RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several treatment options for chronic periprosthetic joint infections have been published in the current literature, with an on-going discussion to determine effective management algorithms. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of the two-stage exchange procedure in revision TKA prior to and after implementation of the PRO-IMPLANT Foundation treatment algorithm. The primary endpoints were defined as (i) revisions during the interval time, (ii) duration of the interval time and (iii) successful PJI eradication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 02/2013 and 09/2016, 122 patients were included in a single-centre cohort analysis. 55 patients were treated according to the previously used algorithm (K1) and 67 according to the PRO-IMPLANT Foundation algorithm (K2). A minimum follow-up period of 3 years was set as the inclusion criterion. Successful eradication of infection was defined in accordance with the consensus criteria by Diaz-Ledezma et al. RESULTS: Successful eradication was achieved in 42 (67%) patients in K1 and 47 (85.5%) in K2 (p ≤ 0.005). The mean interval time was 88 days (range 51â-â353) in K1 and 52 days (range 42â-â126) in K2 (p ≤ 0.005). In K1, a mean of 0.8 (range 0â-â6) revisions were necessary during the interval period compared with 0.5 (range 0â-â4) in K2 (p = 0.066). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the PRO-IMPLANT treatment algorithm led to significant improvement in the outcome of periprosthetic joint infections. During mid-term follow-up, infection eradication was highly successful, with decreases in the interval time as well as the number of revisions.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , AlgoritmosRESUMO
The nucleus ventrolateralis thalami (VLT) in pigeons receives direct retinal and forebrain projections and has reciprocal connections with the optic tectum. Although VLT is a component of the avian visual system, no study directly examined its connections or its cellular response characteristics. We, therefore, recorded from single units in the pigeon's VLT while visually stimulating the ipsi- and/or contralateral eye. In addition, tracing experiments were conducted to investigate its afferent connections. Electrophysiologically, we discovered three types of neurons, two of which were probably activated via a top-down telencephalotectal system (latencies > 100 ms). Type I neurons responded to uni- and bilateral and type II neurons exclusively to bilateral stimulation. Type III neurons were probably activated by retinal or retinotectal input (latencies < 27 ms) and responded to contra- and bilateral stimulation. Retrograde tracer injections into the VLT revealed an ipsilateral forebrain input from the visual Wulst, from subregions of the arcopallium, and bilateral afferents from the optic tectum. Most intriguing was the direct connection between the VLTs of both hemispheres. We suggest that the avian VLT is part of a system that integrates visuomotor processes which are controlled by both forebrain hemispheres and that VLT contributes to descending tectomotor mechanisms.