Effects of common haplotypes of the ileal sodium dependent bile acid transporter gene on the development of sporadic and familial colorectal cancer: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: The genetics of sporadic and non-syndromic familial colorectal cancer (CRC) is not well defined. However, genetic factors that promote the development of precursor lesions, i.e. adenomas, might also predispose to CRC. Recently, an association of colorectal adenoma with two variants (c.507C>T;p.L169L and c.511G>T;p.A171S) of the ileal sodium dependent bile acid transporter gene (SLC10A2) has been reported. Here, we reconstructed haplotypes of the SLC10A2 gene locus and tested for association with non-syndromic familial and sporadic CRC compared to 'hyper-normal' controls who displayed no colorectal polyps on screening colonoscopy. METHODS: We included 150 patients with sporadic CRC, 93 patients with familial CRC but exclusion of familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch's syndrome, and 204 'hyper-normal' controls. Haplotype-tagging SLC10A2 gene variants were identified in the Hapmap database and genotyped using PCR-based 5' exonuclease assays with fluorescent dye-labelled probes. Haplotypes were reconstructed using the PHASE algorithm. Association testing was performed with both SNPs and reconstructed haplotypes. RESULTS: Minor allele frequencies of all SLC10A2 polymorphisms are within previously reported ranges, and no deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium are observed. However, we found no association with any of the SLC10A2 haplotypes with sporadic or familial CRC in our samples (all P values > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Common variants of the SLC10A2 gene are not associated with sporadic or familial CRC. Hence, albeit this gene might be associated with early stages of colorectal neoplasia, it appears not to represent a major risk factor for progression to CRC.

Contribution of common monoallelic MUTYH gene variants in German patients with familial colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: Mutations of the base excision repair gene MUTYH have been reported as underlying genetic defects in autosomal-recessive familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Our aim was to determine the frequency of the most common mutations (p.Tyr165Cys and p.Gly382Asp) in patients with strong evidence for familial colorectal cancer (fCRC). METHODS: We recruited 93 patients with fCRC but no indication for monogenic CRC syndromes (FAP, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer). Tumors showed regular expression of MLH1 and MSH2, and microsatellite instability was excluded. Sporadic CRC patients (n=93) and 'hyper-normal' controls without any adenomas in screening colonoscopies (n=93) were studied for comparison. RESULTS: In the fCRC group, two patients carried biallelic mutations (p.Tyr165Cys/p.Tyr165Cys, p.Tyr165Cys/p.Gly382Asp), while four patients displayed a heterozygous genotype (3 x p.Tyr165Cys/wt, 1 x p.Gly382Asp/wt). In contrast, only two p.Gly382Asp/wt patients were detected in the sporadic CRC group and one p.Gly382Asp carrier was observed in 'hyper-normal' controls, and the p.Tyr165Cys risk allele was absent in both control groups. Association tests demonstrated an increased odds ratio (OR) for CRC in carriers of the p.Tyr165Cys risk allele among fCRC patients, as compared to sporadic CRC patients and controls (OR 2.38; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort the prevalence of pathogenic MUTYH mutations was increased among fCRC patients compared to sporadic CRC and controls. The association of the p.Tyr165Cys mutation with fCRC indicates that this variant represents a susceptibility factor in a defined subgroup of CRC patients with a positive family history.

Association of familial colorectal cancer with variants in the E-cadherin (CDH1) and cyclin D1 (CCND1) genes.

INTRODUCTION: About 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients show some kind of familiarity, which might be caused by yet unknown combinations of low penetrance susceptibility genes. We aimed to identify genetic factors for familial CRC (fCRC) in a unique study design that includes phenotypic extremes as represented by fCRC cases and 'hyper-normal' controls without CRC history and no adenomatous polyps on colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Candidate gene variants were determined by allele-specific amplification (SLC10A2 c.169C>T and c.171G>T) and restriction fragment length polymorphism assays (CCND1 c.870A>G; CDH1 -160C>A; TP53 R72P; VDR T2M). In total, 98 patients with fCRC, 96 patients with sporadic CRC, and 220 hyper-normal controls were included. RESULTS: The minor allele of the CDH1 -160C>A polymorphism occurred significantly more often in controls compared to fCRC cases (OR = 0.664; p = 0.042). Homozygosity of the minor allele was significantly associated with affiliation to the control group (OR = 0.577; p = 0.029), indicating that both heterozygous and homozygous carriers of the common allele are at-risk for CRC. With respect to the CCND1 c.870A>G mutation, comparison of fCRC and sporadic CRC cases showed that A/A homozygosity was more common than G/G homozygosity among fCRC patients compared to controls (OR = 2.119; p = 0.045). However, no differences in allele or genotype frequencies were detected between sporadic CRC cases and controls, and no associations were observed for SLC10A2, TP53, and VDR polymorphisms. CONCLUSIONS: We report a potential association of variants in the CCND1 and CDH1 genes with fCRC using a unique study design with phenotypic extremes.

[Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN): a retrospective survey]. / Therapie des Reizdarmsyndroms mit Escherichia coli Stamm Nissle 1917 (EcN) : Eine retrospektive Untersuchung.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In many patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), one symptom is predominant (e.g., diarrhea, constipation, meteorism, or alternating stool consistency). For IBS therapy, probiotic drugs such as Mutaflor (active ingredient: Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 [EcN]) are also being used. A systematic survey on the efficacy and safety of EcN in different IBS subgroups is still missing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a gastroenterologic outpatient practice, results of 150 IBS patients treated with EcN were evaluated retrospectively. Most IBS patients enrolled belonged to the subgroups "diarrhea", "meteorism", and "alternating stool consistency". RESULTS: Regarding the diarrhea subgroup, not only a statistically significant improvement in stool frequency was observed, but also a marked improvement in concomitant symptoms such as abnormal urge, flatulence, and abdominal fullness. These complaints improved under EcN therapy in the other IBS subgroups as well, so that efficacy was assessed as "good to very good" in 73.4% of all cases. Tolerance to treatment was "good to very good" in 97.9% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The results point to the possibility of EcN being a therapeutic option for patients of various IBS subgroups which is almost free of side effects.