 6%-80%) sites of first recurrence were local, while 2 of 19 (10.5%, 95% CI: 0%-24.5%) sites of first recurrence were local alone in patients receiving post-transplant radiation or no radiation. CONCLUSION: Transplantation does not appear to significantly compromise the delivery or outcome of local radiation therapy for primary breast cancer.

Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy.

PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast in patients with malignant axillary adenopathy and unknown primary malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1993 and December 1997, 38 women with malignant axillary adenopathy and negative mammographic and physical examination findings underwent contrast material-enhanced MR imaging. Sixteen patients were excluded due to axillary tail cancer (n = 7), lack of follow-up (n = 4), second primary malignancy (n = 3), or chemotherapy before MR imaging (n = 2). The study population comprised the remaining 22 patients. Histopathologic findings were available in 20 patients; follow-up MR imaging findings were available in two patients. RESULTS: MR imaging depicted a primary breast cancer in 19 patients (86%; identified at excisional biopsy or mastectomy in 17, resolved on follow-up MR images during treatment in two). MR imaging depicted 4-30-mm cancers (mean, 17 mm), which correlated closely with histopathologic size. Two patients (9%) had false-negative findings: (a) One had a 2-mm invasive ductal carcinoma, and (b) one had 17- and 20-mm invasive ductal carcinomas. Of the 19 patients, 11 underwent mastectomy, seven underwent breast-conservation therapy, and one did not undergo a surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: MR imaging is very sensitive for the detection of mammographically and clinically occult breast cancer in patients with malignant axillary adenopathy. In these patients, MR imaging offers potential not only for cancer detection but also for staging the cancer within the breast, which may be useful for treatment planning.

Cutaneous manifestations of cancer.

The appearance of skin lesions in patients with occult or obvious malignancy may be of extreme value in the detection and management of cancer because the skin is readily accessible to examination and biopsy. Examination of the skin of our patients can provide important insights into underlying malignant processes or possible complications from cancer treatment. The range of cutaneous abnormalities is wide, and include cutaneous paraneoplastic syndromes such as xanthomas, acanthosis nigricans, carcinoid syndrome, unusual erythematous eruptions such as erythema gyratum repens, and a number of genetic syndromes associated with malignancies and inherited dermatoses.

Stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer: analysis of tumor contamination.

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy, engraftment kinetics, effect of bone marrow tumor contamination, and safety of high-dose therapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support for patients with responding metastatic breast cancer. Forty two patients underwent G-CSF (10 microg/kg) stimulated PBPC harvest. PBPC and bone marrow aspirates were analyzed by histologic and immunocytochemical methods for tumor contamination. Thirty-seven patients received high-dose therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin 800 mg/m2 (CTCb) given as an infusion over 4 d followed by PBPC reinfusion and G-CSF (5 microg/kg) support. No transplant related deaths or grade 4 toxicity was recorded. CD34+ cells/kg infused was predictive of neutrophil and platelet recovery. With a median follow-up of 38 months, three year survival was 44% with relapse-free survival of 19%. Histological bone marrow involvement, found in 10 patients, was a negative prognostic factor and was associated with a median relapse-free survival of 3.5 months. Tumor contamination of PBPC by immunohistochemical staining was present in 22.5% of patients and found not to be correlated with decreased survival. G-CSF stimulated PBPC collection followed by a single course of high dose chemotherapy and stem cell infusion with G-CSF stimulated marrow recovery leads to rapid, reliable engraftment with low toxicity and promising outcome in women with responding metastatic breast cancer.

Systemic treatment of metastatic melanoma with chemotherapy.

This article reviews the use of systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma, including single-agent chemotherapy, combination chemotherapy with and without tamoxifen, and biochemotherapy.

The role of the pathologist in the diagnosis of melanoma.

The pathologist plays a vital role in patients with malignant melanoma. Dermatologists, surgeons, and oncologists must rely on the pathologist for accurate and complete diagnoses. Although most melanomas can be easily recognized with routine histopathology, special stains, including immunohistochemistry, may be necessary to differentiate melanoma from other cutaneous malignancies. Likewise, there are benign entities that can mimic melanoma microscopically, including Spitz nevi, pigmented spindle cell nevi, deep-penetrating nevi, and Monsel's reaction. Recognition of these entities is important to avoid unnecessary surgery, testing, adjuvant therapy, and unnecessary concern by the patients and their families. In addition to making an accurate diagnosis, the pathologist should report prognostic histologic attributes that may influence therapy and follow-up care for these patients. These histologic features should be recorded in the pathology report. This chapter provides a brief review of the most important histologic attributes that should be identified and reported by the pathologist.

Autologous hapten-modified melanoma vaccine as postsurgical adjuvant treatment after resection of nodal metastases.

PURPOSE: To determine whether treatment with an autologous whole-cell vaccine modified with the hapten dinitrophenyl (DNP vaccine) is an effective postsurgical adjuvant treatment for melanoma patients with clinically evident nodal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had regional nodal metastases that were large enough (> or = 3 cm diameter) to prepare vaccine. Following standard lymphadenectomy, patients were treated with DNP vaccine on a monthly or weekly schedule. RESULTS: Of 62 patients with metastasis in a single lymph node bed (stage III), 36 are alive after a median follow-up time of 55 months (range, 29 to 76); the projected 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates are 45% and 58%, respectively. Of 15 patients with metastases in two nodal sites, five are alive with a median follow-up time of 73 months. An unexpected finding was the significantly better survival of older patients; the projected 5-year survival of patients greater than 50 versus < or = 50 years was 71% and 47%, respectively (P = .011, log-rank test). The development of a positive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to unmodified autologous melanoma cells was associated with significantly longer 5-year survival (71% v 49%; P = .031). Finally, the median survival time from date of first recurrence was significantly longer for patients whose subcutaneous recurrence exhibited an inflammatory response (> 19.4 v 5.9 months; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Postsurgical adjuvant therapy with autologous DNP-modified vaccine appears to produce survival rates that are markedly higher than have been reported with surgery alone. Moreover, this approach has some intriguing immunobiologic features that might provide insights into the human tumor-host relationship.

Melanoma of unknown primary site: presentation, treatment, and prognosis--a single institution study. University of Pennsylvania Pigmented Lesion Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with melanoma of unknown primary site (MUP) was undertaken to analyze the etiology and clinical behavior of this presentation. METHODS: The patient records were located by a computer search of the Pigmented Lesion Clinic data base at the University of Pennsylvania. With the Cox proportional hazards model, the survival of the MUP patients with lymph node presentation was compared with that of patients with lymph node disease and a known concurrent primary melanoma. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of the patients presented with lymph node metastasis only, 28% presented with visceral lesions, and 8% presented with subcutaneous nodules. The prevalence of dysplastic nevi was 22.5%. The overall 4-year survival rate for the 40 MUP patients was 55% +/- 9%. The 4-year survival (57% +/- 12%) of patients with lymph node presentation was compared with that of patients presenting with lymph node disease and a known concurrent primary melanoma (19 +/- 6%). Survival was significantly different between the groups (P = 0.008). This survival difference remained significant (P = 0.02) even after adjustments for number of positive lymph nodes, year of diagnosis, and age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis revealed that MUP patients with lymph node metastasis survived significantly longer than patients diagnosed with lymph node metastasis concurrent with a known cutaneous primary melanoma. The prevalence of dysplastic nevi in the MUP patient series was intermediate between that reported among primary melanoma patients and that reported among population controls, suggesting the likelihood of a primary cutaneous origin for the metastatic melanoma.